SolarWinds Incident Response vs xMatters comparison

Why PeerSpot?

SolarWinds and Everbridge are both solutions in the IT Alerting and Incident Management category. SolarWinds is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.5, while Everbridge is ranked #12. SolarWinds holds a 1.5% mindshare in IMS, compared to Everbridge’s 4.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of SolarWinds users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Everbridge users who would recommend it.

SolarWinds Incident Response

Read 11 SolarWinds Incident Response reviews

1,122 Views
1,111 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

xMatters

Read 31 xMatters reviews

3,103 Views
2,762 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

SolarWinds Incident Response

xMatters

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2026

xMatters and SolarWinds Incident Response compete in the incident management sector. xMatters has the upper hand in customization and flexibility, whereas SolarWinds is praised for its user-friendly reporting and cost-effectiveness.

Features: xMatters excels in workflow building, custom REST API integrations, and notification management. It is noted for its high flexibility and built-in integrations that streamline processes and incident management. Users can extensively customize notifications and designed workflows, which improves efficiency in managing incidents. SolarWinds Incident Response is recognized for its reliable alerts, vast integration options, and user-friendly reporting, making it a suitable choice for more straightforward incident management needs.

Room for Improvement: xMatters users call for better integration flexibility, enhanced reporting features, and improvements to API and license management. Some highlight a need for more intuitive dynamic list and template management. SolarWinds Incident Response may benefit from a more intuitive UI and stricter alert resolution controls. There are user-driven enhancement opportunities for both products to meet evolving needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: xMatters offers multiple deployment options, including private, public, and hybrid cloud configurations, with a commendable support team known for quick assistance and high responsiveness. SolarWinds also supports varied cloud setups and has a solid support framework, although xMatters is perceived to excel in customer engagement and response times.

Pricing and ROI: xMatters is characterized by a higher price due to its comprehensive features, which may yield substantial ROI through enhanced incident management efficiency despite its costly licensing model. In contrast, SolarWinds Incident Response is viewed as cost-effective with affordable user pricing, appealing to organizations prioritizing budget. The decision between these products should consider the balance of costs and organizational needs, with xMatters offering advanced features for a higher expenditure.

To learn more, read our detailed SolarWinds Incident Response vs. xMatters Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

SolarWinds Incident Response vs. xMatters

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,654 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

SolarWinds Incident Response

Ranking in IT Alerting and Incident Management

5th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

xMatters

Ranking in IT Alerting and Incident Management

12th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the IT Alerting and Incident Management category, the mindshare of SolarWinds Incident Response is 1.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of xMatters is 4.2%, down from 6.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Alerting and Incident Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
SolarWinds Incident Response	1.5%
xMatters	4.2%
Other	94.3%

IT Alerting and Incident Management

Featured Reviews

HemantKumar7

Senior Site Reliability Engineer at a tech vendor with 501-1,000 employees

Proactive alert routing has improved uptime and now reduces incident impact across teams

Squadcast requires improvement in that whenever team members upload notes, there is a restriction preventing them from manually resolving alerts. Alerts can only be resolved via proper signals from Alertmanager. Users should not be able to resolve incidents without manual intervention. This is a major requirement because team members sometimes resolve alerts manually, risking the resolution of critical alerts. Additionally, with multiple production environments and services, we receive multiple alerts for issues such as the same disk alert several times. To reduce this noise, we utilize suppression and need deduplication rules. Having a feature to set deduplication rules in one service applicable to other services would be a great help. Other improvements needed for Squadcast include observations I have made over the last four years, and I will convey any updates regarding improvements in the future.

Read full review

Dean-Robinson

Sr. Developer at a media company with 10,001+ employees

A versatile solution with excellent logging capabilities that reduced our time to resolve

The reporting functionality could be improved, though I know that's something xMatters, inc. is working on. For example, sometimes I need to go into the platform and find users who aren't in groups that have been created recently, haven't logged in and so on. Previously, this was hard work, but they added loads of filters, making it more accessible. Still, the ability to create custom-designated reports that I could run and schedule would be fantastic for me. It would be good if they keep improving the reporting functionality, as it can be somewhat restrictive sometimes. There are a couple of improvements that xMatters could make to the incident hub, where we can manage high-priority incidents. More sharing capability between collaborating incident managers would be good to see, including the ability to whiteboard. That would allow them to share and sketch out ideas while looking for a solution. Those two features are essential, and that's why we want to use the solution in conjunction with Everbridge because xMatters doesn't have them.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Squadcast has positively impacted my organization by helping with incident management and enabling alerts to be responded to more quickly."

"Squadcast has positively impacted our organization because we are timely getting alerts, and based on those alerts, we can take the required actions, so if there is any burning security alert, we can timely act to avoid production downtime, which results in a return on investment, and there are many transactional costs involved in it, so by reducing the downtime of the system, we are able to save revenue loss from the client side."

"Squadcast has positively impacted the organization with its notification feature that allows receiving a call in case an alert is missed from the UI, enabling timely action, which helps in resolving issues within the minimum time frame and prevents more production issues."

"Squadcast helped us build a better product by improving both response time and reliability."

"Squadcast has impacted our organization positively by reducing more time and by making sure our solution runs faster."

"When we receive alerts in a timely manner, we can proactively monitor our systems without downtime, maintaining system health with proper alerts, and within the time frame, we can take the necessary action to resolve those alerts, helping to delay major incidents and achieving uptime above 99.9% and 99.2%."

"A significant return on investment has been seen because incidents can be tracked timely and actions can be taken that minimize downtime."

"Squadcast notifications have helped me resolve issues faster because they notify me as soon as an issue happens, and then I go and fix it before it gets escalated to further sections."

More SolarWinds Incident Response pros

"If you really want to reduce your mean time for restoring a service during a major incident, xMatters would definitely be the right tool."

"It has been easy to use and very reliable."

"xMatters provides targeted, content-rich notifications to reduce response times in our organizations."

"The automated callouts, without a doubt, are most valuable. They have been a huge gain for our company. Previous to xMatters, there was no real management of the on-call resources or rotas. So, having that centralized and automated has been a huge gain."

"It has improved our time to respond; prior to the use of xMatters, it might take hours or even a day to get someone involved on a problem, and now it's down to minutes."

"xMatters is helpful for getting the right on-call resources. That is a key factor. It is also very user-friendly, and just a little documentation helps you to understand things such as how on-calls are configured, how groups are configured, and how users update their on-call devices."

"xMatters helped to automate our incident notification process; we generate incident tickets right from our alerts, enabling immediate response and ownership, and we have seen reduced response times and streamlined escalations that have helped to reduce priority-one incidents in our organization."

"We're able to communicate better with specific groups or offices. We didn't have that capability or granularity before. It has helped in that regard."

More xMatters pros

Cons

"One feature I think Squadcast must improve is the message quality and call quality we get; currently, the proper message is not being clearly heard on the calls we receive."

"A few areas need improvement. For example, AI-generated incident summaries take a lot of time to be completed."

"Sometimes, while updating the escalation policies tab, Squadcast takes a lot of time, which could be improved."

"Squadcast could enhance the UI to be more user-friendly."

"Squadcast could be improved if the pricing could be reduced per user."

"In terms of improvements for Squadcast, there are opportunities, such as having only two workflows for tagging alerts based on priority P1, P2, with our current premium plan."

"Squadcast could be improved because when multiple alerts trigger, the team currently performs manual resolution of those alerts."

"Squadcast can be improved if we restrict the manual resolution of alerts, as currently this feature is lacking inside Squadcast."

More SolarWinds Incident Response cons

"On-call management scheduling is difficult."

"Additional built-in integrations with other applications would be an area of improvement."

"We have to create an Excel sheet for onboarding users and then upload it. But if an employee resigns, we don't have any checkpoints to validate whether the user is still active or not. We have to do that manually every week: Check who has left the organization, and do a cross-check, whether this person had any licenses or signed in to xMatters."

"While the documentation is good, the knowledge base - the collection of user supported community forums - is a little weak compared to some of the other products I've used. If I have a problem that I can't find the answer to in the documentation, there are very few places to go after that, because the user base, the community forums, are not strong for me to find someone who's had the same issue as me, and find out what the answer to their problem was. That's somewhat of a weak point."

"This is our biggest issue: licensing."

"If you want to alter a custom field, you can do so via import/export. But you can't have an unlimited number of custom fields, so in a large environment with a lot of teams, team provisioning becomes more difficult."

"What I would like it to do is tell me anytime there is a P1 incident, except when the ticket is assigned to this team or when this word is in the summary, but there is no exclusion option. I have been complaining about this for a couple years. At one point, we created a ticket for this with the developers to review. I assume that once enough people complain about it, they will bump it up in priority to work on. However, if not enough people think it is an issue, then they prioritize their work and work on other features and functionality. However, this is something that has been challenging for us because we have needed to find ways to work around it or just deal with it. So, I would love to see an exclusion option."

"Every time that I say, "I need extra licenses to make sure that all Level 1 and 2s have their own xMatters account," they keep telling me that it is too expensive."

More xMatters cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"I know roughly what we pay per year. For what we use it for and what its purpose is, it is very valuable."

"This is our biggest issue: licensing. Our customer has only purchased a set number of full licensed users, and we are constantly running up against our license limit. To mitigate licensing concerns, we completely control at the admin level user additions and removals, and do a monthly cleanup process driven by security contractor removal reports."

"xMatters shortens the time to resolution, so the amount saved in potential lost revenue and productivity has justified the cost for our organization."

"Then, in pricing, you are limited on your number of SMS messages that you can send a month and the licensing cost annually."

"If the licensing were cheaper, our customer might buy more."

"We're currently per license. We're paying around $44,000 per year for 80 full users and 300 standard users. For a new implementation, we also need to pay for an expert."

"I'm not really involved with the cost standpoint. I've only heard rumors of how much it costs, and if it costs what I think it costs, its cost is very high as compared to a lot of other tools that we're using here. It seems on the higher end from a cost standpoint."

"The pricing is too high... we procured 150 licenses and we have almost 1,500 users in IT. We had to come up with a few ideas for determining which users get a license and which users don't need one. Due to the limitation of the number of licenses, we were unable to integrate the user profiles with Active Directory."

More xMatters pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Alerting and Incident Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,654 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

21%

Computer Software Company

17%

Construction Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

11%

Construction Company

10%

Performing Arts

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	24

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Squadcast?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was very awesome because pricing is affordable. They charge a very affordable pricing compared to features. The setup cost was more attractive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Squadcast?

A few areas need improvement. For example, AI-generated incident summaries take a lot of time to be completed.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Squadcast?

My main use case for Squadcast is in two different ways. I use it for on-call management, whereby I'm able to schedule calls and do the escalations, as well as live call routing to agents. That is ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

BigPanda vs SolarWinds Incident Response

Compared 29% of the time

PagerDuty Operations Cloud vs SolarWinds Incident Response

Compared 16% of the time

Splunk On-Call vs SolarWinds Incident Response

Compared 13% of the time

Salesforce Service Cloud vs SolarWinds Incident Response

Compared 11% of the time

Freshservice vs SolarWinds Incident Response

Compared 8% of the time

More SolarWinds Incident Response Competitors

PagerDuty Operations Cloud vs xMatters

Compared 24% of the time

Opsgenie vs xMatters

Compared 16% of the time

Everbridge IT Alerting vs xMatters

Compared 16% of the time

FireHydrant vs xMatters

Compared 8% of the time

Salesforce Service Cloud vs xMatters

Compared 1% of the time

More xMatters Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

SolarWinds Incident Response

August 2026

Download SolarWinds Incident Response product report

Buyer's Guide

xMatters

August 2026

Download xMatters product report

Also Known As

No data available

xMatters IT Management

Overview

Squadcast enhances incident management by providing centralized notifications and alert escalation. Its integration capabilities and user-friendly design improve response times, impacting MTTR and MTTA positively. Organizations use Squadcast to streamline incident responses and maintain system thresholds efficiently.

Squadcast is an effective platform for incident management, offering features like multiple notifications via phone, email, and SMS for quick alert responses. Escalation policies and maintenance window suppression help reduce alert noise. Its integration capabilities with Prometheus and AWS improve service management, ensuring alerts are timely acknowledged and routed to the appropriate teams. Users find Squadcast's interface support for incident management and reporting beneficial. Suggestions for improvement include simplifying the interface, enhancing alert handling, and clarifying documentation.

What are the standout features of Squadcast?

Notifications: Receive alerts via phone, email, and SMS for fast response.
Escalation Policies: Customize how alerts escalate for efficient handling.
Integration: Seamless integration with Prometheus, AWS, and other tools.
Routing: Direct alerts to relevant teams with tagging for focused responses.
Maintenance Window: Suppress alerts during maintenance to reduce noise.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Improved Response Times: Faster alert acknowledgment impacts MTTR positively.
Team Efficiency: Enhances incident routing and management.
Service Management: Integrations with monitoring tools streamline operations.
Alert Reduction: Maintenance suppression lowers alert noise.

In the tech sector, organizations rely on Squadcast for monitoring and threshold breaches. Integrating with Prometheus and Alertmanager, it serves as a central alert system. Notifications trigger via various channels to ensure rapid incident response. This setup helps tech teams maintain performance metrics effectively.

SolarWinds

xMatters provides robust automated notifications and incident management, enhancing alerting and critical IT incident handling with seamless integrations, ensuring timely communications.

xMatters is designed for efficient incident management and streamlined IT alerting. It offers flexibility through integrations with ServiceNow, Slack, and others, enhancing communication and workflow management during critical events. Users highlight the SaaS model, customizable on-call scheduling, and effective communication tools. These features reduce incident response times, enhance message delivery, and support team collaboration across platforms.

What features make xMatters stand out?

REST API Automation: Facilitates seamless integration and automation.
Intuitive UI: Simplifies the user experience for managing workflows.
Workflow Builder: Enhances customization for incident processes.
Integration Flexibility: Supports various tools like ServiceNow and Slack.
Customizable Scheduling: Offers tailored on-call schedules and escalation paths.
Automated Notifications: Streamlines incident response times.
Robust Logging: Ensures reliability in tracking system activities.
Device Management: Offers comprehensive control over notification devices.
Self-Service Capabilities: Empowers users in managing their alerts and settings.
Conference Bridging: Facilitates communication during incident resolution.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Operational Efficiency: Enhanced by seamless integrations.
Improved Incident Response: Driven by automated notification and escalation pathways.
User Empowerment: Through self-service and device management features.
Accessibility: Enabled by a SaaS-based infrastructure.
Collaboration: Boosted through messaging and conference features.

xMatters supports industries in managing IT incidents and emergency notifications. Teams prioritize alerts, maintain on-call schedules, and automate response workflows, particularly integrating with tools like ServiceNow for critical event handling. Its application in infrastructure monitoring and proactive engagement is notable across sectors.

Everbridge

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Over 2.7 million users trust xMatters daily at successful startups and global giants including athenahealth, BMC Software, Box, Credit Suisse, Danske Bank, Experian, NVIDIA, ViaSat and Vodafone. xMatters is headquartered in San Ramon, California and has offices worldwide. Visit our website to see how business like yours found solutions with xMatters.

Buyer's Guide

SolarWinds Incident Response vs. xMatters

September 2026

Free Report: SolarWinds Incident Response vs. xMatters

Find out what your peers are saying about SolarWinds Incident Response vs. xMatters and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,654 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our SolarWinds Incident Response vs. xMatters report.

See our list of best IT Alerting and Incident Management vendors.

We monitor all IT Alerting and Incident Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.