Hyland OnBase vs QuickBase comparison

Hyland and Quickbase are both solutions in the Low-Code Development Platforms category. Hyland is ranked #12 with an average rating of 7.6, while Quickbase is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.3. Hyland holds a 2.4% mindshare in LCDP, compared to Quickbase’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Hyland users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of Quickbase users who would recommend it.

Hyland OnBase

Read 13 Hyland OnBase reviews

4,371 Views
962 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

QuickBase

Read 75 QuickBase reviews

2,015 Views
1,149 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Hyland OnBase

QuickBase

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Hyland OnBase and QuickBase are enterprise content management and application development platforms. User reviews indicate QuickBase scores higher due to its features, despite Hyland OnBase offering competitive pricing and support.

Features: Hyland OnBase offers robust document management, workflow automation, and secure content storage. QuickBase stands out for its customization, ease of use in creating business applications, and flexible application development capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Hyland OnBase users often mention its complexity, steep learning curve, and need for a more intuitive user interface. QuickBase users highlight limitations in advanced reporting, integration features, and occasional performance issues.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Hyland OnBase's deployment is usually seen as time-intensive and complex, although its customer service is well-rated. QuickBase has a smoother deployment process with straightforward setup, though its customer service receives mixed reviews.

Pricing and ROI: Hyland OnBase is generally viewed as cost-effective with good ROI, but its higher upfront setup cost can be a barrier. QuickBase, while more expensive, often justifies the cost with faster deployment and better ROI from quicker solution implementation.

To learn more, read our detailed Hyland OnBase vs. QuickBase Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Hyland OnBase vs. QuickBase

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Hyland OnBase

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

12th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (15th), Enterprise Content Management (6th)

QuickBase

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

13th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Rapid Application Development Software (18th), Employee Time Tracking Software (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Low-Code Development Platforms category, the mindshare of Hyland OnBase is 2.4%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of QuickBase is 2.1%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Low-Code Development Platforms Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Hyland OnBase	2.4%
QuickBase	2.1%
Other	95.5%

Low-Code Development Platforms

Featured Reviews

reviewer1981395

Product owner at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

Seamless data management enhances security while monolithic architecture and reporting need improvements

I believe the reporting features need improvement, as other competitors in the market provide better analytics. Hyland is working on a new platform (HXP) to integrate features from all products, addressing some concerns. Additionally, there could be more integration points with products Hyland has acquired, such as Alfresco and Nuxeo. Offering a trial version with basic features would allow users to experience the product before purchasing. I find OnBase's monolithic architecture to be expensive, and adopting microservices could be beneficial.

Read full review

RahulSharma15

Associate principal engineer at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees

Empowers content management and application creation without SQL

The user interface of Quick Base is complex. It can be difficult to navigate, and ideally, it should be simplified to facilitate use by anyone, not just certified individuals. There is room for improvement in front-end functionalities. I cannot deploy and use front-end features anywhere; they must be deployed inside Quick Base. The introduction of hooks would allow for easier deployment elsewhere, such as GitHub. Additionally, their APIs have limitations, such as reliance on XML for backend APIs, which restricts their utility.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The retention module is one of the most valuable features. Whatever we scan onto the system can be identified and we are notified when the records are due to be disposed."

"Hyland OnBase is valued for its security, especially for those in the finance domain who require data confidentiality."

"It provided data security features, allowing restrictions on sensitive documents, such as who could view or modify them."

"The solution is very developed and we are not taking full advantage of its functionalities."

"The solution's most valuable features are integration and flexibility."

"I like the cloud and its integrability."

"The most valuable features are that it's very secure and provides audit trails for our documents."

"Its most valuable aspect is its flexibility"

More Hyland OnBase pros

"The product is easy to use."

"Creating applications in Quickbase will take, literally, a fraction of the time it would take to create them in other database applications (which shall remain unnamed)."

"This solution has provided for Rapid deployment of data collection tools, replacing spreadsheets with near real-time data."

"The usability of QuickBase largely depends on how you design your workflows within the platform. If you keep them simple and straightforward, it can be a highly usable product."

"It has helped streamline and simply track status and collection of data from suppliers and other internal departments."

"It has superb ease of use and no code needed to create and build apps and databases."

"The most valuable feature of QuickBase is its dynamic form capabilities. These forms allow backend automation, making tasks like updating data based on specific conditions much easier."

"Technical support is really good, and I would rate it a nine out of ten."

More QuickBase pros

Cons

"Software malfunctioning usually occurs when we receive documents from external sources."

"The solution’s initial setup is a little difficult."

"The dashboards do have some room for improvement as compared to the other vendors which are there in the market."

"We are struggling with duplicates and would like to have OCR functionality when using this solution."

"For user experience, they would have to do more with the interface. It is not easy to work with and is a little messy. It is getting better, but it is not yet good enough. Other products are comparatively doing better in terms of the user interface. I have been hearing about Box, which is very easy to use and learn for the users. OnBase has to work on this aspect. It should have BPM capabilities. We compete with tools that provide the BPM feature and support those standards. They can do better in terms of the pricing model. It is a really expensive tool in Latin America. They should have different prices for different regions."

"We need to troubleshoot why our reports didn't get downloaded in a day. There is a workflow feature which powerful but also complicated."

"We found the size of images to be a restriction, though this may have been due to the API used rather than the Hyland application."

"The application could potentially be more open-source, allowing integration with more solutions."

More Hyland OnBase cons

"Its UI needs improvement. They should improve it and make it a little bit more modern. We should also be able to have more real-time information that connects with other software platforms. It has an open API, but it doesn't always connect with some of the other platforms that we would like to utilize. These are probably two of the biggest things for us, and hopefully, they will keep ensuring that in the future, they continually build QuickBase to be a little bit more efficient in that regard."

"Unfortunately, there is still no new report formatting available natively, and would still require 3rd party developers to help with that. ."

"The mobile app has improved, but it still needs work."

"The user interface of Quick Base is complex. It can be difficult to navigate, and ideally, it should be simplified to facilitate use by anyone, not just certified individuals."

"I would like to see the reporting enhanced because some of them are not easy to generate."

"The dashboard is not organized."

"When learning QuickBase, I noticed a shift in its cost structure. It operated on a cost-efficient model tied to the number of users, with invoicing based on applicants."

"It would be beneficial for the QuickBase team to focus on improving the integration of cloud-based storage platforms within their product. In use cases like ours, where QuickBase serves as a centralized source of truth for construction projects, having seamless integration with platforms like Dropbox or OneDrive would greatly enhance the product's capabilities."

More QuickBase cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"They can do better in terms of the pricing model. It is a really expensive tool in Latin America. They should have different prices for different regions."

"There are a number of different types of licenses. There are concurrent licenses, individual licenses and imaging licenses."

"OnBase is reasonably priced."

"The solution costs around $6,000 per month."

"The tool's price is high."

"Quickbase is probably not the cheapest app out there. That said, it is worth its weight in gold. There is no other app that I know of in the market today that can do what Quickbase does."

"The solution is expensive and geared toward enterprise-level clients."

"The pricing for the tier my company used included ten seats and the subcontractor, amounting to approximately $18,000 USD per year."

"The product is cheap when compared to other products."

"The pricing for QuickBase is pretty straightforward, It is based on a per user/per month licensing fee."

"We felt the pricing and licensing for QuickBase were easy enough to understand, fair and competitive."

"You have to negotiate the price because it varies based on the number of users you have, as well as how much cloud storage space you need."

"It is probably about 300 per license per person. There is just the licensing cost. There are no additional costs."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Low-Code Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

13%

University

Comms Service Provider

Transportation Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	38
Midsize Enterprise	14
Large Enterprise	23

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Hyland OnBase?

I find pricing to be on the higher side due to its monolithic architecture. I would rate it six out of ten. Transitioning to microservices, allowing users to pay for only what they use, could reduc...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Hyland OnBase?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Hyland OnBase?

I was a vendor managing Hyland OnBase ( /products/hyland-onbase-reviews ) for Hyland, not as a direct user but as a business partner. We managed the solution and were a partner with Hyland.

See all answers

What do you like most about QuickBase?

The most valuable feature of QuickBase is its dynamic form capabilities. These forms allow backend automation, making tasks like updating data based on specific conditions much easier.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for QuickBase?

Pricing could be cheaper. I rate it around a seven out of ten. Mainly larger companies use it, which influences the pricing structure.

See all answers

What needs improvement with QuickBase?

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText Content Management vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 10% of the time

Alfresco vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 8% of the time

OpenText Documentum Content Management vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 8% of the time

SharePoint vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 7% of the time

IBM FileNet vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 7% of the time

More Hyland OnBase Competitors

Microsoft Power Apps vs QuickBase

Compared 11% of the time

ServiceNow vs QuickBase

Compared 9% of the time

OutSystems vs QuickBase

Compared 7% of the time

Pega Platform vs QuickBase

Compared 7% of the time

Knack vs QuickBase

Compared 4% of the time

More QuickBase Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Hyland OnBase

January 2026

Download Hyland OnBase product report

Buyer's Guide

QuickBase

January 2026

Download QuickBase product report

Also Known As

OnBase

Quick Base, TSheets

Overview

Hyland OnBase is acclaimed for its robust document management, automating workflows, and improving organizational efficiency across various industries. Praised for its ability to manage records compliantly, especially in regulated sectors like healthcare and finance, the tool also integrates smoothly with other enterprise systems. Users benefit significantly from streamlined processes, reduced manual tasks, and enhanced data accuracy, boosting productivity and customer satisfaction.

Hyland

Trusted by more than half of the Fortune 100, QuickBase is a low-code platform for building, customizing, and integrating custom business applications. With more than 6,000 customers and 500,000 active users, QuickBase is the technology of choice for organizations that want to empower business users to solve their own challenges while maintaining the governance and security of an enterprise-quality app development system.

Quickbase

Sample Customers

Honda France Industries, Hill County Texas, Hylant Group, ING Lease France, State of South Carolina, Syracuse University, Swindon College, Rhode Island Department of Human Services, Rochester Institute of Technology, Moen, Odense University Hospital

Procter & Gamble, Tesla, Norwegian Cruise Line, Google, Metso, Agero, Kayak, PTC, Patra Corp, TomTom, Southwest Airlines, FedEx Office

Buyer's Guide

Hyland OnBase vs. QuickBase

December 2025

Free Report: Hyland OnBase vs. QuickBase

Find out what your peers are saying about Hyland OnBase vs. QuickBase and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Hyland OnBase vs. QuickBase report.

See our list of best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Low-Code Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.