Hyland OnBase vs Salesforce Platform comparison

Hyland and Salesforce are both solutions in the Low-Code Development Platforms category. Hyland is ranked #12 with an average rating of 7.6, while Salesforce is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.0. Hyland holds a 2.4% mindshare in LCDP, compared to Salesforce’s 5.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Hyland users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of Salesforce users who would recommend it.

Hyland OnBase

Read 13 Hyland OnBase reviews

4,371 Views
962 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Salesforce Platform

Read 97 Salesforce Platform reviews

5,935 Views
3,086 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Hyland OnBase

Salesforce Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Salesforce Platform and Hyland OnBase cater to businesses seeking robust software solutions for their operations. Salesforce Platform excels in customer relationship management, while Hyland OnBase is strong in enterprise content management.

Features: Users appreciate Salesforce Platform for its extensive CRM functionalities, integration capabilities, and analytics tools. On the other hand, Hyland OnBase is praised for its document management, workflow automation, and compliance features. While both platforms offer valuable features, Salesforce’s CRM tools stand out, whereas Hyland OnBase’s document management features are unrivaled.

Room for Improvement: Salesforce Platform users note the need for a more intuitive learning curve and better customization options. Conversely, users suggest Hyland OnBase could improve its integration with third-party applications and enhance user training resources. Both platforms have areas to refine, but the emphasis varies, with Salesforce focusing on user accessibility and Hyland on integration.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Salesforce Platform is generally seen as easier to deploy, with comprehensive support services and a large community. Hyland OnBase's deployment complexity is mentioned more frequently, though its customer service is commendable. Salesforce offers a smoother deployment experience, while Hyland counters with strong support.

Pricing and ROI: Users indicate Salesforce Platform has a higher upfront cost but yields rapid ROI through its extensive features. Hyland OnBase, while potentially less costly initially, shows significant ROI over time, particularly in document management efficiencies. Users find Salesforce costly but justified by its capabilities, whereas Hyland OnBase is seen as a cost-effective, long-term investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Hyland OnBase vs. Salesforce Platform Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Hyland OnBase vs. Salesforce Platform

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Hyland OnBase

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

12th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (15th), Enterprise Content Management (6th)

Salesforce Platform

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

PaaS Clouds (9th), Mobile Development Platforms (3rd), Rapid Application Development Software (6th), No-Code Development Platforms (2nd), Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (12th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Low-Code Development Platforms category, the mindshare of Hyland OnBase is 2.4%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Salesforce Platform is 5.3%, down from 7.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Low-Code Development Platforms Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Salesforce Platform	5.3%
Hyland OnBase	2.4%
Other	92.3%

Low-Code Development Platforms

Featured Reviews

reviewer1981395

Product owner at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

Seamless data management enhances security while monolithic architecture and reporting need improvements

I believe the reporting features need improvement, as other competitors in the market provide better analytics. Hyland is working on a new platform (HXP) to integrate features from all products, addressing some concerns. Additionally, there could be more integration points with products Hyland has acquired, such as Alfresco and Nuxeo. Offering a trial version with basic features would allow users to experience the product before purchasing. I find OnBase's monolithic architecture to be expensive, and adopting microservices could be beneficial.

Read full review

Sharmila-K

Cloud Transformations and Infrastructure Delivery Manager at a university with 10,001+ employees

Integration processes improve but scripting requires effort

The updates, pricing part, and upgrades to the products are some of the most valuable features with the Salesforce Platform.With the Salesforce Platform, I have minimal experience of approximately one and a half years. I get minimal exposure, once every three or two months, especially during holidays. The Salesforce Platform is connected to the cloud, which is beneficial. When it is integrated with different tools such as Microsoft BI Analytics, it helps us analyze much better. Currently, the integration itself is tricky as we have to use extensive scripting. It should be more of a plug-in and use solution. That is the only issue I see, but otherwise, I appreciate it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Hyland OnBase is valued for its security, especially for those in the finance domain who require data confidentiality."

"The most valuable features are that it's very secure and provides audit trails for our documents."

"Integrating Hyland OnBase with our systems enabled us to automate document designs and templates, which was extremely helpful in the finance and banking industry."

"The solution's most valuable features are integration and flexibility."

"I like the cloud and its integrability."

"Its most valuable aspect is its flexibility"

"OnBase is a remarkable tool. It is a well-done product. Hyland has a lot of experience in building it and looking for new things for clients in terms of functionalities. It has amazing stability, and it can grow horizontally and vertically. It is built for growth. Their technical support is also quite good and available throughout the year."

"The solution is very developed and we are not taking full advantage of its functionalities."

More Hyland OnBase pros

"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the unit coordination between sales and marketing when it comes to lead management."

"Stability of the platform is important, as are security and flexibility."

"The most valuable aspect is that all data is stored in one place, making it easy to find what is needed and to report on it."

"We use this solution to track customer activities, opportunities and contact information."

"Salesforce's strongest feature is reporting especially. It's also a lot more usable than other platforms I've worked with. It has a great user experience, with the ability to filter and access information in real-time."

"I'm not sure what the most valuable aspect of the solution is, but I can say that their finance and auditing systems are quite impressive. You can audit in different invoices right to procurement. It's all quite seamless."

"The product is pretty responsive."

"What we like the most about it is the fact that it helps us track the record of our projects. It keeps everything on one interface, facilitating the operations and planning."

More Salesforce Platform pros

Cons

"We are struggling with duplicates and would like to have OCR functionality when using this solution."

"The application could potentially be more open-source, allowing integration with more solutions."

"An area for improvement would be the training - getting our people up to speed on how to use it required more training than we expected due to the complexity of the solution."

"We need to troubleshoot why our reports didn't get downloaded in a day. There is a workflow feature which powerful but also complicated."

"The dashboards do have some room for improvement as compared to the other vendors which are there in the market."

"I find OnBase's monolithic architecture to be expensive, and adopting microservices could be beneficial."

"Software malfunctioning usually occurs when we receive documents from external sources."

"We found the size of images to be a restriction, though this may have been due to the API used rather than the Hyland application."

More Hyland OnBase cons

"Getting reports in Salesforce is sometimes a little bit difficult. You need to do a lot of things to get detailed reports. This feature can be improved. Its price can also be improved. It is currently expensive."

"The cost of data storage is an issue once the company grows."

"The back end really isn't user-friendly at all."

"The reporting needs improvement and the dashboard could have more components added."

"Salesforce introduces a lot of products and sometimes rebrands them, causing confusion. They acquire products like W and retain their names, creating confusion in the market. This confusion isn't related to the product's functionality but rather its positioning and rebranding. For instance, what was once known as Community Cloud is now referred to as Experience Cloud. This can be confusing for business leaders."

"UI needs to be more intuitive and user friendly."

"It's all set up for us in a way that establishes our account. We need to tag ourselves to opportunities. You have to tag yourself to the opportunity manually; you need to find it yourself and tag it."

"The previous version had a complicated interface where multiple pages and data entries were required, which was not pleasant for sales teams or business users."

More Salesforce Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution costs around $6,000 per month."

"There are a number of different types of licenses. There are concurrent licenses, individual licenses and imaging licenses."

"The tool's price is high."

"OnBase is reasonably priced."

"They can do better in terms of the pricing model. It is a really expensive tool in Latin America. They should have different prices for different regions."

"Costly, but it is the top product in SaaS/PaaS. Pricing is more for large to enterprise level companies."

"Salesforce is cheap."

"rice-wise, the solution is reasonable for what we're getting."

"It is an expensive program."

"The price varies depending on the cloud."

"Salesforce does a user capacity analysis on a regular basis. For example, if you're not using certain areas, you may lose access. If you don't go in and quote and edit quotes, all of a sudden you may lose your rights to quote."

"It is expensive. Licensing is on an annual basis."

"The solution is a bit expensive."

More Salesforce Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Low-Code Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	39
Midsize Enterprise	26
Large Enterprise	39

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Hyland OnBase?

I find pricing to be on the higher side due to its monolithic architecture. I would rate it six out of ten. Transitioning to microservices, allowing users to pay for only what they use, could reduc...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Hyland OnBase?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Hyland OnBase?

I was a vendor managing Hyland OnBase ( /products/hyland-onbase-reviews ) for Hyland, not as a direct user but as a business partner. We managed the solution and were a partner with Hyland.

See all answers

How would you choose between Microsoft PowerApps and Salesforce Platform?

I think it depends on your use case. If your organization uses Microsoft Enterprise products, PowerApps will work better in your environment. Similarly, if you have a Salesforce integration in pla...

See all answers

How does Salesforce Platform compare with Azure?

Microsoft’s Windows Azure platform is not easy or intuitive to deploy. The difficulty will be impacted by the type of application that you are trying to use the platform to build. Organizations tha...

See all answers

Do you build applications using low-code or pro-code builders on Salesforce Platform?

At my organization, we have only used Salesforce Platform's low-code builder. The reason for this is not because we do not like the pro-code option, but because we do not see the need of using it, ...

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText Content Management vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 10% of the time

Alfresco vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 8% of the time

OpenText Documentum Content Management vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 8% of the time

SharePoint vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 7% of the time

Appian vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 3% of the time

More Hyland OnBase Competitors

Oracle Application Express (APEX) vs Salesforce Platform

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Azure vs Salesforce Platform

Compared 9% of the time

Appian vs Salesforce Platform

Compared 9% of the time

ServiceNow vs Salesforce Platform

Compared 7% of the time

SUSE Cloud Application Platform vs Salesforce Platform

Compared 3% of the time

More Salesforce Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Hyland OnBase

January 2026

Download Hyland OnBase product report

Buyer's Guide

Salesforce Platform

January 2026

Download Salesforce Platform product report

Also Known As

OnBase

Salesforce1, Force.com, Salesforce App Cloud

Overview

Hyland OnBase is acclaimed for its robust document management, automating workflows, and improving organizational efficiency across various industries. Praised for its ability to manage records compliantly, especially in regulated sectors like healthcare and finance, the tool also integrates smoothly with other enterprise systems. Users benefit significantly from streamlined processes, reduced manual tasks, and enhanced data accuracy, boosting productivity and customer satisfaction.

Hyland

Salesforce Platform is a tool that provides application building with open application programming interfaces (APIs), integration tools, back-end services, starter templates, and developer environments. With a low-code interface, users are able to build applications and benefit from automated processes. The product helps customers to increase work productivity and save on IT costs through efficient, easy-to-understand, methods for creating applications.

Salesforce Platform allows companies to build and operate intelligent applications at scale and share them with employees and customers in real time. The tool secures companies' data while connecting and synchronizing it simultaneously across their Customer 360 accounts. The main components of the product are:

Application development: With low code, companies can build applications faster and automate their businesses.
Automation: The product can connect with Salesforce Genie, allowing employees to create seamless processes.
Security: The Shield component allows companies to secure their data and build applications.
Hyperforce: Companies have the option to scale globally and serve customers locally, providing secure, private, and agile solutions.
Einstein Intelligence: Organizations can utilize artificial intelligence (AI) to create personalized experiences for customers, potentially increasing companies’ growth.
Sandboxes: Salesforce Platform offers developers secure development environments where they can test, build, and deploy changes before rolling out final products.

Salesforce Platform Features

Also referred to as a “drag and drop app builder," this solution offers various features for customers to create intelligent applications and build personalized services for clients, partners, and employees within the apps.

Mobile feature: The mobile feature of Salesforce Platform allows users to build applications for mobile as well as turn already-made apps into mobile apps instantly.
AI: Through AI, users are able to personalize their applications, utilizing the smart assistant of the platform (called Einstein). The creation of customized services for clients can drive engagement and scale customer experience.
Vision feature: The Vision feature also utilizes Einstein Platform, where users can take advantage of Einstein Prediction Builder, Bots, Vision, and Language to create AI-powered applications.
Data protection: Salesforce Platform offers a data protection feature called Salesforce Shield. With it, companies can monitor app and data use, automate security policies, run compliance audits, and encrypt sensitive data.
Privacy and identity feature: Salesforce Customer Identity is a feature for privacy that offers user access through a single login. The feature provides a seamless user experience while maintaining a high level of security.
Community feature: The community feature of the product offers a digital experience platform where companies can create secure portals, applications, and websites.
Builder feature: The application building feature of Salesforce Platform offers various ways for users to create apps, including through low-code builders and pro-code tools.

Salesforce Platform Benefits

The benefits of using Salesforce Platform include:

Compared to manual coding products, Salesforce Platform is simpler for beginner users who want to develop a product.
The tool requires a low amount of coding, making it a quick and agile way to develop applications.
The adaptable design of the platform offers multi-layered security which maintains data accessible to users while protecting it from outside sources.
The product can be incorporated with various platforms and coding languages for application development.
The platform can be used to create applications compatible with large database systems like MySQL and Oracle.
Salesforce Platform allows collaboration between users, as it offers simultaneous access to various users at the same time.
Salesforce Platform is compatible with desktop databases such as Microsoft Access.

Reviews from Real Users

A vice president at a healthcare company values Salesforce Platform because it is flexible and user-friendly with helpful pre-built schemas.

Peter G., a senior technical consultant at a tech services company, rates Salesforce Platform highly because it is intuitive, quite easy to learn, and stores all kinds of relevant sales information.

Salesforce

Sample Customers

Honda France Industries, Hill County Texas, Hylant Group, ING Lease France, State of South Carolina, Syracuse University, Swindon College, Rhode Island Department of Human Services, Rochester Institute of Technology, Moen, Odense University Hospital

ADP

Buyer's Guide

Hyland OnBase vs. Salesforce Platform

December 2025

Free Report: Hyland OnBase vs. Salesforce Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Hyland OnBase vs. Salesforce Platform and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Hyland OnBase vs. Salesforce Platform report.

See our list of best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Low-Code Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.