Scout APM offers an application performance monitoring tool tailored for developers seeking efficient performance insights. It helps identify issues impacting app speed and performance, providing deep visibility into app behavior.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Scout APM | 0.4% |
| Splunk AppDynamics | 5.0% |
| Dynatrace | 4.9% |
| Other | 89.7% |
Scout APM specializes in identifying and diagnosing performance bottlenecks in applications. Designed with developer needs in mind, it offers precise insights, enabling quicker deployments and improved application performance. It focuses extensively on providing clear, actionable data without overwhelming users with too much complexity. Scout APM's lightweight design ensures minimal overhead, making it effective for performance optimization and increasing developer productivity without slowing down applications under heavy load.
What are the key features of Scout APM?Scout APM is valuable across industries such as e-commerce, healthcare, and finance, where application performance is critical to user experience and operational success. In e-commerce, it aids in maintaining fast load times during high-traffic sales events. Healthcare applications benefit from uninterrupted service, ensuring seamless user interaction and data processing. In finance, reliability is key; thus, Scout APM helps maintain robust and secure app environments.
Chargify, Synctree, Aptuitiv, Barnes and Noble, Journey, Geosnapshot, Kongregate, PaperTrail, Adobe, SendGrid, Sentry
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Regional Manager LatAm at Splunk | 5.0 | I rate Scout 10/10. It's an extremely stable, scalable observability solution with broad features across digital environments. Setup is manageable, offering great visibility and helping my organization be more forward-thinking. |
Today, it's all about observability. There is a digital environment and I'm not just taking care of the application. I'm also looking at the application, process, cloud, cloud service, microservices, et cetera. Everything that is around the digital performance environment, I can see.
It is a solution that we can put in the business level of data. The company uses my data to make decisions about the business.
It's allowed our company to be more forward-thinking and to consider the future a bit more.
The solution is stable.
It's pretty easy to set up, especially if you have the knowledge base and/or you have a partner assist you.
The product can scale.
The processes are great. It helps with services and microservices.
The product is great for man different industries, including energy, government, finance, and more.
I can't recall coming across any missing features. Its capabilities are pretty broad.
I've been using Scout for 21 years or so. I've definitely used it in the last 12 months.
The solution is very stable. It's reliable. There are no bugs or glitches and it doesn't crash or freeze.
The solution, of course, is quite scalable. It's not a problem if you need to expand it.
We have 87 people using the solution currently.
We're likely to increase usage. In Latin America this year, there will be investments of $24 billion in IT processes. And 14% of this is just APM, just monitoring solutions. That will likely increase by 16% every single year.
Technical support has been great.
Positive
We've replaced this solution in the past with a more up-to-date version. You can upgrade even if your current version is running well.
I've dealt with Splunk, Datadog, and Dynatrace. I work with a lot of solutions.
I'm a Splunk salesperson. However, Dynatrace is very, very good. And Datadog has been improving all the time.
How complex or simple the implementation process is depends a lot on the customer and what they need to do. Do they have a good background? Are they using different tools? These questions and more will come up during implementation. However, for the most part, it's not a big deal.
I'd rate the solution a three out of five in terms of the general ease of setup.
We only need six people to handle deployment and maintenance.
When you use a partner, the initial setup is easier. We can do it either way.
We've seen ROI a lot.
Users pay for licensing on a yearly basis. In general, the pricing is great. It's very reasonable.
We looked at a few other options, including those that were open source. What we ultimately choose depends on what the client needs. Scout is ideal, typically, as it does provide great visibility.
When putting this tool into place, it's very important to consider the rules before adopting everything.
I'd rate the solution ten out of ten.
