Hyland OnBase vs QuickBase comparison

Hyland and Quickbase are both solutions in the Low-Code Development Platforms category. Hyland is ranked #13 with an average rating of 7.6, while Quickbase is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.3. Hyland holds a 2.5% mindshare in LCDP, compared to Quickbase’s 2.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Hyland users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of Quickbase users who would recommend it.

Hyland OnBase

Read 13 Hyland OnBase reviews

4,894 Views
1,126 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

QuickBase

Read 76 QuickBase reviews

2,381 Views
1,381 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Hyland OnBase

QuickBase

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Hyland OnBase and QuickBase are enterprise content management and application development platforms. User reviews indicate QuickBase scores higher due to its features, despite Hyland OnBase offering competitive pricing and support.

Features: Hyland OnBase offers robust document management, workflow automation, and secure content storage. QuickBase stands out for its customization, ease of use in creating business applications, and flexible application development capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Hyland OnBase users often mention its complexity, steep learning curve, and need for a more intuitive user interface. QuickBase users highlight limitations in advanced reporting, integration features, and occasional performance issues.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Hyland OnBase's deployment is usually seen as time-intensive and complex, although its customer service is well-rated. QuickBase has a smoother deployment process with straightforward setup, though its customer service receives mixed reviews.

Pricing and ROI: Hyland OnBase is generally viewed as cost-effective with good ROI, but its higher upfront setup cost can be a barrier. QuickBase, while more expensive, often justifies the cost with faster deployment and better ROI from quicker solution implementation.

To learn more, read our detailed Hyland OnBase vs. QuickBase Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Hyland OnBase vs. QuickBase

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,707 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Hyland OnBase

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

13th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (15th), Enterprise Content Management (6th)

QuickBase

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

14th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Rapid Application Development Software (18th), Employee Time Tracking Software (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Low-Code Development Platforms category, the mindshare of Hyland OnBase is 2.5%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of QuickBase is 2.2%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Low-Code Development Platforms Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Hyland OnBase	2.5%
QuickBase	2.2%
Other	95.3%

Low-Code Development Platforms

Featured Reviews

reviewer1981395

Product owner at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

Seamless data management enhances security while monolithic architecture and reporting need improvements

I believe the reporting features need improvement, as other competitors in the market provide better analytics. Hyland is working on a new platform (HXP) to integrate features from all products, addressing some concerns. Additionally, there could be more integration points with products Hyland has acquired, such as Alfresco and Nuxeo. Offering a trial version with basic features would allow users to experience the product before purchasing. I find OnBase's monolithic architecture to be expensive, and adopting microservices could be beneficial.

Read full review

Morgan Victor

Software Test Engineer at Roche

Automation has transformed project and inventory workflows and improves revenue forecasting

The best features QuickBase offers include being a no-code software, meaning it is very easy to use even for new users. It also provides life cycle management, workflow management, and dashboards. The dashboards and workflow management help my team significantly, as they have a drag-and-drop interface and prebuilt templates, which play a pivotal role in creating custom applications. Those features also help provide the ability to manage the entire application life cycle with QuickBase easily. Integration has been very seamless with our overall IT stack. The user interface is very user-friendly and intuitive, which makes it very easy to use, together with the no-code aspect. Any kind of personnel can use this tool easily.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I like the cloud and its integrability."

"The solution is very developed and we are not taking full advantage of its functionalities."

"The solution's most valuable features are integration and flexibility."

"The most valuable features are that it's very secure and provides audit trails for our documents."

"The product's initial setup phase is not difficult."

"Hyland OnBase is valued for its security, especially for those in the finance domain who require data confidentiality."

"OnBase is a remarkable tool. It is a well-done product. Hyland has a lot of experience in building it and looking for new things for clients in terms of functionalities. It has amazing stability, and it can grow horizontally and vertically. It is built for growth. Their technical support is also quite good and available throughout the year."

"It provided data security features, allowing restrictions on sensitive documents, such as who could view or modify them."

More Hyland OnBase pros

"It has helped streamline and simply track status and collection of data from suppliers and other internal departments."

"The most valuable feature of QuickBase is its dynamic form capabilities. These forms allow backend automation, making tasks like updating data based on specific conditions much easier."

"Allows users have anytime/anywhere access."

"I run my own business and the solution allows me to invoice and pay for additional resources. It has helped me in terms of invoicing, quoting, and doing recruitment measures."

"QuickBase reminds me when a software license or a hardware support contract is near expiration so that I can initiate our company's procurement process in time and not miss a deadline."

"The usability of QuickBase largely depends on how you design your workflows within the platform. If you keep them simple and straightforward, it can be a highly usable product."

"QuickBase has positively impacted my organization by resolving our purchase order and inventory management issues, helping us in revenue management and forecasting revenue, and making data-driven decisions easily while saving significant time and cost."

"QuickBase is an excellent product and it is very easy to get support."

More QuickBase pros

Cons

"For user experience, they would have to do more with the interface. It is not easy to work with and is a little messy. It is getting better, but it is not yet good enough. Other products are comparatively doing better in terms of the user interface. I have been hearing about Box, which is very easy to use and learn for the users. OnBase has to work on this aspect. It should have BPM capabilities. We compete with tools that provide the BPM feature and support those standards. They can do better in terms of the pricing model. It is a really expensive tool in Latin America. They should have different prices for different regions."

"Software malfunctioning usually occurs when we receive documents from external sources."

"The solution’s initial setup is a little difficult."

"We found the size of images to be a restriction, though this may have been due to the API used rather than the Hyland application."

"The dashboards do have some room for improvement as compared to the other vendors which are there in the market."

"The migration is a bit difficult in the tool."

"We need to troubleshoot why our reports didn't get downloaded in a day. There is a workflow feature which powerful but also complicated."

"The application could potentially be more open-source, allowing integration with more solutions."

More Hyland OnBase cons

"Whenever we do onboarding, or we get new employees, there tends to be a delay of not just a week but a couple of weeks, and sometimes even a few weeks of being able to see certain new employees in the system."

"I would like the product to add more working processes."

"The improved developer interface in some areas can be difficult to use for complex items."

"The mobile app has improved, but it still needs work."

"I would like to see better options for producing paper reports from Quick Base, rather than viewing things exclusively on screen."

"Access to more standard default layouts and sample builds would be useful, and access to more training on use and flexibility."

"It would be beneficial for the QuickBase team to focus on improving the integration of cloud-based storage platforms within their product. In use cases like ours, where QuickBase serves as a centralized source of truth for construction projects, having seamless integration with platforms like Dropbox or OneDrive would greatly enhance the product's capabilities."

"The user interface of Quick Base is complex. It can be difficult to navigate, and ideally, it should be simplified to facilitate use by anyone, not just certified individuals."

More QuickBase cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"OnBase is reasonably priced."

"The tool's price is high."

"They can do better in terms of the pricing model. It is a really expensive tool in Latin America. They should have different prices for different regions."

"The solution costs around $6,000 per month."

"There are a number of different types of licenses. There are concurrent licenses, individual licenses and imaging licenses."

"We felt the pricing and licensing for QuickBase were easy enough to understand, fair and competitive."

"The product is cheap when compared to other products."

"The solution is expensive and geared toward enterprise-level clients."

"You have to negotiate the price because it varies based on the number of users you have, as well as how much cloud storage space you need."

"The pricing for the tier my company used included ten seats and the subcontractor, amounting to approximately $18,000 USD per year."

"The pricing for QuickBase is pretty straightforward, It is based on a per user/per month licensing fee."

"Quickbase is probably not the cheapest app out there. That said, it is worth its weight in gold. There is no other app that I know of in the market today that can do what Quickbase does."

"It is probably about 300 per license per person. There is just the licensing cost. There are no additional costs."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Low-Code Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

13%

Marketing Services Firm

Computer Software Company

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	38
Midsize Enterprise	14
Large Enterprise	25

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Hyland OnBase?

I find pricing to be on the higher side due to its monolithic architecture. I would rate it six out of ten. Transitioning to microservices, allowing users to pay for only what they use, could reduc...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Hyland OnBase?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Hyland OnBase?

I was a vendor managing Hyland OnBase ( /products/hyland-onbase-reviews ) for Hyland, not as a direct user but as a business partner. We managed the solution and were a partner with Hyland.

See all answers

What do you like most about QuickBase?

The most valuable feature of QuickBase is its dynamic form capabilities. These forms allow backend automation, making tasks like updating data based on specific conditions much easier.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for QuickBase?

Pricing could be cheaper. I rate it around a seven out of ten. Mainly larger companies use it, which influences the pricing structure.

See all answers

What needs improvement with QuickBase?

The user interface of Quick Base is complex. It can be difficult to navigate, and ideally, it should be simplified to facilitate use by anyone, not just certified individuals. There is room for imp...

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText Content Management vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 10% of the time

Alfresco vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 7% of the time

IBM FileNet vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 7% of the time

SharePoint vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Documentum Content Management vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 6% of the time

More Hyland OnBase Competitors

Microsoft Power Apps vs QuickBase

Compared 10% of the time

ServiceNow vs QuickBase

Compared 7% of the time

OutSystems vs QuickBase

Compared 7% of the time

Pega Platform vs QuickBase

Compared 5% of the time

Knack vs QuickBase

Compared 4% of the time

More QuickBase Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Hyland OnBase

January 2026

Download Hyland OnBase product report

Buyer's Guide

QuickBase

January 2026

Download QuickBase product report

Also Known As

OnBase

Quick Base, TSheets

Overview

Hyland OnBase is acclaimed for its robust document management, automating workflows, and improving organizational efficiency across various industries. Praised for its ability to manage records compliantly, especially in regulated sectors like healthcare and finance, the tool also integrates smoothly with other enterprise systems. Users benefit significantly from streamlined processes, reduced manual tasks, and enhanced data accuracy, boosting productivity and customer satisfaction.

Hyland

Trusted by more than half of the Fortune 100, QuickBase is a low-code platform for building, customizing, and integrating custom business applications. With more than 6,000 customers and 500,000 active users, QuickBase is the technology of choice for organizations that want to empower business users to solve their own challenges while maintaining the governance and security of an enterprise-quality app development system.

Quickbase

Sample Customers

Honda France Industries, Hill County Texas, Hylant Group, ING Lease France, State of South Carolina, Syracuse University, Swindon College, Rhode Island Department of Human Services, Rochester Institute of Technology, Moen, Odense University Hospital

Procter & Gamble, Tesla, Norwegian Cruise Line, Google, Metso, Agero, Kayak, PTC, Patra Corp, TomTom, Southwest Airlines, FedEx Office

Buyer's Guide

Hyland OnBase vs. QuickBase

December 2025

Free Report: Hyland OnBase vs. QuickBase

Find out what your peers are saying about Hyland OnBase vs. QuickBase and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Hyland OnBase vs. QuickBase report.

See our list of best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Low-Code Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.