Hyland OnBase vs Temenos Quantum comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Hyland and Temenos are both solutions in the Low-Code Development Platforms category. Hyland is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.0, while Temenos is ranked #25. Hyland holds a 1.6% mindshare in LCDP, compared to Temenos’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Hyland users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 81% of Temenos users who would recommend it.

Hyland OnBase

Read 19 Hyland OnBase reviews

9,278 Views
2,505 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Temenos Quantum

Read 15 Temenos Quantum reviews

5,071 Views
2,028 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Hyland OnBase

Temenos Quantum

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Temenos Quantum and Hyland OnBase are two enterprise-level software solutions offering different strengths. Users are generally happier with the flexibility and scalability of Temenos Quantum, noting it excels in mobile application support and integration capabilities, while Hyland OnBase is praised for its robust document management features, making it a superior choice for organizations primarily seeking improved Enterprise Content Management solutions.

Features: Temenos Quantum is recognized for its strong mobile application development features, ease of integration with other platforms, and broad support for various environments. Hyland OnBase stands out with its extensive document management capabilities, strong workflow automation, and better search functionalities.

Room for Improvement: User feedback for Temenos Quantum indicates the need for more advanced reporting tools and improved UI customization options. For Hyland OnBase, users suggest enhancements in the user experience for non-technical staff and a more intuitive setup process.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Temenos Quantum users highlight the straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service. Conversely, Hyland OnBase is noted for having a lengthier deployment timeline but offers comprehensive support once implemented.

Pricing and ROI: Temenos Quantum offers competitive pricing with a quicker return on investment, appreciated for its cost-effectiveness in terms of deployment and overall flexibility. Hyland OnBase has a higher upfront cost but users report it delivers significant ROI through its robust features.

To learn more, read our detailed Hyland OnBase vs. Temenos Quantum Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Hyland OnBase vs. Temenos Quantum

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,929 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

4.7

Hyland OnBase enhances efficiency, accuracy, and security, offering savings, reduced errors, and improved workflows, especially for insurance companies.

Sentiment score

7.8

Organizations using Temenos Quantum report increased development efficiency, cost savings, improved security, seamless integration, and scalable architecture benefits.

I have seen a return on investment with Hyland OnBase because it provides a very reliable ECM platform for my organization, helps to remove the dependency on paper files and file folders, saves real estate costs, and facilitates the ability to work from anywhere.

Abdul_Jabbar

Senior Software Engineer at Infosys

There's also prevention of financial loss because I have some workflows designed specifically to validate certain processes, and in the past a lot of money was lost because calculations were done incorrectly.

Joao Santiago

Analista at a consultancy with 201-500 employees

Automation processes that used to take four or three weeks now only require days, and users can be easily trained to implement their own processes.

reviewer2917962

Process Analyst at a consultancy with 51-200 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Hyland OnBase report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Temenos Quantum report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

5.6

Hyland OnBase provides professional 24/7 support, often praised despite complex processes or premium fees required for premium options.

Sentiment score

5.7

Temenos Quantum's support is generally helpful with a good ticketing system, but response times and experiences vary.

Our vendor relationship facilitated integration with our system and offered additional service beyond the Hyland OnBase product.

reviewer2560407

Program Manager at a financial services firm with 11-50 employees

Whenever I proved it was an issue on their side, they always followed up quickly and professionally and always resolved the problems.

Joao Santiago

Analista at a consultancy with 201-500 employees

Customer support largely falls on us, as many aspects must be handled directly with Hyland.

reviewer2917962

Process Analyst at a consultancy with 51-200 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Hyland OnBase report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Temenos Quantum report

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

6.4

Hyland OnBase is scalable and adaptable, supporting growth in users and documents, with cloud services easing manageability and costs.

Sentiment score

7.0

Temenos Quantum is praised for scalability and performance, supporting 100-1000 users, despite some complexity concerns compared to Flutter or React.

Transitioning to cloud-based services may reduce these costs in the future.

reviewer1981395

Product owner at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

Hyland OnBase's scalability is one of its most significant strengths.

reviewer2917962

Process Analyst at a consultancy with 51-200 employees

In the cloud it's easier to handle; you work with pods and other infrastructure elements.

Joao Santiago

Analista at a consultancy with 201-500 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Hyland OnBase report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Temenos Quantum report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

8.0

Hyland OnBase is highly stable, with users praising its reliability, minimal downtime, and excellent scalability, security, and data protection.

Sentiment score

7.5

Temenos Quantum is stable and reliable with frequent updates, but areas like pending applications and front-end need improvement.

Since then they've improved a lot, and now it's very stable.

Joao Santiago

Analista at a consultancy with 201-500 employees

Hyland OnBase was a stable solution that worked effectively for us.

reviewer2560407

Program Manager at a financial services firm with 11-50 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Hyland OnBase report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Temenos Quantum report

Room For Improvement

Hyland OnBase needs enhanced dashboards, AI integration, user-friendly interface, flexible pricing, improved support, OCR, and simplified processes.

Temenos Quantum requires security, interface, and stability enhancements, better integration, faster support, flexible widgets, and improved development tools.

The application could potentially be more open-source, allowing integration with more solutions.

reviewer2560407

Program Manager at a financial services firm with 11-50 employees

Hyland is working on a new platform (HXP) to integrate features from all products, addressing some concerns.

reviewer1981395

Product owner at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

If AI could be used more at an enterprise level, since we are purchasing at an enterprise level for the subscription of Hyland OnBase, I would say if those AI informations would stay within the enterprise and not go outside of our enterprise boundaries, it would be secure and maintain our privacy.

reviewer2867946

Business Analyst at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Hyland OnBase report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Temenos Quantum report

Setup Cost

Hyland OnBase's complex pricing is costly, especially in Latin America, with varied monthly licensing averaging $4,500-$5,000.

Temenos Quantum is costly, with prices ranging from $70,000 to $500,000, though some users find it affordable.

We also paid for workflow licenses, which allowed up to 250 concurrent users.

reviewer2560407

Program Manager at a financial services firm with 11-50 employees

I find pricing to be on the higher side due to its monolithic architecture.

reviewer1981395

Product owner at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it is very cost-effective and affordable.

Abdul_Jabbar

Senior Software Engineer at Infosys

For more quotes and insights, download the Hyland OnBase report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Temenos Quantum report

Valuable Features

Hyland OnBase enhances document management with secure storage, AI capabilities, workflow automation, and flexible integration for business efficiency.

Temenos Quantum is valued for its user-friendliness, customizability, integration, security, and comprehensive mobile and web development features.

It provided data security features, allowing restrictions on sensitive documents, such as who could view or modify them.

reviewer2560407

Program Manager at a financial services firm with 11-50 employees

The workflow engine has made the biggest difference for me because it is excellent for automating approval processes.

Abdul_Jabbar

Senior Software Engineer at Infosys

Hyland OnBase has impacted my organization positively by faster document retrieval, intuitive setup, reduced manual processing, and comes with security.

reviewer2867946

Business Analyst at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Hyland OnBase report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Temenos Quantum report

Categories and Ranking

Hyland OnBase

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

16th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (13th), Enterprise Content Management (5th)

Temenos Quantum

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

25th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile App Platforms (3rd), Mobile Development Platforms (7th), Rapid Application Development Software (27th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Low-Code Development Platforms category, the mindshare of Hyland OnBase is 1.6%, down from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Temenos Quantum is 1.6%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Low-Code Development Platforms Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Hyland OnBase	1.6%
Temenos Quantum	1.6%
Other	96.8%

Low-Code Development Platforms

Featured Reviews

Joao Santiago

Analista at a consultancy with 201-500 employees

Digital workflows have transformed meeting minutes and document tracking across departments

There are some particular aspects of Hyland OnBase, such as layouts or some modules that have just been built, that are not designed with the end user in mind. That's something they need to improve. However, even if it's not adequate for the end user, you can still take that and, with custom development, use those modules and APIs in a user-friendly way. They need to improve the interface and usability of Unity and think more about usability. In terms of tool usability, sometimes there are too many clicks to perform an action, which, if you developed it yourself, you could do in two clicks, whereas within Unity you need four or five clicks to do the same process.

Read full review

Saad Zia Soomro

Software Engineer at Systems Limited

Enhancing banking with robust security but lacking in comprehensive support

When it comes to their support team, my experience hasn't been particularly positive. We've had numerous interactions with them, and a lot of issues have arisen during these encounters. Most of the time, the support team has been unable to provide guidance or in-depth knowledge about their own product and it seems that the development team, the core team, understands the product far better than the support team.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Low-Code Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,929 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Healthcare Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

18%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	16

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	10

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Hyland OnBase?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it is very cost-effective and affordable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Hyland OnBase?

More training videos, if they are more findable, would improve documentation and training documentations from Hyland's side, because there is a lack of documentation and training materials from Hyl...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Hyland OnBase?

As a business analyst, while working on a recent project, I used Hyland OnBase as an enterprise-like document management tool. It was used for storing, organizing, and retrieving invoices regarding...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

SharePoint vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Content Management vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 5% of the time

IBM FileNet vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 5% of the time

Alfresco vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 4% of the time

OpenText Documentum Content Management vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 3% of the time

More Hyland OnBase Competitors

Appzillon Digital Platform vs Temenos Quantum

Compared 9% of the time

Axway Appcelerator vs Temenos Quantum

Compared 6% of the time

OutSystems vs Temenos Quantum

Compared 6% of the time

Mendix vs Temenos Quantum

Compared 4% of the time

Sencha Complete vs Temenos Quantum

Compared 4% of the time

More Temenos Quantum Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Hyland OnBase

October 2026

Download Hyland OnBase product report

Buyer's Guide

Temenos Quantum

October 2026

Download Temenos Quantum product report

Also Known As

OnBase

KonyOne, Kony, Kony Quantum

Overview

Hyland OnBase is acclaimed for its robust document management, automating workflows, and improving organizational efficiency across various industries. Praised for its ability to manage records compliantly, especially in regulated sectors like healthcare and finance, the tool also integrates smoothly with other enterprise systems. Users benefit significantly from streamlined processes, reduced manual tasks, and enhanced data accuracy, boosting productivity and customer satisfaction.

Hyland

Temenos Quantum is a versatile platform designed for mobile and web development, offering robust security and customizability. It simplifies integration with databases and systems, facilitating cross-platform application creation while supporting mobile, desktop, and kiosk interfaces.

Temenos Quantum serves cross-platform mobile app development, supporting a unified codebase for iOS, Android, and Windows. It caters to banks for core banking and financial applications, enhancing retail operations and customer interfaces. Kony Studio allows easy development with prebuilt templates, visual design tools, and JavaScript ES6 compatibility, streamlining B2B and B2C app creation and API integration.

What are the key features?

User-Friendliness: Easy to navigate and customize.
Robust Security: Ensures secure data transmission in banking apps.
All-in-One Platform: Supports mobile and web development in one place.
Integration: Simplifies connection with databases and third-party systems.
Cross-Platform Support: Enables development for mobile, desktop, and kiosk interfaces.

What benefits should users expect?

Efficient Development: Quick installation with minimal customization due to prebuilt templates.
Cross-Platform Capabilities: Unified codebase reduces development time across devices.
Banking Suitability: Secure environment ideal for financial applications.
Improved Operations: Enhances retail and customer-facing interfaces.
Seamless API Integration: Facilitates smooth connections with other systems.

Organizations leverage Temenos Quantum in banking, finance, and retail industries, focusing on app development for internal tools, customer interactions, and operational efficiency. Its ability to streamline processes, integrate third-party systems, and support a secure environment makes it highly applicable across sectors.

Temenos

Sample Customers

Honda France Industries, Hill County Texas, Hylant Group, ING Lease France, State of South Carolina, Syracuse University, Swindon College, Rhode Island Department of Human Services, Rochester Institute of Technology, Moen, Odense University Hospital

Partners FCU, Banco Bolivariano, PSECU, CFG Bank, Commerce Bank

Buyer's Guide

Hyland OnBase vs. Temenos Quantum

September 2026

Free Report: Hyland OnBase vs. Temenos Quantum

Find out what your peers are saying about Hyland OnBase vs. Temenos Quantum and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,929 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Hyland OnBase vs. Temenos Quantum report.

See our list of best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Low-Code Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.