HPE Zerto Software vs vRanger [EOL] comparison

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Quest Software are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. Additionally, 98% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of Quest Software users who would recommend it.

HPE Zerto Software

Read 344 HPE Zerto Software reviews

15,285 Views
8,712 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

vRanger [EOL]

Read 1 vRanger [EOL] review

50% willing to recommend

HPE Zerto Software

vRanger [EOL]

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 26, 2025

HPE Zerto Software and vRanger EOL compete in the disaster recovery and backup solutions category. HPE Zerto Software demonstrates an advantage with its advanced features and resilience capabilities, making it a preferred choice.

Features: HPE Zerto Software provides continuous data protection, granularity in recovery points, and advanced orchestration and automation. vRanger EOL offers backup and replication, appreciated for its simplicity and rapid recovery.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HPE Zerto Software offers a streamlined deployment process and robust support resources. vRanger EOL provided straightforward installation, but post-EOL support is diminished.

Pricing and ROI: HPE Zerto Software may have higher initial costs but provides a strong ROI due to featured resilience and support. vRanger EOL, known for lower setup costs, lacks ongoing ROI due to EOL status and absence of updates.

To learn more, read our detailed Backup and Recovery Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Backup and Recovery

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,707 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE Zerto Software

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

344

Ranking in other categories

Backup and Recovery (2nd), Cloud Migration (1st), Cloud Backup (2nd), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (1st)

vRanger [EOL]

Average Rating

9.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

David Riberdy

Enterprise data management supervisor at a insurance company with 1,001-5,000 employees

An all-in-one and cost-efficient solution that does what it promises

Zerto is very easy to use. Installation is about half an hour, and then it starts protecting the data and VMs. It is not very cumbersome. The UI is built very well. It is fairly self-explanatory. To be able to stand up a product you have never seen in half an hour and get it functioning and protecting speaks to how good the UI and workflow are. Zerto has near-synchronous replication. As a change is made on site A, it gets copied across the network to site B. We are five or six seconds behind production. If I have a heavily used system and I use traditional backups, I could be anywhere from 5 minutes to 23 hours behind. With Zerto, I am single-digit seconds behind. That works well for us. Our disaster recovery test, which used to span an entire week, now takes two days. We used to recover our servers in the first two or three days with a backup product and then test for two days before tearing it all down. Now, we spend half a day on new servers and ensuring things work with networking, etc. We test the next day, and we are done in two days. Across the entire company, we are able to save significant man-hours by shortening the test from a week to two days. We are now doing smaller tests once a month and larger tests once a year. Zerto has reduced our DR testing time by 60% to 70%. We are also able to do more disaster recovery testing. Previously, we were doing it once a year, whereas now, we are doing smaller tests once a month and our large tests once a year. In recovery point objectives, we are single-digit seconds behind. In terms of RTOs, I can recover 350 VMs in 30 minutes. It takes less than several seconds to restore a single VM. From days to 30 minutes for 350 compared to 100 VMs is an incredible time-saving in terms of RTOs and RPOs for us.

Read full review

it_user411396

Senior Systems Engineer at a aerospace/defense firm with 5,001-10,000 employees

It's easy to use and restore. Tech support is also good.

Easy to use and restore. Restoring when there is issue. Backup bigger virtual machines (VMs). Six years. No. Some big servers don't seem to backup well. Good. Straightforward. It's easy to use.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user159711

Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Nov 9, 2014

VMware SRM vs. Veeam vs. Zerto

Disaster recovery planning is something that seems challenging for all businesses. Virtualization in addition to its operational flexibility, and cost reduction benefits, has helped companies improve their DR posture. Virtualization has made it easier to move machines from production to…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	90
Midsize Enterprise	87
Large Enterprise	197

No data available

Questions from the Community

What advice do you have for others considering Oracle Data Guard?

Ik fluister:VM Host Oracle en DataGuard hebben we per toeval vervangen door Zerto :-) tijdens de Zerto implementatie en VPG werden de Host Data in write-ack Block-Level gerepliceerd. Qua licentie 1...

See all answers

What do you like most about Zerto?

Its ability to roll back if the VM or the server that you are recovering does not come up right is also valuable. You have the ability to roll back a few seconds or a few minutes. The rollback feat...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zerto?

From a pricing perspective, HPE Zerto Software is expensive in comparison to other products on the market, but I think it is an easier sell because it works so well and it is so easy to set up a de...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Veeam Data Platform vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 14% of the time

VMware Live Recovery vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 5% of the time

Rubrik vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 5% of the time

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 5% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 5% of the time

More HPE Zerto Software Competitors

Bocada Enterprise vs vRanger [EOL]

Compared 25% of the time

N-able Cove Data Protection vs vRanger [EOL]

Compared 22% of the time

NetVault Plus vs vRanger [EOL]

Compared 22% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs vRanger [EOL]

Compared 18% of the time

Veritas Backup Exec vs vRanger [EOL]

Compared 13% of the time

More vRanger [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HPE Zerto Software

January 2026

Download HPE Zerto Software product report

Buyer's Guide

Backup and Recovery

January 2026

Download vRanger [EOL] product report

Also Known As

Zerto Virtual Replication

No data available

Overview

Zerto is used for disaster recovery, business continuity, data migration, and ransomware recovery, providing continuous data protection and near real-time replication. Valued for ease of use, efficient failover processes, and versatile integration, it enhances organizational efficiency, reduces errors, and boosts productivity.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

vRanger [EOL] was a backup and recovery software tailored for virtual environments, specifically designed to support VMware infrastructures. Known for its reliability, it became a go-to tool for IT professionals seeking efficient data protection solutions in their virtual data centers.

With a focus on securing virtual environments, vRanger [EOL] provided comprehensive backup and recovery capabilities. It enabled quick restoration processes that were essential for maintaining high availability and minimizing downtime. Targeted at enterprises relying on virtual machines, it offered features that streamlined backup operations and optimized resource allocation, ensuring that critical data stayed protected across complex infrastructures.

What were the critical features of vRanger [EOL]?

Image-Level Backups: Streamlined the backup process by capturing complete VM images.
Deduplication: Reduced storage requirements through efficient data deduplication techniques.
Replication: Enhanced disaster recovery efforts with virtual machine replication.
Multi-Platform Support: Supported various VMware platforms ensuring compatibility.

What benefits and ROI were noted with vRanger [EOL]?

Cost Efficiency: Lower storage costs due to deduplication.
Time Savings: Quick backup and recovery processes reduced downtime.
Scalability: Easily scaled to accommodate growing virtual environments.
Security: Ensured data integrity and availability with robust recovery options.

In industries like finance and healthcare, which require stringent data recovery solutions, vRanger [EOL] was implemented to provide dependable backup operations. Its features facilitated compliance with data protection regulations, allowing businesses to safeguard sensitive information efficiently.

Quest Software

Sample Customers

United Airlines, HCA, XPO Logistics, TaxSlayer, McKesson, Insight Global, American Airlines, Tencate, Aaron’s, Grey’s County, Kingston Technologies

University of Miami

Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Commvault and others in Backup and Recovery. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.