SCOM vs TruView comparison

Microsoft and NETSCOUT are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Microsoft is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.2, while NETSCOUT is ranked #64 with an average rating of 5.0. Microsoft holds a 1.5% mindshare in NMS, compared to NETSCOUT’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of NETSCOUT users who would recommend it.

SCOM

Read 83 SCOM reviews

9,597 Views
6,430 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

TruView

Read 17 TruView reviews

2,026 Views
1,925 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SCOM

TruView

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

SCOM and TruView are competing products in network and application monitoring. SCOM offers robust integration with Microsoft's ecosystem, while TruView provides comprehensive features for in-depth data analysis, making it a leading choice for analytics.

Features: SCOM integrates deeply with Windows servers, offering essential monitoring capabilities and actionable insights. It benefits Microsoft ecosystems with strong synergy. TruView focuses on advanced analytics, real-time performance monitoring, and cross-platform compatibility, making it suitable for diverse operational environments.

Room for Improvement: SCOM could enhance its user interface and simplify its complex setup processes. Improved cross-platform capabilities and analytics of non-Microsoft systems could broaden its appeal. TruView might benefit from expanded integration with Microsoft products, clearer pricing structures, and providing more comprehensive documentation for further customer guidance.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SCOM requires a complex setup due to its integration needs, but it benefits from extensive documentation and Microsoft’s support. TruView offers straightforward installation with responsive customer service, enhancing user-friendliness and efficiency in support.

Pricing and ROI: SCOM generally presents a lower initial setup cost, making it attractive for Microsoft-centric organizations. TruView, though more expensive, provides a higher ROI through advanced analytics capabilities. SCOM is cost-effective for Microsoft ecosystems, while TruView offers greater ROI potential in diverse environments.

To learn more, read our detailed SCOM vs. TruView Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

SCOM vs. TruView

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,644 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

SCOM

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

14th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Event Monitoring (2nd)

TruView

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

64th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of SCOM is 1.5%, down from 1.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TruView is 0.5%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
SCOM	1.5%
TruView	0.5%
Other	98.0%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Akshita Kukreja

Assistant Manager at SMS group GmbH

Have integrated effective monitoring and seamless alerting with improved visualization capabilities

The most valuable feature of SCOM is its monitoring capability, and we have integrated SCOM with Grafana, which is a dashboarding tool. We have implemented and integrated this to create dashboarding of the SCOM monitoring system for the database, SQL, and the Linux servers we have configured in SCOM. We have created separate dashboarding for it, and the monitoring and creating rules and monitors in the management servers and management packs that SCOM provides are very useful for us. The alerting mechanism of SCOM has benefited our operations because we have modified the thresholds as per our internal requirements. We have configured threshold modifications for the CPU, memory, and especially for disk space. For routine disk space usage on the system, we have provided a separate threshold configuration.

Read full review

Zotex

Network Engineer at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees

Monitors traffic, analyzes flows, tracks packets, and measures bandwidth across our network

We use TruView primarily for network performance analysis and monitoring. It helps us track traffic, flows, packets, and bandwidth to understand our network's condition and detect any anomalies or attacks. However, the product's age limits its advanced features for performance analysis. The main advantage lies in its low cost and reliable functionality, as we have a permanent license and do not require support. Real-time monitoring in TruView is somewhat limited, as there is a delay of about five minutes in data updates, making it less effective for immediate insights.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"On this solution, the things we monitor are fine and perhaps other users will want more, but for our purpose and what we use it for, it's enough."

"It's a lot more powerful than people realize, and I believe people become dissatisfied with it because of the complicated setup, but once it's up and running, it's pretty amazing at what it can do."

"It's easy to use."

"This solution helps our application teams by allowing them to drill further into issues and perform a root cause analysis."

"The System Center 2012 R2 is really powerful, all products work great together, is not so expensive anymore, easy to license, and can cover from end to end (Networking, Hardware layer, OS, App and services, ports, etc.)."

"Proactive monitoring has helped us prepare and mitigate potential issues before they even happen."

"SCOM is a very powerful tool if deployed and eventually maintained correctly."

"SCOM is a great monitoring tool."

More SCOM pros

"Visual TruView helped our network team respond to potential issues before they became larger ones."

"We use TruView primarily for network performance analysis and monitoring. It helps us track traffic, flows, packets, and bandwidth to understand our network's condition and detect any anomalies or attacks. However, the product's age limits its advanced features for performance analysis. The main advantage lies in its low cost and reliable functionality, as we have a permanent license and do not require support. Real-time monitoring in TruView is somewhat limited, as there is a delay of about five minutes in data updates, making it less effective for immediate insights."

"TruView takes only minutes to install."

"The most valuable feature for us was the ability to monitor sites and get a nice overview of all the data in a single view."

"It gives us the ability to determine the root of a problem or a network, whether it's on the network side, the database, application server, or server infrastructure."

Cons

"The configurations could be better. There are multiple tests where you can do something, but they can be a trigger as well. The overriding methodologies are not that easy. The configurations are difficult. The configuration and thorough day-to-day operations to get them to the level you want takes some time. It's very difficult."

"The configuration, especially for alerts, are somewhat lengthy."

"The solution should be more user-friendly and offer a better user interface."

"They can focus more on cloud monitoring instead of on-premise monitoring. We should be able to monitor cloud-related applications. They can include this feature in the next release. If it is in the cloud, we can have scalability by using Kubernetes. The container is containerized, packaged, and managed using Kubernetes. This feature is not there in SCOM. Going forward, if they can focus on that, it will be great."

"I’d like to see cross-platform support that would make SCOM a single enterprise monitoring application."

"Monitoring non Microsoft products and 3rd party applications."

"This product is not easy to use."

"Very expensive now that you are forced to buy entire System Center suite, although comparable to other monitoring solutions that include basic APM."

More SCOM cons

"We have faced delays in data retrieval and the lack of support due to the product being out of service."

"Whilst Citrix could be handled better like their nGenius product line (which does an excellent job) it copes with the centralised type of deployment TruView covers."

"I can't give them quite a 10, because from time to time, I'll work with the folks who, not that they're not good, but there are some who are just phenomenal."

"One area that could be improved is the reporting features. In the version transformation from ten to eleven, the platform changed from a Windows-based platform to a Linux-based platform. As a result, the previous reporting feature using Crystal Reports was no longer available. Instead, we had to generate PDF dashboard reports, which were not as flexible."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"SCOM is part of the System Center suite and I am satisfied with the pricing."

"Two customers bought the enterprise agreement with Microsoft and paid for Software Assurance. But few customers don't buy it for Software Assurance. They just buy it and deploy it, and they think that we will be using it for the next five years."

"Our licensing fees are approximately $30 per user, per month."

"It is more expensive than the competition."

"Our Enterprise Agreement includes the price."

"SCOM's pricing is average."

"I don't know the exact cost because it's managed by our sales team, but Microsoft is on the higher side."

"If you have a Microsoft Enterprise Agreement, then this is part of the agreement."

More SCOM pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

20%

Construction Company

14%

Transportation Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	22
Large Enterprise	54

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SCOM?

I am not aware of the exact pricing as it is managed by my supervisor. As an academic institution, we receive substantial discounts.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SCOM?

We believe that the dashboarding in SCOM needs to be improved or enhanced because it is not too expressive in reporting. We can work on deploying new ways of viewing things and modifying visualizat...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SCOM?

My usual use case for SCOM is as an administrator role where I create reports and provide system configuration for Linux and installation of the SCOM agent. I handle deploying and upgrading the age...

See all answers

What needs improvement with TruView?

We have faced delays in data retrieval and the lack of support due to the product being out of service.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for TruView?

We use TruView to monitor traffic, analyze flows, track packets, and measure bandwidth across our network. This helps us gain insights into our network's performance, detect any anomalies or attack...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering TruView?

Overall, I would rate TruView a nine out of ten. I would recommend it for mid-sized organizations, particularly those with fewer than two thousand people, as it offers flexible licensing without de...

See all answers

Comparisons

Nagios XI vs SCOM

Compared 6% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs SCOM

Compared 6% of the time

Zabbix vs SCOM

Compared 5% of the time

LogicMonitor vs SCOM

Compared 5% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs SCOM

Compared 5% of the time

More SCOM Competitors

OmniPeek vs TruView

Compared 11% of the time

PingPlotter vs TruView

Compared 9% of the time

NetFort LANGuardian vs TruView

Compared 8% of the time

ClearSight Analyzer vs TruView

Compared 8% of the time

LiveNX vs TruView

Compared 8% of the time

More TruView Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

SCOM

May 2026

Download SCOM product report

Buyer's Guide

TruView

May 2026

Download TruView product report

Also Known As

System Center Operations Manager, SCOM 2012

No data available

Overview

SCOM monitors Microsoft environments with a focus on Windows servers and applications such as SQL, Exchange, and SharePoint. It offers integration with Active Directory and Azure, along with customizable dashboards, management packs, and robust alert mechanisms, aiding efficient management and control.

SCOM provides a comprehensive monitoring solution for Microsoft technologies, helping organizations track performance and availability of applications, services, and infrastructure. It integrates with Active Directory and Azure, offering capabilities for monitoring Windows and Linux environments. Extensive management packs, customizable dashboards, and automated alerts offer a refined monitoring experience. Users benefit from detailed performance data, network monitoring, and auto-discovery features, enhancing operational insights and server management efficiency.

What are key features of SCOM?

Microsoft Environment Monitoring: Specialized for Windows servers and applications such as SQL, Exchange, and SharePoint.
Integration Capabilities: Seamless integration with Active Directory and Azure for streamlined operations.
Customizable Dashboards: Tailor visual data displays to enhance monitoring and decision-making.
Extensive Management Packs: Broad range of management packs for enhanced resource and application control.
Robust Alert Mechanisms: Comprehensive alerting to maintain service stability and address potential issues promptly.

What benefits should users seek in reviews?

Operational Efficiency: Enhanced management of server applications and infrastructure.
Comprehensive Monitoring: Detailed insights into performance and service availability.
Proactive Issue Notification: Timely alerts for quick issue resolution.
Improved Control: More efficient server management through automation and visibility.

In technology sectors, SCOM is widely implemented for its ability to monitor server applications and infrastructure components. Healthcare and finance utilize its monitoring and alert systems for compliance and uptime. Enterprises integrate SCOM for managing complex systems like Exchange, SharePoint, and Active Directory, enabling comprehensive analytics and reporting.

Microsoft

TruView streamlines data analytics by offering comprehensive features that empower users to efficiently manage and interpret large datasets. It is designed for those who seek precision and depth in their analytics tools.

TruView is a versatile analytics tool tailored for expert users who require detailed insights and powerful data processing capabilities. It is crafted to accommodate extensive data volumes, offering flexible integration options and customizable analytics for precise decision-making. TruView is recognized for its speed and accuracy, supporting users in achieving data-driven insights efficiently.

What are the valuable features of TruView?

Advanced Data Processing: Efficiently handles large datasets without compromising speed.
Customizable Dashboards: Tailors visualizations to meet specific analytical needs.
Seamless Integration: Connects easily with existing data systems for smoother transitions.
Real-time Analytics: Provides up-to-date insights for prompt decision-making.
Comprehensive Reporting: Generates detailed reports for effective data interpretation.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Cost Efficiency: Beneficial return on investment through efficient data management.
User Satisfaction: High ratings for reliability and precision from expert users.
Scalability: Adapts to growing data needs without performance loss.
Improved Decision Making: Facilitates timely and informed business decisions.
Time-Saving: Reduces time spent on data analysis with streamlined processes.

TruView's implementation varies across industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail, where it provides tailored solutions to meet sector-specific demands. In finance, it enhances risk assessment and investment strategies. Healthcare facilities leverage it for patient data analytics, while retailers use it to understand consumer behavior and optimize inventory management.

NETSCOUT

Sample Customers

Dialog Telekom

FloraHolland, Miami-Dade Public Library System, Southeastern Freight Lines, Valdosta State University, Everett Clinic, Bioreference, Key Information Systems, ACER, Odeabank A.S.

Buyer's Guide

SCOM vs. TruView

June 2026

Free Report: SCOM vs. TruView

Find out what your peers are saying about SCOM vs. TruView and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our SCOM vs. TruView report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.