Hyland OnBase vs Temenos Quantum comparison

Hyland and Temenos are both solutions in the Low-Code Development Platforms category. Hyland is ranked #12 with an average rating of 7.6, while Temenos is ranked #25. Hyland holds a 2.4% mindshare in LCDP, compared to Temenos’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Hyland users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 81% of Temenos users who would recommend it.

Hyland OnBase

Read 13 Hyland OnBase reviews

4,371 Views
962 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Temenos Quantum

Read 15 Temenos Quantum reviews

1,323 Views
582 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Hyland OnBase

Temenos Quantum

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Temenos Quantum and Hyland OnBase are two enterprise-level software solutions offering different strengths. Users are generally happier with the flexibility and scalability of Temenos Quantum, noting it excels in mobile application support and integration capabilities, while Hyland OnBase is praised for its robust document management features, making it a superior choice for organizations primarily seeking improved Enterprise Content Management solutions.

Features: Temenos Quantum is recognized for its strong mobile application development features, ease of integration with other platforms, and broad support for various environments. Hyland OnBase stands out with its extensive document management capabilities, strong workflow automation, and better search functionalities.

Room for Improvement: User feedback for Temenos Quantum indicates the need for more advanced reporting tools and improved UI customization options. For Hyland OnBase, users suggest enhancements in the user experience for non-technical staff and a more intuitive setup process.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Temenos Quantum users highlight the straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service. Conversely, Hyland OnBase is noted for having a lengthier deployment timeline but offers comprehensive support once implemented.

Pricing and ROI: Temenos Quantum offers competitive pricing with a quicker return on investment, appreciated for its cost-effectiveness in terms of deployment and overall flexibility. Hyland OnBase has a higher upfront cost but users report it delivers significant ROI through its robust features.

To learn more, read our detailed Hyland OnBase vs. Temenos Quantum Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Hyland OnBase vs. Temenos Quantum

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Hyland OnBase

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

12th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (15th), Enterprise Content Management (6th)

Temenos Quantum

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

25th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile App Platforms (5th), Mobile Development Platforms (8th), Rapid Application Development Software (31st)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Low-Code Development Platforms category, the mindshare of Hyland OnBase is 2.4%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Temenos Quantum is 1.3%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Low-Code Development Platforms Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Hyland OnBase	2.4%
Temenos Quantum	1.3%
Other	96.3%

Low-Code Development Platforms

Featured Reviews

reviewer1981395

Product owner at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

Seamless data management enhances security while monolithic architecture and reporting need improvements

I believe the reporting features need improvement, as other competitors in the market provide better analytics. Hyland is working on a new platform (HXP) to integrate features from all products, addressing some concerns. Additionally, there could be more integration points with products Hyland has acquired, such as Alfresco and Nuxeo. Offering a trial version with basic features would allow users to experience the product before purchasing. I find OnBase's monolithic architecture to be expensive, and adopting microservices could be beneficial.

Read full review

Zain Omer

Software Engineer (Kony-Temenos | Android) at Xpert Digital

Though a secure tool for building applications, there is a need to improve its stability

There is a lot of room for improvement in Temenos Quantum. Temenos Quantum is not quite stable yet. Improvements can be made to make Temenos Quantum stable. Improvements are needed in the solution, considering how my company needs to raise a lot of tickets with the technical support team of Temenos for some basic issues every time. There are some features in Temenos Quantum that I want to be stabilized by Temenos, just like in Android Studio and Xcode. Building an application using Temenos Quantum is not difficult, but my company needs to seek some support for the solution all the time.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It provided data security features, allowing restrictions on sensitive documents, such as who could view or modify them."

"The solution is very developed and we are not taking full advantage of its functionalities."

"Integrating Hyland OnBase with our systems enabled us to automate document designs and templates, which was extremely helpful in the finance and banking industry."

"Hyland OnBase is valued for its security, especially for those in the finance domain who require data confidentiality."

"The retention module is one of the most valuable features. Whatever we scan onto the system can be identified and we are notified when the records are due to be disposed."

"We found the setup process to be okay since they do offer a troubleshooting guide."

"I like the cloud and its integrability."

"The most valuable features are that it's very secure and provides audit trails for our documents."

More Hyland OnBase pros

"It is a single platform that can cater to mobile and web development requirements, making it convenient for businesses looking to transition into the digital space."

"With the new VM releases, it is a faster product with more abilities that benefit the user."

"You can do rapid development across multiple platforms."

"The most valuable feature is usability. You can develop components inside it and reuse them in different parts of your application, wherever needed. You can replicate them. There's also a Quantum Fabric on the back end, which provides a middle layer between your database and the third-party systems you need to integrate. It also provides the integration to handle all sorts of exceptions and timeouts on the Fabric. This makes it easy to troubleshoot errors coming from third-party APIs."

"The best feature is the Kony Studio, which is the product that is used to develop interfaces."

"It is an important solution for reducing the development efforts by developing a mobile application efficiently, in a shorter period of time, across multiple platforms, such as Android and iOS."

"Its greatest advantage lies in its exceptional security and robustness."

"The main benefit lies in its exceptional speed of implementation."

More Temenos Quantum pros

Cons

"I find OnBase's monolithic architecture to be expensive, and adopting microservices could be beneficial."

"The dashboards do have some room for improvement as compared to the other vendors which are there in the market."

"The solution’s initial setup is a little difficult."

"We found the size of images to be a restriction, though this may have been due to the API used rather than the Hyland application."

"The application could potentially be more open-source, allowing integration with more solutions."

"The look and feel could be better. The integration with the user could be better. It could also be more user-friendly."

"Software malfunctioning usually occurs when we receive documents from external sources."

"For user experience, they would have to do more with the interface. It is not easy to work with and is a little messy. It is getting better, but it is not yet good enough. Other products are comparatively doing better in terms of the user interface. I have been hearing about Box, which is very easy to use and learn for the users. OnBase has to work on this aspect. It should have BPM capabilities. We compete with tools that provide the BPM feature and support those standards. They can do better in terms of the pricing model. It is a really expensive tool in Latin America. They should have different prices for different regions."

More Hyland OnBase cons

"We would like to have widgets for graphs and analytics, as well as the integration of machine learning."

"It would be highly beneficial if future iterations of Temenos could incorporate support for QR-based payment methods, as it would enhance the platform's capabilities and align it more closely with modern payment trends"

"There are many issues when integrating with native sides when building an Android application of the retail accelerator or an iOS application of the retail actuator. We have to incorporate on the native side of things, which creates a lot of issues. Temenos Quantum is a proprietary product and not open source. There is not much information available on the internet for developers to reference when solving issues. You have to contact the help desk, who will then give you an appointment and work to resolve the issue. In terms of what Temenos can do better, they can make the product more mature so that we do not encounter as many black holes when encountering an issue."

"Some features are only enabled for paid users. It would be much better if they enabled those features without having to pay. I would also like to see them publish information about future technologies on the Home screen under a separate tab. That would be an improvement."

"When developing our application, we also encountered certain issues related to delays and time-consuming builds."

"Using the API manager can be complicated when you're dealing with multiple teams, projects, and APIs. Quantum doesn't have user-based access, so I can't restrict parts of the project to specific users."

"The UI lacks flexibility, especially regarding customizations. There are numerous issues at the fabric end, and working with the visualizer is extremely challenging. Basic development tasks require a high-end machine, and even clicking on an icon initiates a thirty-second processing time. The challenges mainly revolve around fabric and content."

"Temenos Quantum needs to improve its usability. It lacks information on the network. We have to contact the support when we are stuck with something."

More Temenos Quantum cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"They can do better in terms of the pricing model. It is a really expensive tool in Latin America. They should have different prices for different regions."

"The tool's price is high."

"There are a number of different types of licenses. There are concurrent licenses, individual licenses and imaging licenses."

"OnBase is reasonably priced."

"The solution costs around $6,000 per month."

"Temenos Quantum is an expensive tool. Taking into consideration my company's use of Temenos Quantum for a bank, the costs attached to the solution ranged from 3,00,000 to 5,00,000 USD for building one application for the bank."

"This is an expensive solution, and it is the biggest challenge that we face when we present this platform to customers."

"It is expensive solution."

"The product is expensive. First, they must purchase the product, and then pay an annual renewal fee. The renewal fee depends on the product details and the license term’s length. Clients can buy licenses for five or ten years and pay for them upfront, or they can set up a yearly renewal cycle."

"The price is too high. The annual cost for the Kony license is very high. Every year you have to renew it in order to maintain it"

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Low-Code Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

28%

Computer Software Company

University

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	10

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Hyland OnBase?

I find pricing to be on the higher side due to its monolithic architecture. I would rate it six out of ten. Transitioning to microservices, allowing users to pay for only what they use, could reduc...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Hyland OnBase?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Hyland OnBase?

I was a vendor managing Hyland OnBase ( /products/hyland-onbase-reviews ) for Hyland, not as a direct user but as a business partner. We managed the solution and were a partner with Hyland.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

OpenText Content Management vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 10% of the time

Alfresco vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 8% of the time

OpenText Documentum Content Management vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 8% of the time

SharePoint vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 7% of the time

IBM FileNet vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 7% of the time

More Hyland OnBase Competitors

Appzillon Digital Platform vs Temenos Quantum

Compared 34% of the time

Apple iOS SDK vs Temenos Quantum

Compared 6% of the time

OutSystems vs Temenos Quantum

Compared 6% of the time

Jitterbit Vinyl vs Temenos Quantum

Compared 6% of the time

Pega Platform vs Temenos Quantum

Compared 6% of the time

More Temenos Quantum Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Hyland OnBase

January 2026

Download Hyland OnBase product report

Buyer's Guide

Temenos Quantum

January 2026

Download Temenos Quantum product report

Also Known As

OnBase

KonyOne, Kony, Kony Quantum

Overview

Hyland OnBase is acclaimed for its robust document management, automating workflows, and improving organizational efficiency across various industries. Praised for its ability to manage records compliantly, especially in regulated sectors like healthcare and finance, the tool also integrates smoothly with other enterprise systems. Users benefit significantly from streamlined processes, reduced manual tasks, and enhanced data accuracy, boosting productivity and customer satisfaction.

Hyland

Temenos Quantum is a Multiexperience Development Platform (MXDP) that combines ease-of-use and speed of low-code productivity with deep enterprise capabilities for both consumer grade digital experiences across multiple touchpoints and robust backend services for identity, integration, orchestration, business process automation, and business rules management.

Temenos

Sample Customers

Honda France Industries, Hill County Texas, Hylant Group, ING Lease France, State of South Carolina, Syracuse University, Swindon College, Rhode Island Department of Human Services, Rochester Institute of Technology, Moen, Odense University Hospital

Partners FCU, Banco Bolivariano, PSECU, CFG Bank, Commerce Bank

Buyer's Guide

Hyland OnBase vs. Temenos Quantum

December 2025

Free Report: Hyland OnBase vs. Temenos Quantum

Find out what your peers are saying about Hyland OnBase vs. Temenos Quantum and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Hyland OnBase vs. Temenos Quantum report.

See our list of best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Low-Code Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.