Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Boomi AtomSphere Flow vs Hyland OnBase comparison

Boomi and Hyland are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Boomi is ranked #16 with an average rating of 7.8, while Hyland is ranked #17 with an average rating of 7.7. Boomi holds a 0.8% mindshare in BPM, compared to Hyland’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Boomi users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Hyland users who would recommend it.
Boomi AtomSphere Flow
Read 6 Boomi AtomSphere Flow reviews
  • 485 Views
  • 284 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Hyland OnBase
Read 13 Hyland OnBase reviews
  • 339 Views
  • 165 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Hyland OnBase and Boomi AtomSphere Flow are enterprise content management platforms with distinct features, deployment models, and user feedback. Boomi AtomSphere Flow seems to have the upper hand due to its strong integration capabilities and responsive customer service.

Features: Hyland OnBase is praised for its robust document management, workflow automation, and secure storage. Boomi AtomSphere Flow is noted for its strong integration capabilities, flexibility, and comprehensive feature set.

Room for Improvement: Hyland OnBase could improve its reporting features, scalability, and user interface. Boomi AtomSphere Flow users mention the need for enhanced documentation, better customization options, and improved user onboarding.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Hyland OnBase offers a straightforward deployment model but has mixed customer service feedback. Boomi AtomSphere Flow is highlighted for its seamless deployment and responsive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Hyland OnBase users feel the initial setup cost is justified by its return on investment. Boomi AtomSphere Flow users also see value in their investment despite higher upfront costs.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Boomi AtomSphere Flow vs. Hyland OnBase Report (Updated: May 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Boomi AtomSphere Flow vs. Hyland OnBase
May 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 860,592 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Boomi AtomSphere Flow
Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)
16th
Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms
12th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Hyland OnBase
Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)
17th
Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms
13th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Content Management (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Boomi AtomSphere Flow is 0.8%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Hyland OnBase is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Business Process Management (BPM)
 

Featured Reviews

NarendraThota - PeerSpot reviewer
A tool that helps save money in the long run with a need to offer users the ability to deal with large datasets
From an improvement perspective, Boomi AtomSphere Flow should come up with the ability to deal with large datasets. The data integration part is a concern when you try to connect to an on-premises environment since the latency is high, making it an aspect where improvements are required to reduce the latency. Whenever Boomi AtomSphere Flow gets integrated with applications like SAP, it is important to ensure that what you develop is user-friendly, which is a process that takes time, especially when compared with webMethods.io or TIBCO. The development effort with Boomi AtomSphere Flow is more when you compare it with other tools, which is a drawback and an area of improvement.
Read full review
Srinivas Rao Kagitha - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers good dashboards and reports but fails to offer better migration features
The migration is a bit difficult in the tool. Whenever we make certain changes to workflow or other stuff, migrating the code from one environment to another is a bit tedious. The tool has an option for export and import, which is not robust. Most of the time, we need to do things stuff manually. For example, if we make any changes in the existing life cycle or any queues, we have to move those changes manually. There is no robust way to migrate code from one environment to a lower environment, like prod. When it comes to the product's technical support, the turnaround time is a bit longer than expected. The issue may be because there are a number of issues or a large number of customers who are reaching out to the support team for help. I believe that the solution's technical team can provide a solution more quickly.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable features include the ease of designing Boomi flows and the significant cost savings and reduced time to market they offer our clients."
"Boomi AtomSphere Flow gives us flexibility."
"Boomi AtomSphere Flow is integrated through APIs, it exposes the API and any product can call the APIs in the queue. Additionally, it is secure."
"Boomi enhances application integration with scalability, reliability, and security."
"In the long run, if you have a good team, solution architect, and an architect from Boomi's side, then it is a good tool from an ROI perspective since it can help save money."
"Boomi AtomSphere Flow is very easy to develop and maintain compared to other tools like SAP HANA Cloud Integration or Cloud Platform."
"The solution's most valuable feature is its core integration with Boomi AtomSphere because it's extremely easy to tap into any informational system of a company."
"I like the cloud and its integrability."
"Its most valuable aspect is its flexibility"
"It provided data security features, allowing restrictions on sensitive documents, such as who could view or modify them."
"Hyland OnBase is valued for its security, especially for those in the finance domain who require data confidentiality."
"The solution is very developed and we are not taking full advantage of its functionalities."
"The solution's most valuable features are integration and flexibility."
"Integrating Hyland OnBase with our systems enabled us to automate document designs and templates, which was extremely helpful in the finance and banking industry."
"We found the setup process to be okay since they do offer a troubleshooting guide."
More Hyland OnBase pros
 

Cons

"The technical support is rated around 6.5 to seven out of ten. It lacks clarity on how to reach out, write emails, or understand responsiveness."
"Its stability could be improved."
"The solution could improve by being more user-friendly. The whole solution is used through an interface and it could always be improved."
"The development effort with Boomi AtomSphere Flow is more when you compare it with other tools, which is a drawback and an area of improvement."
"There is room for improvement in Boomi's AI capabilities."
"The solution's user interface building needs improvement."
"Boomi is not as flexible compared to other integration products like IBM's. For complex integration scenarios, Boomi could improve its flexibility."
"The application could potentially be more open-source, allowing integration with more solutions."
"The look and feel could be better. The integration with the user could be better. It could also be more user-friendly."
"We need to troubleshoot why our reports didn't get downloaded in a day. There is a workflow feature which powerful but also complicated."
"The dashboards do have some room for improvement as compared to the other vendors which are there in the market."
"The migration is a bit difficult in the tool."
"For user experience, they would have to do more with the interface. It is not easy to work with and is a little messy. It is getting better, but it is not yet good enough. Other products are comparatively doing better in terms of the user interface. I have been hearing about Box, which is very easy to use and learn for the users. OnBase has to work on this aspect. It should have BPM capabilities. We compete with tools that provide the BPM feature and support those standards. They can do better in terms of the pricing model. It is a really expensive tool in Latin America. They should have different prices for different regions."
"Software malfunctioning usually occurs when we receive documents from external sources."
"The solution’s initial setup is a little difficult."
More Hyland OnBase cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Since its pricing positioning has a different construction with respect to its competitors, the solution is sometimes way more expensive and sometimes less expensive."
"When you use Boomi AtomSphere Flow in production, you have to pay for licenses. The solution is not expensive but it could be cheaper."
"OnBase is reasonably priced."
"The solution costs around $6,000 per month."
"They can do better in terms of the pricing model. It is a really expensive tool in Latin America. They should have different prices for different regions."
"There are a number of different types of licenses. There are concurrent licenses, individual licenses and imaging licenses."
"The tool's price is high."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
19%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Educational Organization
6%
Government
15%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
11%
Insurance Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Boomi AtomSphere Flow?
The solution's most valuable feature is its core integration with Boomi AtomSphere because it's extremely easy to tap into any informational system of a company.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Boomi AtomSphere Flow?
The pricing is good for a small-scale company like ours, and the licensing cost is reasonable.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Boomi AtomSphere Flow?
Boomi is not as flexible compared to other integration products like IBM's. For complex integration scenarios, Boomi could improve its flexibility. Moreover, it lacks features like the ESQL scripti...
See all answers
What do you like most about Hyland OnBase?
The solution is very developed and we are not taking full advantage of its functionalities.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Hyland OnBase?
I find pricing to be on the higher side due to its monolithic architecture. I would rate it six out of ten. Transitioning to microservices, allowing users to pay for only what they use, could reduc...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Hyland OnBase?
I believe the reporting features need improvement, as other competitors in the market provide better analytics. Hyland is working on a new platform (HXP) to integrate features from all products, ad...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Camunda vs Boomi AtomSphere Flow Logo
Camunda vs Boomi AtomSphere Flow
Compared 31% of the time
Apache Airflow vs Boomi AtomSphere Flow Logo
Apache Airflow vs Boomi AtomSphere Flow
Compared 16% of the time
Microsoft Power Apps vs Boomi AtomSphere Flow Logo
Microsoft Power Apps vs Boomi AtomSphere Flow
Compared 14% of the time
Appian vs Boomi AtomSphere Flow Logo
Appian vs Boomi AtomSphere Flow
Compared 13% of the time
Pega Platform vs Boomi AtomSphere Flow Logo
Pega Platform vs Boomi AtomSphere Flow
Compared 10% of the time
More Boomi AtomSphere Flow Competitors
Alfresco vs Hyland OnBase Logo
Alfresco vs Hyland OnBase
Compared 18% of the time
OpenText Documentum Content Management vs Hyland OnBase Logo
OpenText Documentum Content Management vs Hyland OnBase
Compared 14% of the time
SharePoint vs Hyland OnBase Logo
SharePoint vs Hyland OnBase
Compared 12% of the time
IBM FileNet vs Hyland OnBase Logo
IBM FileNet vs Hyland OnBase
Compared 9% of the time
OpenText Content Management vs Hyland OnBase Logo
OpenText Content Management vs Hyland OnBase
Compared 9% of the time
More Hyland OnBase Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Business Process Management (BPM)
June 2025
Boomi AtomSphere Flow reportDownload Boomi AtomSphere Flow product report
Buyer's Guide
Hyland OnBase
June 2025
Hyland OnBase reportDownload Hyland OnBase product report
 

Also Known As

Boomi Flow
OnBase
 

Overview

Boomi Flow is a modern, cloud-native service for creating customer journeys and automating simple and sophisticated workflows that accelerate your business outcomes.

Boomi

Hyland OnBase is acclaimed for its robust document management, automating workflows, and improving organizational efficiency across various industries. Praised for its ability to manage records compliantly, especially in regulated sectors like healthcare and finance, the tool also integrates smoothly with other enterprise systems. Users benefit significantly from streamlined processes, reduced manual tasks, and enhanced data accuracy, boosting productivity and customer satisfaction.

Hyland
 

Sample Customers

bioventus, AM Transport Services
Honda France Industries, Hill County Texas, Hylant Group, ING Lease France, State of South Carolina, Syracuse University, Swindon College, Rhode Island Department of Human Services, Rochester Institute of Technology, Moen, Odense University Hospital
Buyer's Guide
Boomi AtomSphere Flow vs. Hyland OnBase
May 2025
Free Report: Boomi AtomSphere Flow vs. Hyland OnBase
Find out what your peers are saying about Boomi AtomSphere Flow vs. Hyland OnBase and other solutions. Updated: May 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Boomi AtomSphere Flow vs. Hyland OnBase report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors and best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.