HPE Intelligent Management Center offers extensive features for network device management, monitoring, and interoperability across various equipment, valued for its user-friendly interface, automation, and rapid insights.

| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| HPE Intelligent Management Center | 4.5% |
| Cisco DNA Center | 9.4% |
| OpenText Network Node Manager | 5.5% |
| Other | 80.6% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 3 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 3 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 63 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 32 |
| Large Enterprise | 68 |
HPE Intelligent Management Center is a comprehensive network management platform allowing seamless integration with non-Cisco equipment, aiding in managing diverse environments. It is essential for network device backups, infrastructure monitoring, and comprehensive device management. With its Application Monitor, users gain deep platform insights. The tool offers efficient device interrogation, capable firmware deployment, and customizable reports, significantly enhancing its functionality. Though users find it challenging in configuration and interface intuitiveness, its core capabilities remain respected for network oversight. Additional improvements in documentation and Fortinet Firewall integration would enhance its appeal further.
What are the most important features of HPE Intelligent Management Center?HPE Intelligent Management Center is primarily implemented for network monitoring and infrastructure management. It is crucial for end-to-end tracking, link, switch, and bandwidth management within industries reliant on robust IT frameworks. Leveraging tools like FortiVAF, FortiAnalyzer, and FortiManager creates a comprehensive security infrastructure, enhancing user management and report generation. The focus remains on the core platform, with additional modules used less frequently.
HPE Intelligent Management Center was previously known as HPE IMC.
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Manager ITSM at Lucky Cement Limited | 4.5 | I use HP IMC for network monitoring, backup, and automated configuration. It's stable, scalable, and saves me significant time and cost. Though Fortinet integration needs work, I'm very satisfied and rate it 9/10. |
| Network and Network Performance Monitoring and Diagnostics (NPMD) Expert at Unemployed | 4.0 | I use HPE Intelligent Management Center to manage network switches efficiently, benefiting from its user-friendly interface and quick responses in critical situations. However, it lacks diversity in models, safety features, and online support compared to alternatives like SolarWinds. |
| Network and security manager at SICIO | 3.5 | I use HPE Intelligent Management Center for monitoring and deploying firmware. It offers comprehensive functionality, including customizable reports, but is slow when navigating. It supports SNMP for third-party devices but has limited firmware deployment capabilities beyond HPE. Previously, I used Nagios/Centreon. |
| Network Administrator at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees | 3.5 | I use HPE IMC for network monitoring, appreciating its infrastructure monitoring and stability. I desire more modules and am concerned about its future availability, rating it 7/10 despite its reasonable cost. |
| Team Leader Security Operations with 1,001-5,000 employees | 3.5 | I use this solution primarily for HP patch management. While the interface is easy to use, I've found stability and integration with other devices need improvement, and it's expensive. I recommend it for HP users, rating it 7/10. |
| Consultant at a tech services company with 51-200 employees | 4.5 | I find IMC an exceptionally versatile NMS with unmatched network interrogation and management, delivering significant ROI. However, weak documentation, poor intuition, and cumbersome technical support make for a steep learning curve. |
| Network Engineer at a construction company with 501-1,000 employees | 2.0 | While offering strong interoperability and stability, I found its setup difficult, ease of use poor, and customer service horrible. Scalability and data retention are also issues, making me now prefer alternatives like SolarWinds. |