SolarWinds Network Device Monitor Reviews

Enterprise buyers evaluating SolarWinds Network Device Monitor report varied pricing experiences. While some find the cost reasonable or manageable, others note it is high compared to alternatives. Many emphasize the licensing costs increase with additional devices and that it includes complex components leading to added expenses. Installation is generally straightforward. Licensing models vary, with both perpetual and annual options mentioned, and price ratings range from moderate to high. Some recommend price reductions, particularly in competitive markets like India.

• "I find the cost of SolarWinds Network Device Monitor reasonable for our company. Though, I'm not aware of the exact licensing cost."
• "I rate the product's price as three to three and a half or on a scale of one to ten, where one means low price, and ten means high price."
• "SolarWinds Network Device Monitor is not an expensive solution."

Users primarily utilize SolarWinds Network Device Monitor for managing and tracking network devices, checking device status, and monitoring network performance including CPU, memory, and bandwidth utilization. It aids in NetFlow log collection, incident management, device configuration, and real-time monitoring to detect outages and performance degradation. Teams engage in monitoring various network components such as switches, routers, and servers, while also utilizing IP management and remote device monitoring capabilities.

Many users express satisfaction with SolarWinds Network Device Monitor's support, rating it highly and praising response times and support quality. Some users mention quick feedback, beneficial for practical scenarios. A few users note areas for improvement, citing slower response times and unclear SLAs. Many have limited contact due to the software's ease of use. Companies often rely on in-house expertise before escalation. Overall, the support is generally considered reliable and efficient.

Most users find SolarWinds Network Device Monitor's initial setup straightforward and easy, with deployment times varying from a few hours to two days. It generally requires one engineer but can involve more for larger deployments. Some note the setup complexity and the need for additional configuration, such as fine-tuning thresholds. Users rate ease of setup highly, often scoring it between nine and ten out of ten, though advanced IT skills may be needed for optimal installation.

SolarWinds Network Device Monitor is recognized as scalable. Many users and organizations appreciate its ease of adding users and handling numerous devices. Various models cater to different needs, and it allows expansion, such as adding servers. Some mention potential performance challenges when exceeding certain limits but still rate scalability high. Plans exist for future expansion, and it supports a significant number of users in different regions, including enterprises in Asia-Pacific.

SolarWinds Network Device Monitor is generally perceived as stable, with many praising its reliability. Although most find it consistent, some note that stability can vary based on infrastructure and usage. A few users report not experiencing significant issues, while others face challenges like resource consumption and occasional lags. Several rate its stability highly, at eight or above out of ten, but some suggest improvements for handling heavy device loads.