

Box Intelligent Content Management and Hyland OnBase compete in the content management solutions category. Box appears to have the upper hand in collaboration and integration capabilities, while Hyland OnBase is stronger in process automation and document retrieval.
Features: Box stands out with robust collaboration tools, multi-platform accessibility, and third-party integrations, which allow seamless teamwork and flexibility. It also ensures compliance with stringent security protocols. Hyland OnBase excels in automating workflows, indexing, and document retrieval. Its system integration capabilities streamline complex business processes and improve operational efficiency.
Room for Improvement: Box needs to refine its API complexity, enhance search functionalities, and improve role-based permissions. Users suggest better integration of collaborative editing. Hyland OnBase could improve by simplifying its user interface, easing data migration processes, and providing faster support responses. Users also desire enhanced AI features and a reduction in operational costs.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Box efficiently deploys across public and private clouds and is appreciated for its quick accessibility and strong customer service, though there are occasional concerns about support speed. Hyland OnBase is effective in on-premises and hybrid setups, with dependable customer service generally deemed positive despite occasional complexity and slower responses.
Pricing and ROI: Box offers competitive pricing, often resulting in notable ROI from reduced turnaround times, although costs can escalate with advanced features. Hyland OnBase, while pricier especially at enterprise levels, provides a justifiable investment due to its document handling prowess and modular offerings. Its transition to microservices might improve future cost-effectiveness, with substantial ROI reported from time savings and optimized processes.
I have seen a return on investment with Hyland OnBase because it provides a very reliable ECM platform for my organization, helps to remove the dependency on paper files and file folders, saves real estate costs, and facilitates the ability to work from anywhere.
I have been able to see a return on investment as the time for approvals has been reduced, and since they are centralized, everything is in one place.
Our vendor relationship facilitated integration with our system and offered additional service beyond the Hyland OnBase product.
I would describe the customer service and technical support of Hyland OnBase as being based on the partner that is used.
I find technical support from Hyland to be good.
I am uncertain about its effectiveness at an enterprise level, where SharePoint might be preferred.
Transitioning to cloud-based services may reduce these costs in the future.
Box was very stable and did not have any latency issues.
Hyland OnBase was a stable solution that worked effectively for us.
If Box had an AI feature to summarize and identify documents based on their contents, it would significantly enhance usability.
To open and see who is accessing the document now and see my movements across the document or the file we are sharing together.
Collaborative editing was challenging if multiple people were in a document at once.
The experience with the platform's learning curve is quite steep, especially for less technical staff.
The application could potentially be more open-source, allowing integration with more solutions.
I find OnBase's monolithic architecture to be expensive, and adopting microservices could be beneficial.
I found the pricing reasonable because when I was working for an IBM partner, Box was free for us.
I find pricing to be on the higher side due to its monolithic architecture.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it is very cost-effective and affordable.
We also paid for workflow licenses, which allowed up to 250 concurrent users.
The best features of Box for me include the structured file organizing, which is the most important part I found.
Box had a very easy-to-use search feature and a good user interface on its website, which was faster and better than SharePoint.
I find the synchronization feature most valuable in Box. When I use multiple devices, it syncs them together and gives excellent results.
The impact of Hyland OnBase on our organization is that automating manual processes has had an incredible effect on our return on investment, and the man-hours saved by automating processes pays for the system, ranging from one to five hours.
It provided data security features, allowing restrictions on sensitive documents, such as who could view or modify them.
It has increased the transparency of the processes and workflows. Every user who is involved in each of the steps is well aware. Even the manager gets an update.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Hyland OnBase | 4.9% |
| Box | 3.6% |
| Other | 91.5% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 18 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 10 |
| Large Enterprise | 30 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 6 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 14 |
Box offers seamless integration with third-party apps, strong collaboration tools, and secure content distribution to enhance productivity across devices.
Box is a powerful platform for file storage and collaboration, known for its security, ease of use, and advanced integration options. Supporting seamless synchronization and real-time editing, Box facilitates effective teamwork and secure sharing of content both internally and externally. Though it faces challenges such as folder-level security and collaboration speed, Box remains a preferred choice for enterprises seeking efficient document management and secure file transfers. Its robust feature set, including metadata management and customizable permissions, supports remote work and facilitates easy access to stored documents and workflows.
What are the key features of Box?
Why do users appreciate using Box?
In industries like finance, healthcare, and legal, Box is employed for secure document storage and sharing, ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements. Teams leverage its features for secure project collaboration, e-signatures, and handling large files, making it invaluable in sectors requiring strict data management protocols.
Hyland OnBase is acclaimed for its robust document management, automating workflows, and improving organizational efficiency across various industries. Praised for its ability to manage records compliantly, especially in regulated sectors like healthcare and finance, the tool also integrates smoothly with other enterprise systems. Users benefit significantly from streamlined processes, reduced manual tasks, and enhanced data accuracy, boosting productivity and customer satisfaction.
We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.