Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud Logo

Top 10 Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud Alternatives

Vendor: Kaspersky
3.7 out of 5
Leave a review

Top Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, SentinelOne Singularity Complete, and HP Wolf Security. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud surpasses its competitors by providing comprehensive multi-layered protection, streamlined management, and efficient cloud-based solutions, offering real-time threat intelligence and seamless integration to enhance security for businesses of all sizes.

Kaspersky Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Kaspersky, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint offers seamless integration within the Microsoft ecosystem, real-time threat detection, and automated response. In comparison, Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud provides comprehensive threat protection and cloud management features. Microsoft excels in ease of deployment, while Kaspersky offers stronger security and responsive customer support.
Download Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud vs. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Report
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint has a higher setup cost, while Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud is more affordable to set up.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint has a higher setup cost, while Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud is more affordable to set up.
Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete
4.3 out of 5
SentinelOne Singularity Complete offers advanced AI-driven threat detection and response, while Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud provides comprehensive and user-friendly security management. In comparison, SentinelOne excels in autonomous malware detection, and Kaspersky is noted for its ease of deployment and detailed security management.
Download Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud vs. SentinelOne Singularity Complete Report
SentinelOne Singularity Complete has a higher setup cost compared to Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud, which offers a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
SentinelOne Singularity Complete has a higher setup cost compared to Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud, which offers a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment.
Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud Logo
HP Wolf Security
3.9 out of 5
Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud Logo
HP Wolf Security
3.9 out of 5
HP Wolf Security excels with robust support and attractive pricing, making it ideal for cost-conscious buyers focused on advanced threat containment and easy management. In comparison, Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud, with higher costs, offers comprehensive features appealing to those requiring extensive protection and centralized management.
Download HP Wolf Security vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud Report
HP Wolf Security requires a higher upfront setup cost, whereas Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud offers a more budget-friendly initial setup. HP Wolf Security justifies its cost with robust features not typically found in Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud.
View comparison
Pricing
HP Wolf Security requires a higher upfront setup cost, whereas Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud offers a more budget-friendly initial setup. HP Wolf Security justifies its cost with robust features not typically found in Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud.
Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud Logo
Intercept X Endpoint
4.2 out of 5
Intercept X Endpoint is known for comprehensive threat detection and automated response mechanisms. In comparison, Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud excels in multi-layered protection and easy management. Intercept X Endpoint faces integration challenges, while Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud needs enhanced reporting and performance efficiency.
Download Intercept X Endpoint vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud Report
Intercept X Endpoint has a higher initial setup cost compared to Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud. Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud is generally seen as more economical in setup expenses than Intercept X Endpoint.
View comparison
Pricing
Intercept X Endpoint has a higher initial setup cost compared to Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud. Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud is generally seen as more economical in setup expenses than Intercept X Endpoint.
Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR
4.2 out of 5
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR excels with its advanced threat detection, customizable policies, and competitive pricing. In comparison, Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud offers robust zero-day protection and superior support, though it comes at a higher cost. Bitdefender is ideal for affordability, while Kaspersky provides comprehensive security.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone EDR vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud Report
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR has a higher setup cost compared to Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud, making the latter a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR has a higher setup cost compared to Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud, making the latter a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment.
Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud Logo
Cisco Secure Endpoint
4.3 out of 5
Cisco Secure Endpoint excels at immediate threat detection and advanced machine learning. In comparison, Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud offers comprehensive application control and web threat protection. Cisco's higher cost is seen as justified by robust security, whereas Kaspersky is perceived as cost-effective.
Download Cisco Secure Endpoint vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud Report
Cisco Secure Endpoint has a lower initial setup cost compared to Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud, which requires a higher upfront investment. Kaspersky's overall maintenance can also be more expensive due to additional service fees.
View comparison
Pricing
Cisco Secure Endpoint has a lower initial setup cost compared to Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud, which requires a higher upfront investment. Kaspersky's overall maintenance can also be more expensive due to additional service fees.
Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud Logo
WatchGuard EPDR
4.2 out of 5
Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud Logo
WatchGuard EPDR
4.2 out of 5
Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud excels in ease of deployment and integration capabilities. In comparison, WatchGuard EPDR offers advanced threat detection and detailed insights. Kaspersky is noted for competitive pricing, while WatchGuard's robust protection justifies higher costs, addressing different priorities for tech buyers.
Download Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report
Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud has a lower setup cost than WatchGuard EPDR. WatchGuard EPDR may incur higher expenses during initial setup compared to Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud.
View comparison
Pricing
Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud has a lower setup cost than WatchGuard EPDR. WatchGuard EPDR may incur higher expenses during initial setup compared to Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud.
Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud Logo
Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
3.8 out of 5
Datto EDR excels in ease of deployment and customer service. In comparison, Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud offers superior features and a higher perceived value despite higher costs. A tech buyer might choose Datto EDR for its simplicity or Kaspersky for its comprehensive protection.
Download Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud Report
Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) has a higher setup cost compared to Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) has a higher setup cost compared to Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud Logo
ESET EDR/XDR
4.0 out of 5
Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud Logo
ESET EDR/XDR
4.0 out of 5

ESET PROTECT Elite is an all-in-one prevention, detection & response combining enterprise-grade XDR with complete multilayered protection.

Download ESET EDR/XDR vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud Report
I rate the solution’s pricing a six or seven out of ten..
View comparison
Pricing
I rate the solution’s pricing a six or seven out of ten..
Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud Logo
SonicWall Capture Client
4.0 out of 5
SonicWall Capture Client emphasizes robust threat detection and real-time response features. In comparison, Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud offers comprehensive security with advanced application control. SonicWall needs better performance efficiency, while Kaspersky could improve reporting. Kaspersky is noted for quicker setup and improved ROI, while SonicWall is appreciated for effective support.
Download Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud vs. SonicWall Capture Client Report
SonicWall Capture Client has a moderate setup cost, while Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud is known for its more affordable setup cost. SonicWall offers an extensive feature set which may justify its higher initial investment compared to Kaspersky.
View comparison
Pricing
SonicWall Capture Client has a moderate setup cost, while Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud is known for its more affordable setup cost. SonicWall offers an extensive feature set which may justify its higher initial investment compared to Kaspersky.
Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud Logo
Sangfor Endpoint Secure
4.1 out of 5

Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud offers cost-effective threat detection and cloud management, appealing to SMBs. In comparison, Sangfor Endpoint Secure provides advanced threat response and network integration, justifying its higher cost for enterprises seeking comprehensive security. Both solutions feature distinct strengths catered to different organizational needs.

Download Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud vs. Sangfor Endpoint Secure Report
Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud has a low initial setup cost, while Sangfor Endpoint Secure has a moderate setup cost, highlighting a difference in upfront investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud has a low initial setup cost, while Sangfor Endpoint Secure has a moderate setup cost, highlighting a difference in upfront investment.
Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud Logo
Quick Heal Total Security
1 out of 5
Quick Heal Total Security is ideal for protecting against malware, viruses, and online threats. It offers a user-friendly interface, parental controls, and secure online banking features. Some users feel improvements are needed in system performance impact and real-time protection updates.
View comparison
Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud Logo
Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response
3.8 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response excels in comprehensive threat detection and real-time remediation, making it ideal for robust security. In comparison, Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud offers superior advanced security features and efficient cloud management, attracting users for cloud environments. Symantec users seek improved reporting; Kaspersky users desire enhanced scalability. Symantec requires more initial setup but offers strong customer support, while Kaspersky provides easier cloud-based deployment with effective service. Symantec is noted for competitive pricing; however, Kaspersky is praised for transparent costs and higher ROI.
Download Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud vs. Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response Report
Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response has no upfront setup cost, while Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud includes a nominal setup fee. Symantec offers cost efficiency at the beginning compared to Kaspersky’s initial expense.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response has no upfront setup cost, while Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud includes a nominal setup fee. Symantec offers cost efficiency at the beginning compared to Kaspersky’s initial expense.
Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud Logo
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response
4.0 out of 5
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response is valued for comprehensive threat detection and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud is preferred for robust protection mechanisms and cloud management features. Budget-conscious tech buyers might choose WithSecure, while those seeking extensive capabilities often select Kaspersky.
Download Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Report
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response has a higher setup cost, while Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response has a higher setup cost, while Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud offers a more budget-friendly setup option.

Related categories

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
Ransomware Protection
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)