Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Head Enterprise Platforms at Mashreq
Real User
Add option simplifies scale of production and all production processes
Pros and Cons
  • "Good user interface and good add option."
  • "Could increase vulnerability and security patches to make it more robust."

What is our primary use case?

We currently use IBM BPM in our company to digitize platforms, to ensure that whatever we are currently doing in terms of manual operations, gets digitized. It means that anything a customer needs becomes an STP journey straight through processing instead of requiring any manual work. We chose IBM BPM because of that. I'm the head of enterprise platforms and we're a customer of IBM. 

What is most valuable?

It has a good user interface and I think the easy add option to build features with deployment in six to eight weeks is one of the key features. Also the add option, being an industry linker, simplifies things with the scale of production and all our production processes.

What needs improvement?

We place a lot of importance on security and one area they could make improvements in is to definitely increase the vulnerability and security patches to make it more robust and stable. As a financial institution we're always concerned about product and security vulnerabilities, it's an important parameter. The product could be more competitive in terms of cost. 

In a future release, I'd like to see more business related KPIs that can be measured from a digital transformation perspective. If they could build more on analytics reporting and help businesses to derive more benefits out of the solution that would be beneficial. I think they need to probably make it more business friendly and get more insights based on analytics.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Both stability and scalability are fine. I think we have been able to manage the monumental growth of the processes over the last three to four years. It has been pretty encouraging. It's been a success story for us. 

Buyer's Guide
IBM BPM
April 2025
Learn what your peers think about IBM BPM. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2025.
860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

How are customer service and support?

We get very good support from IBM on whatever issues and challenges we have. I think they are very quick to respond. We have a good, healthy relationship with IBM in this regard.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

I'm pretty sure licensing is on the pricier side, but it depends on the use case and the benefits that you realize from your investment. There are different versions of the product; a standard edition and an advanced edition. Each is based on the number of PC users, CPU's that you license out, and the cost varies based on your instrumentation and the number of processes.

What other advice do I have?

I have no serious complaints, it's basically the combination of pricing and the security vulnerability that are concerns. I think they also repackage a lot of their products within the new upgraded version of IBM BPM, a BAW - Business Automation Workflow. 

For anyone contemplating using this solution, it's important to study the entire landscape of your business operations. A solution needs to be chosen based on your business needs and there are multiple solutions available. If you're a smaller company, for example, there are other tools like Zing that have less scalability, but it's a reasonable alternative. If you're in the big league, then IBM BPM is the way to go forward.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Hybrid Cloud
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Scott Francis - PeerSpot reviewer
Scott FrancisCEO at BP3 Global Inc
Real User

Nice review - I'll offer that if you're looking for easier-to-use UI for IBM BPM/Automation, you might want to check out Brazos UI from BP3. 

See all 2 comments
reviewer1028712 - PeerSpot reviewer
Professional Services Manager at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Real User
A reasonably priced tool that is helpful for the automation of business processes
Pros and Cons
  • "Previously, our company's business automation process was slow. IBM BPM's schedule and response functionalities are excellent...There are countless use cases in which IBM BPM proves to be a valuable tool for my clients."
  • "I hope IBM uses something from IBM Content Navigator to make the interface easier to navigate."

What is our primary use case?

Previously, our company's business automation process was slow. IBM BPM's schedule and response functionalities are excellent. So, our customers are happy with it. We implement the solution for our customers.

My clients utilize IBM BPM for various business processes, ranging from correspondence management and vacation requests to expedited legal cases and numerous committee meetings. There are countless use cases in which IBM BPM proves to be a valuable tool for my clients.

How has it helped my organization?

Our customers have experienced a lot of benefits. So now, they have automation in place to implement internally or externally in their environment. This has enhanced the customer experience and made it good. The product has many BPM tools, which help eliminate bits of work. Also, information is now available and accessible according to their security or role in their businesses. They can now increase their process in the Middle East. They also do manual work using the tool. The tool also helps them ensure that they are able to follow policy compliance. In short, the tool helps in a digital transformation, and so IBM BPM increases the efficiency of our clients. All of the aforementioned reasons increase the revenue of our clients and our company.

What is most valuable?

Customers find the tool's capability to scan and compare it with other products in the market to be valuable. As a top business process management technology, it is comparable to the cloud-based automation tool BAO, which appears to be a fusion of two solutions, IBM BPM and IBM Case Manager. Customers can cover their work-related issues, or problems can be covered with IBM BPM. Customers can streamline their operations and automate certain processes while managing their security. So I believe there are a lot of advantages one can reap using the tool.

What needs improvement?

Currently, the tool's interface is created using a forklift upgrade, which is proving unhelpful. I hope IBM uses something from IBM Content Navigator to make the interface easier to navigate.

In the past, IBM BPM has worked on certain features to make it a container solution.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using IBM BPM for four to five years. I work as a system implementer for IBM. Also, I am using the solution's latest version. We have a lot of customers using it since it is an affordable tool.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It is a scalable solution that can be scaled up or scaled down, including the components or processes of IBM BPM.

Our company handles ten customers using the tool.

How are customer service and support?

The technical support of the solution is excellent.

How was the initial setup?

The level of complexity involved in setting up the system depends on whether the business processes are simple or highly complex. Based on our experiences, we deal with the complex setup required for complex business processes. Our team has gained valuable experience in implementing the product and handling complexities with the help of our customer support.

The tool's deployment model depends on the country where customers are located.

The product itself has a feature to take care of the deployment process.

During the deployment process, the first stage involves development, distinction, and protection. In the second stage, servers are deployed on nodes. As someone from the development side, I do not handle the deployment myself. Instead, we install the solutions and configure the environment on our customers' dashboards. After that, we can deploy our solutions or applications on top of it.

We only need a few people to carry out the deployment process.

The maintenance and deployment of the solution are very easy. Also, installation of the latest release is an easy process.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

I think it's a reasonably priced tool, but it's important to consider which customers should buy this solution. It's designed for enterprise customers, not small ones. Small customers may opt for another solution, a small one, or a resource. However, it's a reasonable tool for enterprise customers, especially for governance purposes in their space. Also, according to IBM's policies, the cost of the solution will increase as the need for it grows. Therefore, the cost varies for different companies. We have been working with many solutions for over 25 years, and we have a lot of enterprise customers in Saudi Arabia. Some of our customers have been with us for 25 years.

What other advice do I have?

I would tell those planning to use the solution that they need to start using it gradually over time before scaling up to achieve the best value from the product. They can eventually implement or automate all of their systems. For me, it is one of the best products globally. Over the years, IBM has been able to merge two solutions into one. For Business processes or integrations and to deal with whatever issues customers face, IBM BPM can help to automate such business processes. Overall, I rate the tool a ten out of ten.

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Implementer
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
IBM BPM
April 2025
Learn what your peers think about IBM BPM. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2025.
860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ismail El-Dahshan - PeerSpot reviewer
CEO at areebah
Real User
Top 10Leaderboard
Scalable solution as adding many offline and online servers is easy
Pros and Cons
  • "Its most valuable features are usability and integration with other IBM products."
  • "The initial setup process is complex for basic users."

What is our primary use case?

We use the solution for multiple business processes and its quality of service feature.

What is most valuable?

The solution's most valuable features are usability and integration with other IBM products.

What needs improvement?

They should include coaches or forms from the back end. We get multiple forms as many implementations are involved, and attaching them to the business processor via phone takes a lot of work. The implementation process could be more accessible.

They should make the integration between BPM and RPA easier. We can have a systematic process using RPA.

For how long have I used the solution?

We have been using the solution for four years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I rate the solution's stability as a seven as we face issues with the snapshots in the processor.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The solution is scalable, as adding many offline and online servers is easy. We have 100-200 customers using the solution.

How was the initial setup?

The solution's initial process is straightforward for professionals. It is complex for basic users.

What about the implementation team?

Our team provides application support and administers the operations for BPM administrator.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The solution is highly-priced.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

I compared the solution with Oracle BPM. The solution is better than Oracle as it's very stable and robust. With its help, you can easily develop, publish, and deploy your work.

What other advice do I have?

It is a good solution overall. I rate it as an eight.

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Partner
PeerSpot user
reviewer1948521 - PeerSpot reviewer
Técnico sênior at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees
Real User
Reliable and simple to use but is expensive
Pros and Cons
  • "The solution is stable."
  • "I'd like the tool to be more flexible."

What is our primary use case?

We primarily use the solution to develop some internal applications and as a business process modeler. It is a way to prototype and start developing applications.

What is most valuable?

The solution provides an easy way to develop. It's simple to use. 

The solution is stable. 

What needs improvement?

I would like them to make the tool more user-friendly in order to make the development process even simpler. They use an outdated programming language. 

I'd like the tool to be more flexible. It should be modernized a bit. It looks outdated. 

The initial setup can be challenging. 

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using the solution for five years. 

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The stability is pretty good. I'd rate it seven out of ten in terms of reliability. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The solution isn't exactly scalable. I'd rate it two out of ten overall. 

How are customer service and support?

Technical support is okay. 

How would you rate customer service and support?

Neutral

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I am also starting to use Cloud Pak.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is challenging. However, once it is done, it's done. It's not hard in the sense that you don't have a lot of other things to do. 

Right now, we are integrating from Cloud Pak. The cloud makes it easy to handle, and we have the help of IBM engineers. Once again, you do it once, and it is done. After that, you are just using it.

I'd rate the initial setup a two out of ten in terms of ease of use. That's in terms of IBM in general, as we have a lot of IBM products. This product has a generally much easier process, however, IBM is hard. 

What about the implementation team?

We did not use a third-party consultant. We worked with IBM engineers. We talked directly to them and were able to set everything up. 

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The solution is expensive. The company may not be of the opinion it is expensive, however, it is expensive when I look at the total cost. I'd rate it eight out of ten in terms of how expensive it is.

What other advice do I have?

We are IBM partners. 

I'd rate the product as a whole six out of ten. It is okay in general. 

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Senior Services Engineer at KENAC COMPUTER SYSTEMS
Real User
Top 20
Covers most pain points but may be too complex for entry-level clients
Pros and Cons
  • "It's a solid product. It covers most of the pain points for clients."
  • "It might not be suitable for entry level clients because it comes with a huge number of modules for processing that at times might not be necessary for upcoming clients."

What is most valuable?

It's a solid product. It covers most of the pain points for clients.

What needs improvement?

It might not be suitable for entry level clients because it comes with a huge number of modules for processing that at times might not be necessary for upcoming clients. It's too complex, but it's suitable for the enterprise level.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using this solution for 10 years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It's stable. We haven't had any issues.

How was the initial setup?

With the business process tool, it needs to be customized according to what the clients want. So, complexities will be there.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The pricing is high.

What other advice do I have?

I would rate this solution 7 out of 10.

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Partner
PeerSpot user
PeerSpot user
Enterprise Architect at Mobiliser
Consultant
Top 5
How to decide which edition of IBM BPM you need

Since the blue-washing of Lombardi, IBM has introduced three variations on the core BPM product in order to provide different entry level costs to customers based on the how they intend to use the product suite.

These levels are defined as

  • Express Edition
  • Standard Edition
  • Advanced Edition

Broadly speaking Express and Standard differ in how the customer is allowed to use the technology where Advanced edition differs in that it allows customers to use WebSphere Process Server (WPS) capabilities which have now been integrated into the technology suite (this includes Integration Designer which is the new WebSphere design too and also Business Spaces)

Update: IBM is introducing additional changes to BPM Advanced edition that will result in a further divergence of the Advanced edition from Standard and Express and have advanced their Cloud offering significantly. More on this later.

WPS has previously been known for strong integration capabilities and Lombardi has been known for strong human centric capabilities so the combination makes sense in larger more complex environments (barring a solution that meets both needs) Purchasing Advanced Edition would be a consideration for anyone wanting those advanced integration capabilities.

From experience I would not recommend Advanced edition for BPM 7.5.x as they were still issues ironing out the blue-washing of the product for full compatibility with the Lombardi Process Center and model. With version 8.x there are a number of improvements with each release but still some gaps leaving it not quite integrated the way it should have been. Version 8.1.x and 8.5.x have improved significantly from the other code streams but I'd recommend a full proof of concept to be conducted before investing the additional cash in Advanced Edition even with the current 8.5.x releases. I'd also call out that Advanced has a number of limitations around integration that many integration specialists would unlikely be satisfied with.

Deciding between Express and Standard is more about licensing restrictions. Express carries restrictions on both authors that can write processes (typically a maximum of 3) and on the number of users that can use the system (typically 200 users) Express is not licensed for use with a scalable architecture so unless your operator base is under 200 people (or 200 logins not concurrent users) and your existing systems don’t need scaling its unlikely Express would serve you. Express seems to be more targeted to proof of concept / first time projects, SMBs and systems for internal use (i.e. HR systems, internal processes that have non-critical SLA’s). Some clients may go Express edition as a form of production trial system then upgrade to Standard if they find the BPM solution can add value in additional areas.

If Express happens to meet your needs the other advantage is its easier to install because it doesn’t support complex advanced configuration options (clusters). Also if your worried about three process authors don’t be. A medium scale project can be completed by three BPM specialists as long as process specialists have a way of capturing requirements in BPMN format or similar. There are plenty of free BPMN tools around and a great cloud based tool called Blueworks live that allows for design of processes at a business level. The bulk of the analysis can therefore be done without using the Process Designer which is more geared towards technical implementation in any case.

Breakdown of features

All editions

  1. Process Designer (BPMN Compatible)
  2. Collaboration and Playback capabilities
  3. Human Centric Form Designer
  4. Very basic ILOG style based process rules (but not using ILOG in all cases)
  5. Real time monitoring and reporting
  6. Optimiser
  7. Performance Data Warehouse
  8. Shared asset repository and Process Center

Express

  • Max 3 Process Authors
  • Max 200 End Users
  • Development / Production 2 / 4 cores
  • Single Server only

Standard

  • Unlimited Authors
  • Unlimited End Users
  • Unlimited Cores (bound to license costs so scalable cost)
  • Clustering

Advanced

  • Unlimited Authors
  • Unlimited End Users
  • Unlimited Cores (bound to license costs so scalable cost)
  • Clustering (Golden Topology is relevant)
  • WebSphere Process Server Compatible
  • New tool Integration Designer (SOA / BPEL / ESB)
  • New tool Business Spaces
  • Transaction Support
  • Integration Adapters
  • New Case Management feature which has been under trail since early 2014

So in summary, Standard Edition is probably going to be the key version that most customers will be happy with as it covers scalability, provides all the key BPM features without adding the burden of having trained WPS staff on hand but still has the ability to integrate with anything using custom developed code. On the sales front I suspect IBM will still get customers to buy into Advanced Edition for “future proofing” or longer term integration with mainly existing WPS customers buying into the offering for reasons founded on technical needs.

Going forward I suspected IBM would direct more features into Advanced Edition to get premiums on licensing from larger customers and this view certainly has recently been proven with the appearance of a basic case management capability available in the Advanced edition of v8.5.5 even though it was originally considered for inclusion for standard edition.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
it_user311346 - PeerSpot reviewer
it_user311346Works at a tech company with 51-200 employees
Real User

Thank you for sharing Paul

See all 2 comments
reviewer1126206 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Account Manager at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Real User
Performs well for both us and our customers
Pros and Cons
  • "The performance is fine."
  • "I would like to see the solution be able to interact with other customer software solutions."

What is our primary use case?

Everything is possible with the solution. We use it for order, personal and production processes. We make use of it in the healthcare and food markets. There are no limits to its use. 

What is most valuable?

Owing to my lack of a technical background, it is difficult for me to state which features are most valuable. 

What needs improvement?

I would like to see the solution be able to interact with other customer software solutions. I am referring to interaction with SSP or other applications from the IT customer management database, in respect of integration in the IBM BPM.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using IBM BPM for six years

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The solution is stable. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The solution is scalable. While this varies with the needs of the customer, we have very good technicians and developers for IBM BPM. As such, it depends on our know-how, although I can say that our customers are satisfied. 

How are customer service and support?

I am not in a position to comment on the support. 

How was the initial setup?

I have never installed the solution and am not aware of the process involved. 

What about the implementation team?

I believe we have 20 persons on the BPM team, consisting of a manager, support people and several developers. 

What other advice do I have?

We use the solution both for our own needs and those of our customers. We have a contract with IBM for the solution, meaning that we offer both cloud-based and on-premises solutions. We provide these products and are partners to the vendor. 

The performance is fine. 

I believe we have 40 customers who make use of the solution.

I would certainly recommend the solution to others. 

I rate IBM BPM as an eight out of ten. 

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Partner
PeerSpot user
Senior J2EE Developer at DataServe
Real User
Top 20
Integrates well, good design, and reliable
Pros and Cons
  • "The integration and design are valuable features."
  • "The interface is limited and should improve in the future."

What is our primary use case?

We use the solution as a business process management platform.

What is most valuable?

The integration and design are valuable features.

What needs improvement?

The interface is limited and should improve in the future. We are having to develop an extended application to avoid the limitation in the interface design.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using the solution for approximately 10 years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I have found the solution to be stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The solution is scalable.

How are customer service and technical support?

We have contacted customer service when we had some issues and it took quite some time. They could be more responsive.

What about the implementation team?

We have an in-house team that does the implementation of the solution.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

When considering the features of the solution the price is expensive compared to competitors.

What other advice do I have?

I recommend this solution to those who have enterprise companies. If the business is small then the price of the solution would not make sense financially because it is expensive.

I rate IBM BPM an eight out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Partner
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Download our free IBM BPM Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
Updated: April 2025
Buyer's Guide
Download our free IBM BPM Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.