Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud vs SonicWall Capture Client comparison

Kaspersky and SonicWall are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. Kaspersky is ranked #24 with an average rating of 7.6, while SonicWall is ranked #43 with an average rating of 8.0. Kaspersky holds a 0.6% mindshare in EDR, compared to SonicWall’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Kaspersky users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of SonicWall users who would recommend it.
Kaspersky Endpoint Security...
Read 13 Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud reviews
  • 858 Views
  • 789 Comparison Views
92% willing to recommend
SonicWall Capture Client
Read 10 SonicWall Capture Client reviews
  • 1,604 Views
  • 1,075 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

SonicWall Capture Client and Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud are competing in the endpoint security space. User reviews indicate that SonicWall Capture Client excels in pricing and support, while Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud stands out in features, making it a preferred choice despite its higher cost.

Features: Users value SonicWall Capture Client's endpoint protection, integration capabilities, and straightforward deployment. Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud is praised for its comprehensive security suite, ease of management, and extensive features that users find crucial for robust endpoint security.

Room for Improvement: SonicWall Capture Client users point out the need for better reporting, dashboard enhancements, and more customization options. Kaspersky users highlight the need for improved customer support, faster updates, and better documentation. Both products have specific areas for development, with user needs varying based on the context of their security environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SonicWall Capture Client is noted for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service. Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud also offers seamless deployment but has mixed reviews about its customer support responsiveness. SonicWall appears easier to deploy and is backed by more reliable support according to user reviews.

Pricing and ROI: Users find SonicWall Capture Client to be cost-effective with a favorable ROI. Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud is seen as more expensive, but users feel its extensive features justify the price. SonicWall offers competitive pricing and good ROI, while Kaspersky's higher cost is balanced by its rich feature set.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud vs. SonicWall Capture Client Report (Updated: September 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud vs. SonicWall Capture Client
September 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 868,787 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Kaspersky Endpoint Security...
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
24th
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.3
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
Ransomware Protection (8th)
SonicWall Capture Client
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
43rd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (45th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud is 0.6%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SonicWall Capture Client is 0.6%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud0.6%
SonicWall Capture Client0.6%
Other98.8%
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
 

Featured Reviews

Zunair Aftab - PeerSpot reviewer
Security features excel while management tools face challenges
Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud has proven to be a robust and comprehensive solution for endpoint protection. So far, no major negative features have been observed. However, email security integration with Microsoft 365 has room for improvement. In a recent real-world incident, a company received 10 phishing emails, of which only three were blocked by the system. Enhancing detection accuracy to block 7 or more would significantly improve trust and effectiveness. With the on-premises version, there's a known issue where assigning a device to a new group results in it being auto-assigned back to the previous group. Fixing this bug would greatly streamline device management. Additionally, in the cloud version, once a device is assigned to a user, it cannot be reassigned without deleting the user or the device entirely. It would be far more user-friendly if the platform allowed simple reassignment or de-assignment, returning the device to an "unassigned" state. As for automated behavioral analysis, while current functionality is based on machine learning, upgrading to true AI-powered detection could bring substantial improvements. Ideally, the system should proactively flag potential threats, and offer administrators the option to either allow or block applications based on intelligent risk analysis
Read full review
LUIZ FERNANDO MARIANO SILVA - PeerSpot reviewer
Enables faster updates and provides an easy-to-use user interface
I have an advanced license that includes all features. Though we have the license, we cannot use it completely because it is not enabled in the Microsoft tier. It does not make sense. We do not want to buy it separately because the price is different if we buy separate licenses.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"In terms of software performance, it has been effective in providing good security."
"I find the EDR service valuable as it adds extra protection and provides a centralized view."
"Kaspersky has a Cloud Discovery feature. There is no template in Kaspersky. They provide a temporary risk assessment of the cloud services. For example, if we want to block public storage services like OneDrive or Google Drive, we need to specify each individually. The main difference is that Kaspersky's process takes more time because it requires individual input."
"We had the cloud suite of KasperskyEndpoint Security Cloud, and its monitoring was fine."
"Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud is a very good solution for endpoint protection."
"It is a powerful tool for zero-day attack prevention."
"The product works perfectly to prevent malware in our organization."
"In Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud, anti-phishing and anti-malware are two very powerful aspects."
More Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud pros
"SonicWall Capture Client has a serial number to connect to your firewall."
"The most valuable features of SonicWall Capture Client are CSC (Capture Security Center), RTDMI (Real-Time Deep Memory Inspection), and the deep memory inspection feature."
"The product’s interface is easy to use."
"Considering other products, SonicWall Capture Client has two differentiators."
"SonicWall Capture Client's scalability is nice."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"SonicWall Capture Client offers a cost-effective solution that's cheaper compared to other vendors like CrowdStrike."
"The threat protection feature of SonicWall Capture Client is most valuable."
More SonicWall Capture Client pros
 

Cons

"It requires specific expertise or certified professionals to deploy the product. There is a need to expand the offerings to various industries covering different-sized businesses."
"One area where the product could be improved is in its delivery and installation process."
"While the product provides a good level of protection, we need better support, especially in terms of being kept informed about new threats and specific configurations needed."
"Sometimes, the tool consumes a lot of resources from the endpoints, making it an area of concern where improvements are required since it currently consumes a little bit of RAM."
"Certain shortcomings in the anti-ransomware part of the solution need improvement. XDR and MDR, along with threat hunting, a big step in cybersecurity today, need improvement."
"Kaspersky doesn't provide local support."
"Its high CPU usage also slows down devices, particularly those with lower specifications like Core i3."
"The solution’s stability could be improved because we earlier faced an issue where the solution was not detecting file-less malware."
More Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud cons
"The implementation is not easy."
"SonicWall Capture Client should use less of our PC's memory, as it tends to slow down the performance."
"It takes technical support too long to resolve an issue."
"An area for improvement in SonicWall Capture Client is TenantCloud support. Suppose you want to implement SonicWall Capture Client. You'll have to register it on MySonicWall. Then once your SonicWall Capture Client license expires and you don't want to renew it, you can't delete it from your MySonicWall account, so that's an area for improvement."
"The vulnerability reports need to be better. Windows Defender detected some issues that SonicWall Capture Client couldn't."
"SonicWall Capture Client could be made a little lighter than it currently is in terms of memory consumption."
"The biggest issue with SonicWall Capture Client is network latency."
"Technical support from SonicWall has room for improvement. While their escalation process is understandable, it can be time-consuming as all logs need to be provided multiple times across different service levels."
More SonicWall Capture Client cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I find Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud more accessible in terms of pricing."
"Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud is a cost-effective solution."
"We had to pay an annual licensing fee for KasperskyEndpoint Security Cloud."
"The product’s price is flexible."
"The platform is expensive."
"The solution is reasonably priced."
"The pricing is favorable, and there are no additional expenses associated with using the product."
"The solution is moderately priced and cannot be considered an expensive or cheap tool."
More Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud pricing and cost advice
"The product is very expensive."
"You have to pay for the solution, and a lot of customers do not want to pay."
"Here in Indonesia, SonicWall Capture Client costs five hundred thousand rupiahs for every endpoint. If I'm correct, you only have to pay the licensing fee, and there's no additional fee. To me, the pricing for SonicWall Capture Client is four out of five."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
19%
Computer Software Company
13%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Government
6%
Government
12%
Educational Organization
9%
Computer Software Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise3
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business9
Midsize Enterprise1
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about KasperskyEndpoint Security Cloud?
The product works perfectly to prevent malware in our organization.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for KasperskyEndpoint Security Cloud?
No advise, its pretty simple
See all answers
What needs improvement with KasperskyEndpoint Security Cloud?
Recent upgrades have occurred, but some customers question why certain options are disabled. Previously these options were functional. Changes occur without notification or updates from the Kaspers...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SonicWall Capture Client?
SonicWall Capture Client offers a cost-effective solution that's cheaper compared to other vendors like CrowdStrike.
See all answers
What needs improvement with SonicWall Capture Client?
It is not similar to other products. For XDR, users have to use another product. XDR cannot be used unless MDR services are purchased with SonicWall. If a user has SonicWall MDR services, then they...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for SonicWall Capture Client?
I am a distributor, but I can be counted as a reseller. It does not differ anyway. Most of my clients are SMBs, and I inform them that they should protect their servers with this kind of product, n...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud
Compared 24% of the time
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud
Compared 12% of the time
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR vs Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR vs Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud
Compared 10% of the time
Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud Logo
Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud
Compared 9% of the time
Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response vs Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud Logo
Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response vs Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud
Compared 9% of the time
More Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud Competitors
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs SonicWall Capture Client Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs SonicWall Capture Client
Compared 17% of the time
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs SonicWall Capture Client Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs SonicWall Capture Client
Compared 17% of the time
CrowdStrike Falcon vs SonicWall Capture Client Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs SonicWall Capture Client
Compared 11% of the time
Fortinet FortiClient vs SonicWall Capture Client Logo
Fortinet FortiClient vs SonicWall Capture Client
Compared 8% of the time
Bitdefender Total Security vs SonicWall Capture Client Logo
Bitdefender Total Security vs SonicWall Capture Client
Compared 7% of the time
More SonicWall Capture Client Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud
September 2025
Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud reportDownload Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud product report
Buyer's Guide
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
September 2025
SonicWall Capture Client reportDownload SonicWall Capture Client product report
 

Overview

All you need to protect Windows desktops and file servers, Mac OS devices, iOS and Android mobiles and even Microsoft Office 365.

Just sign up for an account instead of getting tied up in hardware and software provisioning.

Pre-defined policies are automatically applied to each newly connected device, delivering immediate protection.

Be anywhere and protect anywhere using a cloud-based console.

Secure geographically separated offices, home or field-based workers, at their desks or on the go regardless of device type.

Enable remote encryption to make sure your corporate data is safe, even if a device gets lost or stolen.

Shadow IT discovery manages uncontrolled sharing of corporate data in the cloud and reveals users wasting time on social media and messengers.

Ensure compliance readiness with a Data Discovery audit of your personal and financial data in the cloud.

Enable safe collaboration and communication in Microsoft Office 365 - protection for all its major apps is already included in the Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud Plus and Pro tiers.

Root Cause Analysis provides an attack visualization so you can see the cause and path of an attack.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) provides simple investigation tools an effortless response to evasive threats.

Advance your skills with online cybersecurity training included in Kaspersky Endpoint Security Pro.

Kaspersky

SonicWall Capture Client is a unified client platform that delivers multiple endpoint protection capabilities, including next-generation malware protection and application vulnerability intelligence. It leverages cloud sandbox file testing, comprehensive reporting, and enforcement for endpoint protection.

SonicWall
 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Luton College
Buyer's Guide
Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud vs. SonicWall Capture Client
September 2025
Free Report: Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud vs. SonicWall Capture Client
Find out what your peers are saying about Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud vs. SonicWall Capture Client and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud vs. SonicWall Capture Client report.
See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.