Hyland OnBase vs Nintex Process Platform comparison

Hyland and Nintex are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Hyland is ranked #17 with an average rating of 7.7, while Nintex is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.0. Hyland holds a 0.4% mindshare in BPM, compared to Nintex’s 2.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Hyland users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Nintex users who would recommend it.

Hyland OnBase

Read 13 Hyland OnBase reviews

339 Views
165 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Nintex Process Platform

Read 24 Nintex Process Platform reviews

2,066 Views
686 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Hyland OnBase

Nintex Process Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Nintex Process Platform and Hyland OnBase compete in the business process automation category. Nintex may have a slight edge due to its user-friendliness and flexible deployment options, appealing to businesses seeking quick adaptability and mobile operations.

Features: Nintex Process Platform offers a no-code or low-code solution, enhancing ease of use and scalability. It integrates seamlessly with Microsoft ecosystems, while its LazyApproval feature supports mobile operations. Hyland OnBase provides secure document management and integration with Outlook and Salesforce, offering strong audit trails. Its adaptability to various processes adds versatility, but some users find it less intuitive compared to Nintex.

Room for Improvement: Nintex could improve server efficiency, error reporting, and AI integration. Enhancements in logging, validation, and adaptability in non-SharePoint environments would be beneficial. OnBase needs a simplified user interface and migration process. It also lacks OCR functionality for all languages and support for some local languages like Arabic. Additionally, its pricing model is often considered expensive.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Nintex supports a mix of on-premises, cloud, and hybrid environments, providing broad deployment flexibility. Its global 24/7 support receives mixed reviews on responsiveness. Hyland OnBase is mainly on-premises, praised for reliable and helpful support, though potentially lacking efficiency in service desk solutions compared to Nintex.

Pricing and ROI: Nintex can be expensive upfront but offers valuable automation features, leading to cost efficiencies. Its subscription-based model ensures scalability, with users reporting satisfactory ROI. OnBase is also priced high but considered a worthwhile investment due to its modularity and comprehensive features, delivering quick ROI by streamlining document-heavy processes.

To learn more, read our detailed Hyland OnBase vs. Nintex Process Platform Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Hyland OnBase vs. Nintex Process Platform

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,168 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Hyland OnBase

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

17th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Content Management (5th), Low-Code Development Platforms (13th)

Nintex Process Platform

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

13th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (11th), Workload Automation (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Hyland OnBase is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nintex Process Platform is 2.0%, down from 2.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

Srinivas Rao Kagitha

Senior Onbase Developer & Administrator at HTC Global Services (INDIA) Private

Offers good dashboards and reports but fails to offer better migration features

The migration is a bit difficult in the tool. Whenever we make certain changes to workflow or other stuff, migrating the code from one environment to another is a bit tedious. The tool has an option for export and import, which is not robust. Most of the time, we need to do things stuff manually. For example, if we make any changes in the existing life cycle or any queues, we have to move those changes manually. There is no robust way to migrate code from one environment to a lower environment, like prod. When it comes to the product's technical support, the turnaround time is a bit longer than expected. The issue may be because there are a number of issues or a large number of customers who are reaching out to the support team for help. I believe that the solution's technical team can provide a solution more quickly.

Read full review

Vitor Medeiros

National Sales Director at Konica Minolta

Offers capacity to integrate with external platforms but technically difficult

There is room for improvement in the user experience in the forms. When we need to develop the forms, we don't have much customization, and I think we need more flexibility there. It's technically difficult, but it would be great to be able to develop our own code and integrate it into the platform. We could then run our own code for specific actions and requests or even develop a page or form. So, if I can ask Nintex for something, it would be a way to integrate our own code for specific actions. When it comes to integration, it could have more options for custom requests.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Integrating Hyland OnBase with our systems enabled us to automate document designs and templates, which was extremely helpful in the finance and banking industry."

"The product's initial setup phase is not difficult."

"I like the cloud and its integrability."

"Hyland OnBase is valued for its security, especially for those in the finance domain who require data confidentiality."

"The retention module is one of the most valuable features. Whatever we scan onto the system can be identified and we are notified when the records are due to be disposed."

"We found the setup process to be okay since they do offer a troubleshooting guide."

"The solution is very developed and we are not taking full advantage of its functionalities."

"OnBase is a remarkable tool. It is a well-done product. Hyland has a lot of experience in building it and looking for new things for clients in terms of functionalities. It has amazing stability, and it can grow horizontally and vertically. It is built for growth. Their technical support is also quite good and available throughout the year."

More Hyland OnBase pros

"It has integration with BI and Analytics tools, and RPA toolsets as well."

"Allows to use workflow for simple approvals and LazyApproval. The feature is easy to implement for mobile approval."

"The technical support is very good."

"It saves time as tasks are automated."

"The setup is easy."

"The Vizio-style designer that runs in the browser is, to me, by far the most valuable feature of the solution. It means that the customer doesn’t have to install any client tools to create powerful workflows."

"Easily maintained and customization is quite simple."

"With an extensive list of integrations with LOB data, your workflows can extend far beyond SharePoint, driving adoption of SharePoint."

More Nintex Process Platform pros

Cons

"The solution’s initial setup is a little difficult."

"For user experience, they would have to do more with the interface. It is not easy to work with and is a little messy. It is getting better, but it is not yet good enough. Other products are comparatively doing better in terms of the user interface. I have been hearing about Box, which is very easy to use and learn for the users. OnBase has to work on this aspect. It should have BPM capabilities. We compete with tools that provide the BPM feature and support those standards. They can do better in terms of the pricing model. It is a really expensive tool in Latin America. They should have different prices for different regions."

"The look and feel could be better. The integration with the user could be better. It could also be more user-friendly."

"We need to troubleshoot why our reports didn't get downloaded in a day. There is a workflow feature which powerful but also complicated."

"We are struggling with duplicates and would like to have OCR functionality when using this solution."

"We found the size of images to be a restriction, though this may have been due to the API used rather than the Hyland application."

"The migration is a bit difficult in the tool."

"I find OnBase's monolithic architecture to be expensive, and adopting microservices could be beneficial."

More Hyland OnBase cons

"We'd like to have integration with SharePoint."

"The interface could be better and more language support is needed in the development environment or in the solutions platform in general."

"We cannot use the same solution on cloud."

"The tool can be limiting when more complex solutions are required. Improving it to offer greater functionality and less reliance on technical expertise could be beneficial."

"While Nintex Workflow has pretty robust troubleshooting abilities, I think that improving the default logging and notifications would be helpful."

"I would also like to see the BPM features from Pega implemented, that have to do with the implementation of AI, and the robotics."

"The management server and the admin page where you can manage processes need improvement."

"Nintex is still at the starting point of integrating with AI. It has integrated with a very small piece of artificial intelligence., like only integrated with the Google Cloud. There is a benefit, like a no-code and low-code solution. But, again, if you are a developer, especially if you are a hardcore developer, you are using your code knowledge, its skills, and all. And, suddenly, you are moving into the low-code solution, and then you will feel, like, so many things you can't achieve with the low-code solution."

More Nintex Process Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool's price is high."

"There are a number of different types of licenses. There are concurrent licenses, individual licenses and imaging licenses."

"They can do better in terms of the pricing model. It is a really expensive tool in Latin America. They should have different prices for different regions."

"OnBase is reasonably priced."

"The solution costs around $6,000 per month."

"Offering a licensing model that allows for multiple small workflows would be a huge improvement to an already great platform."

"The initial investment in K2 is heavy. Currently, the expenditure is $28,000 for a year. After we go to the cloud, it is going to be per seat and probably cheaper. Currently, there are unlimited users."

"The product’s price is competitive compared to other vendors."

"Nintex is around INR 200 per license in India, which is much cheaper. Smaller organizations are always looking for cost-effective solutions, and Nintex provides local solutions with very low pricing."

"For the initial hundred users, the cost is $21,000 per year, which I find too high."

"The price of this solution is affordable but the problem in Algeria is our community is a bit slower. The new clients might feel the solution is a bit expensive."

"Nintex products are expensive, but valuable. Licensing in on-premise was historically based on a perpetual model, where you’d license per Web front-end. However, they are switching exclusively to a consumption (subscription) model, where you purchase the number of workflows you think you’ll use in your environment, and can scale up from there."

"The annual support costs are expensive."

More Nintex Process Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

15%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

11%

Insurance Company

Computer Software Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

19%

Educational Organization

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Hyland OnBase?

The solution is very developed and we are not taking full advantage of its functionalities.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Hyland OnBase?

I find pricing to be on the higher side due to its monolithic architecture. I would rate it six out of ten. Transitioning to microservices, allowing users to pay for only what they use, could reduc...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Hyland OnBase?

I believe the reporting features need improvement, as other competitors in the market provide better analytics. Hyland is working on a new platform (HXP) to integrate features from all products, ad...

See all answers

What do you like most about K2?

The latest version of Nintex has many features. We have a clear roadmap and the necessary application to integrate it into our platform.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for K2?

Nintex Process Platform is expensive. Prices relate to both features and the professional services necessary due to our lack of an implementation team.

See all answers

What needs improvement with K2?

The user interface in Nintex needs improvement. It is not very intuitive and requires changes. Additionally, the deployment process should be easier.

See all answers

Comparisons

Alfresco vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 18% of the time

OpenText Documentum Content Management vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 14% of the time

SharePoint vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 12% of the time

IBM FileNet vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 9% of the time

OpenText Content Management vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 9% of the time

More Hyland OnBase Competitors

Camunda vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 18% of the time

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 10% of the time

Pega Platform vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 8% of the time

Bizagi vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 6% of the time

ServiceNow Orchestration vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More Nintex Process Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Hyland OnBase

June 2025

Download Hyland OnBase product report

Buyer's Guide

Nintex Process Platform

June 2025

Download Nintex Process Platform product report

Also Known As

OnBase

K2 blackpearl, K2 Five, Nintex Workflow

Overview

Hyland OnBase is acclaimed for its robust document management, automating workflows, and improving organizational efficiency across various industries. Praised for its ability to manage records compliantly, especially in regulated sectors like healthcare and finance, the tool also integrates smoothly with other enterprise systems. Users benefit significantly from streamlined processes, reduced manual tasks, and enhanced data accuracy, boosting productivity and customer satisfaction.

Hyland

Nintex Process Platform automates processes such as approvals, vendor requests, and leave management, optimizing workflows in sectors like government, banking, and HR.

Nintex Process Platform streamlines collaboration and integrates seamlessly with Microsoft tools. It supports account management, loan origination, claims reimbursement, and public e-services, while also assisting with onboarding, resource management, and compliance workflows. Users benefit from its ease of maintenance, low-code development, and powerful workflow engine capable of handling complex processes through SmartObjects technology.

What are some key features?

Easy Maintenance - Simplifies ongoing management and updates.
Low-Code Development - Enables quick application creation with minimal coding.
Extensive Integration - Connects with diverse data sources through SmartObjects technology.
Drag-and-Drop Interface - Offers a user-friendly, visually intuitive design for creating workflows.
Automatic Workflow Triggers - Allows for seamless automation of predefined actions.
Integration with Microsoft Ecosystems - Ensures compatibility with SharePoint and Office 365.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Affordability - Offers cost-effective solutions for businesses.
Customizability - Provides tailored solutions that meet specific needs.
Support - Beneficial for addressing issues and optimizing performance.
Rapid Development - Facilitates quick project turnaround due to its pre-built constructs.

Nintex Process Platform is implemented across various sectors, such as government, banking, and HR, providing significant improvements in workflow efficiency. In governmental agencies, it facilitates public e-services and compliance workflows, while in banking, it supports account management and loan origination. HR departments benefit from enhanced onboarding, resource management, and leave management processes.

Nintex

Sample Customers

Honda France Industries, Hill County Texas, Hylant Group, ING Lease France, State of South Carolina, Syracuse University, Swindon College, Rhode Island Department of Human Services, Rochester Institute of Technology, Moen, Odense University Hospital

SEA Corp, Omnicom Group, Verizon, STIHL

Buyer's Guide

Hyland OnBase vs. Nintex Process Platform

June 2025

Free Report: Hyland OnBase vs. Nintex Process Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Hyland OnBase vs. Nintex Process Platform and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Hyland OnBase vs. Nintex Process Platform report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.