Top 10 IBM InfoSphere Information Server Alternatives

Name: IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Brand: IBM
Rating: 4.1 (8 reviews)

Vendor: IBM

4.1 out of 5

8 reviews
100% willing to recommend

Leave a review

Top IBM InfoSphere Information Server Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to IBM InfoSphere Information Server based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC), Azure Data Factory, and SSIS. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. IBM InfoSphere Information Server surpasses its competitors by providing comprehensive data integration and governance capabilities, which ensure seamless connectivity and high-quality data management, fostering efficient decision-making processes and enhanced business intelligence across various industries.

IBM Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with IBM, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC)

4.0 out of 5

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC)

4.0 out of 5

Informatica IDMC appeals to technology buyers with its lower pricing and ease of integration for flexible, cloud-native deployment. In comparison, IBM InfoSphere Information Server offers robust data governance and transformation features, justifying its higher price for enterprises needing comprehensive data management solutions.

Download IBM InfoSphere Information Server vs. Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) Report

Pricing

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) offers flexible setup options with potentially lower costs, whereas IBM InfoSphere Information Server may involve higher initial setup expenses.

View comparison

Pricing

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) offers flexible setup options with potentially lower costs, whereas IBM InfoSphere Information Server may involve higher initial setup expenses.

Azure Data Factory

4.0 out of 5

Azure Data Factory

4.0 out of 5

IBM InfoSphere Information Server excels in data validation and governance, beneficial for data-heavy operations despite its complexity and setup demands. In comparison, Azure Data Factory's scalability, cloud integration, and user-friendly deployment appeal to organizations seeking flexible, agile solutions with quick ROI in cloud environments.

Download Azure Data Factory vs. IBM InfoSphere Information Server Report

Pricing

IBM InfoSphere Information Server typically involves higher initial setup costs compared to Azure Data Factory. Azure Data Factory's lower setup expenses make it more accessible for businesses seeking cost-efficient data integration solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

SSIS

3.8 out of 5

SSIS

3.8 out of 5

SSIS attracts buyers with its affordable cost and smooth integration in Microsoft environments. In comparison, IBM InfoSphere Information Server appeals to enterprises with its advanced data governance and scalability, providing value through comprehensive features for large-scale projects requiring detailed data management.

Download IBM InfoSphere Information Server vs. SSIS Report

Pricing

SSIS generally has a lower setup cost compared to IBM InfoSphere Information Server, which tends to be higher due to its comprehensive features and scalability options.

View comparison

Pricing

SSIS generally has a lower setup cost compared to IBM InfoSphere Information Server, which tends to be higher due to its comprehensive features and scalability options.

Collibra Platform

3.9 out of 5

Collibra Platform

3.9 out of 5

IBM InfoSphere Information Server offers comprehensive data integration with strong transformation and quality features. In comparison, Collibra Platform excels in governance and compliance, providing flexible cloud deployment and proactive customer service, making it appealing for those prioritizing data asset management and strategic governance enhancements.

Download Collibra Platform vs. IBM InfoSphere Information Server Report

Pricing

IBM InfoSphere Information Server typically incurs a higher setup cost compared to the Collibra Platform, which offers a more cost-effective initial setup. Their differing setup expenses highlight distinct financial considerations.

View comparison

Pricing

Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)

4.0 out of 5

Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)

4.0 out of 5

Oracle Data Integrator is valued for cost-effectiveness and user-friendly deployment, appealing to budget-conscious organizations seeking quick returns. In comparison, IBM InfoSphere's advanced data governance and scalability attract those requiring comprehensive metadata management, justifying its higher initial investment and more extensive setup.

Download IBM InfoSphere Information Server vs. Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) Report

Pricing

Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) has lower setup costs compared to IBM InfoSphere Information Server, highlighting a cost-effective advantage for organizations seeking budget-friendly integration solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Oracle GoldenGate

4.1 out of 5

Oracle GoldenGate

4.1 out of 5

Oracle GoldenGate provides ease of use and performance, appealing to businesses needing rapid deployment and data handling. In comparison, IBM InfoSphere Information Server offers comprehensive features and is suitable for complex environments, appealing to companies requiring extensive data management capabilities despite higher costs.

Download IBM InfoSphere Information Server vs. Oracle GoldenGate Report

Pricing

Oracle GoldenGate has a lower setup cost than IBM InfoSphere Information Server, offering a more budget-friendly option. In contrast, IBM InfoSphere Information Server provides a more comprehensive solution, albeit with a higher initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Fivetran

4.1 out of 5

Fivetran

4.1 out of 5

IBM InfoSphere Information Server suits enterprises needing detailed data governance and control. In comparison, Fivetran's affordability and quick setup make it ideal for businesses prioritizing ease and speed, with automated connectors simplifying integration. Tech buyers decide based on complexity needs versus cost-effectiveness.

Download Fivetran vs. IBM InfoSphere Information Server Report

Pricing

IBM InfoSphere Information Server involves significant initial setup costs, while Fivetran offers a more streamlined and cost-effective setup process.

View comparison

Pricing

IBM InfoSphere Information Server involves significant initial setup costs, while Fivetran offers a more streamlined and cost-effective setup process.

Denodo

4.0 out of 5

Denodo

4.0 out of 5

Denodo attracts tech buyers with its affordability and easy integration. In comparison, IBM InfoSphere Information Server appeals with its extensive management features and depth in data processing. Denodo's simplicity contrasts with InfoSphere's comprehensive setup, fitting different organizational needs and investment capabilities.

Download Denodo vs. IBM InfoSphere Information Server Report

Pricing

Denodo's setup cost is often viewed as more competitive compared to IBM InfoSphere Information Server, which is noted for a higher initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Denodo's setup cost is often viewed as more competitive compared to IBM InfoSphere Information Server, which is noted for a higher initial investment.

Qlik Replicate

4.1 out of 5

Qlik Replicate

4.1 out of 5

Qlik Replicate offers efficient data replication with real-time integration and ease of deployment, attracting tech buyers with cost-effective solutions and strong support. In comparison, IBM InfoSphere Information Server provides enterprise-grade data integration emphasizing scalability, quality, and governance, appealing to large-scale, feature-demanding businesses despite higher costs.

Download IBM InfoSphere Information Server vs. Qlik Replicate Report

Pricing

Qlik Replicate has a more straightforward setup cost structure, while IBM InfoSphere Information Server involves potentially higher initial costs. This significant difference may impact budgeting plans.

View comparison

Pricing

Alation Data Catalog

4.0 out of 5

Alation Data Catalog

4.0 out of 5

IBM InfoSphere Information Server excels in scalability and integration, suitable for complex environments with its emphasis on data governance. In comparison, Alation Data Catalog offers user-friendly discovery and collaboration, attracting users with its ease of use and quicker deployment.

Download Alation Data Catalog vs. IBM InfoSphere Information Server Report

Pricing

IBM InfoSphere Information Server involves a higher setup cost than Alation Data Catalog, making it a significant consideration for budget-conscious users. In contrast, Alation offers a more cost-effective setup option while still delivering robust data cataloging features.

View comparison

Pricing

Related categories

Data Integration

Metadata Management

Data Quality