Hyland OnBase vs Mendix comparison

Read 63 Mendix reviews

9,064 Views
5,076 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Hyland OnBase

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Hyland OnBase and Mendix compete in enterprise content management and application development. Mendix often has the upper hand due to its versatility and value proposition.

Features: Hyland OnBase is known for document management capabilities, workflow automation, and secure storage. Mendix stands out for its flexibility, rapid application development, and integration capabilities. Users find Mendix adaptable to various business needs.

Room for Improvement: Hyland OnBase users suggest better mobile compatibility, more intuitive admin tools, and improved user interface. Mendix users desire enhanced community support, fewer platform bugs, and better documentation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Hyland OnBase provides a structured deployment model but requires significant initial configuration. Mendix offers a straightforward deployment process with responsive customer service. Mendix's ease of use in deployment and strong support are favorable.

Pricing and ROI: Hyland OnBase has a higher initial setup cost but offers solid ROI over time due to reliable performance. Mendix has a cost-effective setup and quicker ROI, driven by rapid development capabilities and flexibility. Users find Mendix offers better value for investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Hyland OnBase vs. Mendix Report (Updated: April 2026).

Hyland OnBase vs. Mendix

Download the complete report

Helped 893,164 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Hyland OnBase

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

14th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (14th), Enterprise Content Management (6th)

Mendix

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile Development Platforms (1st), Rapid Application Development Software (4th), Agentic Automation (5th), Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (11th), AI Software Development (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Low-Code Development Platforms category, the mindshare of Hyland OnBase is 2.1%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Mendix is 4.1%, down from 8.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Low-Code Development Platforms Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Mendix	4.1%
Hyland OnBase	2.1%
Other	93.8%

Low-Code Development Platforms

Featured Reviews

Abdul_Jabbar

Senior Software Engineer at Infosys

Automated workflows have transformed document handling and support daily approvals and billing

The best features Hyland OnBase offers in my experience include being a robust storage solution that integrates well with the Epic solution, allows Unity Forms to be easy to create and use, and has Distribution Services for sending email notifications as reminders.Out of those features, the workflow engine has made the biggest difference for me because it is excellent for automating approval processes, and we use Hyland OnBase for legal requests, hardware requests, travel requests, corporate credit card requests, and file transfer requests. WorkView is an incredible module for gathering and displaying summary information, and we utilize it highly in our subsidiary to manage our legal contracts, their financial billing process, and their travel. We also use the Document Import Process coupled with Unity API for writing custom code to automate processes to send and receive data from other systems that are not yet API enabled. The impact of Hyland OnBase on our organization is that automating manual processes has had an incredible effect on our return on investment, and the man-hours saved by automating processes pays for the system, ranging from one to five hours. I measured the man-hours saved through the tracking of workflows and automation processes. Additionally, Hyland OnBase has allowed us to move away from moving paper around various departments, providing workflow management to keep approval inside the system and out of the email boxes, eliminating the need for paper storage, and saving storage costs with other vendors.

Read full review

Mitchel Mol BGS

CTO at Blue Green Solutions

Has improved development quality and speed but has introduced persistent IDE slowdowns

In recent years, the IDE has been more buggy and slower, and although there have been more features added, I would like to see more stability, as some areas that used to work for a fairly long time are now slower in my development, which feels like a step back. I choose a seven mainly due to the issues we've faced with slowdowns and bugs during development, while runtime has been very stable, and the overall output on Mendix platform is still good; there is definitely some room for improvement, and I would probably have given it an eight or even a nine if those issues weren't hurting my developer output for the past few years. Overall, Mendix platform is stable, but the IDE could be better.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It provided data security features, allowing restrictions on sensitive documents, such as who could view or modify them."

"The product's initial setup phase is not difficult."

"I like the cloud and its integrability."

"Integrating Hyland OnBase with our systems enabled us to automate document designs and templates, which was extremely helpful in the finance and banking industry."

"A single platform with multiple capabilities to orchestrate processes, complex business rules and all types of business content."

"Its most valuable aspect is its flexibility"

"The impact of Hyland OnBase on our organization is that automating manual processes has had an incredible effect on our return on investment, and the man-hours saved by automating processes pays for the system, ranging from one to five hours."

"Hyland OnBase is valued for its security, especially for those in the finance domain who require data confidentiality."

More Hyland OnBase pros

"It is a development platform which assists in accelerating your developmental lifecycle."

"We find it intuitive and easy to use."

"On a recent project, using Mendix cut development time by about 40-50% compared to traditional coding for a workflow app."

"You can scale the solution."

"Mendix has made a great deal of effort to provide its developers a healthy, modern environment for developing. First of all, it adopts Agile methodology by creating a SCRUM-based app where you can handle your user stories. Next comes version control, which really allows multiple team members to collaborate quite easily. And last but not least, Mendix modeler, which is your IDE for developing Mendix apps."

"Mendix isn't just an IDE or a coding language; it's a whole platform where you don't have to worry about hosting or monitoring your application, tracking project progress or user stories, as everything is essentially provided by the platform, and it has a very active community helping you out if you have any questions at all."

"You could actually build an application as someone from the business side is explaining what the solution requires."

"It's amazing that you can build web apps and mobile (hybrid) apps with one code base in a few clicks. It's a full continuous integration environment."

More Mendix pros

Cons

"Hyland OnBase could be improved in terms of service support response time."

"The application could potentially be more open-source, allowing integration with more solutions."

"We are struggling with duplicates and would like to have OCR functionality when using this solution."

"As the system grows in terms of number of modules, features, and functionality, options can be confusing and they can conflict with other options that you enable."

"The look and feel could be better. The integration with the user could be better. It could also be more user-friendly."

"We are struggling with duplicates and would like to have OCR functionality when using this solution."

"We found the size of images to be a restriction, though this may have been due to the API used rather than the Hyland application."

"The look and feel could be better. The integration with the user could be better. It could also be more user-friendly."

More Hyland OnBase cons

"The vendor should focus more on the opinion of the users and make improvements"

"One area for improvement is its integration capabilities. Creating a pluggable widget or integrating it with other systems is challenging. In terms of features, it would be great to see advancements such as AI services and the integration of third-party services. Additionally, connecting external devices to the application requires multiple steps. Improving this will make it easier for the developers."

"Overall, integration with the enterprise ecosystem needs improvement. I would like to see the inclusion of APIs that can help with the interoperability."

"Mendix needs to think about itself offering machine learning and artificial intelligence."

"Overall, integration with the enterprise ecosystem needs improvement."

"As far as I know, the licence is costly."

"We need better reporting and visualisation as this is a critical part of each app and currently the reporting side has to rely on external BI tools."

"I would like to see more documentation as well as how-to documents."

More Mendix cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There are a number of different types of licenses. There are concurrent licenses, individual licenses and imaging licenses."

"OnBase is reasonably priced."

"They can do better in terms of the pricing model. It is a really expensive tool in Latin America. They should have different prices for different regions."

"The solution costs around $6,000 per month."

"The tool's price is high."

"Mendix licensing cost is based on the number of apps you have on the server. At the basic level, it is free of charge, so that seems reasonable, but once you go beyond that, and when it comes to the number of users on the app, that basic structure doesn't work, and the pricing tends to get a little bit steep."

"The solution is a bit expensive compared to others"

"Mendix seems a bit expensive. But in terms of wanting to have less developers and higher velocity, the total cost of ownership is fine. It's not cheap, though."

"There is a license required to use Mendix. The solution's price is high, but it is best suited for enterprise companies that have the budget. It is not for small or medium-sized businesses."

"Mendix is not open source, but its license cost is cheap, particularly when compared to the Appian license. The license model would depend on how many users you have and how many applications you are creating. If you are creating a single app, you just need to have a single app license, so it's free. If you want a multiple app license to cover two thousand or three thousand users, for example, internal users or external users, then you need to pay for the license. There's also a license model for above three thousand or four thousand, or five thousand internal and external users."

"From a commercial point of view, we would like them to change that they currently sell it as a platform, but as a customer you have to decide upfront the usage of the platform. We would like to have Mendix sell it as a pay as you go model: You pay for what you use, and you don't pay for what you don't use."

"Initially, we started with a year for approximately $25,000, and if we need to expand the number of seats then we will increase it."

"Licensing costs are similar to those for all other IT technology, but they vary by region."

More Mendix pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Low-Code Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	13

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	29
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	25

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Hyland OnBase?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it is very cost-effective and affordable.

What needs improvement with Hyland OnBase?

Hyland OnBase could be improved in terms of service support response time. More timely updates to solution software support documentation also should be improved.

What is your primary use case for Hyland OnBase?

Hyland OnBase is used across the entirety of the organization in a variety of different ways, and its primary use is as a document storage solution that is used in conjunction with other systems su...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Mendix?

I do not have much experience with the pricing, setup cost, and licensing because the sales or business team usually handles that, and as a developer, I don't have a clear idea.

What needs improvement with Mendix?

I think Mendix can be improved by supporting automated tests more easily. For example, Mendix can add some IDs for each component to build the automation tests more easily.

What is your primary use case for Mendix?

I use Mendix to build a system about the consultation of APIs. We are using Mendix to build a system to check SAP, which is another system, and we use APIs to bring information from SAP to this pro...

OpenText Content Management vs Hyland OnBase

Comparisons

Compared 7% of the time

IBM FileNet vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 6% of the time

SharePoint vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 6% of the time

Alfresco vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Documentum Content Management vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 4% of the time

More Hyland OnBase Competitors

OutSystems vs Mendix

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Power Apps vs Mendix

Compared 4% of the time

Oracle Application Express (APEX) vs Mendix

Compared 3% of the time

ServiceNow vs Mendix

Compared 3% of the time

Salesforce Platform vs Mendix

Compared 3% of the time

More Mendix Competitors

Product Reports

Hyland OnBase

Download Hyland OnBase product report

Download Mendix product report

Also Known As

OnBase

No data available

Overview

Hyland OnBase is acclaimed for its robust document management, automating workflows, and improving organizational efficiency across various industries. Praised for its ability to manage records compliantly, especially in regulated sectors like healthcare and finance, the tool also integrates smoothly with other enterprise systems. Users benefit significantly from streamlined processes, reduced manual tasks, and enhanced data accuracy, boosting productivity and customer satisfaction.

Hyland

Mendix offers a robust low-code platform that accelerates application development and enhances business-IT collaboration with strong integration and customization capabilities.

Mendix enables rapid prototyping with visual modeling tools like microflows, aiding seamless cloud deployment with scalability and security. Its low-code environment and reusable widgets support easy REST and SOAP integration. Application development is efficient, bridging business needs with minimal coding effort.

What are Mendix's key features?

Rapid Application Development: Speeds up development with low-code tools and visual modeling.
Integration Capabilities: Supports easy integration with REST, SOAP, and systems like SAP.
Visual Modeling Tools: Offers microflows for simplified process automation.
Cloud Deployment: Provides robust scalability and secure cloud-based solutions.
Customization: Flexible UI components and reusable widgets for tailored solutions.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Faster Time-to-Market: Accelerates development timelines with low-code features.
Flexibility: Adapts to diverse applications in banking, insurance, and manufacturing.
Scalability: Supports growth with strong cloud infrastructure.
Enhanced Collaboration: Bridges business and IT for seamless digital execution.
Integration Ease: Easily integrates with existing systems and improves workflows.

In banking, insurance, and manufacturing, Mendix is adopted for developing web and mobile applications. It aids in automating processes and integrating seamlessly with existing systems like ERP. Businesses leverage Mendix's flexibility in creating scalable and customized applications to streamline workflows and drive digital transformation efforts.

Sample Customers

Honda France Industries, Hill County Texas, Hylant Group, ING Lease France, State of South Carolina, Syracuse University, Swindon College, Rhode Island Department of Human Services, Rochester Institute of Technology, Moen, Odense University Hospital

Genzyme, TNT, Yahoo, Capgemini, Roche, D&B, Aegon, kpn, AZL, Sky, Arch, Penn State Univeristy, BancABC

Hyland OnBase vs. Mendix