Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

What is AWS WAF?

Get the report
Helped 866,218 peers since 2012

Featured AWS WAF reviews

AWS WAF mindshare

As of August 2025, the mindshare of AWS WAF in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category stands at 8.7%, down from 12.8% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Web Application Firewall (WAF) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
AWS WAF8.7%
F5 Advanced WAF10.0%
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway7.9%
Other73.4%
Web Application Firewall (WAF)

PeerResearch reports based on AWS WAF reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryWeb Application Firewall (WAF)Aug 29, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersAug 29, 2025Download
ComparisonAWS WAF vs F5 Advanced WAFAug 29, 2025Download
ComparisonAWS WAF vs Microsoft Azure Application GatewayAug 29, 2025Download
ComparisonAWS WAF vs Fortinet FortiWebAug 29, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks4.21.9%98%111 interviewsAdd to research
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway3.77.9%79%48 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business23
Midsize Enterprise10
Large Enterprise18
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business332
Midsize Enterprise172
Large Enterprise814
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
6%
Comms Service Provider
5%
Healthcare Company
5%
Insurance Company
4%
Retailer
4%
Real Estate/Law Firm
3%
Media Company
3%
University
3%
Educational Organization
3%
Hospitality Company
2%
Energy/Utilities Company
2%
Construction Company
2%
Performing Arts
2%
Legal Firm
2%
Non Profit
2%
Wholesaler/Distributor
2%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Transportation Company
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Outsourcing Company
1%
Engineering Company
1%
Renewables & Environment Company
1%

Compare AWS WAF with alternative products

Learn more about AWS WAF

AWS WAF customers

Related questions

 
AWS WAF Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Security Engineer at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees4.0We use AWS WAF on our websites as part of our data protection strategy due to its seamless integration and ease within the AWS platform. Despite improvements needed in signature sets and limited stateful capabilities, it effectively enhances security and saves resources.
Security Analyst at M2P Fintech3.5I use AWS WAF for its cloud-native functionality, ease of rule management, and better control within AWS infrastructure, though its dashboarding and metric functionalities need improvement. Previously, we switched from Imperva to AWS for cost optimization.
OCI/AWS Consultant at a government with 11-50 employees2.0I use AWS WAF to safeguard sensitive data by filtering HTTP traffic for web applications. While Oracle Cloud Infrastructure offered cost benefits, AWS was chosen for compliance. I appreciate its flexibility but see room for improvement in other AWS services.
Associate Vice President - Engineering at Fedo.ai4.5I use AWS WAF for monitoring incoming calls and enhancing security by filtering web app traffic. Its ability to prevent attacks like SQL injection is valuable, though documentation could be simpler. AWS enhances customer satisfaction and security.
AWS DevOps SRE/Infrastructure Engineer at YES!Delft4.0I manage infrastructure on AWS using services like KMS, EBS, and WAF version two. AWS WAF's automation in blocking security threats is valuable, though integrating with services like Kafka could be improved. While it can be costly, its security benefits are worth it.
Manager, Engineering at 7-Eleven4.5I use AWS WAF to protect our retail application from various attacks, including bot attacks and SQL injection. While it's effective, the pricing could be better, and it doesn't support adding multiple rules within its CPU.
IT Project Manager at Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute In India5.0I implemented AWS WAF to manage global web traffic and enhance security against hacking. While it effectively filters requests, the reporting needs improvement for easier management understanding. Despite AWS WAF's capabilities, I prefer Fortinet for its ease of use and deployment.
Director of Security Architecture at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees3.0I use AWS WAF to protect web applications, appreciating its integration and ease of deployment within AWS. However, I'm seeking alternatives due to concerns about dependency on AWS and the need for improved usability and functionality in multi-cloud environments.