

Hyland OnBase and Adobe ColdFusion offer enterprise solutions catering to different user needs in the areas of content management and web development respectively. Hyland OnBase seems to have the upper hand in document management, while Adobe ColdFusion stands out in web application support.
Features: Hyland OnBase users highlight its powerful document management, workflow automation, and integration capabilities. Adobe ColdFusion users value its rapid application development, easy database integration, and scalability.
Room for Improvement: Hyland OnBase users suggest improvements in system speed, mobile accessibility, and performance enhancements. Adobe ColdFusion users seek better debugging tools, enhanced security features, and more efficient performance.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Hyland OnBase provides comprehensive deployment options with strong customer service support. Adobe ColdFusion offers straightforward deployment processes and dependable customer assistance.
Pricing and ROI: Hyland OnBase setup costs are high, but users note a significant ROI due to improved operational efficiencies. Adobe ColdFusion pricing is seen as high but justified by user productivity gains.
Our development cycle improved by around 25 to 30%, which allowed us to deliver more.
Since we have relatively few employees within the organization, I would say that return on investment is excellent.
We saved at least 25 percent of development time with Adobe ColdFusion.
I have seen a return on investment with Hyland OnBase because it provides a very reliable ECM platform for my organization, helps to remove the dependency on paper files and file folders, saves real estate costs, and facilitates the ability to work from anywhere.
I have been able to see a return on investment as the time for approvals has been reduced, and since they are centralized, everything is in one place.
The technical team also helped us towards the relevant documentation and provided step-by-step assistance whenever needed.
I reached out to them regarding integration failures and received a very quick response with detailed documentation.
They provided clear guidance and helped us troubleshoot a deployment issue very quickly.
Our vendor relationship facilitated integration with our system and offered additional service beyond the Hyland OnBase product.
I would describe the customer service and technical support of Hyland OnBase as being based on the partner that is used.
I find technical support from Hyland to be good.
Adobe ColdFusion is very scalable, and I have found it easy to scale as our needs have grown.
As we have grown, we have been able to handle more users and larger datasets without any major performance issues.
Regarding Adobe ColdFusion's scalability, we were using an on-premises machine and scalability was fine.
Transitioning to cloud-based services may reduce these costs in the future.
It supports load balancing, clustering, and high availability.
We run several business-critical applications on it, and there are few issues that we encounter.
Adobe ColdFusion is really stable and very reliable.
Hyland OnBase was a stable solution that worked effectively for us.
Adobe should invest more in open-source IDE tools to have robust, error-free linting, formatting, and auto-completion standards that match the seamless experience found in environments such as Python.
Expanding the ecosystem and improving integration with popular DevOps and cloud-native tools would be beneficial.
Adobe ColdFusion can be improved if there was an AI feature integrated through prompt engineering, which would be very helpful.
The application could potentially be more open-source, allowing integration with more solutions.
Hyland is working on a new platform (HXP) to integrate features from all products, addressing some concerns.
The experience with the platform's learning curve is quite steep, especially for less technical staff.
It is positioned more towards the enterprise market, so it's not the lowest-cost option compared to some open-source alternatives.
The pricing for Adobe ColdFusion is fair, and performance is a solid aspect of this tool for me.
We also paid for workflow licenses, which allowed up to 250 concurrent users.
I find pricing to be on the higher side due to its monolithic architecture.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it is very cost-effective and affordable.
Adobe ColdFusion reduces development cost, with less boilerplate code compared to Java or .NET.
The rapid development capabilities really stand out, especially the built-in tags and functions that simplify database interaction, form handling, and API creation.
Previously, creating an admin panel took us 10 to 15 days, but now we are able to create it in one to two hours, which is very useful for us.
It provided data security features, allowing restrictions on sensitive documents, such as who could view or modify them.
The workflow engine has made the biggest difference for me because it is excellent for automating approval processes.
Hyland OnBase is valued for its security, especially for those in the finance domain who require data confidentiality.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Hyland OnBase | 2.0% |
| Adobe ColdFusion | 1.7% |
| Other | 96.3% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 8 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 9 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 6 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 13 |
Adobe ColdFusion is an enterprise tool for rapid application development, ideal for web and mobile platforms. Its strong backend and API capabilities simplify application management and integration, making it a preferred choice for creating scalable, stable, and secure enterprise applications.
Adobe ColdFusion supports backend applications and integrations with systems, enabling fast development with minimal code. Known for stability, it provides seamless collaboration across platforms with robust API capabilities. It supports efficient backend processing and integration, offering automation and sophisticated workflows. Users benefit from its ability to maintain and develop applications quickly, reducing both costs and time to market. Despite its strengths, improvements are needed in terms of modernizing its developer experience, enhancing documentation, and expanding third-party integrations with modern frameworks and cloud-native environments.
What are ColdFusion's most important features?ColdFusion is widely implemented in industries requiring backend processing and integration. Companies leverage it for developing web applications, automating business logic, and creating APIs. It effectively handles complex workflows and is used in environments demanding robust scalability and secure operations, such as financial institutions, government, and corporations with extensive data processing needs.
Hyland OnBase is acclaimed for its robust document management, automating workflows, and improving organizational efficiency across various industries. Praised for its ability to manage records compliantly, especially in regulated sectors like healthcare and finance, the tool also integrates smoothly with other enterprise systems. Users benefit significantly from streamlined processes, reduced manual tasks, and enhanced data accuracy, boosting productivity and customer satisfaction.
We monitor all Low-Code Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.