Top 10 CoreOS Clair Alternatives

4.3 out of 5

2 reviews
100% willing to recommend

Top CoreOS Clair Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to CoreOS Clair based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Snyk, and SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Red Hat Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Red Hat, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks

4.2 out of 5

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks

4.2 out of 5

CoreOS Clair offers efficient vulnerability analysis for Docker containers and integrates well with CI/CD pipelines. In comparison, Prisma Cloud provides extensive cloud-native security features, making it suitable for enterprises needing comprehensive protection, despite a more complex initial setup.

Download CoreOS Clair vs. Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Report

Pricing

CoreOS Clair's setup cost is generally lower, catering to users with budget constraints, while Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, with a higher setup cost, targets organizations seeking comprehensive security solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Snyk

4.0 out of 5

Snyk

4.0 out of 5

CoreOS Clair offers cost-effectiveness and straightforward integration in container ecosystems. In comparison, Snyk provides comprehensive programming language coverage, real-time monitoring, and superior security analysis, making it valuable for diverse development environments seeking enhanced features and customer support.

Download CoreOS Clair vs. Snyk Report

Pricing

CoreOS Clair setup costs are generally lower than Snyk, which is reflected in its basic offerings. In contrast, Snyk may require a higher initial investment, often offset by its extensive feature set.

View comparison

Pricing

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security

4.4 out of 5

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security

4.4 out of 5

CoreOS Clair excels in container vulnerability scanning and CI/CD tool integration. In comparison, SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security offers end-to-end protection and automated threat response. CoreOS Clair is easier to deploy, while SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security provides superior customer support and extensive features.

Download CoreOS Clair vs. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Report

Pricing

CoreOS Clair has a relatively low setup cost, while SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security comes with a higher initial expense. The disparity in setup costs highlights key differences between the products.

View comparison

Pricing

Qualys VMDR

4.2 out of 5

Qualys VMDR

4.2 out of 5

Qualys VMDR excels with its comprehensive platform combining asset discovery and vulnerability assessment, ideal for enterprises with broad security needs. In comparison, CoreOS Clair caters to specialized container security, appealing to DevOps teams seeking detailed static analysis and open-source flexibility.

Download CoreOS Clair vs. Qualys VMDR Report

Pricing

Qualys VMDR offers a straightforward setup with an initial cost, whereas CoreOS Clair provides a budget-friendly setup with minimal initial expenditure, highlighting a key difference in cost structure between the two solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

JFrog Xray

3.9 out of 5

JFrog Xray

3.9 out of 5

CoreOS Clair offers simplicity and integration capabilities, appealing for those valuing cost-effectiveness and quick ROI. In comparison, JFrog Xray's extensive vulnerability database and deeper scanning capabilities make it a robust choice for long-term value despite higher pricing. JFrog Xray is preferred for its customer service.

Download CoreOS Clair vs. JFrog Xray Report

Pricing

CoreOS Clair has a lower setup cost, while JFrog Xray requires a higher initial investment. The setup process for Clair is simpler compared to Xray, which has more complex initial configuration steps.

View comparison

Pricing

Aqua Cloud Security Platform

4.0 out of 5

Aqua Cloud Security Platform

4.0 out of 5

CoreOS Clair excels in efficient vulnerability scanning and tool integration, making it ideal for streamlined security needs. In comparison, Aqua Cloud Security Platform offers comprehensive features like real-time alerts and compliance reports. CoreOS Clair is more cost-effective, while Aqua Cloud Security Platform provides higher ROI with extensive capabilities.

Download Aqua Cloud Security Platform vs. CoreOS Clair Report

Pricing

CoreOS Clair has a low initial setup cost, making it accessible for smaller teams, while Aqua Cloud Security Platform requires a higher upfront investment, reflecting its extensive features and robust security capabilities. Clair offers cost-efficiency, whereas Aqua provides comprehensi...

View comparison

Pricing

Trivy

4.3 out of 5

Trivy

4.3 out of 5

Trivy is used for security scanning in codebases, container images, microservices, and Kubernetes environments. Organizations integrate it into CI/CD pipelines for automatic scans. Benefits include easy setup and comprehensive scanning. Installation is simple. Users request better reporting, faster scanning, and more integration with cloud services. They recommend improving awareness efforts.

Download CoreOS Clair vs. Trivy Report

Pricing

Trivy is an open-source product.

View comparison

Pricing

Trivy is an open-source product.

Sysdig Secure

4.1 out of 5

Sysdig Secure

4.1 out of 5

CoreOS Clair offers straightforward vulnerability scanning and integration capabilities, making it cost-effective. In comparison, Sysdig Secure excels with advanced runtime security and compliance features, justifying its higher price with significant long-term ROI. CoreOS Clair's primary challenge is usability, while Sysdig Secure faces performance issues.

Download CoreOS Clair vs. Sysdig Secure Report

Pricing

CoreOS Clair has a low initial setup cost, while Sysdig Secure's setup cost is relatively higher, reflecting its wide range of advanced features and comprehensive solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

CoreOS Clair has a low initial setup cost, while Sysdig Secure's setup cost is relatively higher, reflecting its wide range of advanced features and comprehensive solutions.

Tenable.io Container Security

4.0 out of 5

Tenable.io Container Security

4.0 out of 5

Tenable.io Container Security focuses on advanced features like CI/CD pipeline integration, automated threat detection, and workflow automation. In comparison, CoreOS Clair offers granular vulnerability scanning and open-source flexibility. Tenable.io requires performance tuning, while CoreOS Clair needs better documentation and wider format support.

Download CoreOS Clair vs. Tenable.io Container Security Report

Pricing

Tenable.io Container Security involves higher setup costs, while CoreOS Clair offers a more economical setup. Differences in initial investment impact budget planning for these container security solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

CrowdSec Security Engine

1 out of 5

CrowdSec Security Engine

1 out of 5

Users utilize CrowdSec Security Engine for real-time threat detection and mitigation. It blocks malicious IPs, provides dynamic security measures against cyber attacks, and offers comprehensive visibility into network traffic. CrowdSec's real-time collaborative threat intelligence, powerful automation, easy integration, and open-source nature are appreciated, though documentation and configuration could be improved.

View comparison

Related categories

Container Security

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM)