AuraQuantic vs Hyland OnBase comparison

AuraQuantic and Hyland are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. AuraQuantic is ranked #16 with an average rating of 10.0, while Hyland is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.0. AuraQuantic holds a 0.8% mindshare in BPM, compared to Hyland’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of AuraQuantic users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Hyland users who would recommend it.

AuraQuantic

Read 6 AuraQuantic reviews

2,333 Views
1,143 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Hyland OnBase

Read 15 Hyland OnBase reviews

6,334 Views
1,520 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

AuraQuantic

Hyland OnBase

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Hyland OnBase and AuraQuantic are two prominent solutions in the enterprise content management and low-code automation space. Hyland OnBase excels in support and pricing, while AuraQuantic is preferred for its robust features.

Features: Hyland OnBase offers comprehensive document management, workflow automation, and case management features. Users appreciate its scalability and integration capabilities. AuraQuantic stands out with extensive low-code development tools, advanced reporting options, and a superior rules engine. Users favor AuraQuantic for its customization and extensive feature set.

Room for Improvement: Hyland OnBase users seek a more intuitive design and faster processing speeds. They also desire improved mobile functionalities. AuraQuantic users report challenges with initial setup complexity and the learning curve associated with its advanced features. Both systems have areas requiring enhancement, but the focus differs significantly.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Hyland OnBase deployment is praised for being straightforward, with strong customer support backing. Its deployment model is flexible, supporting on-premises and cloud options. AuraQuantic users find its deployment more complex but appreciate detailed support and comprehensive documentation. Despite this, Hyland OnBase is noted for easier deployment.

Pricing and ROI: Hyland OnBase is seen as cost-effective with swift ROI due to its efficient implementation process. AuraQuantic, while initially perceived as more expensive, offers substantial ROI attributed to its expansive functionality and customization potential. Users find AuraQuantic worth the investment for its long-term benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed AuraQuantic vs. Hyland OnBase Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

AuraQuantic vs. Hyland OnBase

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,221 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AuraQuantic

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

16th

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

22nd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (15th), No-Code Development Platforms (11th), Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) (13th), Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (21st)

Hyland OnBase

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

14th

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

14th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Content Management (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of AuraQuantic is 0.8%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Hyland OnBase is 1.2%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Hyland OnBase	1.2%
AuraQuantic	0.8%
Other	98.0%

Business Process Management (BPM)

Q&A Highlights

Guillermo Perez

General Manager at XIMPLEX

Nov 01, 2019

Are Laserfiche and OnBase considered eBPMs? How do they compare to AuraPortal?

I am not familiar with LaserFiche or AuraPortal, but we employ OnBase here and I am familiar with IBM's ECM platform. Without splitting too many hairs, tools like these provide a "content-enabled" workflow and are often referred to as Enterprise Content Management (ECM) systems. That is, they don't do anything until a piece of content presents itself for processing. They are very good at automating/mechanizing a wide variety of business processes that have a form (paper or electronic) associated with them. Business Process Management packages are designed to be able to create workflows that do not depend on a piece of content to function properly. So, it depends on what problem you are trying to solve. If the business process that you are trying to automate has content (forms, faxes, etc) then ECM packages like OnBase, LaserFiche, etc. might fit your need. If you need to automate processes that do not require content, then a more traditional BPM system might be required.

See all answers

Featured Reviews

Emilio Valle

Programmer at Banco de Guatemala

Responsive support, easy to use, and reliable

It helped a lot when we started using it with more images. Before, it was basic. With images, it's more effective. Users consider it more animated and user-friendly. We can easily track a process and know exactly where a process is. It's a low-code application. The solution is very easy to use. It is stable and reliable. The solution scales well. Technical support is extremely responsive.

Read full review

Abdul_Jabbar

Senior Software Engineer at Infosys

Automated workflows have transformed document handling and support daily approvals and billing

The best features Hyland OnBase offers in my experience include being a robust storage solution that integrates well with the Epic solution, allows Unity Forms to be easy to create and use, and has Distribution Services for sending email notifications as reminders.Out of those features, the workflow engine has made the biggest difference for me because it is excellent for automating approval processes, and we use Hyland OnBase for legal requests, hardware requests, travel requests, corporate credit card requests, and file transfer requests. WorkView is an incredible module for gathering and displaying summary information, and we utilize it highly in our subsidiary to manage our legal contracts, their financial billing process, and their travel. We also use the Document Import Process coupled with Unity API for writing custom code to automate processes to send and receive data from other systems that are not yet API enabled. The impact of Hyland OnBase on our organization is that automating manual processes has had an incredible effect on our return on investment, and the man-hours saved by automating processes pays for the system, ranging from one to five hours. I measured the man-hours saved through the tracking of workflows and automation processes. Additionally, Hyland OnBase has allowed us to move away from moving paper around various departments, providing workflow management to keep approval inside the system and out of the email boxes, eliminating the need for paper storage, and saving storage costs with other vendors.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"AuraPortal has the best price for its process."

"I chose AuraPortal due to its capabilities for implementing BPM solutions with limited programming skills, as interfaces can be developed very fast and the cycle time for developing applications or integration between different systems can be improved by 70-80%."

"It's a low-code application."

"AuraPortal is very user-friendly and flexible; it's really interesting for me, and I'm focusing on this application and BPM because it's really complete."

"AuraPortal provides several solutions embedded into one single platform that provides unbroken services to resolve almost any type of process for almost any industry segment."

"AuraQuantic's technical support is very good - they work well with partners and follow up on everything."

"AuraPortal is very user-friendly and flexible."

"AuraPortal is a beautiful solution for any company because you can do everything you want."

More AuraQuantic pros

"Hyland OnBase is valued for its security, especially for those in the finance domain who require data confidentiality."

"OnBase is a remarkable tool; it is a well-done product with amazing stability that can grow horizontally and vertically and is built for growth, with technical support that is quite good and available throughout the year."

"OnBase is a remarkable tool. It is a well-done product. Hyland has a lot of experience in building it and looking for new things for clients in terms of functionalities. It has amazing stability, and it can grow horizontally and vertically. It is built for growth. Their technical support is also quite good and available throughout the year."

"I like the cloud and its integrability."

"A single platform with multiple capabilities to orchestrate processes, complex business rules and all types of business content."

"This solution is easy to implement and easy to use as long as you know what your business requirement are or the specifications are straightforward."

"OnBase provides high-value solutions for organizations with much less cost in comparison to other ECM solutions."

"The most valuable features are that it's very secure and provides audit trails for our documents."

More Hyland OnBase pros

Cons

"I would like to see support for Unix, Oracle and other RDBMS."

"One thing that could be improved would be for it to be deployed in a shorter time."

"The price could be better. It's quite expensive."

"There should be a more affordable consulting pricing."

"We'd like it more animated. It would be useful if we could integrate GIFs, for example."

"AuraQuantic's price could be improved."

"More documentation and the ability to extract different reports about different relations in the objects I use will help."

"One thing that could be improved would be for it to be deployed in a shorter time."

"The look and feel could be better. The integration with the user could be better. It could also be more user-friendly."

"The migration is a bit difficult in the tool."

"Hyland OnBase can be improved because Report Services is an additional license and should be included with the base product."

"Hyland OnBase could be improved in terms of service support response time."

"An area for improvement would be the training - getting our people up to speed on how to use it required more training than we expected due to the complexity of the solution."

"We are struggling with duplicates and would like to have OCR functionality when using this solution."

"The dashboards do have some room for improvement as compared to the other vendors which are there in the market."

"The look and feel could be better. The integration with the user could be better. It could also be more user-friendly."

More Hyland OnBase cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price could be better. It's quite expensive."

"They can do better in terms of the pricing model. It is a really expensive tool in Latin America. They should have different prices for different regions."

"The tool's price is high."

"OnBase is reasonably priced."

"The solution costs around $6,000 per month."

"There are a number of different types of licenses. There are concurrent licenses, individual licenses and imaging licenses."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Answers from the Community

Guillermo Perez

General Manager at XIMPLEX

Nov 1, 2019

Are Laserfiche and OnBase considered eBPMs? How do they compare to AuraPortal?

See 2 answers

Phillip Downard

Account Executive / Business Partnerships at a healthcare company with 51-200 employees

Nov 1, 2019

Laserfiche and OnBase can both be classified as such. They both run very robust Business Process Management applications. I personally know that the Laserfiche application has grown enormously over the past few years and is classified by the Gartner Group as one of the leaders in the industry. If you would like more specifics I would gladly discuss with you but would require a few more details.

Read full answer

it_user1081452

Director Of Information Technology at a tech company with 51-200 employees

Nov 1, 2019

Read full answer

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Construction Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Government

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	13

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Hyland OnBase?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it is very cost-effective and affordable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Hyland OnBase?

Hyland OnBase could be improved in terms of service support response time. More timely updates to solution software support documentation also should be improved.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Hyland OnBase?

Hyland OnBase is used across the entirety of the organization in a variety of different ways, and its primary use is as a document storage solution that is used in conjunction with other systems su...

See all answers

Comparisons

Pega Platform vs AuraQuantic

Compared 8% of the time

Bizagi vs AuraQuantic

Compared 8% of the time

Bonita vs AuraQuantic

Compared 6% of the time

AppSheet vs AuraQuantic

Compared 5% of the time

Camunda vs AuraQuantic

Compared 4% of the time

More AuraQuantic Competitors

OpenText Content Management vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 7% of the time

IBM FileNet vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 6% of the time

SharePoint vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 6% of the time

Alfresco vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Documentum Content Management vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 4% of the time

More Hyland OnBase Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AuraQuantic

May 2026

Download AuraQuantic product report

Buyer's Guide

Hyland OnBase

April 2026

Download Hyland OnBase product report

Also Known As

No data available

OnBase

Overview

AuraQuantic is an advanced business process management solution designed to automate organizational processes, enhance operational efficiency, and foster innovation.

AuraQuantic provides a powerful, no-code platform that enables businesses to automate workflows, improve decision-making, and reduce operational costs. Its flexible design accommodates diverse business needs, providing a seamless integration of tasks and data to drive productivity and innovation.

What are the most important features of AuraQuantic?

Process Automation: Empowers users to automate complex workflows without extensive coding knowledge.
Integration Capability: Seamlessly connects with existing systems, ensuring data synchronization and efficient operation.
Analytics: Provides insightful analytics for better decision making and strategic planning.
User-Friendly: Easy to use interface that allows customization to fit specific business needs.
Scalability: Grows with the business, adapting to increasing demands and expanding requirements.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces operational costs through process optimization and automation.
Increased Productivity: Streamlines workflows, allowing employees to focus on higher-value tasks.
Improved Decision Making: Offers data-driven insights that enhance strategic planning and execution.
Flexibility and Adaptability: Adapts to evolving business landscapes, supporting continuous improvement.
Enhanced Customer Experience: Delivers faster and more efficient services to customers.

AuraQuantic has shown effectiveness across industries such as healthcare, manufacturing, and finance by offering industry-specific solutions to streamline operations and enhance customer interactions. Its versatile platform supports a wide range of applications, providing tailored solutions that improve business processes and drive innovation.

AuraQuantic

Hyland OnBase is acclaimed for its robust document management, automating workflows, and improving organizational efficiency across various industries. Praised for its ability to manage records compliantly, especially in regulated sectors like healthcare and finance, the tool also integrates smoothly with other enterprise systems. Users benefit significantly from streamlined processes, reduced manual tasks, and enhanced data accuracy, boosting productivity and customer satisfaction.

Hyland

Sample Customers

Nissan, RSA Chile, New Millennia Group Plc (UK), TOYOTA, ArcelorMittal Brasil, KPN, Farmacia Luis Corbi, Farmacia del Paseo, Frutas Bean, IncAE Business School, BDO Argentina, Refinery of the Pacific, Balfego Grup, Fundacion Seneca, Technological Institute Maranosa, Coprusa Group, Constructec, University of Deusto, Tenco Shopping Centers, Spanish Railways Foundation, Arbora & Ausonia.

Honda France Industries, Hill County Texas, Hylant Group, ING Lease France, State of South Carolina, Syracuse University, Swindon College, Rhode Island Department of Human Services, Rochester Institute of Technology, Moen, Odense University Hospital

Buyer's Guide

AuraQuantic vs. Hyland OnBase

April 2026

Free Report: AuraQuantic vs. Hyland OnBase

Find out what your peers are saying about AuraQuantic vs. Hyland OnBase and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AuraQuantic vs. Hyland OnBase report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors and best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.