Top 10 Hyland OnBase Alternatives

3.9 out of 5

13 reviews
100% willing to recommend

1,672 followers

Top Hyland OnBase Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Hyland OnBase based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC), Camunda, and Appian. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Hyland OnBase surpasses its competitors by offering a robust document management system, seamless integration capabilities, and advanced workflow automation, enabling organizations to streamline operations, improve efficiency, and enhance decision-making processes effectively.

Hyland Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Hyland, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC)

3.9 out of 5

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC)

3.9 out of 5

Informatica IDMC excels in data integration and governance, ideal for data-centric applications. In comparison, Hyland OnBase offers strong document management for various industries. A tech buyer may choose IDMC for enterprise-grade data management or OnBase for its modular workflow flexibility.

Download Hyland OnBase vs. Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) Report

Pricing

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) requires a significant initial setup cost, while Hyland OnBase offers a more affordable setup, highlighting a potential cost advantage for OnBase in the initial implementation phase.

View comparison

Pricing

Camunda

4.1 out of 5

Camunda

4.1 out of 5

Hyland OnBase excels in document management, offering strong workflow automation and easy integration, attracting buyers focused on efficient data handling. In comparison, Camunda's open-source framework provides flexible process automation, appealing to those needing customization and scalability for complex workflows.

Download Camunda vs. Hyland OnBase Report

Pricing

Hyland OnBase has a straightforward setup cost structure, while Camunda offers a flexible pricing model that can be customized based on specific project needs.

View comparison

Pricing

Hyland OnBase has a straightforward setup cost structure, while Camunda offers a flexible pricing model that can be customized based on specific project needs.

Appian

4.2 out of 5

Appian

4.2 out of 5

Appian accelerates time-to-market with low-code application development, ideal for agile projects. In comparison, Hyland OnBase offers strong document management and security, favored by industries requiring data control, making it suitable for information-intensive sectors focused on comprehensive enterprise content management.

Download Appian vs. Hyland OnBase Report

Pricing

Appian's setup cost is typically higher due to its advanced features, while Hyland OnBase offers a more budget-friendly setup option.

View comparison

Pricing

Appian's setup cost is typically higher due to its advanced features, while Hyland OnBase offers a more budget-friendly setup option.

Pega Platform

4.1 out of 5

Pega Platform

4.1 out of 5

Pega Platform offers superior digital process automation and case management, emphasizing low-code development and comprehensive APIs. In comparison, Hyland OnBase excels in content management, offering secure audit trails. Pega's pricing structure includes various licensing options, while Hyland emphasizes modular, configurable solutions.

Download Hyland OnBase vs. Pega Platform Report

Pricing

Pega Platform's setup cost is generally perceived as higher, while Hyland OnBase offers a comparatively lower setup cost, highlighting a significant pricing difference between the two solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Pega Platform's setup cost is generally perceived as higher, while Hyland OnBase offers a comparatively lower setup cost, highlighting a significant pricing difference between the two solutions.

Bizagi

4.2 out of 5

Bizagi

4.2 out of 5

Bizagi is appreciated for its intuitive process modeling and automation capabilities. In comparison, Hyland OnBase is praised for robust document management and extensive integration options. Bizagi offers substantial ROI through competitive pricing, while Hyland OnBase justifies its higher cost with comprehensive features meeting diverse business needs.

Download Bizagi vs. Hyland OnBase Report

Pricing

Bizagi's setup cost is higher than Hyland OnBase, making it more suitable for larger budgets, whereas Hyland OnBase offers a more economical setup cost, appealing to budget-conscious buyers.

View comparison

Pricing

Bizagi's setup cost is higher than Hyland OnBase, making it more suitable for larger budgets, whereas Hyland OnBase offers a more economical setup cost, appealing to budget-conscious buyers.

IBM BPM

3.9 out of 5

IBM BPM

3.9 out of 5

IBM BPM excels in process orchestration and system integration, ideal for businesses seeking flexible modeling. In comparison, Hyland OnBase emphasizes document management with a modular architecture, appealing to those prioritizing strong content management and ease of configuration.

Download Hyland OnBase vs. IBM BPM Report

Pricing

IBM BPM requires a higher initial setup cost compared to Hyland OnBase, providing distinct advantages for complex process integrations, while OnBase offers more affordable pricing, appealing for straightforward document management implementations.

View comparison

Pricing

Nintex Process Platform

3.9 out of 5

Nintex Process Platform

3.9 out of 5

Nintex offers robust workflow capabilities and excellent Microsoft integration, making it ideal for complex business processes automation. In comparison, Hyland OnBase provides strong modularity and secure content management, appealing to industries needing stability and diverse content handling options.

Download Hyland OnBase vs. Nintex Process Platform Report

Pricing

Nintex Process Platform typically involves lower initial setup costs, while Hyland OnBase generally presents higher upfront expenses.

View comparison

Pricing

Nintex Process Platform typically involves lower initial setup costs, while Hyland OnBase generally presents higher upfront expenses.

Boomi AtomSphere Flow

3.9 out of 5

Boomi AtomSphere Flow

3.9 out of 5

Hyland OnBase offers robust document management and workflow automation for seamless document handling. In comparison, Boomi AtomSphere Flow excels in integration flexibility and real-time data processing for extensive data integration. Hyland OnBase features simpler deployment, while Boomi AtomSphere Flow justifies higher costs with extensive functionalities.

Download Boomi AtomSphere Flow vs. Hyland OnBase Report

Pricing

Hyland OnBase has a high initial setup cost, while Boomi AtomSphere Flow offers a more affordable setup cost.

View comparison

Pricing

Hyland OnBase has a high initial setup cost, while Boomi AtomSphere Flow offers a more affordable setup cost.

Related categories

Business Process Management (BPM)

Low-Code Development Platforms

Enterprise Content Management