Top 10 Ivanti Virtual Application Delivery Controller (vADC) Alternatives

Name: Ivanti Virtual Application Delivery Controller (vADC)
Brand: Ivanti
Rating: 3.7 (3 reviews)

Vendor: Ivanti

3.7 out of 5

3 reviews
66% willing to recommend

Leave a review Why PeerSpot?

Top Ivanti Virtual Application Delivery Controller (vADC) Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Ivanti Virtual Application Delivery Controller (vADC) based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include NetScaler, F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM), and NGINX Plus. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Ivanti Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Ivanti, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

NetScaler

4.2 out of 5

NetScaler

4.2 out of 5

NetScaler excels in pricing and support efficiency, making it ideal for budget-conscious enterprises. In comparison, Ivanti vADC's advanced features and cloud integration offer greater flexibility for organizations prioritizing innovation. NetScaler's comprehensive support appeals, whereas Ivanti vADC's automation enhances scalability.

Download Ivanti Virtual Application Delivery Controller (vADC) vs. NetScaler Report

Pricing

NetScaler has a higher setup cost compared to Ivanti Virtual Application Delivery Controller (vADC), which offers a more cost-effective initial investment option.

View comparison

Pricing

NetScaler has a higher setup cost compared to Ivanti Virtual Application Delivery Controller (vADC), which offers a more cost-effective initial investment option.

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)

4.1 out of 5

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)

4.1 out of 5

F5 BIG-IP LTM excels in traffic management and security, ideal for complex environments. In comparison, Ivanti vADC features modern architecture with advanced automation, appealing to those needing flexibility and scalability. LTM's reliability contrasts with vADC's straightforward deployment and cloud-native design.

Download F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs. Ivanti Virtual Application Delivery Controller (vADC) Report

Pricing

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) has a higher setup cost than Ivanti Virtual Application Delivery Controller (vADC), which offers a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment.

View comparison

Pricing

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) has a higher setup cost than Ivanti Virtual Application Delivery Controller (vADC), which offers a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment.

NGINX Plus

4.4 out of 5

NGINX Plus

4.4 out of 5

NGINX Plus excels in scalability and cloud integration, attracting those desiring performance and flexibility. In comparison, Ivanti vADC offers advanced security features for industries with strict requirements. NGINX Plus has flexible pricing, whereas Ivanti vADC's higher initial cost provides long-term security-focused value.

Download Ivanti Virtual Application Delivery Controller (vADC) vs. NGINX Plus Report

Pricing

NGINX Plus offers a straightforward setup process with predictable costs, while Ivanti vADC involves a more complex installation with potentially fluctuating expenses.

View comparison

Pricing

NGINX Plus offers a straightforward setup process with predictable costs, while Ivanti vADC involves a more complex installation with potentially fluctuating expenses.

HAProxy

4.2 out of 5

HAProxy

4.2 out of 5

HAProxy is favored for cost-effectiveness, offering reliability and performance with advanced routing and protocol support. In comparison, Ivanti vADC attracts buyers seeking advanced features and dedicated support, with robust security and easy GUI-driven configuration, despite its higher premium pricing.

Download HAProxy vs. Ivanti Virtual Application Delivery Controller (vADC) Report

Pricing

HAProxy offers a low-cost setup, while Ivanti vADC includes a higher initial investment but provides advanced configuration options.

View comparison

Pricing

HAProxy offers a low-cost setup, while Ivanti vADC includes a higher initial investment but provides advanced configuration options.

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

3.7 out of 5

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

3.7 out of 5

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway attracts tech buyers with cost-effectiveness and integration within Azure. In comparison, Ivanti vADC appeals through superior traffic management and flexibility, ideal for complex deployments requiring custom solutions.

Download Ivanti Virtual Application Delivery Controller (vADC) vs. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Report

Pricing

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway includes a straightforward setup process with moderate initial costs, while Ivanti Virtual Application Delivery Controller (vADC) may require a more complex setup with potentially higher upfront expenses, highlighting the variances in deployment inves...

View comparison

Pricing

Kemp LoadMaster

4.7 out of 5

Kemp LoadMaster

4.7 out of 5

Kemp LoadMaster is favored for its affordability and effective support. In comparison, Ivanti vADC offers extensive advanced features suitable for complex needs, appealing to those prioritizing security and processing speeds. Kemp attracts buyers with cost-efficiency, while Ivanti suits those seeking comprehensive functionality.

Download Ivanti Virtual Application Delivery Controller (vADC) vs. Kemp LoadMaster Report

Pricing

Kemp LoadMaster offers a more straightforward setup cost compared to Ivanti vADC, which may have higher initial expenses.

View comparison

Pricing

Kemp LoadMaster offers a more straightforward setup cost compared to Ivanti vADC, which may have higher initial expenses.

A10 Networks Thunder ADC

4.1 out of 5

A10 Networks Thunder ADC

4.1 out of 5

A10 Networks Thunder ADC is known for its competitive pricing and strong support services, making it ideal for cost-focused businesses. In comparison, Ivanti vADC's advanced features and scalability cater to organizations needing flexibility and long-term efficiency.

Download A10 Networks Thunder ADC vs. Ivanti Virtual Application Delivery Controller (vADC) Report

Pricing

A10 Networks Thunder ADC features low setup costs, while Ivanti vADC provides a cost-efficient setup, underscoring affordability differences between the solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

A10 Networks Thunder ADC features low setup costs, while Ivanti vADC provides a cost-efficient setup, underscoring affordability differences between the solutions.

LoadBalancer Enterprise

4.3 out of 5

LoadBalancer Enterprise

4.3 out of 5

LoadBalancer Enterprise provides strong customer support and competitive pricing, attracting buyers focused on cost-efficiency. In comparison, Ivanti vADC's extensive security features and scalable performance enhance its appeal to those needing advanced capabilities, despite a potentially higher initial cost.

Download Ivanti Virtual Application Delivery Controller (vADC) vs. LoadBalancer Enterprise Report

Pricing

LoadBalancer Enterprise offers a simpler and lower setup cost compared to Ivanti vADC, which requires a higher initial investment for configuration.

View comparison

Pricing

LoadBalancer Enterprise offers a simpler and lower setup cost compared to Ivanti vADC, which requires a higher initial investment for configuration.

Amazon Elastic Load Balancing

4.3 out of 5

Amazon Elastic Load Balancing

4.3 out of 5

Amazon Elastic Load Balancing integrates seamlessly with AWS, offering scalability and cost-effectiveness for AWS users. In comparison, Ivanti vADC provides advanced traffic management and control, ideal for environments needing tailored solutions despite higher initial costs and setup complexity.

Download Amazon Elastic Load Balancing vs. Ivanti Virtual Application Delivery Controller (vADC) Report

Pricing

Amazon Elastic Load Balancing offers a straightforward setup process, while Ivanti Virtual Application Delivery Controller (vADC) may involve more complexities and costs during installation.

View comparison

Pricing

Amazon Elastic Load Balancing offers a straightforward setup process, while Ivanti Virtual Application Delivery Controller (vADC) may involve more complexities and costs during installation.

Array APV Series

1 out of 5

Array APV Series

1 out of 5

Array APV Series attracts tech buyers with cost-effective pricing and reliable performance. In comparison, Ivanti vADC appeals for its scalability and automation features, catering to complex infrastructure needs. Ivanti vADC also stands out with extensive support, promising substantial ROI.

Download Array APV Series vs. Ivanti Virtual Application Delivery Controller (vADC) Report

Pricing

The Array APV Series features a lower setup cost, while the Ivanti vADC incurs higher initial expenses, leading to contrasting financial implications for businesses considering these virtual application delivery solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Related categories

Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

Network Management Applications

Web Application Firewall (WAF)