No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

SoftLogica WAPT Pro vs Tricentis NeoLoad comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

SoftLogica WAPT Pro
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
AWS Marketplace (178th)
Tricentis NeoLoad
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
68
Ranking in other categories
Performance Testing Tools (3rd), Load Testing Tools (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

SoftLogica WAPT Pro and Tricentis NeoLoad aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. SoftLogica WAPT Pro is designed for AWS Marketplace and holds a mindshare of 0.2%, up 0.1% compared to last year.
Tricentis NeoLoad, on the other hand, focuses on Performance Testing Tools, holds 13.0% mindshare, down 13.8% since last year.
AWS Marketplace Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
SoftLogica WAPT Pro0.2%
SettleMint DALP0.4%
Arcus Cloud with single node0.3%
Other99.1%
AWS Marketplace
Performance Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Tricentis NeoLoad13.0%
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)15.6%
Apache JMeter8.9%
Other62.5%
Performance Testing Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Use SoftLogica WAPT Pro?
Leave a review
AnantJoshi - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Director Intelligent Automation at Truglobal
Performance testing has delivered diverse global retail loads and generates clear diagnostic reports
I did not notice any weak points or downsides in Tricentis NeoLoad except for the cost. Everything else is good with the tool. When I consider that service customers have to pay the cost for the load generation, I find that the cost increases, especially when I want to generate a load for a global customer with different loads in different regions.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AWS Marketplace solutions are best for your needs.
913,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user104961 - PeerSpot reviewer
Penetration and Neoload Tester at a university with 501-1,000 employees
Apr 13, 2014
LoadRunner vs NeoLoad
The six phases of an IT project Enthusiasm Disillusionment Panic Search for the guilty Punishment of the innocent (the performance tester) Praise and rewards for the incompetent non-participants This article has been put together as part of an evaluation of the performance test tools NeoLoad and…
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
52%
Outsourcing Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Healthcare Company
6%
Outsourcing Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Construction Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business5
Midsize Enterprise13
Large Enterprise51
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Do you recommend Tricentis NeoLoad?
I highly recommend Tricentis NeoLoad for companies that are in need of a versatile load and performance testing tool. This relatively inexpensive solution is recognized by organizations like Oxford...
What is your primary use case for Neotys NeoLoad?
Tricentis NeoLoad use cases were for retail, specifically a US based retail customer.
What needs improvement with Tricentis NeoLoad?
I did not notice any weak points or downsides in Tricentis NeoLoad except for the cost. Everything else is good with the tool. When I consider that service customers have to pay the cost for the lo...
 

Also Known As

WAPT
NeoLoad, Neotys NeoLoad
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Dell, H&R Block, Best Buy, Orange, Verizon Wireless, ING, Mazda, Siemens, University of Oxford
Find out what your peers are saying about Dice, HailBytes, Tulip Interfaces and others in AWS Marketplace. Updated: August 2026.
913,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.