L7 load balancing features like URL re-write, persistence, etc. Also some of the global load balancing features like sticky, sticky-sync, etc.
What is most valuable?
How has it helped my organization?
Organization has a lot of client facing applications and needs to have multiple servers for scalability. With ADX network load balancer, local load balancing is pretty simple.Should have had more option for L7 load balancing. Also, troubleshooting was little difficult with this production
What needs improvement?
Should have more options for L7 load balancing. Also, troubleshooting is a little difficult with this product.
For how long have I used the solution?
Three years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Not much.Issue with SSL scalability, especially when the Key size is 2K
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Issue with SSL scalability, especially when the Key size is 2K.
How are customer service and technical support?
Eight out of 10.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Have used Cisco ACE. But ADX is better in capacity and its Chassis-based product (10K) is much more scalable.
How was the initial setup?
It was complex, as we had to use many of the features like global load balancing, global persistence, session persistence, URL rewrite, SSL offloading, etc.
![Brocade ADX [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_100/1m0eop45zimdy8bgnpigo2chs5nj.jpg?_a=BACAGSGT)