Microsoft Dynamics CRM Reviews

I use the solution to manage the lead sales pipeline and enable the marketing department to maintain customer data.

The CRM is very fast, which is the most important aspect, and it's very handy. I have implemented some good automation. The cost should be more flexible for smaller organizations. I can add multiple custom fields. I can also create fields and customize them according to my needs.

Costing might be a reason for concern. It could be an issue for the organization, or maybe not. It's uncertain.

Currently, I am not using it, but in the past, I used it for about a year.

I didn't face any issues. There were no downtimes, and I don't think I encountered any problems.

I would rate scalability around seven.

I haven't contacted customer service, but as I mentioned, I am already a gold partner of Microsoft. If there are any problems, I manage without their support.

Neutral

Previously, I used Dynamics, but it did not suit me, so I changed the CRM last year. I am a Microsoft Gold Partner, which is why I used Microsoft Dynamics. However, it wasn't feasible, so I switched to a local provider.

The migration was not easy. I wouldn't say that everything was simple.

I was not the one responsible for the migration. It was handled by upper management.

I changed it to a local provider.

The decisions will be made by management. I recommend using Microsoft Dynamics if the budget allows. The CRM is very fast, with customization and integration options, and easy migration. Everyone should try it if it is feasible for the organization. Overall, I would give this solution a rating of eight out of ten.

The use cases are for HR management, resource management, project insight, and timesheet management. It is mostly connected with people and resource management.

The deployment of Microsoft Dynamics CRM is easy because it's a software as a service, which eliminates the need to deploy anything in our data center. It has improved the verification of value streams by mapping projects to products and demonstrating the total cost of ownership. This automation significantly impacts daily operations by reducing the time spent on manual tasks and improving the quality and delivery time.

The features that have significantly improved effectiveness are the verification of value streams, mapping to products, total cost of ownership, and automation, which improves time delivery and quality.

The UI/UX needs improvement as it is not intuitive from day one. It becomes intuitive once learned, however, it should be less complex initially.

I've been using Microsoft Dynamics CRM for about one year in the current organization.

Microsoft Dynamics CRM is a stable solution, with reliability rated at nine out of ten.

The scalability of Microsoft Dynamics CRM is rated at eight out of ten, indicating it could be more scalable but is generally satisfactory.

Microsoft provides very helpful support from the beginning. They are responsive and offer good assistance with problems.

Positive

We previously used different ERP systems. Now we mainly use Microsoft Dynamics 365. Existing Microsoft products facilitate better integration.

For deployment and operation of Microsoft Dynamics CRM as a software as a service, everything was up and running in about four days, including testing for disaster recovery. It required integrating and migrating data, which went smoothly.

The deployment involved around five people, including two analysts, two engineers, and one architect.

Better time to market and better visibility into cost has been a financial benefit for the company.

Pricing could be improved, as I rated it a six out of ten for affordability. There are no extra expenses post-purchase.

We also considered SAP, yet chose Microsoft for its integrated ecosystem and better talent availability.

I would recommend Microsoft Dynamics CRM due to its good ecosystem and ease of onboarding employees, which are supported by the known Microsoft environment.

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.

It was related to connecting large data with specific company information. We consolidated all the data in one place to speed up the company's decision-making. 

We gathered data based on their specific requirements and stored it alongside the company's personal data. 

Working with all Microsoft products from one platform is very useful. You don't need to open multiple programs on your laptop. 

You can access all the products and software from the same platform. Integrating all these services into one platform is very useful. 

I like the way we can process and store data, fetch and execute commands. All of these details make it a very useful tool to speed up processes against the database.

The UI and GUI could be improved.

I was involved in a project in the USA that used Microsoft Dynamics CRM.

It's stable. However, improving the infrastructure in the background could make it more stable, and the performance would be even better.

It's scalable. For this project, about 75 users had access, but maybe 50 at the same time. When multiple users access the database at the same time, it should be evaluated, and big infrastructure in the background. 

The more infrastructure you have, the better the stability and performance.

I didn't need to request support for Microsoft Dynamics on that project.

I appreciate this solution and would give it a nine out of ten.

We primarily use the solution as a CRM for a call center.

While we already had a workflow, we already had so many tools and needed a better system, so we began to use Dynamics.

When you have a vanilla, straightforward version, it is easy to use.

Since it is Microsoft it runs the same interfaces as, for example, Office, Sharepoint, et cetera. The UI is standard which makes it easier to use, rather than introducing something with a completely different look and feel, like SAP.

A straightforward setup is pretty simple. 

Technical support is good.

The pricing is reasonable.

We had to do some customizations on top and it got a bit cumbersome. Since there are so many ways to customize it, it can get pretty complex. If you do programming on top that doesn't fit right things can get lost pretty easily.

We're using an older version. I'm not sure which features may be missing in general.

While the reporting wasn't great, it is my understanding that they have since improved on that. 

It doesn't scale so well.

We've used the solution for almost six years. I've used it for a while now. 

The stability is okay yet not exceptional. I'd rate the reliability six out of ten.

We are currently working on moving to another platform and therefore aren't dealing with scaling anymore. However, it wasn't ideal to begin with.

We have been happy overall with technical support. They are helpful and responsive.

Positive

While setting up the solution isn't a problem, once you start customizing the solution you may run into issues. It can get really complex. 

We did not witness any return on investment. The issue we have with how the payment is set up is the license was for on-site deployment. 

The pricing is excellent. I would rate it nine out of ten.

We used version 2013, on-premise.

I'm not sure if Microsoft even sells this on-premises product anymore. They want to do everything on the cloud. 

If you're rolling this out for a small to medium operation, and your people are familiarized with Office and SharePoint, as most users are, it's a great option since you won't have to invest too much time to get everyone up to speed. However, for anything larger than that, a company should probably look elsewhere.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. 

I'm primarily using the solution as a CRM. 

The solution works well with Azure, and we also have Sharepoint. It integrates well with other Microsoft products. We enjoy the interconnectivity on offer. We like that it's just one environment.

The product is stable. 

It can scale well.

Microsoft partners can use the solution for free.

There are a lot of modules, and therefore, there is a lot of configurability and customization.

Out of the box, the solution doesn't really have a desirable user experience. We have to set it up and customize it to meet our needs. We'd like to have a better user experience. Sometimes it looks too technical for some users. We'd like the solution to be simpler to use and less technical. 

I'd love to see some more reporting. We'd like more reporting and easier configuring reports. We'd like some more analysis that could act as a prediction engine. That would help a sales organization. We'd like to be able to compare and project year on year, month on month, et cetera.

The initial setup can be a bit complex. 

I've been using the solution for close to five or six years. 

The stability is fine. There are no bugs or glitches. It has been stable most of the time. I'd rate it eight out of ten. 

The solution can scale. I'd rate scalability at seven or eight out of ten. We have 35 people using the solution. 

I haven't had any technical support contact. However, my team may have. 

I'm also familiar with Zoho, which has a nicer user experience. 

Since we are a Microsoft gold partner, we do get the Microsoft solution for free. 

The initial setup is a bit complex. We require IT assistance to handle that. The onboarding is not easy either. 

In terms of customizing the solution, we hired a company that handled that aspect.

All CRM solutions are around the same price; however, as partners, we get to use the product for free. 

We're a Microsoft gold partner. As a partner, we can access Microsoft products, including this solution. 

I'd recommend Zoho over Microsoft as it is technically easier to use. However, Microsoft if good.

It has a lot of modules and is configurable. It's just a bit more technical. When there is too much functionality, sometimes people don't know what to do with the product. 

I'd rate the solution seven out of ten. 

We use the solution for sales productivity and marketing.

The solution is easy to use and stable. It offers a 360-degree view of your customers. It allows you to track interactions, giving you full visibility into customer habits and behavior

Microsoft Dynamics CRM needs to improve its integrations. 

The tool is stable. 

I rate Microsoft Dynamics CRM's scalability a ten out of ten. My company has 100 users. 

I haven't contacted the solution's support yet. 

Microsoft Dynamics CRM's deployment is easy. 

The solution is not expensive. 

I rate Microsoft Dynamics CRM a nine out of ten. It is integrated with Microsoft tools like Word, Excel, and PowerPoint, and the AI feature also improves productivity. 

Microsoft Dynamics CRM has the same features as Salesforce CRM, but what I like about the solution is that it's customizable. It's also one of the top-rated CRMs in the market.

I also like that the coverage system of Microsoft Dynamics CRM is very, very broad, which means you can do a lot with it versus what you can do with Salesforce CRM.

The main issue with Microsoft Dynamics CRM is that its GUI isn't very attractive. 

Overall, the solution has the same functionalities as other CRMs such as Salesforce, but Salesforce is much simpler to use. Microsoft Dynamics CRM is complicated to use, and this is another area for improvement.

It was also more difficult to set up the solution, so its setup could still be improved.

What I'd like to see in the next version of Microsoft Dynamics CRM is a cleaner user interface because currently, it looks messy to me. Salesforce CRM has a better, more simplified user interface that makes it easier for you to get what you need, while in Microsoft Dynamics CRM, you have to put in a lot of effort to get things done.

I've been using Microsoft Dynamics CRM for over three years.

Microsoft Dynamics CRM is a very stable solution.

Microsoft Dynamics CRM is a scalable solution, and I wouldn't be using it if it wasn't scalable or stable.

We've contacted the technical support team of Microsoft Dynamics CRM, and they've provided us with good service.

My organization used custom-made software previously, but because the software had a lot of issues, the team decided to switch to Microsoft Dynamics CRM.

The initial setup for Microsoft Dynamics CRM wasn't that easy. I found it easier to set up Salesforce CRM.

As for how long it took to deploy Microsoft Dynamics CRM, that depends on project complexity and how much your budget is, but it could be a minimum of three months. In some projects, the deployment of the solution could even take one year.

I don't have details about the licensing cost of Microsoft Dynamics CRM because it's the procurement team that's in charge of it.

I've used Salesforce CRM. Both Salesforce CRM and Microsoft Dynamics CRM are top-rated, so all features you need are available in both solutions, so I'm not concerned much about features. It's usability that's more important to me, and I found Salesforce CRM to have a simpler user interface that I like.

I've hardly used Salesforce CRM. It's Microsoft Dynamics CRM I've been using the most.

My organization has one hundred users of Microsoft Dynamics CRM. There's a plan to increase its usage as well.

There's a dedicated team that's in charge of managing the Microsoft Dynamics CRM environment.

I would recommend the solution to others who want to start using it. I always recommend Microsoft Dynamics CRM to others, even to people considering Oracle CRM, but it would still depend on your environment and what the customer needs. I recommend solutions to others based on the requirements.

I would rate Microsoft Dynamics CRM six out of ten.

We use this solution for customer relationship management. It enables us to have a 360-degree view of all our customer interactions. We have various touch points and a call center that our customers call into. After every call, we log the interactions with the customer.

We also have customers that walk into our premises, and we attend to various requests like inquiries, requests, or complaints. After the interactions with the customer, we log the interactions. We also have email interactions with customers that are logged on the platform.

When you go to a customer's profile, you're able to see all communications with that customer based on the various touch points. Whether it's a phone call, whether they're coming into the office physically, or whether it's via emails, you're able to see all the interactions and keep a track of all events regarding that customer.

Anybody who looks at the customer profile is able to know what has transpired up until that point and proffer whatever solutions the customer requires based on their inquiries. It's been very helpful.

It's currently deployed on-prem, but we're planning to update to the cloud version.

There are about 125 people using this solution.

It's been very helpful in ensuring that we're able to provide the best of services and provide responses to whatever queries we get from all our customers. It ensures that there's continuity, and you don't have to start asking the customer about what happened. From CRM, you can easily see all the interactions and events in the record and take it from there.

We're also able to customize it for some of our core solutions. For example, we do benefit payments, so we're able to utilize the workflow part of that. We found out that when you initiate a benefits payment request, we're able to flow through the different approval stages. We're able to see and keep track of that on the system.

In terms of the performance, when it comes to loading a large volume of data, it's slow at times, so the system could be optimized. A lot of those things can be dependent on the kind of resources that you're using, but over time we've been able to scale on the resources and that has actually improved over time.

It's stable. It's better if you use it for the core function that it was meant for. When we used it for other processes, like our core processes, we found out that it was quite unstable. But the moment we took that process out, it became much more stable.

Whenever we need to reach out to Microsoft, they're always there to provide required assistance.

Setup was easy, especially when you have capable partners. The only thing is that when we use it for some of our very processor intensive processes, we found out that it couldn't handle that very effectively. We had to take that process out.

We try to maximize the functionality of the system. We have to do a lot of customizations initially for our core processes. CRM is really for managing customer interactions, so by the time you start using it for things that it's not meant for, then you won't get the best of it.

Deployment took about nine months because we used it for much more than customer relationship management. We used it for our core processes too. By bringing in those processes, they actually extended the project timeline. For the core CRM itself, implementation was done within four months.

Our partners implemented the solution.

The implementation depends on the number of licenses, as well as the partner who is also implementing. It also depends on the core processes you want to bring in. The cost depends on a number of factors, so whoever is implementing it will need to take that into consideration before it is done.

I would rate this solution 8 out of 10. 

I would absolutely recommend this solution to those who want to start using it. My advice is that you need to understand what the scope of the project is. What exactly do you want CRM to do? If it's for customers and to manage customer interactions, then it's going to perform excellently well.

If you're bringing in other processes into the solution outside of core CRM functionalities, then you need to ensure that the system is able to handle such processes. But when it comes to handling a large volume of data processing, there might be a drive on the system, but it handles its core functions adequately well.