OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing offers robust scalability, ease of use, and high accuracy in scanning, making it a valuable tool for enterprises.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing | 18.1% |
| HCL AppScan | 14.9% |
| Checkmarx One | 13.2% |
| Other | 53.8% |
| Type | Title | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) | Aug 29, 2025 | Download |
| Product | Reviews, tips, and advice from real users | Aug 29, 2025 | Download |
| Comparison | OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs HCL AppScan | Aug 29, 2025 | Download |
| Comparison | OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs Rapid7 InsightAppSec | Aug 29, 2025 | Download |
| Comparison | OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs Checkmarx One | Aug 29, 2025 | Download |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GitLab | 4.2 | N/A | 97% | 85 interviewsAdd to research |
| Snyk | 4.0 | N/A | 100% | 48 interviewsAdd to research |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 13 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 140 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 65 |
| Large Enterprise | 407 |
This security testing platform is known for its centralized dashboard, guided scans, and comprehensive reporting. It integrates seamlessly with tools like Fortify code scanner and supports extensive vulnerability detection and analysis, enhancing efficiency in security management. Despite its strengths, users suggest improvements in cloud integration, cost-effectiveness, and installation processes. Faster scans, reduced false positives, and improved mobile testing features are also desired.
What are the key features of OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing?In industries like BFSI, OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing is employed for performance network application testing, dynamic and static application security testing, and code checks. Security and QA teams use it in development processes to ensure application security prior to release, proving integral in both enterprise and testing environments.
OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing was previously known as Micro Focus WebInspect, WebInspect.
Aaron's
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Cyber Security Consultant at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees | 4.0 | I've used WebInspect for years due to its strong DAST features and detailed reports, but the on-premises version struggles with resource use and Salesforce apps, while the cloud version performs better and is more stable and scalable. |
| Senior Customer Solutions at a media company with 5,001-10,000 employees | 3.5 | I used Fortify WebInspect for production testing in financial services, finding its transaction recorder valuable for our team. However, the pricing is a concern, as it is about 25% higher than similar solutions. We currently lack an alternative. |
| Global ISO 27001 Program Lead at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees | 4.0 | We use Fortify WebInspect to scan software packages for BFSI clients, appreciating its ability to handle various file extensions and its user-friendly reporting. However, it doesn't support .SER files, requiring us to use other tools. |
| Services Project Lead, Information Technology at IGT Solutions | 4.5 | I use Fortify WebInspect to scan applications for security vulnerabilities. Its valuable features include comprehensive scan reports, but I wish the scanning was faster and more affordable, especially in licensing for multiple users. |
| Director at Eguardian lanka | 4.5 | I use Fortify WebInspect to scan web applications, finding its ability to scan with user authentication valuable for identifying vulnerabilities. However, I wish it had more automation to simplify interpreting and addressing scan results effectively. |
| General Manager at Inexion Co. | 4.0 | I sell Fortify WebInspect, a powerful tool with diverse customer use cases. However, its high cost in Korea poses a challenge, as there are cheaper alternatives. We considered HCL AppScan and Synopsys during the evaluation phase. |
| Senior Manager - IT Security & ISMS at Ericsson | 4.0 | We deployed Fortify WebInspect to proactively scan and address vulnerabilities in our development environment. It excels at early-stage vulnerability detection and tool integration, but system incompatibility remains a challenge compared to previous limitations experienced with Netsparker. |
| Consulting Engineer at a consultancy with 11-50 employees | 4.0 | I use Fortify WebInspect to scan web applications for vulnerabilities, appreciating its request and response visibility and tools like the HTTP editor. Although mostly stable and easy to set up, it struggles with authentication and scalability issues. |
