Hyland OnBase vs Salesforce Platform comparison

Hyland and Salesforce are both solutions in the Low-Code Development Platforms category. Hyland is ranked #12 with an average rating of 7.7, while Salesforce is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.3. Hyland holds a 1.4% mindshare in LCDP, compared to Salesforce’s 8.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Hyland users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of Salesforce users who would recommend it.

Hyland OnBase

Read 13 Hyland OnBase reviews

3,322 Views
532 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Salesforce Platform

Read 95 Salesforce Platform reviews

6,403 Views
3,650 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Hyland OnBase

Salesforce Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Salesforce Platform and Hyland OnBase cater to businesses seeking robust software solutions for their operations. Salesforce Platform excels in customer relationship management, while Hyland OnBase is strong in enterprise content management.

Features: Users appreciate Salesforce Platform for its extensive CRM functionalities, integration capabilities, and analytics tools. On the other hand, Hyland OnBase is praised for its document management, workflow automation, and compliance features. While both platforms offer valuable features, Salesforce’s CRM tools stand out, whereas Hyland OnBase’s document management features are unrivaled.

Room for Improvement: Salesforce Platform users note the need for a more intuitive learning curve and better customization options. Conversely, users suggest Hyland OnBase could improve its integration with third-party applications and enhance user training resources. Both platforms have areas to refine, but the emphasis varies, with Salesforce focusing on user accessibility and Hyland on integration.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Salesforce Platform is generally seen as easier to deploy, with comprehensive support services and a large community. Hyland OnBase's deployment complexity is mentioned more frequently, though its customer service is commendable. Salesforce offers a smoother deployment experience, while Hyland counters with strong support.

Pricing and ROI: Users indicate Salesforce Platform has a higher upfront cost but yields rapid ROI through its extensive features. Hyland OnBase, while potentially less costly initially, shows significant ROI over time, particularly in document management efficiencies. Users find Salesforce costly but justified by its capabilities, whereas Hyland OnBase is seen as a cost-effective, long-term investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Hyland OnBase vs. Salesforce Platform Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Hyland OnBase vs. Salesforce Platform

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,295 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Hyland OnBase

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

12th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (16th), Enterprise Content Management (5th)

Salesforce Platform

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

PaaS Clouds (8th), Mobile Development Platforms (2nd), Rapid Application Development Software (5th), No-Code Development Platforms (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Low-Code Development Platforms category, the mindshare of Hyland OnBase is 1.4%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Salesforce Platform is 8.2%, up from 7.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Low-Code Development Platforms

Featured Reviews

Srinivas Rao Kagitha

Senior Onbase Developer & Administrator at HTC Global Services (INDIA) Private

Offers good dashboards and reports but fails to offer better migration features

The migration is a bit difficult in the tool. Whenever we make certain changes to workflow or other stuff, migrating the code from one environment to another is a bit tedious. The tool has an option for export and import, which is not robust. Most of the time, we need to do things stuff manually. For example, if we make any changes in the existing life cycle or any queues, we have to move those changes manually. There is no robust way to migrate code from one environment to a lower environment, like prod. When it comes to the product's technical support, the turnaround time is a bit longer than expected. The issue may be because there are a number of issues or a large number of customers who are reaching out to the support team for help. I believe that the solution's technical team can provide a solution more quickly.

Read full review

Yasser_Anter

Independent Business Consultant at Freelance

Has customization and integration capabilities which increase efficiency

Salesforce could improve by offering AI features or functionalities to help business decision-makers analyze business history, suggest forward strategies, and participate in events. The previous version had a complicated interface where multiple pages and data entries were required, which was not pleasant for sales teams or business users. Also, deploying Salesforce took a long time, about four to five months, which is not ideal for any business.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The retention module is one of the most valuable features. Whatever we scan onto the system can be identified and we are notified when the records are due to be disposed."

"The product's initial setup phase is not difficult."

"It provided data security features, allowing restrictions on sensitive documents, such as who could view or modify them."

"The most valuable features are that it's very secure and provides audit trails for our documents."

"Hyland OnBase is valued for its security, especially for those in the finance domain who require data confidentiality."

"Integrating Hyland OnBase with our systems enabled us to automate document designs and templates, which was extremely helpful in the finance and banking industry."

"I like the cloud and its integrability."

"OnBase is a remarkable tool. It is a well-done product. Hyland has a lot of experience in building it and looking for new things for clients in terms of functionalities. It has amazing stability, and it can grow horizontally and vertically. It is built for growth. Their technical support is also quite good and available throughout the year."

More Hyland OnBase pros

"We like that the technology is very agile and flexible in the sense that there's a large partner ecosystem within Salesforce Platform. This enables us to choose from many different partners with different advantages, and all of it can be done in a plug-and-play kind of way."

"We use this solution to track customer activities, opportunities and contact information."

"Intuitive to work with and the overall fundamental of the platform is very strong."

"The solution scales extremely well."

"Salesforce offers control over the opportunities to see where we are and gives me high-level dashboards on each opportunity stage."

"Salesforce is a phenomenal application. It's very diverse."

"The most valuable feature is ease of use."

"The most valuable features of the Salesforce Platform are the ability to manage customers' data, many report filtering options, and consolidation."

More Salesforce Platform pros

Cons

"We are struggling with duplicates and would like to have OCR functionality when using this solution."

"The solution’s initial setup is a little difficult."

"For user experience, they would have to do more with the interface. It is not easy to work with and is a little messy. It is getting better, but it is not yet good enough. Other products are comparatively doing better in terms of the user interface. I have been hearing about Box, which is very easy to use and learn for the users. OnBase has to work on this aspect. It should have BPM capabilities. We compete with tools that provide the BPM feature and support those standards. They can do better in terms of the pricing model. It is a really expensive tool in Latin America. They should have different prices for different regions."

"An area for improvement would be the training - getting our people up to speed on how to use it required more training than we expected due to the complexity of the solution."

"I find OnBase's monolithic architecture to be expensive, and adopting microservices could be beneficial."

"The look and feel could be better. The integration with the user could be better. It could also be more user-friendly."

"The migration is a bit difficult in the tool."

"The dashboards do have some room for improvement as compared to the other vendors which are there in the market."

More Hyland OnBase cons

"Salesforce Platform operates as a cloud system, and within our organization, numerous internal systems handle data processing. While real-time data retrieval is feasible through services, achieving real-time communication poses some challenges."

"The initial setup is rather complex."

"It does need very specific resources to help deploy it and buy in from the users. It's one of those items it's pretty disruptive and if it's not deployed properly and if it doesn't get utilized efficiently, it won't be effective."

"If you have resellers or distributors, you just need to figure out a way to set up the system in the backend. Since every company is different, it takes a little bit of time to figure that out."

"Technical support could be a bit faster."

"When it switched to lightning, it threw me for a loop. When they changed the look and feel, I had a hard time finding things and doing what I used to do."

"Pricing is the biggest factor. The cost right now is too high and I've had a lot of clients leave."

"Salesforce also did not integrate well with some of the other systems that we had."

More Salesforce Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"They can do better in terms of the pricing model. It is a really expensive tool in Latin America. They should have different prices for different regions."

"The solution costs around $6,000 per month."

"The tool's price is high."

"OnBase is reasonably priced."

"There are a number of different types of licenses. There are concurrent licenses, individual licenses and imaging licenses."

"The solution is fairly priced."

"It is expensive."

"I have heard that it is fairly priced. It offers ROI."

"It is very expensive. Its licensing is on a monthly basis."

"It is a fair price for what it's offering, in comparison with other solutions that are available on the market."

"For the number of people that are using Salesforce Platform in my organization, I feel the price is reasonable."

"I haven't had to buy Salesforce, however, I have heard it's $1500 a user."

"Salesforce does a user capacity analysis on a regular basis. For example, if you're not using certain areas, you may lose access. If you don't go in and quote and edit quotes, all of a sudden you may lose your rights to quote."

More Salesforce Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Low-Code Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

14%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Hyland OnBase?

The solution is very developed and we are not taking full advantage of its functionalities.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Hyland OnBase?

I find pricing to be on the higher side due to its monolithic architecture. I would rate it six out of ten. Transitioning to microservices, allowing users to pay for only what they use, could reduc...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Hyland OnBase?

I believe the reporting features need improvement, as other competitors in the market provide better analytics. Hyland is working on a new platform (HXP) to integrate features from all products, ad...

See all answers

How would you choose between Microsoft PowerApps and Salesforce Platform?

I think it depends on your use case. If your organization uses Microsoft Enterprise products, PowerApps will work better in your environment. Similarly, if you have a Salesforce integration in pla...

See all answers

How does Salesforce Platform compare with Azure?

Microsoft’s Windows Azure platform is not easy or intuitive to deploy. The difficulty will be impacted by the type of application that you are trying to use the platform to build. Organizations tha...

See all answers

Do you build applications using low-code or pro-code builders on Salesforce Platform?

At my organization, we have only used Salesforce Platform's low-code builder. The reason for this is not because we do not like the pro-code option, but because we do not see the need of using it, ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Alfresco vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 14% of the time

OpenText Documentum Content Management vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 11% of the time

SharePoint vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 10% of the time

OpenText Content Management vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 8% of the time

IBM BPM vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 3% of the time

More Hyland OnBase Competitors

Oracle Application Express (APEX) vs Salesforce Platform

Compared 17% of the time

Appian vs Salesforce Platform

Compared 14% of the time

Microsoft Power Apps vs Salesforce Platform

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Azure vs Salesforce Platform

Compared 8% of the time

ARIS Cloud vs Salesforce Platform

Compared 2% of the time

More Salesforce Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Hyland OnBase

August 2025

Download Hyland OnBase product report

Buyer's Guide

Salesforce Platform

July 2025

Download Salesforce Platform product report

Also Known As

OnBase

Salesforce1, Force.com, Salesforce App Cloud

Overview

Hyland OnBase is acclaimed for its robust document management, automating workflows, and improving organizational efficiency across various industries. Praised for its ability to manage records compliantly, especially in regulated sectors like healthcare and finance, the tool also integrates smoothly with other enterprise systems. Users benefit significantly from streamlined processes, reduced manual tasks, and enhanced data accuracy, boosting productivity and customer satisfaction.

Hyland

Salesforce Platform is a tool that provides application building with open application programming interfaces (APIs), integration tools, back-end services, starter templates, and developer environments. With a low-code interface, users are able to build applications and benefit from automated processes. The product helps customers to increase work productivity and save on IT costs through efficient, easy-to-understand, methods for creating applications.

Salesforce Platform allows companies to build and operate intelligent applications at scale and share them with employees and customers in real time. The tool secures companies' data while connecting and synchronizing it simultaneously across their Customer 360 accounts. The main components of the product are:

Application development: With low code, companies can build applications faster and automate their businesses.
Automation: The product can connect with Salesforce Genie, allowing employees to create seamless processes.
Security: The Shield component allows companies to secure their data and build applications.
Hyperforce: Companies have the option to scale globally and serve customers locally, providing secure, private, and agile solutions.
Einstein Intelligence: Organizations can utilize artificial intelligence (AI) to create personalized experiences for customers, potentially increasing companies’ growth.
Sandboxes: Salesforce Platform offers developers secure development environments where they can test, build, and deploy changes before rolling out final products.

Salesforce Platform Features

Also referred to as a “drag and drop app builder," this solution offers various features for customers to create intelligent applications and build personalized services for clients, partners, and employees within the apps.

Mobile feature: The mobile feature of Salesforce Platform allows users to build applications for mobile as well as turn already-made apps into mobile apps instantly.
AI: Through AI, users are able to personalize their applications, utilizing the smart assistant of the platform (called Einstein). The creation of customized services for clients can drive engagement and scale customer experience.
Vision feature: The Vision feature also utilizes Einstein Platform, where users can take advantage of Einstein Prediction Builder, Bots, Vision, and Language to create AI-powered applications.
Data protection: Salesforce Platform offers a data protection feature called Salesforce Shield. With it, companies can monitor app and data use, automate security policies, run compliance audits, and encrypt sensitive data.
Privacy and identity feature: Salesforce Customer Identity is a feature for privacy that offers user access through a single login. The feature provides a seamless user experience while maintaining a high level of security.
Community feature: The community feature of the product offers a digital experience platform where companies can create secure portals, applications, and websites.
Builder feature: The application building feature of Salesforce Platform offers various ways for users to create apps, including through low-code builders and pro-code tools.

Salesforce Platform Benefits

The benefits of using Salesforce Platform include:

Compared to manual coding products, Salesforce Platform is simpler for beginner users who want to develop a product.
The tool requires a low amount of coding, making it a quick and agile way to develop applications.
The adaptable design of the platform offers multi-layered security which maintains data accessible to users while protecting it from outside sources.
The product can be incorporated with various platforms and coding languages for application development.
The platform can be used to create applications compatible with large database systems like MySQL and Oracle.
Salesforce Platform allows collaboration between users, as it offers simultaneous access to various users at the same time.
Salesforce Platform is compatible with desktop databases such as Microsoft Access.

Reviews from Real Users

A vice president at a healthcare company values Salesforce Platform because it is flexible and user-friendly with helpful pre-built schemas.

Peter G., a senior technical consultant at a tech services company, rates Salesforce Platform highly because it is intuitive, quite easy to learn, and stores all kinds of relevant sales information.

Salesforce

Sample Customers

Honda France Industries, Hill County Texas, Hylant Group, ING Lease France, State of South Carolina, Syracuse University, Swindon College, Rhode Island Department of Human Services, Rochester Institute of Technology, Moen, Odense University Hospital

ADP

Buyer's Guide

Hyland OnBase vs. Salesforce Platform

July 2025

Free Report: Hyland OnBase vs. Salesforce Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Hyland OnBase vs. Salesforce Platform and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Hyland OnBase vs. Salesforce Platform report.

See our list of best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Low-Code Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.