Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Adobe ColdFusion based on the interviews we conducted with its users.
The top alternative solutions include ServiceNow, Microsoft Power Apps, and Appian.
The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.
Adobe Alternatives Report
Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Adobe, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
ServiceNow excels in IT service management with extensive workflow automation and cloud-native architecture. In comparison, Adobe ColdFusion is favored for rapid web application development with quick code deployment. Tech buyers choose ServiceNow for scalability, while Adobe ColdFusion appeals with development speed and flexibility.
ServiceNow's setup cost is relatively high, offering robust features suited for large enterprises, while Adobe ColdFusion has a lower setup cost, appealing to businesses with budget constraints.
ServiceNow's setup cost is relatively high, offering robust features suited for large enterprises, while Adobe ColdFusion has a lower setup cost, appealing to businesses with budget constraints.
Adobe ColdFusion offers robust coding and integration capabilities, ideal for enterprise-level applications. In comparison, Microsoft Power Apps enables app creation with minimal coding, enriched with Microsoft 365 and Dynamics 365 integration. ColdFusion appeals to technical developers, while Power Apps suits businesses seeking scalability and ease of use.
Adobe ColdFusion has a lower setup cost compared to Microsoft Power Apps, which requires higher initial investment. This cost discrepancy highlights the differing entry barriers for these software solutions.
Adobe ColdFusion has a lower setup cost compared to Microsoft Power Apps, which requires higher initial investment. This cost discrepancy highlights the differing entry barriers for these software solutions.
Appian focuses on process automation and ease of deployment, attracting buyers seeking fast setup and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Adobe ColdFusion's rich integration abilities and advanced scripting make it desirable for those prioritizing feature depth despite higher initial costs.
Appian's setup cost is straightforward and competitive, whereas Adobe ColdFusion requires a more substantial upfront investment, highlighting a significant difference in initial pricing.
Appian's setup cost is straightforward and competitive, whereas Adobe ColdFusion requires a more substantial upfront investment, highlighting a significant difference in initial pricing.
Pega Platform specializes in no-code application development with strong automation and process management, ideal for operations-focused businesses. In comparison, Adobe ColdFusion excels in dynamic web application development with advanced scripting and flexible deployment, attracting developers seeking robust scripting features and initial cost-effectiveness.
Pega Platform offers a competitive setup cost compared to Adobe ColdFusion, with distinct variations in pricing that cater to different user requirements.
Pega Platform offers a competitive setup cost compared to Adobe ColdFusion, with distinct variations in pricing that cater to different user requirements.
Bizagi is favored for its pricing and support, making it appealing for cost-conscious buyers. In comparison, ColdFusion offers a robust development environment and powerful integration options, ideal for those seeking comprehensive features and willing to invest in long-term benefits, despite a steeper learning curve.
Mendix offers a low-code development environment, favored for its visual modeling and third-party integration tools. In comparison, Adobe ColdFusion provides powerful server-side scripting and inbuilt web application features. Mendix excels in ease of use, while Adobe ColdFusion offers extensive customization and a comprehensive toolkit.
Mendix has a lower setup cost compared to Adobe ColdFusion, making it more affordable for initial deployment. Adobe ColdFusion's setup cost is higher, which may impact budget considerations for some users.
Mendix has a lower setup cost compared to Adobe ColdFusion, making it more affordable for initial deployment. Adobe ColdFusion's setup cost is higher, which may impact budget considerations for some users.
Adobe ColdFusion satisfies complex enterprise integrations with robust performance, while Oracle Application Express (APEX) is favored for ease of use and rapid development. In comparison, Adobe ColdFusion benefits large-scale projects with strong ROI, whereas Oracle APEX's cost-effective pricing appeals to various project sizes.
Salesforce Platform excels in user satisfaction with strong customer service and deployment. In comparison, Adobe ColdFusion offers powerful scripting and integration capabilities. While Salesforce provides a comprehensive ecosystem, ColdFusion focuses on backend development. Tech buyers choose Salesforce for its robust CRM features and ColdFusion for its efficient development tools.
OutSystems excels in ease of use with its drag-and-drop functionality and rapid application development. In comparison, Adobe ColdFusion offers powerful features for handling complex logic. OutSystems is praised for deployment simplicity, while Adobe ColdFusion provides detailed expert-level support. Pricing favors Adobe ColdFusion for smaller projects.
OutSystems has a high setup cost compared to Adobe ColdFusion's relatively low setup cost, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment.
OutSystems has a high setup cost compared to Adobe ColdFusion's relatively low setup cost, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment.
Adobe ColdFusion provides powerful tools for building enterprise-level applications with strong support and a straightforward deployment model. In comparison, GitHub CoPilot enhances coding productivity with AI-driven suggestions, offering a cost-effective solution for developers through easy integration and minimal deployment complexity within GitHub’s ecosystem.
Adobe ColdFusion is favored for rapid application development and strong support. In comparison, Microsoft Azure App Service excels in scalability and extensive features, ideal for cloud-based and large-scale applications, appealing to enterprises seeking efficient deployment and integration capabilities.
Adobe ColdFusion offers a straightforward setup cost, while Microsoft Azure App Service's setup cost can be more variable, reflecting its flexible scalability options. This highlights a distinct approach to initial costs between these two platforms.
Adobe ColdFusion offers a straightforward setup cost, while Microsoft Azure App Service's setup cost can be more variable, reflecting its flexible scalability options. This highlights a distinct approach to initial costs between these two platforms.
QuickBase is noted for its ease of use, support, and pricing. In comparison, Adobe ColdFusion stands out with robust features and is seen as worth the price despite higher costs. QuickBase appeals to those needing no-code solutions, whereas Adobe ColdFusion suits users requiring comprehensive development tools.
Adobe ColdFusion offers a cost-effective solution with simple deployment and support for rapid development. In comparison, Studio Creatio provides advanced automation, customization, and superior customer service, making it suitable for those who value comprehensive features over initial investment.
Adobe ColdFusion caters to deep web application development with robust customization and security features. In comparison, KiSSFLOW provides simplified workflow automation tools for non-technical users. While Adobe ColdFusion requires technical expertise for deployment, KiSSFLOW ensures ease of implementation and quicker setup.
Adobe ColdFusion is valued for its pricing and customer support advantages, making it attractive for those seeking cost-effective solutions with strong support. In comparison, Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service offers a feature-rich environment at a higher price, appealing to enterprises needing comprehensive integration and powerful development tools.
Adobe ColdFusion has a higher setup cost compared to Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service, which offers a more cost-effective initial setup. This makes Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service a better choice for cost-conscious organizations.
Adobe ColdFusion has a higher setup cost compared to Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service, which offers a more cost-effective initial setup. This makes Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service a better choice for cost-conscious organizations.
Temenos Quantum is favored for its comprehensive features and flexible deployment. In comparison, Adobe ColdFusion is praised for its robust performance and extensive integration capabilities. Temenos Quantum users suggest better performance tuning, while Adobe ColdFusion users seek enhanced debugging tools and competitive pricing.
Adobe ColdFusion shines with its powerful integration capabilities and strong security options, appealing to those needing robust backend solutions. In comparison, FlutterFlow's intuitive design tools and rapid development capabilities make it attractive for front-end developers. FlutterFlow provides superior ROI due to enhanced productivity despite higher initial costs.
Adobe ColdFusion provides rapid application development and integration options, attracting users focused on web applications. In comparison, WorkflowGen offers advanced workflow and forms management, appealing to those prioritizing workflow automation. Adobe ColdFusion's deployment is straightforward, while WorkflowGen allows flexible yet complex setups.
Adobe ColdFusion setup cost is higher compared to WorkflowGen's more affordable setup cost. WorkflowGen is generally seen as more cost-effective for initial setup.
Adobe ColdFusion setup cost is higher compared to WorkflowGen's more affordable setup cost. WorkflowGen is generally seen as more cost-effective for initial setup.
Adobe ColdFusion excels in features, offering powerful web application development and scalability. In comparison, WaveMaker is more cost-effective, with a simplified drag-and-drop interface and built-in templates. Adobe ColdFusion has more advanced features, while WaveMaker ensures easier deployment and better customer support.
Adobe ColdFusion is known for ease of use and rapid development tools. In comparison, Alpha Anywhere impresses with versatile mobile and web app development features. Adobe ColdFusion excels in efficient integration, while Alpha Anywhere's extensive capabilities provide flexibility. Adobe ColdFusion offers affordable setup; Alpha Anywhere yields better long-term ROI.
Adobe ColdFusion offers rapid application development, a powerful scripting language, and ease of use. In comparison, Pillir provides offline functionality, a low-code environment, and SAP integration. Tech buyers may choose Adobe ColdFusion for internal development strengths, while Pillir appeals with low-code efficiency and seamless deployment.
