OpenVPN Access Server Reviews

Our primary use case for OpenVPN is remote connectivity for clients in the mining exploration industry, specifically for winter road and ice road access.

The most valuable features of OpenVPN are its ease of use, client familiarity, end-user familiarity, operating system integration, and price points. The scalability is a bonus since it allows running on any hardware. It's part of our client stack for all of our clients' VPNs and is a de facto standard for an endpoint VPN solution.

OpenVPN could improve in centralized management and enhance the GUI configuration steps. Although it's straightforward, if I don't know what I am doing, ease of use and configuration might be challenging. I would rate ease of configuration around a five or six out of ten.

I have had experience with OpenVPN for several years.

The stability of OpenVPN is very good. On a scale of one to ten, I would rate it an eight.

I would give OpenVPN a six out of ten for scalability, as it's usually a single user or single device.

I have not dealt with support or customer service, however, the documentation is good, and I would rate it a seven out of ten.

We have not switched from another solution as OpenVPN is part of the default stack with most of our routers.

The initial setup for OpenVPN is straightforward.

It's a one-person job for implementation, and all of our technicians can deploy it.

There is not much to mention in terms of return on investment, other than providing standard VPN connectivity.

My experience with pricing is excellent as the pricing is free.

We are slowly replacing it with WireGuard solutions.

OpenVPN could improve the GUI and configuration steps. Overall, it's a straightforward deployment, however, it would be challenging for someone without technical knowledge. I would rate the solution an eight out of ten.

My main use case for OpenVPN Access Server is access to private subnets.

What I appreciate the most about OpenVPN Access Server is that it's very easy to set up.

OpenVPN Access Server has helped in meeting my organization's security requirements. I get to keep everything in the cloud private. People on the outside cannot see it, and this I use to connect.

There are ways OpenVPN Access Server could be improved. There are many small things, such as resetting MFA. There are tasks that require logging onto the server to run commands, which is not intuitive through the UI. If they had a one-click setup where you provide credentials instead of manually running commands, that would be beneficial. But it remains quite simple, which is why people appreciate it.

I assess the compatibility of OpenVPN Access Server with different client software and operating systems as quite easy. It's very good and simple to use. That's one of the reasons we use it. It's easy to set up the server side and the client side for users. It doesn't matter if it's Windows, Apple, Mac, or Linux - they're all very easy.

I have been using OpenVPN Access Server for seven to eight years.

OpenVPN Access Server scales with the growing needs of my organization. I have had some clients who expanded their usage, starting with three users, then increasing to 10, then to 20 users, each one in a different cloud with different licenses. It's not very easy to expand, and it would be beneficial if the process were simpler.

I had to use their customer service and technical support for OpenVPN Access Server. It was very good, and I would rate it an eight.

Positive

I have not really seen any ROI from OpenVPN Access Server. It's very hard to measure ROI as it's just a method of connection.

I had considered other solutions before choosing OpenVPN Access Server, such as AWS VPN and others, but OpenVPN Access Server is simply easier to use.

Regarding OpenVPN Access Server's advanced monitoring and reporting tools, I have not seen many features. They have a basic log, which is sufficient most of the time.

I found the setup and pricing of OpenVPN Access Server very easy since I've set it up many times. Even the first time wasn't particularly complicated.

I use the feature for hybrid deployment on OpenVPN Access Server in the cloud, not on-premises.

Overall, my experience with OpenVPN Access Server on a scale of one to 10 is a nine.

I use OpenVPN Access Server to access certain networks from home or external locations.

The most valuable features of the solution are that it is easy to use and quick overall.

Sometimes OpenVPN Access Server is difficult to connect to, and in our company, we don't know why it is difficult. The product may not connect if we lose connection at times. There are certain shortcomings in the product's stability that need improvement.

In general, I want to improve the connect connectivity of the solution since I sometimes face stability issues.

I have been using OpenVPN Access Server for five years. I use the solution's latest version.

Stability-wise, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

The product's scalability is good. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

There are three users of OpenVPN Access Server in my company.

The product is not extensively used, and we do not have plans to increase the number of users in the company.

I have previously used solutions similar to OpenVPN Access Server, but I don't remember their names.

The initial setup phase of OpenVPN Access Server was fine, and it was easy.

Only I am involved in the deployment and maintenance of the solution.

The installation phase was carried out in-house by myself.

I don't need to pay for its license since it is an open-source tool.

The solution is okay for me.

I recommend the solution to those planning to use it. OpenVPN Access Server is a good solution.

Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

We have a virtual machine set up on Google Cloud. The virtual machine is connected to all our clients. It is connected to OpenVPN, which is connected to Google Cloud. It connects our clients throughout the country. We also have clients in other countries.

The product’s adaptability is valuable. We can connect to clients through different methods. We could set up a site-to-site connection, or we could set it up as a tunnel. There are a lot of different ways of setting up the connection. We can try a different method if something doesn't work for a client's security configuration or firewall. The product is fairly easy to use.

The logs should be made easier to read. If there is an issue, it takes me a while to find it in the log.

I am using the solution currently.

The solution is quite stable. When we first set it up, there were some issues. I only have to complain about some issues with the connection. We've used other services and were able to stay connected permanently.

We have been able to have all our clients on the server so far. I haven't had a problem so far with adding more users. We have about 50 users.

The support team is really quick to jump on any support cases. I had a case open about two weeks ago. It was related to our DNS. I received an email within 15 minutes. The team set up the support tickets and worked with me. I rate support a nine or ten out of ten.

Positive

It was fairly easy to set up. I rate the ease of setup a seven out of ten.

Overall, I rate the tool an eight out of ten.

We use the product for secure remote access, including WiFi and IoT device security.

The product has strong encryption and scalability features. It provides security for private network connections.

The product’s connectivity is very slow. It could be faster.

We have been using OpenVPN Access Server for four years.

It is a stable platform.

We have 100 OpenVPN Access Server users in our organization. It is a scalable product.

We have a network engineer to look after technical issues within the organization. However, we escalate queries to the OpenVPN’s support team over email. They are responsive.

We have used Cisco IOS Security.

The initial setup process is straightforward. It takes less than an hour to deploy. It involves choosing the server, IP address, or domain name and setting it up.

I implemented the product myself.

OpenVPN Access Server helps us limit errors or additional damage to the organization.

The product offers yearly as well as monthly subscription plans. It has moderate pricing.

I rate OpenVPN Access Server a nine out of ten. I advise others to check whether the server connects well with the product. It helps them avoid any loopholes for the account while entering the network for configuration.

The solution is primarily used for connecting desktops or laptops. Users can connect to this from an insecure environment. 

I like that you can have a safe access point from all kinds of places. 

The security is fine.

The pricing is okay. 

I have found the stability to be good. 

It offers a straightforward setup. 

I haven't had issues with the solution. It's a good product. 

I'd like the solution to have more access points and more speed. 

I've been using the solution for two to three years. 

It's stable and reliable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze.

I don't have information about the scalability. I haven't tried to scale it. 

We have 30 to 40 customers using the solution. 

I've never used technical support in the past. I can't speak to how helpful they would be. 

The solution is simple to set up. The deployment is very fast. It takes mere minutes. 

The solution has an annual subscription. The price is okay. It is not very expensive. 

I'm a consultant. 

I'd recommend the solution to others.

I'd rate the product eight out of ten. 

It can create an environmentally friendly setting, such as a park or green space, where I can interact with other people and use various tools and resources.

OpenVPN Access Server allows us to establish a secure connection to an IP address that would otherwise be inaccessible without using a VPN.

The stability of the OpenVPN Access Server has room for improvement.

I have been using the solution for almost two years.

The solution is stable but requires some work each time we scale.

The solution is scalable.

I previously used Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks but we did not renew the account.

I give the solution a seven out of ten.

We have under 100 people using the solution.

I recommend the solution to others.

We connect to the OpenVPN using a VPN for any computer not directly connected to our local server. This is necessary because multiple offices need to use the software developed on the local server.

We use OpenVPN Access Server on every device that needs to connect to the server. It's the best way to achieve better latency and connect remotely.

It is easy to use. We connect to the server and launch our software in between.

It should automate our processes. Our developers continuously improve the software, but we'll continue using PowerBuilder unless we undertake a significant project to migrate to a different platform, possibly Java. Additionally, we need RPA software. I've also looked into Twilio, which provides automated SMS alerts. We're assessing how useful that service could be for our needs.

It's stable.

We need RPA software and automatic testing software to make any improvements.

We want to scale internationally. To do this, we'll create a blank copy of our software, replicate our database architecture schema, and then prepare it for the new location. Additionally, we plan to implement automation tools, such as RPA and automated testing, to catch up on the technological aspects we've been lagging. Since our current software is built on PowerBuilder, starting from scratch is challenging. Therefore, we'll continue using it while integrating new resources to improve our system.

It is suitable for small to medium businesses. We have three locations: one laboratory and two offices. We have approximately 120 to 130 employees across these locations.

The initial setup was very easy, and one system administrator did it.

It's efficient. Connecting to the local server without it would be much more difficult. Every employee who works from another office has to use it, so it's essential.

It is not that expensive. It makes it more efficient for some people's jobs.

Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

OpenVPN Access Server provides remote secure access. 

OpenVPN Access Server needs to have fewer updates. 

OpenVPN Access Server is stable. 

The tool is scalable. 

The tool's deployment is straightforward. It took ten minutes to complete. 

OpenVPN Access Server is a cheap corporate solution. 

I rate the product a nine out of ten. 

I use OpenVPN Access Server for remote maintenance, enabling secure access to systems. It is also my choice for smart working, providing a reliable and encrypted connection for remote employees. Additionally, I deploy it for site-to-site VPNs, ensuring secure communication between our headquarters and branch offices.

The most valuable thing about OpenVPN Access Server is its ease of use. The user-friendly interface simplifies configuration, and features like reversibility and scalability enhance its flexibility.

One improvement I would like to see in OpenVPN is better adaptability in certain geographical areas, like Asia, where the traffic can face blocks. Addressing this issue would enhance the overall performance, especially for data transfer in those regions.

I have been using OpenVPN Access Server for many years.

I would rate the stability of the solution as a nine out of ten.

OpenVPN is generally scalable, but in certain regions like China, where deep packet inspection is widespread, there are certain challenges. The scalability holds up well, but consideration is needed for environments with stringent stateful inspection, especially in cases like China. Overall, I would rate the scalability of the solution as an eight out of ten.

Setting up OpenVPN is generally quick, both from the client and server sides. The connection setup is speedy. The more time-consuming part is implementing traffic policies, but overall, the initial setup is efficient.

Licensing for OpenVPN is generally hassle-free. Server-side access is usually included, and there is flexibility with features. I haven't encountered licensing issues on the user side either, as proprietary solutions or OpenVPN's built-in options are commonly used without problems.

Currently, we are evaluating solutions from Barracuda, Sophos, and Fortinet.

My advice for those starting with OpenVPN is to ensure you are using the latest version, as the trend is to refine encryption algorithms. Being up-to-date with the software ensures you benefit from the latest improvements and security measures. Overall, I would rate OpenVPN Access Server as a nine out of ten.