Fortinet FortiWLM Reviews

Our customers are essential. We install the solution and provide support alongside our customers. Any company needing to integrate with a single vendor for firewall, switching, and endpoint solutions should work with us.

The solution is controlled from one device and one GUI for all devices.

Improving support and firmware upgrades is necessary. Firmware upgrades and bug improvements need to be tested well. This summarizes my wishes for enhancing the system.

I have been working with the solution for six years.

For our project and our software, there are scalability issues.

In Egypt, the Fortinet support team assists us quickly. If we encounter any bugs, they inform us of the recommended configuration and firmware to resolve our problems.

Positive

I find Fortinet easy to configure, easy to set up, and easy to stop support. It is simple for anything.

The price is competitive. I've compared it to the likes of Aruba or TP-Link.

I rate Fortinet eight out of ten. I like all Fortinet products. I work with them, sell them to my customers, install, and support them. 

I appreciate their secure connection through FortiWLM, and how it scans any port and connection with FortiSwitch and FortiX Point by FortiGate. These are the main features I love. 

We provide wireless access to customers as per the business case. The primary preferences of clients are usually to choose Fortinet, Ubiquiti, or Cisco, as these offer free consumer-based options built into the FortiGate firewall. This reduces costs and provides a unified space where we can deploy valid policies and enable first-time monitoring.

Regarding cost and financials, customers do not need to purchase an additional controller and can scale and expand as their business needs dictate. This is one of the major features in terms of cost and financial management. Additionally, we can from a single console, deploy and push firewall policies, monitor everything, lock and give access, and extend and scale easily. Furthermore, stability, adaptability, performance, and low interference of other frequencies are all managed by radio bands. This is why Fortinet is suitable for the customer.

The Fortinet FortiWLM system can be controlled through the cloud controller, which is convenient when the solution is not installed in our environment, as it allows us to manage the entire WiFi or access points and provides more adaptability.

In comparison to the Extreme and UBNT wireless solutions, we find that Fortinet falls short in terms of validity management, practice management, and firmware arrangement.

The initial setup is complex and has room for improvement.

I would like to have some customized modifications to the radio bands so that we can see which is interfering with the wireless IP. If FortiWLM could provide a tool where the user could generate a heat map of the space in which the FortiWLM is operating, this would be a valuable addition to the solution. Most organizations rely on their existing knowledge of wireless before deploying a wireless solution. When we look at the market, we see many more commercial products which provide comprehensive tools. Fortinet has the basic tool, but I don't use it because it is not flexible enough. If Fortinet could provide us with flexible customization of band management, and add a special dashboard where the user can see other devices and settings, as well as a tool to generate a heat map in the next version, this would greatly improve the solution.

I have been using the solution for one year.

The solution is stable.

The scalability is an eight out of ten.

We have used the solution in enterprise-level organizations but it is primarily for SMBs.

The initial setup is complex, especially with regard to the bad software, complex system integration with the existing infrastructure, integration with multi-factor authentication, and integration with industrial equipment. The solution also supports the industry's portables. However, the UC does not have an extensive list of industries for the portables.

Before implementing, we analyze our customer's requirements and discuss their budget, so we consider the financial aspect. Then, we recommend a customized, scalable, and flexible solution that not only meets their current requirements but also has the potential to last for the next five years. This is why we can plan and execute the solution in such a way that the customer can scale it up for the next five years.

In the last few years, due in part to the impact of COVID on the market, Fortinet has increased its prices by 35 percent.

I give the solution a seven out of ten.

Most of our customers prefer Cisco over Fortinet due to their longevity of almost 40 years and superior security protocols. Cisco has developed its own set of protocols, giving them flexible options to integrate and coordinate with many open-source centers, and providing excellent integration.

Fortinet FortiWLM is a good solution and I recommend it.

The solution is used as a wireless router.

The most valuable feature of the solution is the management.

The technical support response time can use improvement.

The pricing for the solution is expensive and can be improved.

I have been using the solution for eight years.

I give the stability a nine out of ten.

I give the scalability an eight out of ten.

The technical support team is knowledgeable but the response time can be improved.

Positive

I give the initial setup a nine out of ten. I like the way FortiGate devices manage the FortiAPs. Each AP takes between five and ten minutes to adapt to the FortiGate.

The solution is expensive. I give the solution a one out of ten for the price.

I give the solution a nine out of ten.

At our company we're using mainly Fortinet, instead of, say, Cisco, for firewalls and other networking solutions that we offer to customers, and right now, we only have one customer who uses FortiWLM. Unfortunately the customer was not able to properly perform a site survey during the initial project, so they now have a few problems with their WiFi network. However, we don't attribute the problems they have encountered to FortiWLM itself. The customer did not follow the instructions during the installation when we asked them to position the access points in specific sections so as not to interfere with each other.

Because of this, our experience with FortiWLM hasn't been very good, and we have not implemented any further FortiWLM solutions for other customers to date. Though, I must emphasize that it was not because of a problem with FortiWLM. It was merely because a proper site survey was not performed from the beginning, and so the positioning of the access points was not optimal.

At the moment, particularly with the COVID-19 situation, the most valuable feature is probably the IPsec VPN, which is easy to implement and manage with Fortinet.

When compared with Sonic Wall and Palo Alto, Fortinet is more straightforward, whereas with the other solutions the procedure to implement the proper IT connections for end users was somewhat more complicated. I think that's a valuable point for Fortinet, when you consider all the SD-WAN technologies that they have. They are straightforward and go well together.

The interface could certainly do with some improvement. We have other customers with WiFi networks, and they always use Ubiquiti. With Ubiquiti, it's a much better user interface, and it is much easier to configure. I managed to get some certificates myself, so I can speak for some features that we need to consider on our wireless networks that are easier to implement with Ubiquiti which aren't so straightforward with Fortinet.

When it comes to Ubiquiti, we have something that we use a lot which is similar to a site survey. Once all the access points are positioned physically inside the office, we can perform a scan on the premises themselves, so the customers can find which channels have more interference, which have less interference, and automatically distribute channels for each access point, and make it so these access points do not cause interference with each other. That feature is extremely useful for us, and it is something that is sorely lacking in Fortinet FortiWLM.

With FortiWLM, we have to perform that type of survey manually, discovering which channels have less interference, and then manually distribute these channels to each access point.

My impressions on stability are good. 

It is certainly scalable.

The tech support is good. I don't have any complaints. We have a lot of experience interacting with them and more often than not they can successfully work with us on solutions.

We have used Sonic Wall and Palo Alto products before, yet we have definitely found Fortinet to be more straightforward.

The setup is easy. Of course, I don't think it's as easy as with Ubiquiti, as that's a big sales point for them. Fortinet still has some catching up to do in this regard, but the setup is not that difficult compared to other solutions such as Meraki.

Our implementations with Fortinet solutions vary with the customer size. For a small to medium company of up to 200-250 employees, I'd say a team of four specialists would be required.

If we are only using FortiGate and FortiWLM, and if we have more products such as for email and for the client, and for the endpoints, then maybe a specialist just for Fortinet, and four to five extra people.

In general, I would say that at least two engineers would be required for a medium-sized company of about 250 employees. 

To save yourself from increased setup and maintenance costs, I highly recommend undertaking a proper site survey from the beginning. 

Fortinet FortiWLM is a good solution, though I must add that it is of paramount importance that whoever implements any WiFi solution ⁠— be it Fortinet or any other solution ⁠— must complete a site survey. In our experience with currently our only FortiWLM customer, we did not have a good experience, but again, it was simply because they did not perform a proper survey, and there's not much more to said. A site survey is very important.

I would rate Fortinet FortiWLM a seven out of ten. 

We use Fortinet FortiWLM in medical offices.

The most valuable features of this solution are its speed, reliability, and integration with the firewall.

Cost is something that could be improved, but you have to pay for what you get.

 I have been dealing with Fortinet FortiWLM for three years.

The series we are using is 431F.

The stability of Fortinet FortiWLM is phenomenal.

The scalability is exceptional. You can integrate into the firewall and have full visibility on a single pane of glass.

Phenomenal. Fortinet's technical support is outstanding.

Previously, we were using Meraki. We are getting better coverage, better throughput, and a more stable connection with Fortinet FortiWLM.

The initial setup is pretty straightforward. It can be deployed in minutes.

I am a single person responsible to maintain, more than 18 offices and 60 APs. I do everything myself. The single pane of glass and the integration of the complete Fortinet product line, are very easy to deploy and maintain.

The prices are high, but you get what you pay for if you can afford it.

Support contracts typically cost approximately $100.00 per year.

In addition to licensing fees, there are no other costs.

We replaced Meraki, and my advice is that we switched from a mandatory maintenance contract to an optional maintenance contract, which costs significantly less per unit.

I would rate Fortinet FortiWLM a nine out of ten.

I use Fortinet FortiWLM for wireless communication and the internet. 

The solution should improve user capacity. 

I have been working with the solution for three months. 

I rate Fortinet FortiWLM's stability an eight out of ten. 

I rate the tool's scalability a ten out of ten. 

Fortinet FortiWLM's installation was easy. 

The tool offers good returns on business. 

Fortinet FortiWLM's pricing is regular and competitive. 

I rate the product a nine out of ten. 

The most valuable features are central management and the many other features available.

The roaming of Fortinet FortiWLM could improve when comparing it to other solutions. We are missing some of the functionality in the controller. Additionally, they should offer more logs instead of using FortiAnalyzer because all the users will not be using the same thing.

I have been using Fortinet FortiWLM for approximately two weeks.

You need to understand the concept first before you can implement the solution. You need to be familiar with networking first to be able to install Fortinet FortiWLM.

I rate Fortinet FortiWLM an eight out of ten.

The most valuable features are the roaming profile, the mesh, and the performance.

Areas for improvement would be the compatibility with Apple products and cross-platform integration. In the next release, I would like them to include accessibility authentication for user authentication.

I've been using this solution for two and a half years.

The technical support is good.

The initial setup was easy.

I implemented using an in-house team.

Once you install this solution, it just runs properly and gets the job done. I would rate it as ten out of ten.