ZAPTEST and UiPath Test Cloud compete in the automated testing industry. UiPath Test Cloud has the upper hand due to its advanced features and integration capabilities, making it a preferred choice despite higher costs.
Features: ZAPTEST provides multi-platform support, detailed analytics, and one script multi-run technology. UiPath Test Cloud excels with AI-driven automation, extensive integration capabilities, and robotic process automation that simplifies complex scenarios.
Room for Improvement: ZAPTEST could improve in scalability for larger testing environments, enhance integration options with more lifecycle tools, and offer more customizable deployment options. UiPath Test Cloud could work on reducing complexity in setup for new users, offer more straightforward pricing transparency, and improve the intuitiveness of its AI features for better accessibility.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ZAPTEST offers easy deployment and strong customer support that resolves issues quickly. UiPath Test Cloud offers flexible deployment options and comprehensive support, with a personalized service approach that efficiently handles complex queries and scalability requirements.
Pricing and ROI: ZAPTEST has lower initial setup costs and immediate ROI benefits with a flexible pricing model. UiPath Test Cloud has higher setup costs, justified by its advanced features offering long-term ROI. The main contrast lies in ZAPTEST's cost-effectiveness versus UiPath's investment in advanced features.
They get into the meeting, understand the problem, and try to provide a solution quickly.
Support should be free, especially for product-related issues.
Proper knowledge of Orchestrator and CI/CD processes makes the product truly scalable.
Scaling with UiPath Test Cloud is supported; they have the infrastructure to scale automation to meet business needs.
It is performing better than two to three years back; significant improvements have been made for complete project delivery.
UiPath Test Suite has matured over the years and is now quite stable.
If they could add defect management, it could work independently without needing Jira.
UiPath should introduce compatibility so existing processes in Selenium or other tools can work seamlessly with UiPath Test automation.
Our customers usually pay around 30K to 35K for five licenses, which is priced per year.
The pricing of UiPath tends to be on the higher side, which can restrict smaller companies from adopting it.
The most valuable feature of UiPath Test Cloud that I have found is the TestManager dashboard, which integrates with Jira through Planview Tasktop.
What I really like about UiPath Test Suite is its ability to ensure that any changes made do not affect other functionalities.
UiPath Test Cloud revolutionizes testing through advanced AI agents, enhancing productivity in software assessment.
UiPath Test Cloud, with its AI-augmented automation, offers testers enterprise-grade capabilities for over 190 technologies. Featuring seamless integration with tools like Orchestrator and CI/CD pipelines, it streamlines testing processes and cuts maintenance costs. While users value its functionalities, the need for enhancements in mobile automation and third-party integration, particularly with Jira, is recognized. Efficient test organization through Test Manager and simplified process management via the cloud are noteworthy. Enhancements in reporting and file management are sought, highlighting areas for development.
What are the key features of UiPath Test Cloud?Organizations across industries utilize UiPath Test Cloud for testing types such as origination, smoke, and web application testing. Common implementations include testing in supply chain management, regression testing, and integrating workflows. Teams find it beneficial for ensuring functionality and efficiency in mobile app testing, enabling cross-platform support for RPA and applications like Oracle and SAP.
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.