

OpenText Content Manager and Hyland OnBase compete in the document management software category. Both products have distinct advantages, with Hyland OnBase slightly leading due to its integration capabilities and flexible customization.
Features: OpenText Content Manager offers comprehensive document management, robust compliance features, and storage capabilities, making it ideal for legal document lifecycles. Hyland OnBase is known for its integration capabilities with various business processes, scalability, and flexible customization, allowing it to adapt to different workflow needs.
Room for Improvement: OpenText Content Manager users encounter challenges with ease of use, complex security settings, and extensive training requirements. Suggestions include simplifying the licensing process and improving integration. Hyland OnBase can enhance its user experience and pricing by simplifying its interface and adopting a more flexible pricing model, as costs can be prohibitive in some areas.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Content Manager offers on-premises, hybrid, and public cloud deployment options, but users report delays in customer support. Hyland OnBase typically deploys on-premises or in a private cloud, with generally responsive support, though it's seen as less personal post-acquisitions.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText Content Manager is considered expensive but offers good functionalities and strong security. Enterprises find ROI in its document processing capabilities. Hyland OnBase is also pricey, especially in certain regions, but its modular design allows customization to suit business needs, making it a worthwhile investment due to its adaptability and content management features.
I have seen a return on investment with Hyland OnBase because it provides a very reliable ECM platform for my organization, helps to remove the dependency on paper files and file folders, saves real estate costs, and facilitates the ability to work from anywhere.
I have been able to see a return on investment as the time for approvals has been reduced, and since they are centralized, everything is in one place.
Our vendor relationship facilitated integration with our system and offered additional service beyond the Hyland OnBase product.
I would describe the customer service and technical support of Hyland OnBase as being based on the partner that is used.
I find technical support from Hyland to be good.
Transitioning to cloud-based services may reduce these costs in the future.
Hyland OnBase was a stable solution that worked effectively for us.
The experience with the platform's learning curve is quite steep, especially for less technical staff.
The application could potentially be more open-source, allowing integration with more solutions.
I find OnBase's monolithic architecture to be expensive, and adopting microservices could be beneficial.
The main factors that influenced my decision to choose Hyland OnBase over other options available on the market were the cost compared to others and the high document-handling capacity that Hyland OnBase can provide.
We also paid for workflow licenses, which allowed up to 250 concurrent users.
I find pricing to be on the higher side due to its monolithic architecture.
It provided data security features, allowing restrictions on sensitive documents, such as who could view or modify them.
The impact of Hyland OnBase on our organization is that automating manual processes has had an incredible effect on our return on investment, and the man-hours saved by automating processes pays for the system, ranging from one to five hours.
The best features that Hyland OnBase offers are the security it provides to control permissions and the traceability of documents.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Hyland OnBase | 5.1% |
| OpenText Content Manager | 3.7% |
| Other | 91.2% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 6 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 13 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 8 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
Hyland OnBase is acclaimed for its robust document management, automating workflows, and improving organizational efficiency across various industries. Praised for its ability to manage records compliantly, especially in regulated sectors like healthcare and finance, the tool also integrates smoothly with other enterprise systems. Users benefit significantly from streamlined processes, reduced manual tasks, and enhanced data accuracy, boosting productivity and customer satisfaction.
OpenText Content Manager delivers comprehensive document and information management with advanced security and retention functionalities.
OpenText Content Manager is a key player in enterprise content and records management. By integrating well with tools like SharePoint and Microsoft Office, it supports metadata search, audit trails, and document lifecycle management. Its drag-and-drop functionality aids in managing both paper and electronic records efficiently. Compliance with standards, combined with automated notifications for destruction and retention, enhances its efficiency. Although integration with other systems and ERP-like features for legal processes needs improvement, it remains a robust solution for content classification, tracking, and document security.
What are the key features?In industries such as legal and engineering, OpenText Content Manager is vital for document archival and digital information handling. Sectors like SAP and Salesforce leverage it for data governance, content classification, and streamlined workflows. Organizations rely on it to bolster document security and facilitate content approval processes.
We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.