OpenVPN Access Server Reviews

The main use case for OpenVPN Access Server is making internal web applications and using them within our organization. We have many internal apps, such as Re:dash for analytics, and internal peering and accessing different VM machines and internal servers.

I have hosted OpenVPN Access Server in my VM for one of those internal apps. From that VM, I have done the VPC peering to our different VPCs. And I have hosted, for example, Re:dash, an analytics tool for our internal company members. So we use VPN to whitelist them, and then they can internally use Re:dash for the analytics dashboard, querying, and connecting to the different databases and all.

The best features OpenVPN Access Server offers is whitelisting members in my company who have joined recently. It is really easy to use, and it is really easy to set up OpenVPN Access Server as an internal app.

When whitelisting members, I just add the name of the user. I go into User Permissions, add the name of the person I'm going to whitelist, and send them the credentials. They are able to log in and authenticate using an authenticator app and are easily able to onboard on OpenVPN Access Server and access internal apps.

It is easy to whitelist new apps that I'm going to host or when I've created a new VPC. I will do the VPC peering where I have hosted OpenVPN Access Server, and I can easily add the IP or CIDR of that particular new VPC or subnet which I'm going to use for my new app in the UI.

Before using OpenVPN Access Server, only developers mainly had access to databases. We can create read-only users for databases and internally give them access using OpenVPN Access Server. It has been really useful, as we don't have to give access to everyone, and just give access to OpenVPN Access Server, and they are able to access databases or internal websites.

The change has mainly led to the onboarding process being more smoothed out. It is really fast and saves developers' time. It saves my time as a DevOps engineer, setting up things for people.

The plan for OpenVPN Access Server could be improved. When adding new people, better plans for startups would be beneficial. I'm working in a startup and sometimes people think we should take the enterprise plan or not. If there was a dedicated plan for startups, it would be really helpful. For instance, providing store credit for OpenVPN Access Server through a startup program, similar to YC's program which gives credit to new startups.

UI-wise, OpenVPN Access Server is easy to manage, but the overall overview dashboard in the admin portal could be improved. Currently, you have to go through dropdowns to find where to add users or whitelist IPs. Creating an onboarding dashboard where an admin person can find these things easily would be beneficial.

I have been using OpenVPN Access Server for around two years.

OpenVPN Access Server has been stable since the last six months with no issues.

I have hosted OpenVPN Access Server in a VM. It does not utilize much memory or CPU on the VM. So far, I have been using around 40 users, and I did not need to scale it up. I think just scaling the VM would help in case it is needed.

I haven't used customer support from OpenVPN Access Server.

I haven't used any other solutions on the VPN side. OpenVPN Access Server was the first tool I have used for whitelisting people, but it did not give me any reason to move to any other product. It has been good.

I found some open-source documentation for setting up OpenVPN Access Server. It was really easy to set up initially. I got some networking issues from the VPC peering side, but it was resolved from open-source references.

I have utilized the access controls feature of OpenVPN Access Server, including an auto-login feature. For some developers who are heavily using OpenVPN Access Server, I allow an auto-login feature. For others, they still have to put the MFA code from the authenticator app.

I haven't seen exact numbers from the investment side, but OpenVPN Access Server has been really useful and saved a lot of time for developers.

The experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for OpenVPN Access Server is really good, not that expensive. I am easily able to add new users from the OpenVPN Access Server official website. I would suggest adding a startup plan for small startups would be really helpful.

Before choosing OpenVPN Access Server, I haven't evaluated any other options. Some of my colleagues recommended OpenVPN Access Server, and I went through it, and it has been really useful.

I would suggest for others looking into using OpenVPN Access Server, people find it difficult sometimes to self-host. Find the right documentation and go through it. Mostly it is all about networking. If your basics of networking are clear, you will be able to host it easily.

On a scale of one to ten, I rate OpenVPN Access Server a nine.

I have used OpenVPN Access Server for around two to three months when I was dealing with client-related work where we needed to utilize this because they were also using the same. To connect with systems, this application was required.

Primarily, I was using OpenVPN Access Server for a secure VPN connection.

I used OpenVPN Access Server on a VPN for a client where they have a server deployed for the network connection, and it was configured and installed at our end also.

Basically, related to big enterprises where we need to work remotely and be secure by using a good VPN, that's why we utilize OpenVPN Access Server, and it was good.

The deployment part of OpenVPN Access Server is quite easy, and it also provides a web interface for the admin panel and supports multi-factor authentication. We can also integrate with Active Directory and deploy on the cloud as well.

For me, the web admin UI part of OpenVPN Access Server is very good because I can directly manage from there what users to add, whom to deploy, and what rights I have to provide to each specific user, and I can manage them from an easy web interface.

An amazing feature of OpenVPN Access Server is compatibility with AWS and DigitalOcean-like service providers, and I think that's a great feature.

OpenVPN Access Server is strong and quite good, and the cross-platform support is excellent. The integration with enterprise-level authentication is very good, and the scalability part is quite strong. OpenVPN Access Server provided improved security, better than other tools in the market, and we can utilize it in different ways while integrating with other cloud platforms or on-premises, so in that field, it stands out from others and improved our security.

I have been using the LDAP RADIUS solution with OpenVPN Access Server, and it is quite effective and secure to use, with very good integration.

Some advanced networking of OpenVPN Access Server requires Linux network expertise for a person to work on.

I wish OpenVPN Access Server could also explain how a normal user can utilize it, and the subscription cost sometimes can be a little high compared to other tools in the market.

I have been working in my field for three or more years and exploring the team in blue teaming parts and other aspects of the cybersecurity domain.

OpenVPN Access Server is very stable in nature and quite easy to work on.

The scalability of OpenVPN Access Server is very high, as other tools have good scalability as well, so the scalability is high.

OpenVPN Access Server provides good customer support, and if you are having any connection or any kind of issues, you can directly raise the queries, and they will get it resolved within two to three hours. I would give OpenVPN Access Server's customer support a perfect score as I do not have any issues with their customer support, and they are always willing to solve your queries.

The deployment part of OpenVPN Access Server is quite easy, and it also provides a web interface for the admin panel and supports multi-factor authentication. We can also integrate with Active Directory and deploy on the cloud as well.

It was quite easy to install and set up OpenVPN Access Server; we did not take more than four to five hours to set up our team.

I have not calculated any return on investment with OpenVPN Access Server, but based on the time saved, its connectivity is automated, so when we connect to other VPN servers, it takes around ten to thirty minutes of setup and other tasks. With the setup part and automatic connection in this, we save around thirty minutes to one hour on a daily basis in connection setup and related activities.

The cost of OpenVPN Access Server can be a little more for other teams if they have a low budget, but if you do not have a tight budget constraint, then it also offers a free tier for a small number of concurrent users, so it also offers a free tier that they can utilize.

I did not reevaluate options before choosing OpenVPN Access Server as our client was also using it, so we were required to use it, and we did not have a choice either, but it was a good experience while using it.

OpenVPN Access Server works easily.

We have used the role-defining feature of OpenVPN Access Server because not all users are required to have admin-level privileges, so we define roles for what a particular user should have access to and what resources they should access, and based on that, we manage OpenVPN Access Server.

The user interface of OpenVPN Access Server is very good, and it is easy to navigate and handle the parts which are required to perform, including adding roles, adding users, and managing them via the web admin UI panel.

OpenVPN Access Server provides low latency and is much better than other VPN solutions, and providing low latency offers higher efficiency to the networks and getting connected and receiving the data in real time.

If a person is looking for secure connectivity based on a good admin UI, multi-factor authentication support, and multiple integration options, then they can definitely choose OpenVPN Access Server apart from traditional VPNs that come into the market. I would rate this product an eight out of ten.

Our primary use case is enabling secure VPN access for remote employees. It ensures encrypted connections to internal systems and protects company data while users work from outside the office.

OpenVPN Access Server has improved our organization's security by providing reliable and encrypted remote access to internal resources. It has made remote work easier for employees, reduced connectivity issues, simplified VPN management, and helped ensure business continuity while maintaining secure access to company systems.

OpenVPN Access Server's best features are its strong security, easy deployment, centralized management, and reliable remote connectivity. The web-based administration portal simplifies user and VPN management, while encrypted connections ensure secure access to internal resources. It also supports multiple operating systems, making it easy for employees to connect from different devices.

OpenVPN Access Server is a reliable solution, but it could be improved with a more modern and intuitive user interface, enhanced monitoring and reporting dashboards, more detailed audit logs, easier integration with cloud identity providers, and built-in high-availability and load-balancing features. Additional automation through APIs and improved troubleshooting tools would also make administration more efficient.

We have been using OpenVPN Access Server for approximately one year. During this time, it has provided reliable and secure remote access while meeting our organization's connectivity and security requirements.

Yes, OpenVPN Access Server is a stable and reliable solution. It has provided consistent VPN connectivity with minimal downtime, making it dependable for secure remote access. With regular updates and maintenance, it continues to perform well and meet our business needs.

The scalability of OpenVPN Access Server is highly effective structurally but limited by pricing configurations, as it scales exponentially and well by deploying multiple node instances in an active-active cluster to handle heavy concurrent user traffic, although the licensing model does not scale dynamically and requires manual integration to purchase fixed user blocks.

The customer support for OpenVPN Access Server is highly reliable and helpful, the official ticket-based support team is responsive and technically knowledgeable when addressing complex configuration needs, and because OpenVPN is an industry standard, it is backed by extensive public knowledge, comprehensive documentation, and an active community forum that makes troubleshooting straightforward.

I would rate the customer support an eight out of ten, as the official ticket-based support team is highly responsive and technically proficient when handling complex challenges.

Yes. We previously used a basic VPN solution but switched to OpenVPN Access Server for its stronger security, easier management, better reliability, and cross-platform support. It also provides a more user-friendly experience for both administrators and end users.

It was very easy to install and set up OpenVPN Access Server; for example, launching it directly as a preconfigured virtual appliance from the cloud marketplace onto an AWS instance streamlined the configuration, allowing us to establish user management controls rapidly without manual support.

We evaluated other options including standard cloud-native solutions such as AWS Client VPN and alternative protocols such as standalone WireGuard, but ultimately we chose OpenVPN Access Server because it provided the best balance of built-in SAML integration, user self-service protocols, and granular access rules out of the box.

While we don't have exact ROI metrics, OpenVPN Access Server has delivered value through improved security, reliable remote connectivity, reduced administrative effort, and better support for remote work. These benefits have contributed to increased operational efficiency and lower support costs over time

The pricing and licensing are straightforward and scalable. Setup was simple with minimal deployment effort, and the overall cost has been reasonable for the features, security, and reliability provided.

Before choosing OpenVPN Access Server, we evaluated solutions such as Cisco AnyConnect, Fortinet FortiClient VPN, and WireGuard. OpenVPN Access Server stood out because it offers a good balance of security, ease of deployment, centralized management, and cross-platform compatibility. While some enterprise VPN solutions provide more advanced security and networking features, they are often more complex to deploy and manage. WireGuard offers excellent performance but requires additional configuration for centralized user management and enterprise-scale administration. Overall, OpenVPN Access Server provided the best combination of simplicity, reliability, and security for our needs.

8/10. OpenVPN Access Server is a reliable, secure, and easy-to-manage VPN solution. I would recommend it to organizations looking for secure remote access with simple deployment, centralized management, and excellent cross-platform support.

My main use case for OpenVPN Access Server involves managing secure remote access for our internal teams and technical engineers who need to connect to our private cloud infrastructure. We rely heavily on established secure connections so the team can certainly access the database, internal applications, server dashboards, and the web admin UI makes it straightforward to manage user cases and integrates well with our existing authentication setup, which gives us significant time savings on the IT support side.

A quick specific example of how my team uses OpenVPN Access Server day to day includes the admin web UI being at the top of the list because it makes managing user access and subnets incredibly simple without having to use the command line. Another standout feature is the built-in client portal that allows users to log in and download their configured profile, saving our IT team considerable manual setup work. Lastly, the authentication flexibility helps us regularly, specifically how smoothly it integrates with our Active Directory and multifactor authentication, which enhances our IT support experience on a daily basis.

OpenVPN Access Server has positively impacted our organization by providing a high, reliable, stable environment, especially for remote work. We handle critical infrastructure, and having a secure gateway that does not drop connections unexpectedly is a huge win, greatly improving our security posture without adding administrative headaches, as engineers and technical teams can securely connect to private cloud resources and databases from anywhere without a hitch, ensuring that our operations workflow runs smoothly around the clock and offering total peace of mind regarding remote access security.

Regarding specific outcomes, the clear impact of OpenVPN Access Server has been a massive drop in VPN-related support tickets. We previously handled profile issues, broken connections, and credential setups manually which used to be a daily headache for the IT team. Those tickets have now dropped by seventy percent to eighty percent, roughly because of the self-service client portal. It saves significant time on user onboarding as it used to take administration about twenty to thirty minutes to generate and securely send configuration files, but now, thanks to Active Directory integration, it takes hardly two to three minutes, resulting in considerable hours saved weekly and monthly.

The main feature of OpenVPN Access Server that stands out to me is the admin UI, and it is very well integrated with the Active Directory multifactor authentication, which provides the kind of enterprise-grade security we have been looking for, and we are very happy with that.

The admin web UI makes managing user access and subnets incredibly simple without having to use the command line. Another standout feature is the built-in client portal that allows users to log in and download their configured profile, saving our IT team considerable manual setup work. The authentication flexibility helps us regularly, specifically how smoothly it integrates with our Active Directory and multifactor authentication.

The main area for OpenVPN Access Server improvement is its pricing model, as the concurrent user license gets expensive quickly as the organization grows, so more flexible pricing options would be a huge plus for AVIARC. Another area I would specify is the configuration disconnect, as the admin UI handles about ninety percent of what you need, but when it comes to advanced routing customization, tweaking specific variables requires dropping back into the command line interface. It would be great to see those deeper configurations integrated into the web portal for ease of use, along with support for newer, lighter protocols like WireGuard built straight into the platform for better performance and efficiency.

I have been using OpenVPN Access Server for about three and a half to four years.

OpenVPN Access Server demonstrates absolute stability with no issues regarding its reliability, scalability, or other concerns.

OpenVPN Access Server scales very well from a technical standpoint. You can easily upgrade the underlying hardware resources or spin up additional nodes in a cluster configuration to handle a massive surge in concurrent users. The only real constraint to its scalability is financial, as the concurrent user licensing model leads to expenses increasing quickly as you scale up to support larger teams, meaning while the software handles growth seamlessly, your budget is the main thing you need to plan around.

I would rate customer support nine out of ten. The ticketing system is responsive, and the technical team knows the product inside and out. Moreover, due to the massive community around VPNs, you can almost always find immediate answers in their forum documentation without needing to open a ticket.

Installing and setting up OpenVPN Access Server is very easy, especially compared to the community edition of OpenVPN. In our environment, we deployed it without a manual script or built-in installation from scratch, simply pulling a pre-configured image directly onto our virtual machine. The initial setup wizard guided us through core settings like admin password configuration and a primary network interface through the terminal, from where we immediately transitioned to the web UI to handle the rest of the configuration, which included setting up routing paths and subnets. It took less than an hour for the fully functional server to be up, which is a massive time-saver for our engineering team.

My advice to others looking into using OpenVPN Access Server is to map out your user access groups and routing subnets before configuring the server, as the tool makes enforcing least privilege incredibly easy, but it is smoother with clearly defined access policies on paper first. I would also recommend taking full advantage of the two free concurrent connections to test out the SAML or Active Directory integrations completely before purchasing licenses, allowing you to prove the workflow and see how much time it can save your IT team before making a financial commitment. I would rate this product an eight out of ten overall.

OpenVPN Access Server is our main solution to ensure that the VPN is properly connected at the client's location so that they are able to access our system, as we have a platform for inventory invoice management.

Just as there are typical firewalls in a system, such as Cloudflare 1.1.1.1, I use OpenVPN Access Server to allow access from specific IPs and block access to specific IPs in my invoice management platform.

OpenVPN Access Server has positively impacted my organization by helping us design a reliable infrastructure and even providing definite SLA metrics to our clients.

We have different SLA levels such as L0, L1, L2, and L3 in a typical IT scenario. Some clients need immediate access within 24 hours, while other clients, depending on their SLA levels, need support within one to two days. There are also some clients who are low priority and need support within five days or a week. This is how we organize our SLA structure. The high-priority clients who are hosted on our private server need immediate resolution, or a penalty is applied.

The best features OpenVPN Access Server offers are the secure access to the portal and the ability to stop irrelevant IPs from accessing our system.

The secure access feature and blocking irrelevant IPs help my team on a day-to-day basis by protecting us. The unnecessary load on the servers is avoided in the first place. The regular backups that are taken are also easily available for our clients. Even the support team feels updated with all such features.

OpenVPN Access Server needs improvement as it requires definite marketing in the East Africa region so that many people have access to it. It should also be available offline and not always dependent on the internet. It should have AI-based observability metrics as well.

From the user experience perspective, OpenVPN Access Server should be more user-friendly in the East Africa market where I am located. It should be easy to use and compliant with local norms. From the technical perspective, it should not be heavily dependent on the resources of the PC.

I have been using OpenVPN Access Server for the past three years.

Others who are looking to use OpenVPN Access Server should evaluate the proper feature benefits and costing as per their use cases.

From the user experience perspective, OpenVPN Access Server should be more user-friendly in the East Africa market where I am located. It should be easy to use and compliant with local norms. From the technical perspective, it should not be heavily dependent on the resources of the PC.

I found this interview to be good, but it can be improved with a more manual touch. My overall review rating for this product is 9 out of 10.

I use the solution for higher education resources.

The solution does its job and it is easy to customize.

The core VPN functionality is reliable and relatively easy to administer once it is deployed.

The licensing and purchasing workflow needs serious improvement. OpenVPN should provide clear documentation for customers who need multiple Access Server instances, different connection counts, AWS Marketplace subscriptions, PAYG licensing, and BYOL licensing under the same organization. Support and sales also need a clearer internal escalation path. We received guidance that pointed us back to AWS, then AWS clarified that OpenVPN needed to amend or handle the agreement, then OpenVPN proposed BYOL, then the BYOL setup ran into another account conflict. This was embarrassing for a paid enterprise product.

The product should include clearer in-app and portal-level guidance explaining what account types, billing models, and subscription models are compatible. Customers should not have to discover these limitations through a long email chain.

I have been using the solution for 7 months.

We have used OpenVPN Access Server previously and were trying to expand our existing deployment. The issue was not that we were switching from another vendor. The issue was that expanding an existing OpenVPN setup became unexpectedly difficult.

Do not assume the pricing or purchasing path will be straightforward, especially through AWS Marketplace. Confirm in writing whether your intended setup requires PAYG, BYOL, a Marketplace amendment, a separate AWS account, or a separate OpenVPN account. Also, budget staff time for the licensing process itself. The sticker price may look clear, but the real cost includes the time spent untangling subscription limitations, account conflicts, sales handoffs, and unclear guidance.

We considered continuing with OpenVPN because we already had operational familiarity with it and expected the expansion path to be simple.

The technical product is usable. The purchasing and licensing experience was the problem. Our organization needed a simple answer to a simple question: how do we run one 10-connection server and one 50-connection server? Instead of a clear path, we got days of back-and-forth, repeated explanations, conflicting assumptions, AWS/OpenVPN finger-pointing, delayed responses, and a final BYOL path that still ran into account conflicts. For an infrastructure product, that is not acceptable.

Customers should not need to coordinate between vendor sales, vendor support, AWS Marketplace, AWS account teams, and internal billing just to buy more capacity. OpenVPN should make this process dramatically clearer, faster, and more accountable.

My current use case for OpenVPN Access Server is for the security aspect, so I access the servers through the VPN. I disable the public access and only enable the private access.

In my opinion, the most useful function in OpenVPN Access Server is the user management feature, which I regularly use to manage the users and the concurrent sessions. When I have a very small number of connections and users, I used to manage it from OpenVPN Access Server from the UI, discarding or canceling the open connections and unused connections.

I am satisfied with the access control features of OpenVPN Access Server; that access control is a good feature for OpenVPN Access Server.

I have been using the role-defining feature with OpenVPN Access Server. There are different roles: the admin role and the normal roles, so I provide the regular operations roles to the regular users, and admin access is restricted to a few people.

I find the user interface of OpenVPN Access Server to be good; it is an intuitive user interface, so I appreciate that.

At the moment, I do not have any improvements I could think of on top of my head, but it is good; I do not have any improvements or suggestions on the product at the moment.

I have been working with OpenVPN Access Server for around seven to eight years so far.

I would rate the stability of OpenVPN Access Server as six out of ten.

The ability to scale with OpenVPN Access Server is again a six out of ten.

I do not have any complexities with scalability; it is not complex to scale or to increase the number of users or devices.

In my opinion, I have no idea about competitors; I have not considered any other options to compare OpenVPN Access Server.

The initial setup for OpenVPN Access Server is simple.

I confirm that I purchased the product directly from the vendor, OpenVPN.

I rate the price for OpenVPN as overpriced at the moment.

I can recommend OpenVPN Access Server to other users. I would rate this review a six out of ten.

Our primary use case for OpenVPN is remote connectivity for clients in the mining exploration industry, specifically for winter road and ice road access.

The most valuable features of OpenVPN are its ease of use, client familiarity, end-user familiarity, operating system integration, and price points. The scalability is a bonus since it allows running on any hardware. It's part of our client stack for all of our clients' VPNs and is a de facto standard for an endpoint VPN solution.

OpenVPN could improve in centralized management and enhance the GUI configuration steps. Although it's straightforward, if I don't know what I am doing, ease of use and configuration might be challenging. I would rate ease of configuration around a five or six out of ten.

I have had experience with OpenVPN for several years.

The stability of OpenVPN is very good. On a scale of one to ten, I would rate it an eight.

I would give OpenVPN a six out of ten for scalability, as it's usually a single user or single device.

I have not dealt with support or customer service, however, the documentation is good, and I would rate it a seven out of ten.

Neutral

We have not switched from another solution as OpenVPN is part of the default stack with most of our routers.

The initial setup for OpenVPN is straightforward.

It's a one-person job for implementation, and all of our technicians can deploy it.

There is not much to mention in terms of return on investment, other than providing standard VPN connectivity.

My experience with pricing is excellent as the pricing is free.

We are slowly replacing it with WireGuard solutions.

OpenVPN could improve the GUI and configuration steps. Overall, it's a straightforward deployment, however, it would be challenging for someone without technical knowledge. I would rate the solution an eight out of ten.

My main use case for OpenVPN Access Server is access to private subnets.

What I appreciate the most about OpenVPN Access Server is that it's very easy to set up.

OpenVPN Access Server has helped in meeting my organization's security requirements. I get to keep everything in the cloud private. People on the outside cannot see it, and this I use to connect.

There are ways OpenVPN Access Server could be improved. There are many small things, such as resetting MFA. There are tasks that require logging onto the server to run commands, which is not intuitive through the UI. If they had a one-click setup where you provide credentials instead of manually running commands, that would be beneficial. But it remains quite simple, which is why people appreciate it.

I assess the compatibility of OpenVPN Access Server with different client software and operating systems as quite easy. It's very good and simple to use. That's one of the reasons we use it. It's easy to set up the server side and the client side for users. It doesn't matter if it's Windows, Apple, Mac, or Linux - they're all very easy.

I have been using OpenVPN Access Server for seven to eight years.

OpenVPN Access Server scales with the growing needs of my organization. I have had some clients who expanded their usage, starting with three users, then increasing to 10, then to 20 users, each one in a different cloud with different licenses. It's not very easy to expand, and it would be beneficial if the process were simpler.

I had to use their customer service and technical support for OpenVPN Access Server. It was very good, and I would rate it an eight.

Positive

I have not really seen any ROI from OpenVPN Access Server. It's very hard to measure ROI as it's just a method of connection.

I had considered other solutions before choosing OpenVPN Access Server, such as AWS VPN and others, but OpenVPN Access Server is simply easier to use.

Regarding OpenVPN Access Server's advanced monitoring and reporting tools, I have not seen many features. They have a basic log, which is sufficient most of the time.

I found the setup and pricing of OpenVPN Access Server very easy since I've set it up many times. Even the first time wasn't particularly complicated.

I use the feature for hybrid deployment on OpenVPN Access Server in the cloud, not on-premises.

Overall, my experience with OpenVPN Access Server on a scale of one to 10 is a nine.

I use OpenVPN Access Server to access certain networks from home or external locations.

The most valuable features of the solution are that it is easy to use and quick overall.

Sometimes OpenVPN Access Server is difficult to connect to, and in our company, we don't know why it is difficult. The product may not connect if we lose connection at times. There are certain shortcomings in the product's stability that need improvement.

In general, I want to improve the connect connectivity of the solution since I sometimes face stability issues.

I have been using OpenVPN Access Server for five years. I use the solution's latest version.

Stability-wise, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

The product's scalability is good. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

There are three users of OpenVPN Access Server in my company.

The product is not extensively used, and we do not have plans to increase the number of users in the company.

I have previously used solutions similar to OpenVPN Access Server, but I don't remember their names.

The initial setup phase of OpenVPN Access Server was fine, and it was easy.

Only I am involved in the deployment and maintenance of the solution.

The installation phase was carried out in-house by myself.

I don't need to pay for its license since it is an open-source tool.

The solution is okay for me.

I recommend the solution to those planning to use it. OpenVPN Access Server is a good solution.

Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.