

OpenText Content Manager and Hyland OnBase compete in the document management software category. Both products have distinct advantages, with Hyland OnBase slightly leading due to its integration capabilities and flexible customization.
Features: OpenText Content Manager offers comprehensive document management, robust compliance features, and storage capabilities, making it ideal for legal document lifecycles. Hyland OnBase is known for its integration capabilities with various business processes, scalability, and flexible customization, allowing it to adapt to different workflow needs.
Room for Improvement: OpenText Content Manager users encounter challenges with ease of use, complex security settings, and extensive training requirements. Suggestions include simplifying the licensing process and improving integration. Hyland OnBase can enhance its user experience and pricing by simplifying its interface and adopting a more flexible pricing model, as costs can be prohibitive in some areas.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Content Manager offers on-premises, hybrid, and public cloud deployment options, but users report delays in customer support. Hyland OnBase typically deploys on-premises or in a private cloud, with generally responsive support, though it's seen as less personal post-acquisitions.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText Content Manager is considered expensive but offers good functionalities and strong security. Enterprises find ROI in its document processing capabilities. Hyland OnBase is also pricey, especially in certain regions, but its modular design allows customization to suit business needs, making it a worthwhile investment due to its adaptability and content management features.
I have seen a return on investment with Hyland OnBase because it provides a very reliable ECM platform for my organization, helps to remove the dependency on paper files and file folders, saves real estate costs, and facilitates the ability to work from anywhere.
There's also prevention of financial loss because I have some workflows designed specifically to validate certain processes, and in the past a lot of money was lost because calculations were done incorrectly.
Automation processes that used to take four or three weeks now only require days, and users can be easily trained to implement their own processes.
Our vendor relationship facilitated integration with our system and offered additional service beyond the Hyland OnBase product.
Whenever I proved it was an issue on their side, they always followed up quickly and professionally and always resolved the problems.
Customer support largely falls on us, as many aspects must be handled directly with Hyland.
Transitioning to cloud-based services may reduce these costs in the future.
Hyland OnBase's scalability is one of its most significant strengths.
In the cloud it's easier to handle; you work with pods and other infrastructure elements.
Since then they've improved a lot, and now it's very stable.
Hyland OnBase was a stable solution that worked effectively for us.
The application could potentially be more open-source, allowing integration with more solutions.
Hyland is working on a new platform (HXP) to integrate features from all products, addressing some concerns.
If AI could be used more at an enterprise level, since we are purchasing at an enterprise level for the subscription of Hyland OnBase, I would say if those AI informations would stay within the enterprise and not go outside of our enterprise boundaries, it would be secure and maintain our privacy.
We also paid for workflow licenses, which allowed up to 250 concurrent users.
I find pricing to be on the higher side due to its monolithic architecture.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it is very cost-effective and affordable.
It provided data security features, allowing restrictions on sensitive documents, such as who could view or modify them.
The workflow engine has made the biggest difference for me because it is excellent for automating approval processes.
Hyland OnBase has impacted my organization positively by faster document retrieval, intuitive setup, reduced manual processing, and comes with security.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Hyland OnBase | 4.3% |
| OpenText Content Manager | 3.4% |
| Other | 92.3% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 16 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 8 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
Hyland OnBase is acclaimed for its robust document management, automating workflows, and improving organizational efficiency across various industries. Praised for its ability to manage records compliantly, especially in regulated sectors like healthcare and finance, the tool also integrates smoothly with other enterprise systems. Users benefit significantly from streamlined processes, reduced manual tasks, and enhanced data accuracy, boosting productivity and customer satisfaction.
OpenText Content Manager delivers comprehensive document and information management with advanced security and retention functionalities.
OpenText Content Manager is a key player in enterprise content and records management. By integrating well with tools like SharePoint and Microsoft Office, it supports metadata search, audit trails, and document lifecycle management. Its drag-and-drop functionality aids in managing both paper and electronic records efficiently. Compliance with standards, combined with automated notifications for destruction and retention, enhances its efficiency. Although integration with other systems and ERP-like features for legal processes needs improvement, it remains a robust solution for content classification, tracking, and document security.
What are the key features?In industries such as legal and engineering, OpenText Content Manager is vital for document archival and digital information handling. Sectors like SAP and Salesforce leverage it for data governance, content classification, and streamlined workflows. Organizations rely on it to bolster document security and facilitate content approval processes.
We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.