No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
Huntress Managed SIEM Logo

Huntress Managed SIEM Reviews

Vendor: Huntress
4.3 out of 5

What is Huntress Managed SIEM?

Featured Huntress Managed SIEM reviews

Huntress Managed SIEM mindshare

As of May 2026, the mindshare of Huntress Managed SIEM in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category stands at 1.1%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Huntress Managed SIEM1.1%
Splunk Enterprise Security7.1%
IBM Security QRadar5.2%
Other86.6%
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

PeerResearch reports based on Huntress Managed SIEM reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategorySecurity Information and Event Management (SIEM)May 17, 2026Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersMay 17, 2026Download
ComparisonHuntress Managed SIEM vs Splunk Enterprise SecurityMay 17, 2026Download
ComparisonHuntress Managed SIEM vs IBM Security QRadarMay 17, 2026Download
ComparisonHuntress Managed SIEM vs WazuhMay 17, 2026Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
CrowdStrike Falcon4.33.1%97%140 interviewsAdd to research
Wazuh3.74.6%81%50 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers
Last updated May 17, 2026

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Insurance Company
15%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Educational Organization
8%
Computer Software Company
7%
Outsourcing Company
7%
Government
4%
University
4%
Retailer
4%
Performing Arts
3%
Construction Company
3%
Financial Services Firm
3%
Media Company
3%
Non Tech Company
3%
Healthcare Company
2%
Energy/Utilities Company
2%
Consumer Goods Company
2%
Transportation Company
2%
Wholesaler/Distributor
2%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
2%
Hospitality Company
2%
Pharma/Biotech Company
2%
Legal Firm
2%
Logistics Company
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Religious Institution
1%
Real Estate/Law Firm
1%
Museum Or Institution
1%
Mining And Metals Company
1%
Leisure / Travel Company
1%
Import And Exporter
1%
Marketing Services Firm
1%

Compare Huntress Managed SIEM with alternative products

Learn more about Huntress Managed SIEM

Related questions

 
Huntress Managed SIEM Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Partner Account Manager at a wholesaler/distributor with 51-200 employees4.0I rate Huntress Managed SIEM 8/10 for its simple setup, human-assisted threat detection, and strong ROI, preventing breaches and reducing SOC costs for SMEs. While stable and scalable for smaller entities, I wish for more non-Microsoft integrations and improved customization.
Senior System Administrator at Vatsin technology solutions pvt ltd5.0I find Huntress Managed SIEM excellent, particularly its AI filter that shows only important logs. This saves my team significant time and costs, enabling faster issue resolution and threat identification. It's a stable, scalable solution with very good deployment support, making it highly beneficial for securing infrastructure.
Technical Account Manager at a computer software company with 11-50 employees4.0I find Huntress Managed SIEM excellent for automated threat detection, saving us time. While third-party integration and behavioral analytics need work, its easy deployment, cost-efficiency, and strong support make it an 8/10 product that I would recommend.
Director, Engineering & Services Professional at a computer software company with 51-200 employees4.0I've used Huntress Managed SIEM for nearly a decade; it's reliable with fast MDR response times, though I’d like deeper EDR integration and more SIEM features. Support is decent, and pricing is predictable for MSP planning.
CTO at Accent Consulting4.0We use Huntress Managed SIEM for log collection, benefiting from its single-pane management that integrates with other Huntress security products. However, better exclusion of log types is needed. We switched from Total DYL due to cost and integration advantages.