Sophos Email Reviews

We use Sophos Email for use cases involving email security, but there are many policies which we have defined. Like, let's say, like, spamming emails which we have defined and encryptions email which we have defined. Filtering emails we have defined, and there are many more.

I especially like the filtration. We are filtering what emails need to go out. I also found the user interface friendly.

Phishing email is evolving. Sometimes we use tools to send an email. Some companies are using those tools to send an email keeping the face of another company to make it look like that email came from the same person. The solution has not found a way to block these kinds of emails.

It's been almost four years that we have continuously worked with it. We use the latest version of the solution because it's on a subscription, that way we always get the updated version.

The solution’s stability is good.

The solution has good scalability because I haven't seen any problem which has lasted more than three days.

Maintenance is through on-call support. Whenever we face issues, we raise a complaint to the service provider. They have their own level of support.

Positive

We used to use Symantec. Compared to Symantec, Sophos was giving better facilities and better solutions.

The initial setup is not difficult. The solution takes up to 48 hours to deploy, and up to a week to define all the policies and test them.

We used a third-party integrator to deploy the solution. There was one staff member from our side, and the third-party integrator had three people.

Sophos Email is neither cheap nor expensive. It’s affordable, especially for a company like ours.

We found Palo Alto was a bit expensive compared to Sophos. That was the reason we started with Sophos.

I rate Sophos Email a seven to eight out of ten.

We use the product as an antivirus to block phishing emails by implementing mail routing policies.

The product could include all the essential features and capabilities, similar to the on-premise, server-based version.

We have been using Sophos Email for more than ten years.

The platform is scalable when installed on server-based systems like Linux. However, it offers limited scalability for email-based applications. It is suitable for small and medium businesses.

I rate the scalability a five out of ten.

The technical support team is capable of resolving issues.

Positive

We are using FortiMail as well. It is more capable of supporting enterprise deployment than Sophos Email.

The initial setup process is complicated compared to PureMessage.

I rate Sophos Email a seven out of ten.

I use Sophos Email as part of our corporate cybersecurity solution to protect our servers, both on-premises and in the cloud, including Microsoft 365 servers. 

I find the comprehensive features of Sophos Email most valuable. The system easily integrates into our cloud platform and simplifies backend management.

I would like to see improvements in the initial setup process, ensuring better compatibility with diverse customer infrastructures. Additionally, in the next release, it would be valuable to have enhanced features for seamless interaction with customer infrastructure, making the setup more user-friendly and efficient.

I have been working with Sophos Email for two years.

The stability of the solution is good. I would rate it as a ten out of ten.

I would rate the scalability as a nine out of ten. We have around five customers currently using Sophos Email, with a total user count exceeding 100.

Sophos offers technical support, and while it is generally responsive, the speed can vary as it involves opening a ticket and waiting for assistance. Sophos provides a dedicated response team for faster support, but this service may come with an additional cost depending on the customer's plan. Overall, I would rate the support as a nine out of ten.

Positive

Although the setup can be a bit challenging, it is crucial to conduct thorough testing due to the complex environment. I recommend thorough training before use to maximize its effectiveness. The deployment of Sophos Gmail typically takes around a couple of hours, depending on the complexity of the customer's infrastructure. The process involves investigating the customer environment, testing for interoperability, and setting up on the Cloud Platform or on-premises. It is relatively straightforward for a single server, but for cloud environments, careful evaluation of the products involved is necessary. After setup, additional time is spent testing and verifying the system to ensure a smooth operation. 

Clients can opt for yearly or monthly payment plans. Recently, Sophos introduced some interesting solutions, especially for those acting as MSPs or resellers with a flexible model. While Sophos provides options through its cloud marketplace, it is often better to rely on another reseller for technical support.

I would recommend Sophos Email. My advice for those starting to use it is to prepare for training and not hesitate to engage with it. The initial phase might seem challenging, but training is key for a smooth transition. Don't be afraid of the learning process; embrace it for better consolidation with the platform. Overall, I would rate Sophos Email as a ten out of ten.

It is an anti-spam solution. It filters out spam emails. It performs inbound and outbound filtering.

The price is okay. The on-premise email security solution of Cisco can perform only outbound filtering. Sophos Email provides both inbound and outbound filtering. I also like that the solution is deployed on the cloud.

The scanning and filtering must be more detailed. A lot of legit emails get quarantined. The filtering features must be improved.

I have been using the solution for a couple of months.

I rate the tool’s stability a seven out of ten. The tool quarantines legit emails.

The tool supports a lot of endpoints. It's more on a network level. I rate the scalability a ten out of ten. Two of our customers are using the product.

Compared to McAfee, Sophos' technical support is quite slow. The technical support could be faster.

Neutral

The setup is not that complex. We can fine-tune policies and filtering features. If the product is stable, we need one or two infrastructure engineers to deploy and maintain it. If there’s a software bug, we need a developer.

We see an ROI when the solution works perfectly.

We have to pay licensing fees yearly or once every two or three years. The product is cheaper compared to other solutions.

If someone's solution is straightforward and they don't have too many proxies, I will advise them to choose Sophos Email. However, I would not advise choosing Sophos if their network or infrastructure is quite complex. They will need some fine-tuning. We will need a principal developer if there is a bug in the software. Overall, I rate the tool seven out of ten.

I have been using Sophos Email for a year. My company uses the solution as a customer. Also, I am using the solution's latest version.

Feature-wise, everything is fine with the solution.

Servicing and support are areas with shortcomings where the solution needs to improve.

I have been using Sophos Email for a year. My company uses the solution as a customer. Also, I am using the solution's latest version.

It is a stable solution.

It is a scalable solution.

For support, on a scale of one to ten, where one is a low scale, and ten is the highest scale, I rate the support a six.

Neutral

I rate the setup a nine out of ten. So, it is very easy. The deployment can take up to a month.

It is an expensive solution. On a scale of one to ten, where one is low price, and ten is high price, I rate the pricing a seven.

I may suggest those planning to use the solution to give it a try. Since the technical support is not comfortable enough, I rate the overall solution a seven out of ten.

We have been receiving a lot of spam emails and we are using Sophos Email to help prevent the spam.

Sophos Email can improve mail security.

I have been using Sophos Email for approximately six years.

Sophos Email is a stable solution.

The scalability of Sophos Email is good.

We have approximately 450 people using this solution in my company.

We have contacted the support from Sophos Email.

I rate the support from Sophos Email a four out of ten.

Positive

The initial setup of Sophos Email was easy.

I rate the initial setup of Sophos Email a  four out of five.

I rate the price of Sophos Email a four out of five.

I would encourage others to use this solution.

I rate Sophos Email a nine out of ten.

We primarily used the solution as an email gateway, for filtering.

It was a really good appliance. It filtered most of the spam and junk emails and quarantined them. It was working fine for us.

The speed and stability were fine.

It had good features.

The initial setup was very simple.

We didn't have any issues with the solution. It was a good appliance. 

The solution should be able to support the cloud environment.

Sometimes, if there is any ransom email or mails are queued, it will take little time to deliver.

We used the solution for almost eight or nine years. It was a good appliance. The last time we used it was six to eight months back.

The solution was stable and reliable. There are no bugs or glitches, and we never had trouble with it after eight or nine years.

We are closely in touch with our local partners, and our local principals for Sophos. They are also very supportive.

Initially, we had an on-premise exchange server. That time, we were using Sophos. After migrating to Office 365, currently, we don't have anything. We are exploring, and we are doing a POC with Antigena, Mimecast, Defender, and then Sophos Email Labs.

The initial setup was very easy.

This is a licensed product.

I'm a customer. 

We have decommissioned the solution completely.

We did not change Sophos to a new product. We migrated on-premise email to Office 365.

I'd want people to know this is a good product. I'd recommend it.

I'd rate the solution an eight out of ten.

The solution is very good at covering all of my organization's needs.

I've found the security to be quite good on the product.

The deployment is very easy. It's quite straightforward.

The pricing is great. It's quite fair and not too expensive.

Overall, the product has some great features.

The solution seems to be very good at iterating on past editions and continues to improve itself. I don't know if it's truly lacking everything.

It would be great if it was a bit better at protecting from the endpoints.

The solution's technical support is slow and unresponsive. You need to book time in order to get support.

I've been using the solution for about four years now.

The solution is quite stable. We've found it to be very reliable for our organization. There aren't issues with bugs or glitches. I've never experienced it crashing or freezing. It's been good.

The solution is scalable. Your organization can easily expand it if you need it to.

Currently, we have around 100 users on the solution. That would be the maximum number of users.

While Fortinet has great technical support and is quite responsive and fast, I've found that Sophos requires its users to book time for support.

Symantec was also quite helpful - more so than Sophos, which still seems to be iroing out details in terms of handling customer queries. They need to be much more responsive.

In the past, I've used Symantec products including Symantec Gateway and Symantec Endpoint Protection. When Symantec bought Barracuda, the pricing became much different. The solution seemed to offer the same features but with much higher pricing. Our company decided to go in a different direction and chose Sophos.

I still like Symantec. I used it for five years and I'm quite familiar with the product.

The initial setup is quite straightforward. It's not complex. 

The deployment is easy to handle. How long it takes depends on which product you want to use. It's different according to your endpoint, email service, mobile, etc. That said, it's still an easy deployment process.

Our users are able to easily maintain it themselves.

The pricing, in general, if very fair. It's definitely a positive aspect of the solution.

I've looked into Fortinet's server and some related products, however, I likely won't continue looking into them. I'd rather consider Symantec.

We're just customers. We don't have any business relationship with the company.

I'm still working with this solution and testing its capabilities. There's still so much to learn about its offerings.

On a scale from one to ten, I would rate it at an eight. If they had better deployments for email security, I might rate them higher.