

Hyland OnBase and KiSSFLOW are competing enterprise content management solutions. KiSSFLOW tends to be preferred for its intuitive approach, whereas Hyland OnBase is noted for its extensive features.
Features: Users appreciate Hyland OnBase for its comprehensive integration capabilities and robust document management features. Hyland OnBase users benefit from extensive workflow customization options. KiSSFLOW is valued for its workflow automation and ease of creating business processes. KiSSFLOW offers straightforward forms and process building tools that streamline operations. Users indicate that KiSSFLOW provides a more user-friendly setup compared to Hyland OnBase's richer feature set.
Room for Improvement: Hyland OnBase users report a steep learning curve and the need for more frequent updates. Hyland OnBase can experience occasional system slowdowns during high data loads. KiSSFLOW users suggest enhancements in reporting features and occasionally experience limitations in complex workflows. KiSSFLOW could improve its integration capabilities with third-party applications.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Hyland OnBase deployment can be intricate, often requiring professional assistance, but offers reliable customer support. KiSSFLOW is easier to deploy with straightforward tutorials and responsive customer service. Users find KiSSFLOW to be simpler to implement but appreciate the strong support structure of Hyland OnBase.
Pricing and ROI: Hyland OnBase has a higher initial setup cost but delivers a significant ROI for large enterprises through its extensive functionalities. KiSSFLOW offers competitive pricing with quick returns, making it appealing for small to mid-sized organizations. Users find KiSSFLOW to be cost-effective, while Hyland OnBase provides better value for complex requirements.
I have seen a return on investment with Hyland OnBase because it provides a very reliable ECM platform for my organization, helps to remove the dependency on paper files and file folders, saves real estate costs, and facilitates the ability to work from anywhere.
I have been able to see a return on investment as the time for approvals has been reduced, and since they are centralized, everything is in one place.
Our vendor relationship facilitated integration with our system and offered additional service beyond the Hyland OnBase product.
I would describe the customer service and technical support of Hyland OnBase as being based on the partner that is used.
I find technical support from Hyland to be good.
Transitioning to cloud-based services may reduce these costs in the future.
Hyland OnBase was a stable solution that worked effectively for us.
The experience with the platform's learning curve is quite steep, especially for less technical staff.
The application could potentially be more open-source, allowing integration with more solutions.
I find OnBase's monolithic architecture to be expensive, and adopting microservices could be beneficial.
The main factors that influenced my decision to choose Hyland OnBase over other options available on the market were the cost compared to others and the high document-handling capacity that Hyland OnBase can provide.
We also paid for workflow licenses, which allowed up to 250 concurrent users.
I find pricing to be on the higher side due to its monolithic architecture.
It provided data security features, allowing restrictions on sensitive documents, such as who could view or modify them.
The impact of Hyland OnBase on our organization is that automating manual processes has had an incredible effect on our return on investment, and the man-hours saved by automating processes pays for the system, ranging from one to five hours.
The best features that Hyland OnBase offers are the security it provides to control permissions and the traceability of documents.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Hyland OnBase | 1.1% |
| KiSSFLOW | 1.1% |
| Other | 97.8% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 6 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 13 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 4 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 6 |
Hyland OnBase is acclaimed for its robust document management, automating workflows, and improving organizational efficiency across various industries. Praised for its ability to manage records compliantly, especially in regulated sectors like healthcare and finance, the tool also integrates smoothly with other enterprise systems. Users benefit significantly from streamlined processes, reduced manual tasks, and enhanced data accuracy, boosting productivity and customer satisfaction.
KiSSFLOW empowers organizations with a no-code platform for automating workflows and managing processes, providing robust integrations and ease of use to enhance individual and team productivity.
KiSSFLOW offers a comprehensive platform for process customization and automation with seamless virtual approvals, agile concept boards, and easy integration options. It supports rapid process modification and connects with applications like Google Drive, DocuSign, and Salesforce. Despite needing better integration with third-party tools and PDF functionalities, KiSSFLOW remains a valuable tool for standardizing business operations, managing HR tasks, and transitioning from paper to digital forms. The platform is widely used in HR, finance, and project management across education, sales, and nonprofit sectors, improving workflows and reducing administrative tasks.
What are KiSSFLOW's most important features?In industries like ed-tech and NGOs, KiSSFLOW significantly aids in streamlining operations by automating workflows, managing projects, and tracking approvals for finance and purchasing. Its flexibility and ease of use encourage adoption across different fields, enhancing overall operational efficiency.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.