AuraQuantic vs Hyland OnBase comparison

Why PeerSpot?

AuraQuantic and Hyland are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. AuraQuantic is ranked #37, while Hyland is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.0. AuraQuantic holds a 0.9% mindshare in BPM, compared to Hyland’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of AuraQuantic users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Hyland users who would recommend it.

AuraQuantic

Read 6 AuraQuantic reviews

4,273 Views
2,008 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Hyland OnBase

Read 19 Hyland OnBase reviews

9,278 Views
2,598 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

AuraQuantic

Hyland OnBase

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Hyland OnBase and AuraQuantic are two prominent solutions in the enterprise content management and low-code automation space. Hyland OnBase excels in support and pricing, while AuraQuantic is preferred for its robust features.

Features: Hyland OnBase offers comprehensive document management, workflow automation, and case management features. Users appreciate its scalability and integration capabilities. AuraQuantic stands out with extensive low-code development tools, advanced reporting options, and a superior rules engine. Users favor AuraQuantic for its customization and extensive feature set.

Room for Improvement: Hyland OnBase users seek a more intuitive design and faster processing speeds. They also desire improved mobile functionalities. AuraQuantic users report challenges with initial setup complexity and the learning curve associated with its advanced features. Both systems have areas requiring enhancement, but the focus differs significantly.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Hyland OnBase deployment is praised for being straightforward, with strong customer support backing. Its deployment model is flexible, supporting on-premises and cloud options. AuraQuantic users find its deployment more complex but appreciate detailed support and comprehensive documentation. Despite this, Hyland OnBase is noted for easier deployment.

Pricing and ROI: Hyland OnBase is seen as cost-effective with swift ROI due to its efficient implementation process. AuraQuantic, while initially perceived as more expensive, offers substantial ROI attributed to its expansive functionality and customization potential. Users find AuraQuantic worth the investment for its long-term benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed AuraQuantic vs. Hyland OnBase Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

AuraQuantic vs. Hyland OnBase

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

6.8

AuraQuantic enhances efficiency, speeds up tasks, optimizes resources, and boosts productivity and ROI through customization and automation.

Sentiment score

4.7

Hyland OnBase enhances efficiency, accuracy, and security, offering savings, reduced errors, and improved workflows, especially for insurance companies.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the AuraQuantic report

I have seen a return on investment with Hyland OnBase because it provides a very reliable ECM platform for my organization, helps to remove the dependency on paper files and file folders, saves real estate costs, and facilitates the ability to work from anywhere.

Abdul_Jabbar

Senior Software Engineer at Infosys

There's also prevention of financial loss because I have some workflows designed specifically to validate certain processes, and in the past a lot of money was lost because calculations were done incorrectly.

Joao Santiago

Analista at a consultancy with 201-500 employees

Automation processes that used to take four or three weeks now only require days, and users can be easily trained to implement their own processes.

reviewer2917962

Process Analyst at a consultancy with 51-200 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Hyland OnBase report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

8.5

AuraQuantic's customer service is praised for its responsiveness, professionalism, and knowledgeable support team that assists with implementation and troubleshooting.

Sentiment score

5.6

Hyland OnBase provides professional 24/7 support, often praised despite complex processes or premium fees required for premium options.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the AuraQuantic report

Our vendor relationship facilitated integration with our system and offered additional service beyond the Hyland OnBase product.

reviewer2560407

Program Manager at a financial services firm with 11-50 employees

Whenever I proved it was an issue on their side, they always followed up quickly and professionally and always resolved the problems.

Joao Santiago

Analista at a consultancy with 201-500 employees

Customer support largely falls on us, as many aspects must be handled directly with Hyland.

reviewer2917962

Process Analyst at a consultancy with 51-200 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Hyland OnBase report

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

9.0

AuraQuantic is highly scalable, accommodating both easy starts and rapid growth, making it ideal for large clients and expanding needs.

Sentiment score

6.4

Hyland OnBase is scalable and adaptable, supporting growth in users and documents, with cloud services easing manageability and costs.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the AuraQuantic report

Transitioning to cloud-based services may reduce these costs in the future.

reviewer1981395

Product owner at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

Hyland OnBase's scalability is one of its most significant strengths.

reviewer2917962

Process Analyst at a consultancy with 51-200 employees

In the cloud it's easier to handle; you work with pods and other infrastructure elements.

Joao Santiago

Analista at a consultancy with 201-500 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Hyland OnBase report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

8.7

AuraQuantic is highly stable, performs excellently on Microsoft Azure, and has no reported issues, earning a ten out of ten.

Sentiment score

8.0

Hyland OnBase is highly stable, with users praising its reliability, minimal downtime, and excellent scalability, security, and data protection.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the AuraQuantic report

Since then they've improved a lot, and now it's very stable.

Joao Santiago

Analista at a consultancy with 201-500 employees

Hyland OnBase was a stable solution that worked effectively for us.

reviewer2560407

Program Manager at a financial services firm with 11-50 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Hyland OnBase report

Room For Improvement

AuraQuantic needs better system integration, extensive documentation, intuitive training, easier customization, and more responsive technical support.

Hyland OnBase needs enhanced dashboards, AI integration, user-friendly interface, flexible pricing, improved support, OCR, and simplified processes.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the AuraQuantic report

The application could potentially be more open-source, allowing integration with more solutions.

reviewer2560407

Program Manager at a financial services firm with 11-50 employees

Hyland is working on a new platform (HXP) to integrate features from all products, addressing some concerns.

reviewer1981395

Product owner at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

If AI could be used more at an enterprise level, since we are purchasing at an enterprise level for the subscription of Hyland OnBase, I would say if those AI informations would stay within the enterprise and not go outside of our enterprise boundaries, it would be secure and maintain our privacy.

reviewer2867946

Business Analyst at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Hyland OnBase report

Setup Cost

AuraQuantic provides scalable, transparent pricing with various plans based on deployment options, usage requirements, and number of users.

Hyland OnBase's complex pricing is costly, especially in Latin America, with varied monthly licensing averaging $4,500-$5,000.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the AuraQuantic report

We also paid for workflow licenses, which allowed up to 250 concurrent users.

reviewer2560407

Program Manager at a financial services firm with 11-50 employees

I find pricing to be on the higher side due to its monolithic architecture.

reviewer1981395

Product owner at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it is very cost-effective and affordable.

Abdul_Jabbar

Senior Software Engineer at Infosys

For more quotes and insights, download the Hyland OnBase report

Valuable Features

AuraQuantic is a user-friendly, zero-code platform for automating and optimizing processes with quick implementation and reliable support.

Hyland OnBase enhances document management with secure storage, AI capabilities, workflow automation, and flexible integration for business efficiency.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the AuraQuantic report

It provided data security features, allowing restrictions on sensitive documents, such as who could view or modify them.

reviewer2560407

Program Manager at a financial services firm with 11-50 employees

The workflow engine has made the biggest difference for me because it is excellent for automating approval processes.

Abdul_Jabbar

Senior Software Engineer at Infosys

Hyland OnBase has impacted my organization positively by faster document retrieval, intuitive setup, reduced manual processing, and comes with security.

reviewer2867946

Business Analyst at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Hyland OnBase report

Categories and Ranking

AuraQuantic

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

37th

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

40th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (38th), No-Code Development Platforms (17th), Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) (33rd), Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (28th)

Hyland OnBase

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

13th

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

16th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Content Management (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of AuraQuantic is 0.9%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Hyland OnBase is 1.0%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Hyland OnBase	1.0%
AuraQuantic	0.9%
Other	98.1%

Business Process Management (BPM)

Q&A Highlights

Guillermo Perez

General Manager at XIMPLEX

Nov 01, 2019

Are Laserfiche and OnBase considered eBPMs? How do they compare to AuraPortal?

I am not familiar with LaserFiche or AuraPortal, but we employ OnBase here and I am familiar with IBM's ECM platform. Without splitting too many hairs, tools like these provide a "content-enabled" workflow and are often referred to as Enterprise Content Management (ECM) systems. That is, they don't do anything until a piece of content presents itself for processing. They are very good at automating/mechanizing a wide variety of business processes that have a form (paper or electronic) associated with them. Business Process Management packages are designed to be able to create workflows that do not depend on a piece of content to function properly. So, it depends on what problem you are trying to solve. If the business process that you are trying to automate has content (forms, faxes, etc) then ECM packages like OnBase, LaserFiche, etc. might fit your need. If you need to automate processes that do not require content, then a more traditional BPM system might be required.

See all answers

Featured Reviews

Emilio Valle

Programmer at Banco de Guatemala

Responsive support, easy to use, and reliable

It helped a lot when we started using it with more images. Before, it was basic. With images, it's more effective. Users consider it more animated and user-friendly. We can easily track a process and know exactly where a process is. It's a low-code application. The solution is very easy to use. It is stable and reliable. The solution scales well. Technical support is extremely responsive.

Read full review

Joao Santiago

Analista at a consultancy with 201-500 employees

Digital workflows have transformed meeting minutes and document tracking across departments

There are some particular aspects of Hyland OnBase, such as layouts or some modules that have just been built, that are not designed with the end user in mind. That's something they need to improve. However, even if it's not adequate for the end user, you can still take that and, with custom development, use those modules and APIs in a user-friendly way. They need to improve the interface and usability of Unity and think more about usability. In terms of tool usability, sometimes there are too many clicks to perform an action, which, if you developed it yourself, you could do in two clicks, whereas within Unity you need four or five clicks to do the same process.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Answers from the Community

Guillermo Perez

General Manager at XIMPLEX

Nov 1, 2019

Are Laserfiche and OnBase considered eBPMs? How do they compare to AuraPortal?

See 2 answers

Phillip Downard

Account Executive / Business Partnerships at a healthcare company with 51-200 employees

Nov 1, 2019

Laserfiche and OnBase can both be classified as such. They both run very robust Business Process Management applications. I personally know that the Laserfiche application has grown enormously over the past few years and is classified by the Gartner Group as one of the leaders in the industry. If you would like more specifics I would gladly discuss with you but would require a few more details.

Read full answer

it_user1081452

Director Of Information Technology at a tech company with 51-200 employees

Nov 1, 2019

Read full answer

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Construction Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	16

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Hyland OnBase?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it is very cost-effective and affordable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Hyland OnBase?

More training videos, if they are more findable, would improve documentation and training documentations from Hyland's side, because there is a lack of documentation and training materials from Hyl...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Hyland OnBase?

As a business analyst, while working on a recent project, I used Hyland OnBase as an enterprise-like document management tool. It was used for storing, organizing, and retrieving invoices regarding...

See all answers

Comparisons

Bizagi vs AuraQuantic

Compared 8% of the time

Bonita BPM vs AuraQuantic

Compared 7% of the time

Pega Platform vs AuraQuantic

Compared 6% of the time

Fabasoft PROCECO vs AuraQuantic

Compared 5% of the time

Tungsten TotalAgility vs AuraQuantic

Compared 4% of the time

More AuraQuantic Competitors

SharePoint vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Content Management vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 5% of the time

IBM FileNet vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 5% of the time

Alfresco vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 4% of the time

OpenText Documentum Content Management vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 3% of the time

More Hyland OnBase Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AuraQuantic

October 2026

Download AuraQuantic product report

Buyer's Guide

Hyland OnBase

October 2026

Download Hyland OnBase product report

Also Known As

No data available

OnBase

Overview

AuraQuantic is an advanced business process management solution designed to automate organizational processes, enhance operational efficiency, and foster innovation.

AuraQuantic provides a powerful, no-code platform that enables businesses to automate workflows, improve decision-making, and reduce operational costs. Its flexible design accommodates diverse business needs, providing a seamless integration of tasks and data to drive productivity and innovation.

What are the most important features of AuraQuantic?

Process Automation: Empowers users to automate complex workflows without extensive coding knowledge.
Integration Capability: Seamlessly connects with existing systems, ensuring data synchronization and efficient operation.
Analytics: Provides insightful analytics for better decision making and strategic planning.
User-Friendly: Easy to use interface that allows customization to fit specific business needs.
Scalability: Grows with the business, adapting to increasing demands and expanding requirements.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces operational costs through process optimization and automation.
Increased Productivity: Streamlines workflows, allowing employees to focus on higher-value tasks.
Improved Decision Making: Offers data-driven insights that enhance strategic planning and execution.
Flexibility and Adaptability: Adapts to evolving business landscapes, supporting continuous improvement.
Enhanced Customer Experience: Delivers faster and more efficient services to customers.

AuraQuantic has shown effectiveness across industries such as healthcare, manufacturing, and finance by offering industry-specific solutions to streamline operations and enhance customer interactions. Its versatile platform supports a wide range of applications, providing tailored solutions that improve business processes and drive innovation.

AuraQuantic

Hyland OnBase is acclaimed for its robust document management, automating workflows, and improving organizational efficiency across various industries. Praised for its ability to manage records compliantly, especially in regulated sectors like healthcare and finance, the tool also integrates smoothly with other enterprise systems. Users benefit significantly from streamlined processes, reduced manual tasks, and enhanced data accuracy, boosting productivity and customer satisfaction.

Hyland

Sample Customers

Nissan, RSA Chile, New Millennia Group Plc (UK), TOYOTA, ArcelorMittal Brasil, KPN, Farmacia Luis Corbi, Farmacia del Paseo, Frutas Bean, IncAE Business School, BDO Argentina, Refinery of the Pacific, Balfego Grup, Fundacion Seneca, Technological Institute Maranosa, Coprusa Group, Constructec, University of Deusto, Tenco Shopping Centers, Spanish Railways Foundation, Arbora & Ausonia.

Honda France Industries, Hill County Texas, Hylant Group, ING Lease France, State of South Carolina, Syracuse University, Swindon College, Rhode Island Department of Human Services, Rochester Institute of Technology, Moen, Odense University Hospital

Buyer's Guide

AuraQuantic vs. Hyland OnBase

October 2026

Free Report: AuraQuantic vs. Hyland OnBase

Find out what your peers are saying about AuraQuantic vs. Hyland OnBase and other solutions. Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AuraQuantic vs. Hyland OnBase report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors and best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.