No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
Akamai CloudTest Logo

Akamai CloudTest Reviews

Vendor: Akamai
3.8 out of 5
Leave a review

What is Akamai CloudTest?

Akamai CloudTest provides a robust platform for simulating real-world traffic scenarios, allowing businesses to optimize application performance and reliability.

Get the Akamai CloudTest Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about Akamai CloudTest, Apache JMeter, OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) and more!
Akamai CloudTest is the #8 ranked solution in top Performance Testing Tools and top Load Testing Tools. PeerSpot users give Akamai CloudTest an average rating of 7.6 out of 10. Akamai CloudTest is most commonly compared to Apache JMeter: Akamai CloudTest vs Apache JMeter. Akamai CloudTest is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 49% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a financial services firm, accounting for 17% of all views.
Buyer's Guide
Akamai CloudTest
May 2026
Get the report
Helped 893,221 peers since 2012

Featured Akamai CloudTest reviews

Read more reviews

Akamai CloudTest mindshare

Product category:
Load Testing Tools
As of May 2026, the mindshare of Akamai CloudTest in the Load Testing Tools category stands at 3.7%, up from 2.7% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Load Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Akamai CloudTest3.7%
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)12.3%
Tricentis NeoLoad11.3%
Other72.7%
Load Testing Tools

PeerResearch reports based on Akamai CloudTest reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryLoad Testing ToolsMay 9, 2026Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersMay 9, 2026Download
ComparisonAkamai CloudTest vs Apache JMeterMay 9, 2026Download
ComparisonAkamai CloudTest vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)May 9, 2026Download
ComparisonAkamai CloudTest vs Tricentis NeoLoadMay 9, 2026Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Apache JMeter3.99.7%88%97 interviewsAdd to research
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)4.212.3%94%82 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Akamai CloudTest is recognized for its powerful performance testing capabilities, integral in generating load across various geographies. Users find the cloud load agents' on-demand integration with AWS invaluable. The platform offers detailed analyses during testing to optimize components and integrations, highlighting root causes of failures. It is praised for its user-friendly interface and live monitoring, allowing for the creation of custom dashboards with detailed response time metrics between core HTML and non-HTML areas.
  • "From my own experience, if you're talking about load testing and performance testing then definitely you should go for CloudTest."
  • "Akamai Cloud Test provides detailed analysis during load and performance testing which helps in determining different components of our platforms and external integrations with other vendors needs optimization (i.e.) it highlights exact API call with request, response, error, TTFB to identify root cause of failure which in turn helps in improving time to resolution and prioritize change requests."
  • "The agents on the cloud have been extremely valuable for us."

Room for Improvement

Akamai CloudTest requires better technical support and documentation accessibility. Its initial setup demands whitelisting for on-premise applications. Users experience UI delays with large data processing. More user-friendly test clip interfaces are needed. CI/CD integration needs enhancement, as does resource consumption efficiency. Users seek native app testing, IP spoofing, and APM tool integration. The load generation requires excessive server resources, needing optimization compared to competitors. Integrations with tools like Dynatrace and Google Core Web Vitals are suggested.
  • "Resource consumption also needs to be worked on. When we generate a thousand or two thousand concurrent users, we need to optimize the load generator resource utilization."
  • "Akamai CloudTest integration into our current CI/CD pipelines identify and resolve the issues during the sprint phase which helps in delivering an absolute product and reduces time to market and release."
  • "Out of five, I would rate the technical support of the solution at two or three. Sometimes it's a challenge because we face delays."

Pricing

  • "The tool's price is at an intermediate level. When you compare it with other enterprise load testing tools, it falls under the average category."
  • "We have a yearly license, and I would give it a rating of three out of five."
  • "Running cost is very low."

Service and Support

Akamai CloudTest users report strong customer service with quick responses and effective training sessions. While some describe technical support as prompt and helpful, rating it 8/10, others faced challenges with delays, rating it lower. Interactions with technical support often result in swift ticket resolutions, aligning with expected SLAs. Overall, companies generally experience efficient support interactions, though satisfaction levels vary.

Deployment

Akamai CloudTest's initial setup is generally straightforward, especially for those familiar with VM environments, though some face challenges with security compliance. Users appreciate the flexibility and support, benefiting from integration capabilities. Its SaaS nature makes configuration simple, requiring no complex steps beyond subscription.

Scalability

Many find Akamai CloudTest highly scalable. Most users experience no issues; however, some face challenges, particularly with extreme loads or scaling to 10,000 concurrent users. Medium capacities are generally smooth, but geographical considerations are necessary for intense loads. Some rate its scalability eight out of ten. Typically, organizations utilize it effectively with varying user counts, highlighting its adaptability in different environments.

Stability

Akamai CloudTest is generally stable according to users. Some experience occasional, minor stability issues, but these are not severe. Users note that scaling is easier compared to Jmeter. They mention that while it is stable, stability can depend on setup and integration practices. Regular tweaks may be needed with new releases, but these are not complex. Stability is rated highly, with some giving it a nine out of ten due to its strong performance during specific use cases.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our Akamai CloudTest Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
17%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Retailer
9%
Construction Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Computer Software Company
4%
Outsourcing Company
4%
Government
4%
University
4%
Logistics Company
3%
Healthcare Company
3%
Agriculture
3%
Insurance Company
3%
Educational Organization
3%
Recruiting/Hr Firm
3%
Marketing Services Firm
3%
Energy/Utilities Company
3%
Real Estate/Law Firm
3%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Museum Or Institution
1%
Performing Arts
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Transportation Company
1%
Wellness & Fitness Company
1%

Compare Akamai CloudTest with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about Akamai CloudTest

Akamai CloudTest is designed for high-scale load testing, enabling companies to simulate thousands to millions of users in realistic environments. It delivers accurate performance insights, ensuring applications handle peak demands. With its real-time analytics, teams can make informed decisions to improve app reliability and user experience.

What are the key features of Akamai CloudTest?
  • Real-Time Analytics: Provides immediate insights into performance metrics during tests.
  • Scalability: Simulates a range of user loads from thousands to millions.
  • Cloud Integration: Utilizes cloud resources for flexible and extensive testing.
  • Customizable Test Scenarios: Allows tailored load tests to reflect real-world conditions.
  • Integrated Monitoring: Offers comprehensive monitoring of application performance during load tests.
What benefits and ROI can be expected?
  • Improved Performance: Identifies performance bottlenecks swiftly, enhancing application speed and reliability.
  • Cost Efficiency: Optimizes resource allocation by preventing over-provisioning.
  • Informed Decisions: Empowers teams to make data-driven decisions based on real-time insights.
  • Reduced Downtime: Minimizes application downtime through proactive testing and analysis.

In industries like finance, retail, and media, Akamai CloudTest is often implemented to ensure transaction-heavy environments remain stable under peak loads. Retailers use it during sales events to guarantee seamless user experiences, while media companies benefit during high-traffic streaming events.

Akamai CloudTest was previously known as SOASTA CloudTest.

Akamai CloudTest customers

Chester Zoo

Related questions

  • 15
Can you use HPE StormRunner Load as a service and what are the payment options?
  • 245
How can I use AI tools for software testing?
  • 30
Load testing vs. stress testing vs. performance testing?
  • 37
What performance testing tool do you recommend for web applications?
  • 19
Why is Load Testing Tools important for companies?

Product Categories

Product Categories
Load Testing Tools
Performance Testing Tools

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
Apache JMeter vs Akamai CloudTest Logo
Apache JMeter vs Akamai CloudTest
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs Akamai CloudTest Logo
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs Akamai CloudTest
Tricentis NeoLoad vs Akamai CloudTest Logo
Tricentis NeoLoad vs Akamai CloudTest
BlazeMeter vs Akamai CloudTest Logo
BlazeMeter vs Akamai CloudTest
OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs Akamai CloudTest Logo
OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs Akamai CloudTest
OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs Akamai CloudTest Logo
OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs Akamai CloudTest
ReadyAPI vs Akamai CloudTest Logo
ReadyAPI vs Akamai CloudTest
Oracle Application Testing Suite vs Akamai CloudTest Logo
Oracle Application Testing Suite vs Akamai CloudTest
Appvance AIQ Platform vs Akamai CloudTest Logo
Appvance AIQ Platform vs Akamai CloudTest
k6 Open Source vs Akamai CloudTest Logo
k6 Open Source vs Akamai CloudTest
Eggplant Performance vs Akamai CloudTest Logo
Eggplant Performance vs Akamai CloudTest
ReadyAPI Performance vs Akamai CloudTest Logo
ReadyAPI Performance vs Akamai CloudTest
SmartBear LoadNinja vs Akamai CloudTest Logo
SmartBear LoadNinja vs Akamai CloudTest
HCL OneTest vs Akamai CloudTest Logo
HCL OneTest vs Akamai CloudTest
Ixia IxLoad vs Akamai CloudTest Logo
Ixia IxLoad vs Akamai CloudTest
See all alternatives
 
Akamai CloudTest Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Senior Manager - Performance Architect at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees4.0I use Akamai CloudTest for load testing, particularly for APIs and web pages. It's user-friendly and offers live monitoring with customizable dashboards. However, improvements like app-native support, IP spoofing, and integration with APM tools are needed. Gatling is a cheaper alternative.
Senior Manager - Performance Architect at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees4.0I primarily use Akamai CloudTest for load testing, finding it easy to set up and cost-effective compared to previous solutions. I recommend it, despite wishing for better EPM integration and improved resource efficiency for extreme user loads.
Director - DevOps and Infrastructure at INTIGRAL4.5I use Akamai CloudTest for performance and load testing to ensure application readiness and scalability. Its detailed analysis is a strong point, outperforming open-source tools, though CI/CD integration needs work. I rate it 9/10.
Test Engineer at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees3.0I've used the solution for a year, finding its cloud agents valuable, stable, and scalable. However, the test clip is not user-friendly, initial setup was challenging, and customer support is poor. I rate it 6/10.
Senior Quality Manager at a tech company with 10,001+ employees3.5I find Soasta CloudTest an awesome, low-cost tool for web performance testing, enabling dynamic load generation across geographies. My main issues are the challenging technical support access and manual IP whitelisting required for initial setup.
Sr Analyst - Quality Engineer at a tech company with 10,001+ employees3.5I have used this for 3+ years. It offers great AWS integration and realistic load testing. Customer service is good, but the UI often gets stuck, and we sometimes face minor stability/scalability issues.
QA Engineer at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees4.0I found CloudTest powerful, easy to set up, and intuitive for performance testing, even easier than JMeter for grid scaling. My training support was strong, but I haven't applied it to a project yet.