Hyland OnBase vs Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Hyland and Oracle are both solutions in the Low-Code Development Platforms category. Hyland is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.0, while Oracle is ranked #28. Hyland holds a 1.6% mindshare in LCDP, compared to Oracle’s 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Hyland users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Hyland OnBase

Read 19 Hyland OnBase reviews

9,278 Views
2,505 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud...

Read 6 Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service reviews

3,113 Views
2,023 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Hyland OnBase

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Hyland OnBase and Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service both offer robust enterprise solutions, with Hyland OnBase having the upper hand in support and satisfaction, while Oracle Visual Builder stands out for its advanced features and perceived value.

Features: Hyland OnBase provides comprehensive document management, workflow automation, and scalable solutions for various industries. Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service offers powerful development tools, quick app creation, and seamless integrations. Users find Oracle's feature set versatile for developer-centric tasks.

Room for Improvement: Hyland OnBase needs a modernized system architecture, better mobile functionalities, and more user-friendly interfaces. Oracle Visual Builder could improve its documentation, reduce complexity in its learning curve, and streamline its development environment. Both products face specific challenges in updating their features and providing accessible resources to users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Hyland OnBase deployment is straightforward with strong customer service and support. Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service deployment can be complex, requiring skilled developers, but the customization possibilities are extensive. Nonetheless, Hyland OnBase's simpler deployment and better customer support offer notable advantages.

Pricing and ROI: Hyland OnBase has reasonable setup costs with satisfactory ROI due to robust support services. Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service's pricing is higher, but users find value in its advanced features and flexibility, leading to higher perceived long-term value. Hyland OnBase is seen as cost-effective, while Oracle Visual Builder is viewed as an investment in advanced capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Hyland OnBase vs. Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Hyland OnBase vs. Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Hyland OnBase

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

16th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (13th), Enterprise Content Management (5th)

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud...

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

28th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Rapid Application Development Software (28th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Low-Code Development Platforms category, the mindshare of Hyland OnBase is 1.6%, down from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is 1.5%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Low-Code Development Platforms Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Hyland OnBase	1.6%
Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service	1.5%
Other	96.9%

Low-Code Development Platforms

Featured Reviews

Joao Santiago

Analista at a consultancy with 201-500 employees

Digital workflows have transformed meeting minutes and document tracking across departments

There are some particular aspects of Hyland OnBase, such as layouts or some modules that have just been built, that are not designed with the end user in mind. That's something they need to improve. However, even if it's not adequate for the end user, you can still take that and, with custom development, use those modules and APIs in a user-friendly way. They need to improve the interface and usability of Unity and think more about usability. In terms of tool usability, sometimes there are too many clicks to perform an action, which, if you developed it yourself, you could do in two clicks, whereas within Unity you need four or five clicks to do the same process.

Read full review

Sherif Bashar

Head Of Digital Solutions at Aptec Ingrammicro

Offers low-code/no-code concept makes development much easier and faster and offers good community support as the development team actively answers questions on the community every day

There are very minor things, like the feature called "action chains," that could use a bit of enhancement. But the team is perfect; they're working on it. An action chain is a sequence of actions triggered by a button or an event. It executes code in order, from top to bottom. For example, it could call a code, call a REST service, and then insert data into a database. It needs enhancement because it can be a bit complex for fresh grads or new developers to understand. It would be better if it was made more readable. That's the main point. But if you have experience, you'll understand it easily. One more thing I want to add about Visual Builder: up until two years ago, it supported native mobile development. That's not available anymore. They replaced native mobile development with progressive web apps, and most customers are complaining about that. We need native mobile development back – the ability to put apps on stores like Google Play or the App Store. That feature is not available right now, and they deprecated it starting in 2024. It's very important. Otherwise, clients go with Flutter or other mobile development tools. It would be good for Oracle to regain that capability. We need the native mobile development feature back.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Hyland OnBase is valued for its security, especially for those in the finance domain who require data confidentiality."

"I like the cloud and its integrability."

"OnBase provides high-value solutions for organizations with much less cost in comparison to other ECM solutions."

"Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) allowed us to enforce strict data privacy requirements like LGPD by ensuring users could only access authorized records based on their role, while making user onboarding and permission management much faster and more reliable."

"We found the setup process to be okay since they do offer a troubleshooting guide."

"It provided data security features, allowing restrictions on sensitive documents, such as who could view or modify them."

"The solution's most valuable features are integration and flexibility."

"OnBase is a remarkable tool. It is a well-done product. Hyland has a lot of experience in building it and looking for new things for clients in terms of functionalities. It has amazing stability, and it can grow horizontally and vertically. It is built for growth. Their technical support is also quite good and available throughout the year."

More Hyland OnBase pros

"The initial setup is easy."

"You can avoid costly React developers that are required for building advanced UI."

"The action chains are really helpful, and the trigger event, along with those action chains, has been very helpful."

"The tool is very easy to use."

"The most valuable feature was the visual drag and drop on the components."

"VBS is another tool that allows users to create enterprise applications without needing to store their projects in traditional databases like SQL."

"You don't need a dedicated IDE to develop. You can work from any browser, which is very convenient. And, with the cloud concept, your code is stored in the cloud, so you can modify it from anywhere, at any time."

Cons

"Hyland OnBase can be improved by providing a modern user interface, simplified deployment and admin overhead, API capabilities, and advanced AI."

"Software malfunctioning usually occurs when we receive documents from external sources."

"An area for improvement would be the training - getting our people up to speed on how to use it required more training than we expected due to the complexity of the solution."

"Hyland OnBase could be improved in terms of service support response time."

"We are struggling with duplicates and would like to have OCR functionality when using this solution."

"The application could potentially be more open-source, allowing integration with more solutions."

"We need to troubleshoot why our reports didn't get downloaded in a day. There is a workflow feature which powerful but also complicated."

"As an ECM solution, there are a lot of improvements needed. For example, the web client should address the next generation of web technologies such as HTML5 and stylish layout."

More Hyland OnBase cons

"The tool has minor bugs."

"My honest opinion is: do not use this solution — there are plenty of free options out there that will do the trick."

"I would improve the license structure as, for some companies, it may seem a little bit expensive, depending on what they're doing."

"There are some bugs in VBCS."

"The feature called "action chains" could use a bit of enhancement."

"There was an attempt to enable front-end development, it did what it intended to do, but the side effects were too bad."

"If you're doing some, for example, extremely responsive applications for the web, it's not as good."

"The initial setup of Oracle VBCS can be challenging for those unfamiliar with DBS."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution costs around $6,000 per month."

"The tool's price is high."

"OnBase is reasonably priced."

"They can do better in terms of the pricing model. It is a really expensive tool in Latin America. They should have different prices for different regions."

"There are a number of different types of licenses. There are concurrent licenses, individual licenses and imaging licenses."

"Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is much too expensive."

"It's not expensive when you consider what it provides: low-code/no-code development, faster development time, good quality, and good stability."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Low-Code Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Healthcare Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

12%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	16

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Hyland OnBase?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it is very cost-effective and affordable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Hyland OnBase?

More training videos, if they are more findable, would improve documentation and training documentations from Hyland's side, because there is a lack of documentation and training materials from Hyl...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Hyland OnBase?

As a business analyst, while working on a recent project, I used Hyland OnBase as an enterprise-like document management tool. It was used for storing, organizing, and retrieving invoices regarding...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

SharePoint vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Content Management vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 5% of the time

IBM FileNet vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 5% of the time

Alfresco vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 4% of the time

OpenText Documentum Content Management vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 3% of the time

More Hyland OnBase Competitors

Oracle Application Express (APEX) vs Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

Compared 9% of the time

Creatio Studio vs Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

Compared 8% of the time

MATS vs Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

Compared 7% of the time

Comidor vs Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Power Apps vs Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

Compared 4% of the time

More Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Hyland OnBase

October 2026

Download Hyland OnBase product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

October 2026

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service report

Download Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service product report

Also Known As

OnBase

No data available

Overview

Hyland OnBase is acclaimed for its robust document management, automating workflows, and improving organizational efficiency across various industries. Praised for its ability to manage records compliantly, especially in regulated sectors like healthcare and finance, the tool also integrates smoothly with other enterprise systems. Users benefit significantly from streamlined processes, reduced manual tasks, and enhanced data accuracy, boosting productivity and customer satisfaction.

Hyland

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service delivers a low-code environment featuring drag-and-drop capabilities for seamless development without vendor locks, ensuring scalability and versatility.

Offering drag-and-drop functionality and a low-code environment, Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service supports both beginners and experienced developers by integrating JavaScript, HTML, and CSS, enhanced with Oracle JET packages. This service facilitates browser-based development and easy integration with existing systems. However, improvement is needed in its licensing structure, functionality for less experienced developers, and native mobile development support. Performance can be affected by minor bugs, especially with complex tasks.

What are the key features?

Drag-and-Drop Builder: Simplifies UI/UX development with intuitive design tools.
Low-Code Environment: Accelerates application development with minimal coding.
Integration Capabilities: Easily integrates with JavaScript, HTML, and CSS for complex scenarios.
Scalability: Adapts to growing business needs with robust architecture.
Comprehensive Documentation: Provides detailed resources for assistance and learning.
Action Chains & Trigger Events: Enhances application interactivity and functionality.

What should users consider for ROI?

Development Speed: Reduces time to market with efficient design tools.
Cost Effectiveness: Offers long-term savings compared to custom coding solutions.
Flexibility: Supports diverse business applications from case management to AI invoices.
System Integration: Works seamlessly with Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP.

Businesses leverage Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service in industries like legal, healthcare, and enterprise resource planning. It aids in developing software for case management, creating worklists for medical companies, and extending Oracle SaaS applications. Companies also benefit from its capability to build custom forms and streamline business processes.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Honda France Industries, Hill County Texas, Hylant Group, ING Lease France, State of South Carolina, Syracuse University, Swindon College, Rhode Island Department of Human Services, Rochester Institute of Technology, Moen, Odense University Hospital

Transcom Worldwide, Latham Pool Products

Buyer's Guide

Hyland OnBase vs. Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

September 2026

Free Report: Hyland OnBase vs. Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

Find out what your peers are saying about Hyland OnBase vs. Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Hyland OnBase vs. Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service report.

See our list of best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Low-Code Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.