

XM Cyber and Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform are competing cybersecurity products. While XM Cyber offers valuable strategic threat analysis, Zscaler's expansive Zero Trust architecture gives it a competitive edge with its comprehensive features.
Features: XM Cyber provides continuous attack simulation, automatic remediation, and focuses on mapping vulnerabilities through network choke points. Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform includes strong Zero Trust network access, seamless VPN-free connections with single-side logon, and integrated CASB solutions for enhanced security.
Room for Improvement: XM Cyber could enhance integration with existing security tech to reduce reliance on overlapping tools, improve its user interface for easier navigation, and expand on threat visibility and reporting features. Zscaler's initial deployment complexity could be streamlined, its response time for updates and patches improved, and its cost structure made more flexible to cater to varying client needs.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: XM Cyber integrates smoothly with existing infrastructure and provides solid customer support. Zscaler is recognized for its cloud-native design, allowing swift deployments and centralized management but sometimes requiring more initial configuration effort.
Pricing and ROI: XM Cyber is cost-effective with its competitive setup costs and effective threat management yielding high ROI. Zscaler, while more expensive initially, offers significant long-term security benefits that many find to justify the cost due to its comprehensive security approach.
There was a specific issue that our other security tooling did not pick up, but XM Cyber did.
It's reduced the timescale to remediate vulnerabilities that are identified as representing a high risk.
When I see that I am trying to cut costs, for example, even when replacing Prisma, we have managed to save about over half a million dollars a year.
We don't have to purchase many components such as load balancers and proxy servers that were necessary in traditional setups.
The customer support is fantastic; it's probably some of the best we've received across all our security vendors.
Customer support for XM Cyber is good, responsive, and it follows up on issues.
Sometimes, support takes time since the solution has some bugs that need fixing.
They have provided the numbers and contact supports, and it is almost immediate.
Its scalability is great; it's easy to deploy and fully scalable.
We have not experienced any issues with scalability or reached its limits.
The only limitation I was mentioning is that it was unable to identify the sources of vulnerability, which they are going to embed by the mid of this year.
We have quite a complex and large IT estate, and we've certainly experienced no limitations or problems arising from the ability of XM Cyber's product to scale across that estate.
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform is very stable.
We push the boundaries with digital twins; I understand XM Cyber uses a similar concept of graph databases to map environments.
They could improve support because when we need to create a super case and escalate to resolve with technical support, they resolve our ticket in approximately two weeks.
The part that can be improved is the mobile exposure and the IBM i specific equipment.
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform probably needs to be more efficient because scanning takes a lot of time.
They might be able to identify if something is missing with Zscaler.
We have a large, complicated estate, and in the licensing discussions, we were keen not to have the cost balloon because of the complication, the number of PCs and servers that we have.
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform is much, much cheaper when comparing price.
Our loss exposure amount has reduced significantly, leading to two big wins: our loss exposure amount has gone down, and we have direct savings from focusing our team's time on what's important, allowing them to work on other business benefits and generate value for the company.
By far, the best feature of XM Cyber is being able to map out the way vulnerabilities can be exploited based on what they call the choke points in the network where the path that a bad actor would take comes closest to assets within our environment that are most vulnerable but also most valuable.
XM Cyber allows us to quantify the risk, and we are able to track remediation, so we can quantify the risk at an executive level and also to a technical IT team.
The solution is cloud-based with the latest inspection engines, which I find to be amazing.
We have excellent account management, smooth marketplace engagement, and processing in how my team or organization uses Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform.
Since we started using Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform, it has auto-configuration, and wherever we have deployed the auto-configuration, we have not encountered any problem.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| XM Cyber | 12.0% |
| Pentera | 15.6% |
| Cymulate | 14.7% |
| Other | 57.7% |
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform | 9.7% |
| Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks | 12.3% |
| Cato SASE Cloud Platform | 10.2% |
| Other | 67.8% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 16 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 42 |
XM Cyber is a leading hybrid cloud security company that’s changing the way innovative organizations approach cyber risk. Our attack path management platform continuously uncovers hidden attack paths to your critical assets across cloud and on-prem environments, so you can cut them off at key junctures and eradicate risk with a fraction of the effort. This overcomes the big disconnect that security teams experience when they’re presented with endless alerts, yet can’t see which exposures impact risk the most, how they come together to be exploited by an attacker, or how to efficiently eliminate them. This approach is a complete game-changer, which is why some of the world’s largest, most complex organizations choose XM Cyber to help eradicate risk. Founded by top executives from the Israeli cyber intelligence community, XM Cyber has offices in North America, Europe, and Israel.
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange enhances security with seamless cloud-based connectivity and VPN-less operation, offering integration with multiple identity providers and advanced security features, suitable for remote work environments.
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange provides secure, adaptive connectivity without traditional VPNs, allowing organizations to replace legacy systems and bolster remote work security. The platform offers cloud-based protection, single sign-on, dynamic URL categorization, and scalable solutions. While advanced security features like DLP and threat protection enhance data protection, users may face issues with speed, connectivity, and some customization options. Integration challenges, latency due to multi-tenant hosting, reporting delays, and licensing costs require consideration. It supports secure internet access and private application security, ensuring traffic control and data compliance.
What are the key features of Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange?
What are the benefits of using Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange?
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange is deployed across industries to secure remote access and enforce zero trust principles. Organizations in finance, healthcare, and technology sectors utilize it for secure internet access and visibility into cloud applications, enhancing performance and compliance in dynamic environments.
We monitor all Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.