OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs ZAPTEST comparison

OpenText Functional Testing...

Read 7 ZAPTEST reviews

1,270 Views
991 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web and ZAPTEST compete in software testing, each with unique advantages. ZAPTEST appears to have an edge due to its extensive feature set and overall flexibility, especially in multi-platform scenarios.

Features: OpenText Functional Testing Lab offers comprehensive mobile and web testing capabilities, seamless integration with OpenText products, and a robust automation framework. ZAPTEST is noted for its multi-platform automation, simultaneous environment testing, enhanced productivity, and flexibility. OpenText excels in integration opportunities, whereas ZAPTEST is unmatched in cross-platform testing abilities.

Room for Improvement: OpenText could enhance its flexibility beyond its ecosystem, improve initial ROI speed, and offer more cost-effective solutions for smaller enterprises. ZAPTEST could strengthen its integration with existing enterprise tools, enhance emulator support, and streamline its feature set to reduce initial deployment costs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText provides a straightforward deployment process and reliable customer service suited for enterprises. ZAPTEST emphasizes rapid deployment and dedicated customer support. OpenText's approach fits large enterprises, while ZAPTEST's agility caters to diverse organizational needs.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText's setup cost is significant, with benefits over time due to integration. ZAPTEST, though having a higher initial cost, offers a quicker ROI through its feature-rich solutions. OpenText's pricing is competitive for long-term investments, while ZAPTEST is recognized for fast returns.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. ZAPTEST Report (Updated: April 2026).

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. ZAPTEST

Download the complete report

Helped 893,244 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Functional Testing...

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

18th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile App Testing Tools (6th)

ZAPTEST

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

30th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Automation Tools (26th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is 2.0%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ZAPTEST is 1.6%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web	2.0%
ZAPTEST	1.6%
Other	96.4%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

reviewer2356440

Senior Director at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Experienced ease in automation with strong support while seeking improvements in low-code options

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web offers flexibility of deployment, from on-premises to UFT One which is on the cloud. They provide capability for immediate deployment, and assets can be migrated easily. They include enablers specifically for quick migration of test assets. While I have not personally been involved in these migrations, I have observed some clients using it directly while others make a complete shift from OpenText to Tricentis platforms. There have not been many clients moving from OpenText platforms from on-premises to cloud because most shifts have been toward different product categories such as Tricentis altogether.

Read full review

it_user362916

System engineer at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

We can write our codes just after the functional docs are prepared, and we can straight away start testing the application in the system testing phase itself.

* Using this tool, we can automate test cases even before the deployment of an application. This can be done by scanning objects from UI mock-ups or screenshots. * One script multi-run technology reduces scripting effort and budget by which you can run one unique script to test multiple platforms. * We can write one code and run it in multiple browsers (Chrome, IE, Firefox anything) and operating systems (Android, Windows, anything). * PDF validation, average colour validation, etc. are better and stable. * We can literally automate anything (not necessarily web applications) using ZAPTEST as it works exactly as a human eye and doesn't dig into application codes. * Partial OCR and block recognization are game changers. * JIRA and ALM integration

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a complete solution for mobile application testing."

"In general, in my opinion, Mobile Center is a good product that allows us to do everything we need to automate application testing for mobile."

"The product is easy to use."

"They've all been really satisfied with the scalability of the HPE products."

"The solution is easy to use. There are features to orchestrate mobile testing, including mobile testing automation. You can test different devices at the same time."

"There are numerous valuable features such as automation, the ones that facilitate importing and synchronization capabilities between our platform, Jira, and Azure DevOps."

"For automation testing, the tool provides the record and playback option, which helps with object detection easily."

"We evaluated other mobile testing solutions and found this to be superior to all of them."

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web pros

"Customer service has been ZAPTEST's forte; very prompt and helpful."

"On average, I get two cycles per week and that only requires the attention of two people; it saves us a lot of time and gets us to production quicker."

"Using ZAPTEST, we can write our codes just after the functional docs are prepared, and we can straight away start testing the application in the system testing phase itself."

"Customer service is excellent."

"Customer Service: This is where they truly shine! If we suggest a feature, a new version appears in days with that feature fully realized and working."

"Our ROI is 100%."

"The biggest thing this product has done for us is allow us to automate a feature that other commercial and open source tools couldn't do for us."

Cons

"The documentation and user interface both need improvement."

"It's very new to HP. They need to go beyond the HP world."

"We need to scale devices easily. Some customers would like to loop in AWS or other cloud providers to check if their devices have the cloud factor. OpenText UFT Digital Lab needs to improve it."

"OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web could benefit from implementing a low-code, no-code solution that aids in quick automation code preparation."

"I think the biggest issues that I've seen, and this is a personal view of mine, is that most of the HPE products have a common look and feel to them."

"They should introduce a pay-per-use subscription model."

"Deployment was an issue. Each time we set it up and deployed, it failed and we had to relaunch it again."

"It's complex, and you need more skills than in most implementations."

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web cons

"The documentation is not keeping up with the rapid development, and updates are very fast."

"The save function should be fixed so that I no longer have to add a space to a step and then follow it with a backspace to reenable the save icon."

"A few objects on the .NET platform are not getting identified precisely among similar objects."

"We cannot have more than one Object Repository for one test."

"We have used multiple data files types as inputs to our existing automation and this product is currently only supporting CSV."

"I would say the test results features could be made more advanced with options like pie charts, graphs, etc. To be able to visualize the data would be helpful to us."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"OpenText UFT Digital Lab's pricing is average, and I rate it a five out of ten."

"While the pricing may seem relatively high, when compared to competitors, it often falls in line or can even be more cost-effective."

"The product could be more affordable."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

10%

Construction Company

Non Profit

Manufacturing Company

18%

Healthcare Company

11%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Construction Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	13

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

Digital Lab is a pretty solid product with areas that could be continuously improved on.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

I deal with OpenText Analysis Database and Core Performance Engineering, which are categories of software rather than individual pieces. We focus on the ADM area, which includes ALM, UFT One, UFT D...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

I do have experience with OpenText products and OpenText ALM. I have been using ALM Quality Center, which has had a few names for it over time, but it is the old Quality Center that was then rename...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Perfecto vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 7% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 5% of the time

Sauce Labs vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 5% of the time

Appium vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 3% of the time

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web Competitors

OpenText Functional Testing vs ZAPTEST

Compared 13% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs ZAPTEST

Compared 12% of the time

Sauce Labs vs ZAPTEST

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs ZAPTEST

Compared 6% of the time

Zeenyx AscentialTest vs ZAPTEST

Compared 5% of the time

More ZAPTEST Competitors

Product Reports

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Download OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web product report

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web report

Download ZAPTEST product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus UFT Digital Lab, Micro Focus UFT Mobile, Mobile Center, Micro Focus Mobile Center, HPE Mobile Center

No data available

Overview

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web offers integration with HPE and non-HPE tools, real device testing, and device management. It supports real-time analytics and multi-platform testing, ensuring traceability and flexibility with decentralized devices.

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is designed to enhance testing efficiency for mobile and desktop applications by allowing ease of integration with different testing environments. It features real-time analytics, supports automated device management, and provides the flexibility of decentralized testing on real devices. With a focus on robust traceability, it stands out as a comprehensive choice for optimizing software development life cycles, especially notable for its ability to support multiple devices simultaneously and strategic scaling through network virtualization and AWS device farm.

What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing Lab?

Ease of Use: Intuitive interface facilitating user engagement.
Integration: Compatible with HPE and non-HPE tools for improved workflow.
Real Device Testing: Ensures testing on actual devices for accurate results.
Automation: Advanced capabilities streamline repetitive testing.
Device Management: Flexible management of decentralized devices.
Multi-Platform Support: Simultaneous testing across various platforms.
Traceability: Strong application delivery traceability for robust tracking.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Scalability: Ability to handle multiple devices and scale as needed.
Flexibility: Deployment options include both on-premises and cloud-based solutions.
Real-Time Analytics: Provides actionable insights for data-driven decisions.
Enhanced Performance: Optimizes the software development lifecycle.
Comprehensive Testing: Facilitates thorough functional and performance testing.

Financial services companies utilize OpenText Functional Testing Lab for optimizing mobile solutions and applications, ensuring a streamlined integration into their Application Lifecycle Management and Unified Functional Testing processes. It aids in functional and performance testing, adapting to both on-premises and cloud deployments to suit industry-specific demands.

OpenText

ZAPTEST is an advanced automation tool providing robust solutions for streamlining business processes across multiple platforms. Designed for efficiency, it offers users streamlined automation capabilities tailored to their needs.

ZAPTEST supports both functional and performance automation, enhancing business operations through comprehensive testing capabilities. Its cross-platform versatility allows users to automate web, desktop, and mobile apps, facilitating seamless integration into existing workflows. Using ZAPTEST, teams can optimize testing cycles, minimize manual intervention, and ensure consistent output quality, boosting team productivity while maintaining flexibility and scalability.

What are ZAPTEST's most valuable features?

Cross-Platform Automation: Enables users to conduct thorough testing on web, desktop, and mobile applications.
Script-Less Testing: Simplifies the automation process by allowing non-programmers to create automated tests easily.
Real-Time Reporting: Provides instant feedback, enabling quicker decision-making and issue resolution.
Parallel Execution: Facilitates simultaneous test execution to save time and resources.
API Testing: Allows for the efficient verification and performance assessment of application programming interfaces.

What benefits or ROI should users expect?

Increased Efficiency: Automation leads to faster test cycles, saving time and resources.
Reduced Costs: By minimizing manual efforts, ZAPTEST lowers labor costs associated with testing.
Improved Accuracy: Consistent test execution reduces errors and improves software reliability.
Scalability: Easily adapts to changing business demands, supporting growth.

ZAPTEST seamlessly integrates into various industries, including finance, healthcare, and technology, adapting its functionality to meet industry-specific requirements. In finance, it enhances security and compliance testing; in healthcare, it ensures systems meet regulatory standards, while in technology, it supports fast-paced development and deployment cycles.

Sample Customers

Bci, BPER Services, Die Mobiliar, Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare, HPE, Independent Health, Shanghai OnStar Telematics, Pick n Pay, UCB

AT&T, Ally Financial, Inc. Standard & Poors, Comcast, Boeing Employee Credit Union, Nordstroms, Bank of New Zealand, Aviva France, Delta Airlines, First National Bank of South Africa, Leukemia & Lymphoma Society, American Well, SuperValu, 24 Hour Fitness, Inc., Lexis Nexis, Cspire Wireless, GE Intelligent Systems, Accenture, Shelter Mutual Insurance, Agco

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. ZAPTEST