Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs ZAPTEST comparison

OpenText and ZAPTEST are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. OpenText is ranked #18 with an average rating of 7.7, while ZAPTEST is ranked #29. OpenText holds a 2.0% mindshare in FT, compared to ZAPTEST’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of ZAPTEST users who would recommend it.
OpenText Functional Testing...
Read 19 OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web reviews
  • 1,471 Views
  • 1,118 Comparison Views
83% willing to recommend
ZAPTEST
Read 7 ZAPTEST reviews
  • 786 Views
  • 597 Comparison Views
88% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web and ZAPTEST compete in the mobile and web application testing market. OpenText has the upper hand in integration capabilities and technological support, while ZAPTEST excels in automation versatility.

Features: OpenText provides broad technology support, real-device testing, and integration with HPE tools like ALM and UFT. ZAPTEST emphasizes strong automation, scriptless testing, and parallel testing across platforms.

Room for Improvement: OpenText could improve in automation intuitiveness and pricing tier flexibility, enhancing user interface simplicity, while ZAPTEST could benefit from expanding integration options, refining customer feedback processes, and reducing initial setup complexity.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText is favored for seamless deployment and robust integration support. ZAPTEST is noted for easy deployment and superior customer service, offering effective assistance and quick solutions to customer queries.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText often has higher setup costs but offers strong ROI through expansive capabilities. Meanwhile, ZAPTEST provides a budget-friendly setup with a compelling ROI derived from comprehensive automation efficiencies.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. ZAPTEST Report (Updated: March 2026).
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. ZAPTEST
March 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 884,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Functional Testing...
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
18th
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.1
Number of Reviews
19
Ranking in other categories
Mobile App Testing Tools (5th)
ZAPTEST
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
29th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
Test Automation Tools (27th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is 2.0%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ZAPTEST is 1.2%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Functional Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web2.0%
ZAPTEST1.2%
Other96.8%
Functional Testing Tools
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2356440 - PeerSpot reviewer
reviewer2356440
Senior Director at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Experienced ease in automation with strong support while seeking improvements in low-code options
OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web offers flexibility of deployment, from on-premises to UFT One which is on the cloud. They provide capability for immediate deployment, and assets can be migrated easily. They include enablers specifically for quick migration of test assets. While I have not personally been involved in these migrations, I have observed some clients using it directly while others make a complete shift from OpenText to Tricentis platforms. There have not been many clients moving from OpenText platforms from on-premises to cloud because most shifts have been toward different product categories such as Tricentis altogether.
Read full review
it_user362916 - PeerSpot reviewer
it_user362916
System engineer at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
We can write our codes just after the functional docs are prepared, and we can straight away start testing the application in the system testing phase itself.
* Using this tool, we can automate test cases even before the deployment of an application. This can be done by scanning objects from UI mock-ups or screenshots. * One script multi-run technology reduces scripting effort and budget by which you can run one unique script to test multiple platforms. * We can write one code and run it in multiple browsers (Chrome, IE, Firefox anything) and operating systems (Android, Windows, anything). * PDF validation, average colour validation, etc. are better and stable. * We can literally automate anything (not necessarily web applications) using ZAPTEST as it works exactly as a human eye and doesn't dig into application codes. * Partial OCR and block recognization are game changers. * JIRA and ALM integration
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"They've all been really satisfied with the scalability of the HPE products."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is virtualization."
"This is a solution that's easy to use and it also gives us the possibility to use real devices connected either on the Mobile Center server or on our own computers and it works with both iOS and Android devices."
"For automation testing, the tool provides the record and playback option, which helps with object detection easily."
"The solution is easy to use. There are features to orchestrate mobile testing, including mobile testing automation. You can test different devices at the same time."
"There are numerous valuable features such as automation, the ones that facilitate importing and synchronization capabilities between our platform, Jira, and Azure DevOps."
"The solution provides a controlled device farm with the right devices (selected based on analytics), that are readily available (can be reserved), have the right app and can be used for manual or automated tests."
"We escalate tickets to HPE, and we don't have problems."
More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web pros
"Using ZAPTEST, we can write our codes just after the functional docs are prepared, and we can straight away start testing the application in the system testing phase itself."
"On average, I get two cycles per week and that only requires the attention of two people; it saves us a lot of time and gets us to production quicker."
"Customer service is excellent."
"Customer service has been ZAPTEST's forte; very prompt and helpful."
"The biggest thing this product has done for us is allow us to automate a feature that other commercial and open source tools couldn't do for us."
"Customer Service: This is where they truly shine! If we suggest a feature, a new version appears in days with that feature fully realized and working."
"Our ROI is 100%."
 

Cons

"Because of connection errors, we've haven't yet been able to set it up properly at my company."
"We like to host the tools centrally. We would need them to be multi-tenants, so different projects could log on and have their own set of devices and their own set of apps, and they wouldn't see data from other projects that are using it."
"I don't think the product as it is right now is going to sell itself, but it's really what are the next steps."
"We like to host the tools centrally. We would need them to be multi-tenants, so different projects could log on and have their own set of devices and their own set of apps, and they wouldn't see data from other projects that are using it."
"We need to scale devices easily. Some customers would like to loop in AWS or other cloud providers to check if their devices have the cloud factor. OpenText UFT Digital Lab needs to improve it."
"They should introduce a pay-per-use subscription model."
"However, it is still a young product that is improving leaps and bounds each release."
"For the most part, the key challenge is ensuring that customers fully utilize the product as intended and adopt the appropriate frameworks to implement the solutions effectively."
More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web cons
"I would say the test results features could be made more advanced with options like pie charts, graphs, etc. To be able to visualize the data would be helpful to us."
"We cannot have more than one Object Repository for one test."
"The save function should be fixed so that I no longer have to add a space to a step and then follow it with a backspace to reenable the save icon."
"The documentation is not keeping up with the rapid development, and updates are very fast."
"We have used multiple data files types as inputs to our existing automation and this product is currently only supporting CSV."
"A few objects on the .NET platform are not getting identified precisely among similar objects."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"While the pricing may seem relatively high, when compared to competitors, it often falls in line or can even be more cost-effective."
"The product could be more affordable."
"OpenText UFT Digital Lab's pricing is average, and I rate it a five out of ten."
Information not available
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
12%
Computer Software Company
12%
Non Profit
10%
Performing Arts
7%
Manufacturing Company
23%
Outsourcing Company
11%
Healthcare Company
9%
University
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise13
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise5
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Micro Focus UFT Mobile?
For automation testing, the tool provides the record and playback option, which helps with object detection easily.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT Mobile?
Digital Lab is a pretty solid product with areas that could be continuously improved on.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Micro Focus UFT Mobile?
I deal with OpenText Analysis Database and Core Performance Engineering, which are categories of software rather than individual pieces. We focus on the ADM area, which includes ALM, UFT One, UFT D...
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

Sauce Labs vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web Logo
Sauce Labs vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web
Compared 7% of the time
Perfecto vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web Logo
Perfecto vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web
Compared 7% of the time
ReadyAPI vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web Logo
ReadyAPI vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web
Compared 6% of the time
Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web Logo
Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web
Compared 5% of the time
Telerik Test Studio vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web Logo
Telerik Test Studio vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web
Compared 4% of the time
More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web Competitors
SmartBear TestComplete vs ZAPTEST Logo
SmartBear TestComplete vs ZAPTEST
Compared 14% of the time
OpenText Functional Testing vs ZAPTEST Logo
OpenText Functional Testing vs ZAPTEST
Compared 12% of the time
OpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs ZAPTEST Logo
OpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs ZAPTEST
Compared 9% of the time
Worksoft Certify vs ZAPTEST Logo
Worksoft Certify vs ZAPTEST
Compared 7% of the time
Parasoft SOAtest vs ZAPTEST Logo
Parasoft SOAtest vs ZAPTEST
Compared 7% of the time
More ZAPTEST Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web
March 2026
OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web reportDownload OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web product report
Buyer's Guide
ZAPTEST
February 2026
ZAPTEST reportDownload ZAPTEST product report
 

Also Known As

Micro Focus UFT Digital Lab, Micro Focus UFT Mobile, Mobile Center, Micro Focus Mobile Center, HPE Mobile Center
No data available
 

Overview

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web offers integration with HPE and non-HPE tools, real device testing, and device management. It supports real-time analytics and multi-platform testing, ensuring traceability and flexibility with decentralized devices.

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is designed to enhance testing efficiency for mobile and desktop applications by allowing ease of integration with different testing environments. It features real-time analytics, supports automated device management, and provides the flexibility of decentralized testing on real devices. With a focus on robust traceability, it stands out as a comprehensive choice for optimizing software development life cycles, especially notable for its ability to support multiple devices simultaneously and strategic scaling through network virtualization and AWS device farm.

What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing Lab?
  • Ease of Use: Intuitive interface facilitating user engagement.
  • Integration: Compatible with HPE and non-HPE tools for improved workflow.
  • Real Device Testing: Ensures testing on actual devices for accurate results.
  • Automation: Advanced capabilities streamline repetitive testing.
  • Device Management: Flexible management of decentralized devices.
  • Multi-Platform Support: Simultaneous testing across various platforms.
  • Traceability: Strong application delivery traceability for robust tracking.
What benefits should users look for in reviews?
  • Scalability: Ability to handle multiple devices and scale as needed.
  • Flexibility: Deployment options include both on-premises and cloud-based solutions.
  • Real-Time Analytics: Provides actionable insights for data-driven decisions.
  • Enhanced Performance: Optimizes the software development lifecycle.
  • Comprehensive Testing: Facilitates thorough functional and performance testing.

Financial services companies utilize OpenText Functional Testing Lab for optimizing mobile solutions and applications, ensuring a streamlined integration into their Application Lifecycle Management and Unified Functional Testing processes. It aids in functional and performance testing, adapting to both on-premises and cloud deployments to suit industry-specific demands.

OpenText
ZAPTEST is software test automation solution for testing applications cross-platform. ZAPTEST allows testing any GUI based software on any modern OS mobile or conventional that includes iOS; Android; WinMo; Blackberry; Windows; Mac; and Linux. ZAP 1Script technology allows users to script test procedure once and execute it on any correspondent application on any platform and environment. ZAP MultiRun technology offers execution of the same test script on multiple workstations and mobile devices at once, and expedites time to test execution. zapFARM offers mobile and conventional device management, by using distributed and multi-site devices and management of devices and users. ZAPTEST is software test automation solution for testing applications cross-platform. ZAPTEST allows testing of any GUI based software on any modern OS, mobile or conventional including iOS; Android; WinMo; Blackberry; Windows; Mac; and Linux, as well as supports testing of Agile and CI development. ZAP main technologies are ZAPTEST; ZAP-fiX; MultiRun; and zapFARM With over 15 years of industry experience implementing test automation processes ZAP also offers professional help to allows enterprises with testing best practices implementing ZAPTEST. Using ZAPTEST test automation teams reducing time to test development and maintenance, expedite test execution cross-platform and manage devices under test remotely within organization
ZAPTEST
 

Sample Customers

Bci, BPER Services, Die Mobiliar, Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare, HPE, Independent Health, Shanghai OnStar Telematics, Pick n Pay, UCB
AT&T, Ally Financial, Inc. Standard & Poors, Comcast, Boeing Employee Credit Union, Nordstroms, Bank of New Zealand, Aviva France, Delta Airlines, First National Bank of South Africa, Leukemia & Lymphoma Society, American Well, SuperValu, 24 Hour Fitness, Inc., Lexis Nexis, Cspire Wireless, GE Intelligent Systems, Accenture, Shelter Mutual Insurance, Agco
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. ZAPTEST
March 2026
Free Report: OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. ZAPTEST
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. ZAPTEST and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. ZAPTEST report.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.