Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Studio Creatio vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM comparison

Creatio and TIBCO are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Creatio is ranked #24 with an average rating of 9.0, while TIBCO is ranked #31 with an average rating of 7.7. Creatio holds a 0.5% mindshare in BPM, compared to TIBCO’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Creatio users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of TIBCO users who would recommend it.
Studio Creatio
Read 13 Studio Creatio reviews
  • 440 Views
  • 317 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM
Read 7 TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM reviews
  • 511 Views
  • 364 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM and Studio Creatio compete in business process management. TIBCO often has an edge with its integration capabilities, whereas Studio Creatio is favored for its flexible automation features.

Features: TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM is known for its strong integration support with SOAP and web services, customization capabilities, and high stability in production environments. Studio Creatio is appreciated for its process automation, dynamic case management, and low-code platform that allows for ease of use and adaptability.

Room for Improvement: TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM could improve its deployment complexity, ease of configuration without extensive technical expertise, and user interface intuitiveness. Studio Creatio may benefit from enhanced integration flexibility with third-party applications, more comprehensive reporting capabilities, and a more intuitive user interface for complex workflows.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM has a complex deployment process due to detailed integration features, requiring more setup time but offering detailed guidance. Studio Creatio supports faster deployment with its cloud-based model and is praised for responsive customer service, aiding especially during the initial stages.

Pricing and ROI: TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM is seen as having higher initial costs but provides substantial ROI through robust enterprise integration. Studio Creatio, with its higher initial pricing, offers quick ROI with lower-scale implementation costs and efficient process handling.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Studio Creatio vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Studio Creatio vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 851,604 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Studio Creatio
Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)
24th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
Rapid Application Development Software (24th), Low-Code Development Platforms (19th)
TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM
Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)
31st
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Studio Creatio is 0.5%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM is 0.5%, down from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Business Process Management (BPM)
 

Featured Reviews

Anatolii Vovniuk - PeerSpot reviewer
Customizable, easy to use, and has good built-in dashboards
The tool is available on the cloud as well as on-premise. The ease of setup depends on the complexity of the project. In most cases, we just connect and work. We must create our own team and find a partner to build our own application. If we need to create something new, it will take time. I rate the ease of setup of the cloud version a ten out of ten. However, I would rate the ease of setup of the on-premise version a five or six out of ten. The on-premise version takes longer to deploy. The cloud version can be deployed within minutes. We receive a license key and start working. If all the components are ready, we can deploy the on-premise version within ten days.
Read full review
Ray Ochieng - PeerSpot reviewer
Powerful workflow definition enhances operational stability and efficiency
TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM is powerful for defining workflows. It is low code, so you don't need a lot of coding, and tasks are just drag and drop. It is also very stable as we haven't had issues with it going down or encountering any operational issues for a long time. The stability and rich features in workflow definition make it a valuable tool.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Creatio also provides us with scalability, performance and agility."
"The low-code tools and business process management that Creatio provides are useful for our internal processes. It is also very easy to use."
"The tool enables users to work offline through the mobile application."
"The pre-configured CRM functionalities regarding the accounts management and contact activities is very good. It's easy to develop workflows."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is its simplicity."
"The most valuable features are performance, built-in variety of multiple task automation, and has international standards notations."
"The most valuable features of the solution are its CRM functionality and the fact that it is a no-code solution"
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is a low-code and no-code platform."
More Studio Creatio pros
"TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM is powerful for defining workflows."
"The product's initial setup phase is straightforward."
"For specific situations this can be a good solution and a simplified interface to work with."
"It is the best product because of its stability. ActiveMatrix 5.x is highly stable in production, and the downtime is very low. I have worked on a lot of service projects, and the engine is very stable, robust, and scalable. The development and change requests can be pushed quickly, and the mapper activity and SSLT kind of features are also good. It is easy to do changes, testing, and deployment. Its deployment is very easy, and we can automate a lot of scripts for our on-premises solution. I work for an investment bank, and we have automated a lot of processes for our customers. Previously, we used to develop scripts and tools. With version 6.x, everything is moved to Maven and other things. Environment handling is done mostly through DevOps tools. As compared to Mulesoft, the deployment and configuration are very easy in TIBCO."
"The scheduling and the calendar are very useful."
"TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM is powerful for defining workflows."
"The capacity for distributing the jobs in a workflow is an important feature."
 

Cons

"Studio Creatio is a new product in the market, making its lack of maturity an area of concern."
"Numerous options can make implementation confusing."
"Creatio needs to stabilize their marketplace."
"I can have several types of contacts, customers, employees, partners, and so on, and I would like to have a different view for each type of contact in the list view. Currently, there is no way to configure this. This is something I would like Creatio to improve. In this time of COVID, it is very important that all such solutions improve omnichannel communications and omnichannel marketing. Companies need to communicate with customers by using not just the phone number and email but also by using social networks. All companies today need artificial intelligence, machine learning, the internet of things, and social communication."
"The way bpm's infrastructure works, you can only have one data source on a page. It has to be connected to the object and you're pretty much locked in at that point... If you want to connect anything other than what exists in that object to that object, you're going to have to create a completely new home for it in that object."
"The solution does not allow extensive customization of the UI. I would like to have much more control over the UI when I build a process. Currently on the UI where the fields are placed and the layout is set in place and you cannot change it. Your experience is going to be the same throughout whatever use case that you are building from customer to customer. You can not have much control over how it looks for each customer. This is an area where they can improve on."
"They can improve the business rules for defining the type and quantity of the business load. They already seem to be working on this improvement. Integration with the social networks will be very appreciated by the companies. It will be very useful for communication between the company and customers, that is, B to C relationships. Most of the customers or users have smartphones, and they use a lot of social networks. Companies need to stay connected with the customers. They have enabled integration with WhatsApp and Telegram in recent releases, which has been very useful."
"It does not have the ability to run one single large process."
More Studio Creatio cons
"ActiveMatrix is in the middle field. MuleDB is more on the engineering side with Java and other things. SnapLogic is there are on the higher side with very low coding. TIBCO stays in the middle like IBM or Oracle. TIBCO can move towards IBM's way of doing. IBM has a big market and many varieties of products and good integration, which TIBCO doesn't have. It can have better integration. TIBCO's transition to the cloud is a little slow. As compared to Dell, Boomi, and Mulesoft. TIBCO took the steps a little later. TIBCO's ID was far better and easier to work with previously. TIBCO's 5.x ID was very good, and the development environment and the transition were easy. Version 6.5 onwards, it is a stable product, but it would be good if they can do something similar to version 5.4 with version 6. They should concentrate on this API market. It will give them the strength and the ability to grab the market back."
"It is not lightweight and requires a lot of disk space, memory, and CPU."
"Technical support needs to be streamlined."
"The maintenance of the package could be improved."
"The product is missing some means of addressing more complex BPM constructs and should interface with more platforms easily."
"The scalability of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"My experience with tech support has not been very good. Most of the time, issues are escalated to level three, where they are either unresolved or take two weeks to address."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the product price a five or six on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."
"The tool is reasonably priced."
"The pricing plans are not user-friendly because in many cases you have to buy different options to get additional features."
"There is a license required for this solution."
"From my standpoint, it blows out of the water all the other competitors out there that we were potentially looking at, and it was in a reasonable price range, whereas you have these other Fortune 500 companies that were asking for a ridiculous amount."
"I rate the pricing a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive."
"It is fairly competitive."
"There are some discussions about perpetual licenses and conversions, but I'm not much familiar with them."
"TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM is an expensive tool compared to others."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
14%
Comms Service Provider
14%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
40%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Studio Creatio?
The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is a low-code and no-code platform.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Studio Creatio?
The tool is reasonably priced.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Studio Creatio?
Sometimes, the cloud version provides slow responses. The documentation must be more technical. Sometimes, we need to work with massive external data. We might have 10 to 20 million lines of data t...
See all answers
What do you like most about TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM?
The product's initial setup phase is straightforward.
See all answers
What needs improvement with TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM?
It is not lightweight and requires a lot of disk space, memory, and CPU. Making it lightweight so it can run on a minimum processor and less memory would be beneficial. Additionally, the current wo...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM?
We are using TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM for network deployment workflows. For example, if a customer is interested in getting a NetWorker, there is a workflow where we log in, get the customer details,...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Mendix vs Studio Creatio Logo
Mendix vs Studio Creatio
Compared 17% of the time
OutSystems vs Studio Creatio Logo
OutSystems vs Studio Creatio
Compared 17% of the time
Microsoft Power Apps vs Studio Creatio Logo
Microsoft Power Apps vs Studio Creatio
Compared 15% of the time
Oracle Application Express (APEX) vs Studio Creatio Logo
Oracle Application Express (APEX) vs Studio Creatio
Compared 10% of the time
More Studio Creatio Competitors
Camunda vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM Logo
Camunda vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM
Compared 34% of the time
Appian vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM Logo
Appian vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM
Compared 24% of the time
IBM BPM vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM Logo
IBM BPM vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM
Compared 18% of the time
TIBCO iProcess Suite vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM Logo
TIBCO iProcess Suite vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM
Compared 13% of the time
More TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Studio Creatio
April 2025
Studio Creatio reportDownload Studio Creatio product report
Buyer's Guide
TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM
April 2025
TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM reportDownload TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM product report
 

Overview

Intelligent business process management and low-code platform with out-of-the-box solutions and templates

Studio Creatio, Enterprise Edition is the unique synergy of business processes management and case management technologies that provide organizations with powerful tools to easily manage and optimize business processes.

Creatio
TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM is used to develop, deploy, execute and manage Business Process Management centric applications. Use TIBCO Business Studio BPM Edition in conjunction with ActiveMatrix BPM to model business processes. It helps to encompass applications that primarily automate both: business processes (sequences of tasks) to be executed by human users, and technical processes (the flow of data) to be executed by enterprise applications.
TIBCO
 

Sample Customers

Rangel Logistics Solutions
ADIS, Citi, Bank of Montreal, First Citizens Bank
Buyer's Guide
Studio Creatio vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM
April 2025
Free Report: Studio Creatio vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM
Find out what your peers are saying about Studio Creatio vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Studio Creatio vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.