Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Sophos XGS Logo

Top 10 Sophos XGS Alternatives

Vendor: Sophos
4.0 out of 5
Leave a review

Top Sophos XGS Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Sophos XGS based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Fortinet FortiGate, Netgate pfSense, and OPNsense. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Sophos Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Sophos, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Sophos XGS Logo
Fortinet FortiGate
4.2 out of 5
Sophos XGS Logo
Fortinet FortiGate
4.2 out of 5
Fortinet FortiGate is known for its robust performance, while Sophos XGS excels in innovation and features. In comparison, Fortinet FortiGate offers high-speed performance and strong security, whereas Sophos XGS stands out for AI-driven analytics and user-friendly policy management. Fortinet FortiGate's complexity contrasts with Sophos XGS's occasional performance lags.
Download Fortinet FortiGate vs. Sophos XGS Report
Fortinet FortiGate has lower setup costs compared to Sophos XGS. The differences in upfront expenditure are notable, with Fortinet FortiGate being more budget-friendly.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiGate has lower setup costs compared to Sophos XGS. The differences in upfront expenditure are notable, with Fortinet FortiGate being more budget-friendly.
Sophos XGS Logo
Netgate pfSense
4.3 out of 5
Sophos XGS Logo
Netgate pfSense
4.3 out of 5
Netgate pfSense excels in customization and cost-effectiveness, appealing to budget-conscious, tech-savvy users. In comparison, Sophos XGS offers comprehensive security features and smoother deployment, which may attract buyers seeking advanced protections and user-friendly experiences. Netgate pfSense needs better support, while Sophos XGS should enhance usability.
Download Netgate pfSense vs. Sophos XGS Report
The setup cost for Netgate pfSense is generally lower, making it a cost-effective choice, while Sophos XGS has a higher setup cost but offers additional advanced features and support options.
View comparison
Pricing
The setup cost for Netgate pfSense is generally lower, making it a cost-effective choice, while Sophos XGS has a higher setup cost but offers additional advanced features and support options.
Sophos XGS Logo
OPNsense
4.2 out of 5
Sophos XGS Logo
OPNsense
4.2 out of 5
OPNsense is favored for its affordability and reliable support. In comparison, Sophos XGS has more advanced security features. OPNsense offers open-source flexibility. In comparison, Sophos XGS provides advanced threat protection. OPNsense is customizable. Sophos XGS delivers out-of-the-box capabilities.
Download OPNsense vs. Sophos XGS Report
OPNsense has a lower setup cost, while Sophos XGS's setup cost is significantly higher. OPNsense offers cost-effective initial deployment, while Sophos XGS's premium pricing suggests higher initial investment in exchange for advanced features.
View comparison
Pricing
OPNsense has a lower setup cost, while Sophos XGS's setup cost is significantly higher. OPNsense offers cost-effective initial deployment, while Sophos XGS's premium pricing suggests higher initial investment in exchange for advanced features.
Sophos XGS Logo
Sophos XGS Logo
Cisco Secure Firewall
4.1 out of 5
Cisco Secure Firewall is applauded for its advanced threat detection, seamless integration, and robust security. In comparison, Sophos XGS stands out due to intuitive management and performance efficiency. Cisco appeals with competitive pricing and comprehensive support, whereas Sophos attracts higher ROI seekers.
Download Cisco Secure Firewall vs. Sophos XGS Report
The setup cost for Cisco Secure Firewall is higher, while Sophos XGS offers a more affordable initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
The setup cost for Cisco Secure Firewall is higher, while Sophos XGS offers a more affordable initial investment.
Sophos XGS Logo
Sophos XGS Logo
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls
4.3 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls excel with advanced threat prevention and integration capabilities, suitable for high-security environments. In comparison, Sophos XGS provides ease of deployment and competitive pricing, appealing to small and medium businesses with balanced security features and AI-driven tools.
Download Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls vs. Sophos XGS Report
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls have a higher initial setup cost than Sophos XGS, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls have a higher initial setup cost than Sophos XGS, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
Sophos XGS Logo
Cisco Meraki MX
4.1 out of 5
Sophos XGS Logo
Cisco Meraki MX
4.1 out of 5
Cisco Meraki MX is used for network security, VPN connectivity, and cloud management. It acts as a firewall, offers SD-WAN capabilities, and enables zero-touch deployment. With advanced security features like IDS and content filtering, it supports small to large enterprises. Users appreciate its simplicity, but desire better Active Directory integration and improved troubleshooting. Cost and lead times require attention.
Download Cisco Meraki MX vs. Sophos XGS Report
The Meraki UTM is excellent when you buy the Advanced Security license. If you buy a different license you lost all the valuable functions.
It can always improve pricewise regarding throughput.
View comparison
Pricing
The Meraki UTM is excellent when you buy the Advanced Security license. If you buy a different license you lost all the valuable functions.
It can always improve pricewise regarding throughput.
Sophos XGS Logo
WatchGuard Firebox
4.2 out of 5
Sophos XGS Logo
WatchGuard Firebox
4.2 out of 5
WatchGuard Firebox offers easy setup and effective web filtering, ideal for seamless IT management. In comparison, Sophos XGS is praised for its application control and integration with Sophos Central, providing strong security for larger enterprises, making it suitable for diverse network environments.
Download Sophos XGS vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
WatchGuard Firebox setup cost is lower, providing a more budget-friendly option; Sophos XGS, with a higher initial setup cost, offers advanced features that might justify the expense for some organizations.
View comparison
Pricing
WatchGuard Firebox setup cost is lower, providing a more budget-friendly option; Sophos XGS, with a higher initial setup cost, offers advanced features that might justify the expense for some organizations.
Sophos XGS Logo
Sophos XGS Logo
Check Point Quantum Force (NGFW)
4.4 out of 5
Check Point Quantum Force specializes in detailed rule management and comprehensive security modules, suitable for intricate environments. In comparison, Sophos XGS offers ease of use, integrated threat management, and affordability, making it ideal for small to medium-sized businesses seeking synchronized security at a budget-friendly price.
Download Check Point Quantum Force (NGFW) vs. Sophos XGS Report
Check Point Quantum Force (NGFW) features a straightforward setup process, while Sophos XGS generally incurs a higher initial cost despite its competitive features, highlighting a difference in initial investment requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Quantum Force (NGFW) features a straightforward setup process, while Sophos XGS generally incurs a higher initial cost despite its competitive features, highlighting a difference in initial investment requirements.
Sophos XGS Logo
SonicWall TZ
4.1 out of 5
Sophos XGS Logo
SonicWall TZ
4.1 out of 5
SonicWall TZ excels in user-friendly configuration and affordability, targeting small to medium businesses with essential security needs. In comparison, Sophos XGS offers integrated security with advanced threat detection, appealing to businesses requiring a versatile and powerful security solution.
Download SonicWall TZ vs. Sophos XGS Report
SonicWall TZ requires a higher initial setup investment, while Sophos XGS offers a more cost-effective setup option. These pricing differences highlight contrasting entry-level costs.
View comparison
Pricing
SonicWall TZ requires a higher initial setup investment, while Sophos XGS offers a more cost-effective setup option. These pricing differences highlight contrasting entry-level costs.
Sophos XGS Logo
Sophos XGS Logo
Juniper SRX Series Firewall
3.9 out of 5
Juniper SRX Series Firewall offers advanced threat protection, customizable policies, and robust VPN capabilities. In comparison, Sophos XGS excels in deep packet inspection, integrated endpoint protection, and comprehensive reporting tools. Juniper prioritizes policy flexibility, whereas Sophos provides holistic security integration.
Download Juniper SRX Series Firewall vs. Sophos XGS Report
The Juniper SRX Series Firewall is praised for its moderate setup cost, whereas the Sophos XGS users appreciate its affordable initial investment. Sophos XGS stands out for its cost efficiency, while Juniper SRX is seen as reasonably priced.
View comparison
Pricing
The Juniper SRX Series Firewall is praised for its moderate setup cost, whereas the Sophos XGS users appreciate its affordable initial investment. Sophos XGS stands out for its cost efficiency, while Juniper SRX is seen as reasonably priced.
Sophos XGS Logo
Sophos XGS Logo
Fortinet FortiGate-VM
4.2 out of 5
Fortinet FortiGate-VM excels in pricing and customer support, offering robust security features and configurability. In comparison, Sophos XGS stands out for advanced threat protection and easy configuration. While FortiGate-VM is cost-effective, Sophos XGS justifies its premium price through a superior feature set.
Download Fortinet FortiGate-VM vs. Sophos XGS Report
Fortinet FortiGate-VM has a moderate setup cost, while Sophos XGS is more expensive to set up. Fortinet FortiGate-VM offers a cost-efficient option, contrasting with the higher setup investment required for Sophos XGS.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiGate-VM has a moderate setup cost, while Sophos XGS is more expensive to set up. Fortinet FortiGate-VM offers a cost-efficient option, contrasting with the higher setup investment required for Sophos XGS.
Sophos XGS Logo
SonicWall NSa
3.9 out of 5
Sophos XGS Logo
SonicWall NSa
3.9 out of 5
SonicWall NSa excels in comprehensive security and ease of VPN setup, making it cost-effective with strong ROI. In comparison, Sophos XGS offers advanced protection and seamless integration with other security solutions, justifying its higher price with superior features and robust customer support.
Download SonicWall NSa vs. Sophos XGS Report
SonicWall NSa has a high setup cost, while Sophos XGS offers a competitive and lower-cost setup, making Sophos XGS a more budget-friendly option.
View comparison
Pricing
SonicWall NSa has a high setup cost, while Sophos XGS offers a competitive and lower-cost setup, making Sophos XGS a more budget-friendly option.
Sophos XGS Logo
Sophos XGS Logo
Untangle NG Firewall
4.3 out of 5
Untangle NG Firewall offers comprehensive filtering, VPN capabilities, and ease of reporting, ideal for straightforward deployments. In comparison, Sophos XGS excels in advanced threat protection and extensive integration, making it suitable for enterprises needing superior features despite added complexity and higher initial costs.
Download Sophos XGS vs. Untangle NG Firewall Report
Untangle NG Firewall has a lower setup cost compared to Sophos XGS, making it a more budget-friendly option. Sophos XGS involves higher initial investments but offers advanced features suitable for enterprises.
View comparison
Pricing
Untangle NG Firewall has a lower setup cost compared to Sophos XGS, making it a more budget-friendly option. Sophos XGS involves higher initial investments but offers advanced features suitable for enterprises.
Sophos XGS Logo
Sangfor NGAF
4.0 out of 5
Sophos XGS Logo
Sangfor NGAF
4.0 out of 5
Sangfor NGAF is user-friendly with strong virus protection and quick IPS reporting, suitable for budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, Sophos XGS offers synchronized security features and effective threat management, appealing to those prioritizing feature integration and extensive security measures.
Download Sangfor NGAF vs. Sophos XGS Report
Sangfor NGAF involves a lower initial setup cost, whereas Sophos XGS requires a more substantial investment upfront. Sangfor NGAF's pricing structures highlight cost-effectiveness, contrasting with Sophos XGS's higher initial financial demand.
View comparison
Pricing
Sangfor NGAF involves a lower initial setup cost, whereas Sophos XGS requires a more substantial investment upfront. Sangfor NGAF's pricing structures highlight cost-effectiveness, contrasting with Sophos XGS's higher initial financial demand.
Sophos XGS Logo
IPFire
4.0 out of 5
Sophos XGS Logo
IPFire
4.0 out of 5

IPFire enhances network security and protects against cyber threats. It is highly effective at providing secure remote access to networks. Users appreciate its ease of use and flexibility to tailor the solution to their needs. IPFire is also praised for its reliable network monitoring and traffic-shaping capabilities. Its most valuable features include efficient firewall capabilities, customizable options, a user-friendly interface, and reliable network performance.

Download IPFire vs. Sophos XGS Report
View comparison
Sophos XGS Logo
Huawei NGFW
3.6 out of 5
Sophos XGS Logo
Huawei NGFW
3.6 out of 5
Huawei NGFW is valued for robust features and cost-efficient solutions, while Sophos XGS excels in performance and support, despite a higher price. In comparison, Huawei's AI and threat detection impress, whereas Sophos's deep packet inspection and seamless integration make it compelling. Huawei offers customization, contrasting Sophos's automated responses.
Download Huawei NGFW vs. Sophos XGS Report
Huawei NGFW has a higher initial setup cost, while Sophos XGS offers a more budget-friendly setup option. Differences in setup cost can significantly impact the overall affordability and initial investment for each solution.
View comparison
Pricing
Huawei NGFW has a higher initial setup cost, while Sophos XGS offers a more budget-friendly setup option. Differences in setup cost can significantly impact the overall affordability and initial investment for each solution.
Sophos XGS Logo
Sophos XGS Logo
Palo Alto Networks PA-Series
4.3 out of 5
Sophos XGS attracts tech buyers with advanced threat protection, ease of integration, and competitive pricing. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks PA-Series excels with superior threat intelligence and granular control, justifying its higher cost. Sophos XGS simplifies deployment, while Palo Alto Networks PA-Series offers robust post-deployment support.
Download Palo Alto Networks PA-Series vs. Sophos XGS Report
Sophos XGS setup cost is generally lower with straightforward installation, while Palo Alto Networks PA-Series has a higher setup cost reflecting its advanced security features.
View comparison
Pricing
Sophos XGS setup cost is generally lower with straightforward installation, while Palo Alto Networks PA-Series has a higher setup cost reflecting its advanced security features.
Sophos XGS Logo
Sophos XGS Logo
Netskope Cloud Firewall
1 out of 5
Netskope Cloud Firewall secures cloud environments with advanced threat protection and granular policy controls. It enhances security for remote workforces and cloud applications while ensuring compliance. Users appreciate its traffic monitoring, threat detection, and easy deployment but mention integration improvements, better reporting, streamlined deployment, and improved customer support response times.
View comparison

Related categories

Firewalls
Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions
WAN Edge