Nintex Process Platform Reviews

We primarily use the solution for workflows we develop them and deploy them so they appear in the K2 Workspace. We have smart objects and smart prompts as well as views of everything.

The interface is very good. We developed it there and it makes it easy to handle the workflows. 

It is very easy to use. Microsoft technology integrates well with K2. YOu can develop prompts to your .NET framework and are able to integrate K2 workflows within the system.

The solution is stable.

Technical support, especially during the first year, is very helpful and responsive. 

It's not hard to set up. 

We want to upgrade our system. We need to develop more things and need the latest K2 tool to do that. The model we have is out of date. We need to move to K2 Five.

Our version is very old and we do not have support from K2 at this time. 

There are some glitches happening as we consider moving to K2 Five.

The solution needs more RPA and AI features. 

We've been using the product for a long time. We've used it since 2015.

The solution is stable and reliable. We have not had any issues at all. I'd rate it around seven out of ten. Whenever it is required, we update workflows and forms and don't have issues. It integrates with other technologies very well as well, whether it's .NET or Java or APIs and we don't have problems. 

The solution is scalable according to our original requirements. It meets our needs. 

We have about 100 users on the solution. 

Initially, when we bought the licenses, we communicated often with them. After the expiry of one year of the support offering, we haven't really communicated with them. That said, over that first year, when we had support, they were very good and very helpful. 

We still want to use K2. We will likely be upgrading. We're hoping that the migration will be easy.

If we change solutions, we might consider Nintex Workflow, however, we're not sure if that would be too much work and we would be starting from scratch. If we have to start from scratch with K2 as well, we might switch over and try something else. 

Nintex may also offer RPA, which would make it a bit more robust.

The initial setup was pretty straightforward. We had someone buy the license for us and gave us some prerequisites. Then we bought some license keys and it has basically started working. We have a portal where we can request more license keys as needed. It's easy.

We have two administrators handling the solution. 

We had a vendor that provided us with the license. 

I cannot speak to the exact pricing. I have no access to what we are actually paying for the licenses. I'm not sure if there was a discount or not. 

We are revisiting pricing as we look into the upgraded product. Our major concern is migration and how easy it will be if we move to a new K2 system.

We started with K2 Blackboard and K2 Konnect. We want to upgrade to K2 Five. However, if we find out during migration to the newest solution we need to start from scratch we may not stick with the product.

I'm an end-user. My company has a K2 license.

I'd rate the solution six out of ten. 

There are a few workflows, including one of the recent workflows we failed to deliver for a client, Jazz, a telecom operating in Pakistan. They sought to automate their HR processes through a finance solution. As an example, we developed an insurance claim workflow for them. With approximately 10,000 employees within their territory in Pakistan, they aimed to streamline the insurance claim process.

For example, if someone lost their laptop. The normal process takes so much time, the manual effort, and the paperwork to get different information from peers. Our solution centralized the process, allowing the finance team to monitor the status of claims and their dependencies on external entities, such as vendors. We integrated a specific step within the workflow to track the progress of claims with the vendor. The workflow facilitated seamless communication with the vendor, providing updates on the status and estimated time. This data, combined with inputs from different department heads and finance, enabled a comprehensive evaluation of each request, leading to informed approvals or rejections based on predefined parameters. The workflow consisted of seven to eight steps, each incorporating approvals and developer oversight. This is a high-level overview of our engagement with Jazz for their workflow automation.

The drag-and-drop feature is quite interesting; it helps us a lot. We can manage different dates within a single workflow and identify the number of tasks we can dynamically dedicate to other users. Even if we assign a task to a single person at any point, we can change the delegation in the future or the responding entity at any time. Moreover, Nintex integrates with Microsoft ecosystems such as Office 365, MS SQL, and Azure. This makes it a strong candidate for anyone interested in Nintex.

We would appreciate introducing a dynamic hierarchy from a generic source or a custom HnM solution. We can assign tasks to individual users but must integrate with Active Directory, create a security group, or work within Active Directory. It is possible to integrate it so that we aren't dependent on Active Directory or any other HnM solution. We can create a list within Nintex's workflow and obtain the updated data from there. Alternatively, we could leverage integration with a customized HnM solution.

It also facilitates the end developers to determine if UI is much easier or more intuitive in terms of visualization perspective. For example, when building the solution, we had approximately seven to eight steps, and each step added multiple conditional criteria. Whenever we opened the editor with Nintex's editor, it took us about two to five minutes to load the whole development, and if we scrolled within the workflow, it also took time to load the data flow. If this loading and syncing could be improved, and the UI could support a lazy loading feature, that would be appreciated.

I have been using Nintex Workflow for two years.

I rate the solution’s stability an eight out of ten.

The scalability is dependent on SharePoint, which relies on Active Directory. If you have an Active Directory, it depends on the Windows operating system, specifically the Windows server. While it might be challenging to scale horizontally, we can undoubtedly scale it vertically by adding more RAM, CPU, and other resources. The scalability issue has become more apparent recently, especially considering the on-premises solution. However, the number of processes within Nintex plays a significant role. If only ten processes are in place, scalability shouldn't pose a considerable challenge. Understanding the level of processes running within Nintex is crucial for addressing these issues effectively.

We cater the solution to enterprise-level business.

I rate the solution's scalability a seven out of ten.

The technical support is good if you need to build something. The community is very active and helpful.

Neutral

The learning curve is different if you start working within Nintex. It takes some time to understand everything. But connecting other PCs to work with your processes is easier once you get through it.

The deployment doesn't take much time because we deploy it, make changes, and save it. We keep it for the later development cycle instead of redeploying it. We deploy the release once we finish the development, which takes a few minutes.

I rate Nintex's initial setup around seven to eight out of ten.

The solution is expensive and costs around 1000 dollars. I rate the solution’s pricing an eight out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is costly.

If a community edition is available during the initial phase, we could use it to demonstrate the capabilities and set it up on the client's premises. Additionally, if we were to consider the cloud side, the accessibility of the cloud platform is currently limited. If such an option were available, it would be greatly appreciated.

Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

We use K2 as a business process management tool in our company that is connected with our applications. Also, we are using an American-based workflow engine besides K2. We also use ELSA, an open-source platform.

Mainly, we use the tool for automation and workflow. So, we are using ASP.NET for development. Also, we are connected with K2 tool.

Our company needs K2 as an engine. We don't prefer to use the forms because the overall cost is high. Because of this, we have to go to workflowengine.io since it gives us the same results at very low prices. It's not restricted to processes or something like this.

AI is the most required functionality in tools nowadays in the market. The tool lacks to offer support for the Arabic language, and it needs consideration.

My company has been using K2 for two years.

It is not a stable solution.

It is not a scalable solution because of its high prices. We also need K2 engine for small businesses for 50k USD since small businesses are already using other tools for form building. We need something similar to a workflow engine. We use a Russian product offering good protection since it is a .NET-based workflow engine, and its server also can use any programming language. We turned to this tool owing to K2's high prices since, in the end, we ended up paying 300k USD. 100 to 5,000 users work on the solution.

The technical support is very good.

We had previously evaluated other workflow engines, a Russian product. We also used SharePoint Nintex. We switched to K2 since we use Visual Studio for the automation process and to develop our own portal using ASP.NET. So, we don't want more than the required license for forms and other components that we don't need or don't use.

The setup process was not too hard or difficult to understand. It was acceptable since there were no technical issues.

I have seen a return on investment using the solution. So, it is worth the money for its workflow engine and not the forms since I don't need them. Also, I developed the forms using a third-party application which was cheaper.

Prices for licenses of K2 are high. We bought a distributed license for 35k USD. Also, we pay an annual subscription of around 20k. Sometimes we try to lift K2 to higher prices. I need a license for SMBs and distributors, for which I pay around 50k USD. Also, I need a distributed license for our project.

I don't recommend others to start with K2 because of its high prices. There are other components that fit the needs of K2 that will not consider reducing their prices. I rate the overall product an eight out of ten.

Primarily, the solution is used to manage business processes in an organization. It helps with fast app developments and approvals. 

K2 has a very wide collection of smart object technology. It's phenomenal. The concept of the smart objects is core to K2. 

The setup is easy.

The solution is stable.

It can scale well.

Support is helpful. 

I'm not up to date on recent upgrades. I've heard that in the latest technology, the solution is much faster, and the UI has improved. It used to be notoriously slow. 

I'm not sure if they have reusability yet. That's one thing I've always wanted - the reusability of the components. 

We'd like to have integration with SharePoint. 

I've used the solution for more than five years. 

The solution is stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It's reliable. It doesn't crash or freeze. 

It's scalable. It's able to expand easily. 

There aren't too many users using it in the company. We had maybe 1,000 users at one point. I'm not sure if this is still the case. 

We've used technical support. I've contacted them many times. They provide good solutions. We're happy with the support.

While I have used other solutions in the past, I'm not really an expert in others. 

They have a well-managed three-tier implementation. It's very straightforward.

There's an integrated tool used during the deployment, and the process only takes five to ten minutes. The deployment tool makes it very fast and easy. 

You just need a team of five, maximum, for deployment and maintenance. You might not necessarily need a dedicated person to handle the deployment. 

The deployment is basically done in-house. 

The solution used to be server-based. Now that it is on the cloud, the licensing is user-based. 

In terms of the market, K2 is not overly expensive. It's mid-range. 

While K2 is cloud-based now, many older customers use an on-premises version. 

This solution was acquired by Nintex.

I'd advise potential users if they have a legacy K2 system, to upgrade to the latest version of K2. They provide support and handle the migration of legacy K2 to the latest version. You get more features and advancements. 

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. 

The solution has the capability to handle robust execution.

The solution's flexibility can be improved. K2 needs to be fully code-free, and they should try Endeavor to make it code-free. It will help to hide the complexities of smart objects.

Improvements can be made because we are implementing one solution and need a solution that integrates into itself. It's very tedious to manage, so they should ensure that everything is integrated and taken care of.

We have been using K2 for three years.

The solution is scalable. Approximately 100 people use it in our organization.

The customer service and support team are good. The premium support is good, and their response is fast.

K2 is reasonably priced and you pay for licenses. It costs less than half a million, and you own your licenses yearly. Additionally, you pay 400,000 for support and maintenance, but similar tools charge per user. So you are paying roughly $80 per month for one user, which can be quite costly if you have a large organization.

We are currently evaluating Camunda and Integrify.

I rate the solution a six out of ten. K2 is not mature and still needs a lot of stabilization. My advice to new users considering the product will be to use it without customizing it. After installation, use the vanilla workflows, and you will get fast performance. However, if you customize it, you will run into challenges.

Nintex creates forms and digital workflows to automate processes. There is a decision-making engine built using business rules. We specifically use this solution for remittance processes for a bank.

Before using Nintex, we had a manual process which started with sending an email. This process is now 50% automated. We upload a form to start the workflow and the process follows certain business rules. For example, if an amount of money is more than or less than a specific amount, the automation sends it to a specific department. 

This solution is very easy to use and customize, using almost zero coding. It's built on SharePoint which many companies in our country have experience with. This made it easy to adapt the application in our environment.

We would like to have access to an on-premises solution. In our country, we have a relationship with Central Bank of Egypt, which do noes not allow cloud solutions to be used. They should offer an on-premises solution with a flexible price license.

The knowledge base for this solution could be improved and expanded upon. Currently, it takes time to find the specific answers we are looking for. 

I have used this solution for one year. 

This is a stable solution with good performance. However, stability and performance is dependant on capacity planning before the implementation. 

This is a scalable solution, however, some features are not available on the on-premises solution. An external vendor's assistance is needed to overcome this. 

The customer support team could offer faster assistance. It would help if they had a local team in Egypt to assist.

Neutral

The initial setup was straightforward but the customization of the system was time consuming. We started with a POC, worked in a test environment to complete customization and integrate with our full system and then pushed this to production. This whole process took two years. 

We have been able to free up time for our team members to focus on other projects. 

This solution is affordable and is cheaper than most alternatives on the market. We have a standard cloud license that costs about 20k per year.

We evaluated Bizagi, Appian and Pega.

I would rate this solution a seven out of ten. 

We use the solution for SharePoint on-prem and SharePoint online. The solution is deployed both on the cloud and on-prem.

The solution has helped us to automate our business processes, our approval systems, and automation for quickly developing on SharePoint on-prem and SharePoint online.

The Nintex Workflow's straight workflow and auto-response feature, along with its layer response functionality, make it easier for my end users to respond to emails. They can either opt for a date response or respond directly on our website without having to navigate to the initial screen. Overall, it is a straightforward and user-friendly process.

The cost of the solution is high and has room for improvement.

I wish to improve integration with additional Office 365 products. Nintex competes with Microsoft Power Automate, which is gaining market share due to its compatibility and ease of integration with both Microsoft and non-Microsoft operating systems.

I have been using the solution for 12 years.

The solution is stable.

The solution is scalable.

The technical support is good.

Positive

The initial setup is straightforward.

We have seen a return on investment with Nintex Workflow.

Nintex Workflow is more expensive than Microsoft's native products, but it is still considered moderately priced when compared to higher-end products such as K2.

I give the solution a nine out of ten.

We have around 2,000 current users and are expanding to 2,500 next year.

Although Nintex Workflow is a great product, we need to assess our capabilities before integrating it with a Microsoft application. It's worth noting that Microsoft's application is actually less expensive than Nintex Workflow. Nintex Workflow is at the top end of the price range.

It is used to automate all business applications.

The solution is good.

There have been some glitches, and the workflow fails frequently. We had to upgrade to fix it. Even when there is a threshold limit with Sharepoint, it impacts the K2 level. The solution should be more developer-friendly because many steps are involved compared to Power Automate.

We have been using this solution for five years and are using version 5.2. It is deployed on-premises.

It is a stable solution.

It is a scalable solution. From an end-user perspective, we have close to 6000 employees. In addition, we have a third party who does maintenance.

We contacted the technical support team a couple of times last year. I rate the technical support a ten out of ten.

Positive

The setup is easy.

I rate this solution a nine out of ten. Regarding advice, from a business perspective, I would say assess the licensing cost before proceeding.

K2's best feature is that it can solve complex tasks, issues, and projects with little coding.

K2's support for DevOp team corporations is weak.

I've been using K2 for two and a half years.

K2 is very stable - there have been almost no problems in the time I've been using it.

The initial setup is straightforward because it can be deployed on a DB server, application server, and web server.

For the initial hundred users, the cost is $21,000 per year, which I find too high. There are soft thresholds for this initial license, like the number of forms and environments. 

I would give K2 a rating of seven out of ten.

It is very easy to create and deploy. It does not take your time like SharePoint Workflow. There is no need for the IT people to do it. SharePoint Workflow, needed a programmer to do it. So there are vendors looking forward to Nintex because it is easy to create by the end-user.

They have an expensive license for vendors. They have two types of licenses. It is the standard and enterprise. Some actions in the enterprise, are not available in the standard. We need all the features to be in the standard license. Around fifty features are not in the standard license. That is why it is a problem for us. I am looking forward to when they have the same features in the standard license as the enterprise license.

I have been working with Nintex Workflow for the past twelve years.

Nintex Workflow has great stability.

Nintex Workflow is definitely scalable.

Technical support is great to work with.

The initial setup was straightforward.

We did everything in-house and it is extremely user-friendly. 

The price is too high currently for the license structure. There are two types of licenses standard and enterprise.

Nintex Workflow is user-friendly and saves time I would rate Nintex Workflow a ten out of ten.