Grafana Reviews

I copied it on my primary server. I use it to monitor servers. I would say it is a good solution to track all the servers and platforms, specifically the technical platforms.

Grafana has such features that it need not exist on other products.

I had issues with the solution's configuration part. Though I resolved it, the configuration is an area needing improvement since it is the solution's only problem.

I have experience using Grafana. I am a new user of the tool.

Stability-wise, I rate the solution a seven and a half out of ten.

Grafana is a very scalable product. It's a really good product.

I know many people who use Grafana to monitor SuccessFactors.

The setup is not very easy or difficult, so it is in the middle because I faced an issue with it the first time, but the next time, I will configure it and make it work properly and in the correct manner.

To those planning to use the solution, I would say that they need to add the system administrator to use and install Grafana as a monitoring tool to check servers and platforms. It's a good solution to monitor all the platforms.

I rate the overall solution a seven out of ten.

We use Grafana as an APM solution to monitor the performance of our serverless core, like, doctors and containers.

Grafana is a very important tool or product that helps us receive information like alarms, performance, KPIs, and metrics. So Grafana is an important part of our business that helps us to make decisions and plan for business improvement.

The most important feature of Grafana is its alarm formatting capability. Currently, we use the CEMA format to classify alarms according to the callers. For instance, critical alarms are displayed in red, warnings in yellow, and announcement alarms in green. We use Grafana for the formatting of alarms.

The documentation or training provided by Grafana is limited compared to its competitors, like Splunk. Some functionalities are unavailable for us since we use the AWS-managed version of Grafana

I have been using Grafana for three years.

We've never had an outage with Grafana, and its stability is very nice.

Around 25 to 30 people are using Grafana in our organization.

Before using Grafana, we previously used different solutions like PRTG and OpenNMS.

I tried installing Grafana long ago, but it was very hard. Beginners will find that installing Grafana is not as simple as other solutions. You need to have the intermediate or medium-level experience to install Grafana.

Grafana's usability depends on your perspective and function. In my current job, Grafan helps us with serverless solutions. However, Grafana cannot be helpful in monitoring, networking, and interfacing for routers.

My advice to new users of Grafana is to have nice documentation and a good knowledge base before performing tasks like installation or configuration.

Overall, I rate Grafana an eight out of ten.

We use the solution for login and creating dashboards.

The solution provides good integration and accurate application metrics.

The solution's interface could be more accessible.

We have been using the solution for three years.

I refer to the solution's online documentation in case of technical errors.

The solution's initial setup process is complicated. Its complexity depends on the use cases. Also, as it is self-hosted on Grafana cloud, it requires minimum maintenance.

The solution is expensive. Although, its price depends on infrastructure.

I rate the solution a nine.

We use the solution to monitor business applications. It helps us analyze the technical and business metrics. We can find out the reason behind the delays in business processes using it.

They should improve the functioning of the editing tool in the solution's older version.

We have been using the solution since 2018.

I rate the solution's stability as an eight.

It is a scalable solution, but we use it only for one instance. We have over twenty solution users, including support engineers, developers, and system administrators.

The solution's customer service team has several support engineers to address the queries.

The solution's initial setup was straightforward. We have hosted it on Kubernetes installation.

Our team of three DevOps engineers executes the deployment process of the solution.

You need to purchase the solution's license for its commercial use.

It is a powerful solution. I rate it as a nine.

I use the solution to configure new, high performance servers that include application monitoring. 

The solution's application server is easy to use and its overall architecture is better for development. 

It is easy to change and move virtual servers. 

The solution should include online support. 

I have been using the solution for six months. 

The solution is stable. 

The solution is scalable. 

I have not needed technical support. 

The setup is easy. 

Five people on our internal team handle deployments and one person handles ongoing maintenance. 

Our internal team implemented the solution and it occurred quickly with no issues.

I rate the solution a ten out of ten. 

I'm a DevOps Kubernetes consultant and we are customers of Grafana.

Grafana is great when it comes to capacity planning and the solution has a great GUI. It's a very rich product. 

Perhaps the display of the trigger limits should be more efficient because it's difficult to see that in a graph. We also have an issue with flapping where values move up and down and knowing how to deal with that is quite complicated in Grafana.

I've been using this solution for one year. 

The solution is very stable. 

It's easy to scale this solution. 

Customer support is quite efficient. 

Positive

I previously worked for Zabbix. The main difference is in the performance and I prefer Grafana.

The initial setup is relatively simple but it can take a couple of weeks to get a grip on the GUI. We did the set up in-house, using documentation and a couple of training calls. Deployment took about a week. We have five users of Grafana in the company. 

This is a good solution and I recommend it but it's important to have good training and to use the latest version. I rate this solution eight out of 10.