AWS Web Application Firewall (WAF) is a firewall security system that monitors incoming and outgoing traffic for applications and websites based on your pre-defined web security rules. AWS WAF defends applications and websites from common Web attacks that could otherwise damage application performance and availability and compromise security.
Product | Market Share (%) |
---|---|
AWS WAF | 8.7% |
F5 Advanced WAF | 10.0% |
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway | 7.9% |
Other | 73.4% |
Type | Title | Date | |
---|---|---|---|
Category | Web Application Firewall (WAF) | Aug 29, 2025 | Download |
Product | Reviews, tips, and advice from real users | Aug 29, 2025 | Download |
Comparison | AWS WAF vs F5 Advanced WAF | Aug 29, 2025 | Download |
Comparison | AWS WAF vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway | Aug 29, 2025 | Download |
Comparison | AWS WAF vs Fortinet FortiWeb | Aug 29, 2025 | Download |
Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks | 4.2 | 1.9% | 98% | 111 interviewsAdd to research |
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway | 3.7 | 7.9% | 79% | 48 interviewsAdd to research |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 23 |
Midsize Enterprise | 10 |
Large Enterprise | 18 |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 332 |
Midsize Enterprise | 172 |
Large Enterprise | 814 |
You can create rules in AWS WAF that can include blocking specific HTTP headers, IP addresses, and URI strings. These rules prevent common web exploits, such as SQL injection or cross-site scripting. Once defined, new rules are deployed within seconds, and can easily be tracked so you can monitor their effectiveness via real-time insights. These saved metrics include URIs, IP addresses, and geo locations for each request.
AWS WAF Features
Some of the solution's top features include:
Reviews from Real Users
AWS WAF stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are its user-friendly interface and its integration capabilities.
Kavin K., a security analyst at M2P Fintech, writes, “I believe the most impressive features are integration and ease of use. The best part of AWS WAF is the cloud-native WAF integration. There aren't any hidden deployments or hidden infrastructure which we have to maintain to have AWS WAF. AWS maintains everything; all we have to do is click the button, and WAF will be activated. Any packet coming through the internet will be filtered through.”
AWS WAF was previously known as AWS Web Application Firewall.
eVitamins, 9Splay, Senao International
Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
---|---|---|
Security Engineer at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees | 4.0 | We use AWS WAF on our websites as part of our data protection strategy due to its seamless integration and ease within the AWS platform. Despite improvements needed in signature sets and limited stateful capabilities, it effectively enhances security and saves resources. |
Security Analyst at M2P Fintech | 3.5 | I use AWS WAF for its cloud-native functionality, ease of rule management, and better control within AWS infrastructure, though its dashboarding and metric functionalities need improvement. Previously, we switched from Imperva to AWS for cost optimization. |
OCI/AWS Consultant at a government with 11-50 employees | 2.0 | I use AWS WAF to safeguard sensitive data by filtering HTTP traffic for web applications. While Oracle Cloud Infrastructure offered cost benefits, AWS was chosen for compliance. I appreciate its flexibility but see room for improvement in other AWS services. |
Associate Vice President - Engineering at Fedo.ai | 4.5 | I use AWS WAF for monitoring incoming calls and enhancing security by filtering web app traffic. Its ability to prevent attacks like SQL injection is valuable, though documentation could be simpler. AWS enhances customer satisfaction and security. |
AWS DevOps SRE/Infrastructure Engineer at YES!Delft | 4.0 | I manage infrastructure on AWS using services like KMS, EBS, and WAF version two. AWS WAF's automation in blocking security threats is valuable, though integrating with services like Kafka could be improved. While it can be costly, its security benefits are worth it. |
Manager, Engineering at 7-Eleven | 4.5 | I use AWS WAF to protect our retail application from various attacks, including bot attacks and SQL injection. While it's effective, the pricing could be better, and it doesn't support adding multiple rules within its CPU. |
IT Project Manager at Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute In India | 5.0 | I implemented AWS WAF to manage global web traffic and enhance security against hacking. While it effectively filters requests, the reporting needs improvement for easier management understanding. Despite AWS WAF's capabilities, I prefer Fortinet for its ease of use and deployment. |
Director of Security Architecture at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees | 3.0 | I use AWS WAF to protect web applications, appreciating its integration and ease of deployment within AWS. However, I'm seeking alternatives due to concerns about dependency on AWS and the need for improved usability and functionality in multi-cloud environments. |