

Hyland OnBase and OpenText Content Management compete in the enterprise content management category. Hyland OnBase appears to have the upper hand in customer support and flexible pricing, while OpenText Content Management is preferred for its advanced features and scalability.
Features: Hyland OnBase provides robust document management, workflow automation, and seamless integration options, suiting mid-sized businesses. OpenText Content Management offers advanced content services with AI capabilities, powerful analytics, and strong SAP integration, making it ideal for larger enterprises seeking sophisticated solutions.
Room for Improvement: Hyland OnBase could enhance its scalability and analytics capabilities. It may also expand its integration with more third-party applications. OpenText Content Management needs to simplify its deployment process and reduce its learning curve. Its customer service could also become more accessible.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Hyland OnBase is praised for its straightforward deployment and responsive customer support, facilitating rapid implementation. OpenText Content Management has a more complex deployment process, requiring significant IT involvement but is well-suited for complex environments.
Pricing and ROI: Hyland OnBase offers competitive and clear pricing, delivering substantial ROI for small to medium businesses due to lower entry costs. OpenText Content Management, despite its higher cost, provides higher ROI for large enterprises that can utilize its advanced features, balancing setup costs with extensive capabilities.
I have seen a return on investment with Hyland OnBase because it provides a very reliable ECM platform for my organization, helps to remove the dependency on paper files and file folders, saves real estate costs, and facilitates the ability to work from anywhere.
ROI may be very short if you use OpenText Content Management system effectively.
Our vendor relationship facilitated integration with our system and offered additional service beyond the Hyland OnBase product.
I find technical support from Hyland to be good.
In prior years, support was really great; opening a ticket resulted in fast responses and proactive problem-solving.
The staff lacks adequate knowledge.
Transitioning to cloud-based services may reduce these costs in the future.
There is not enough documentation about scaling, which makes it difficult to enhance or modify environments without significant effort.
Hyland OnBase was a stable solution that worked effectively for us.
The product is quite stable if it is well-managed.
If AI could be used more at an enterprise level, since we are purchasing at an enterprise level for the subscription of Hyland OnBase, I would say if those AI informations would stay within the enterprise and not go outside of our enterprise boundaries, it would be secure and maintain our privacy.
The application could potentially be more open-source, allowing integration with more solutions.
I find OnBase's monolithic architecture to be expensive, and adopting microservices could be beneficial.
The expectation from the customer versus the product explanation needs alignment.
Another important aspect is the improvement of the artificial intelligence already embedded in OpenText Content Management solution.
I find pricing to be on the higher side due to its monolithic architecture.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it is very cost-effective and affordable.
We also paid for workflow licenses, which allowed up to 250 concurrent users.
If you compare it to an archiving solution and you are using content management only for archiving, the cost of the license may seem too high, as you are paying for a license that not only includes archiving but also controls the full life cycle of information, connects with SAP and Salesforce, features a native connection with Office 365, and supports parallel editing.
The cost is a significant factor that may deter medium-sized businesses from using OpenText extended ECM.
It has increased the transparency of the processes and workflows. Every user who is involved in each of the steps is well aware. Even the manager gets an update.
It provided data security features, allowing restrictions on sensitive documents, such as who could view or modify them.
The impact of Hyland OnBase on our organization is that automating manual processes has had an incredible effect on our return on investment, and the man-hours saved by automating processes pays for the system, ranging from one to five hours.
The seamless integration between SAP and OpenText offers a 360-degree view of documents, facilitating a full-text search capability.
OpenText Content Management has a feature that is unique in the market, which is the deep integration with leading applications, allowing reflection of the connections between different processes and objects in applications such as SAP, SuccessFactors, or Salesforce, visible inside the document management application.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Hyland OnBase | 4.6% |
| OpenText Content Management | 5.6% |
| Other | 89.8% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 5 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 14 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 13 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 11 |
Hyland OnBase is acclaimed for its robust document management, automating workflows, and improving organizational efficiency across various industries. Praised for its ability to manage records compliantly, especially in regulated sectors like healthcare and finance, the tool also integrates smoothly with other enterprise systems. Users benefit significantly from streamlined processes, reduced manual tasks, and enhanced data accuracy, boosting productivity and customer satisfaction.
OpenText Content Management offers seamless document storage and advanced search features. Ideal for organizations needing integration with SAP and other applications, it enhances workflows while ensuring security and compliance across multiple platforms.
OpenText Content Management stands out with its advanced integration capabilities, allowing seamless connectivity with SAP and other applications. Its enhanced security and permission systems safeguard information, vital for industries like banking, utilities, and oil & gas. Metadata categorization and customizable workflows aid in managing complex document lifecycles. Although improvements in visibility and integration with external tools are needed, the platform provides powerful collaboration tools, enhancing productivity. Users leverage document retention and WebReports features to ensure compliance. Challenges with support, performance during peak times, and architecture complexity are noted. Automation features and analytics require enhancement, alongside more user-friendly SmartUI and record management functionalities.
What key features define OpenText Content Management?OpenText Content Management is widely utilized in sectors such as banking, utilities, and oil & gas. It is implemented to manage software development projects, engineering documents, and workflow automation. Organizations leverage OpenText Extended ECM for document lifecycle management, post-project archiving, and records retention. Integration with platforms like ServiceNow allows efficient handling of document management across global operations, supporting information governance, tax return compilation, and capital projects.
We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.