IBM Engineering Workflow Management manages plans, tasks, the project status and acts as the critical link between required and delivered work. It provides flexibility to adapt to any process, which enables companies to adopt faster release cycles and manage dependencies across both small and complex development projects. This solution offers no-charge server software and flexible pricing models. It becomes a complete IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management solution—when purchased as a set of seamlessly integrated tools: IBM Engineering Workflow Management, IBM Engineering Test Management, and IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next.
Product | Market Share (%) |
---|---|
IBM Engineering Workflow Management | 1.5% |
Microsoft Azure DevOps | 37.4% |
GitLab | 26.3% |
Other | 34.8% |
Type | Title | Date | |
---|---|---|---|
Category | Enterprise Agile Planning Tools | Aug 29, 2025 | Download |
Product | Reviews, tips, and advice from real users | Aug 29, 2025 | Download |
Comparison | IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs Microsoft Azure DevOps | Aug 29, 2025 | Download |
Comparison | IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs GitLab | Aug 29, 2025 | Download |
Comparison | IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management | Aug 29, 2025 | Download |
Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GitLab | 4.2 | 26.3% | 97% | 85 interviewsAdd to research |
Microsoft Azure DevOps | 4.1 | 37.4% | 95% | 135 interviewsAdd to research |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 2 |
Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
Large Enterprise | 8 |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 44 |
Midsize Enterprise | 23 |
Large Enterprise | 164 |
IBM Engineering Workflow Management was previously known as IBM Rational Team Concert (IBM ALM), IBM RTC.
Telstra Corporation, Visteon, Atos SE, Panasonic Automotive Systems, IBM Global Technology Services, CareCore National, JTEKT Corp., ItaÒ BBA, Avea, CACEIS, Danske Bank Group, APIS IT
Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
---|---|---|
Sr. Project Scheduler at a government with 10,001+ employees | 3.5 | I use IBM Engineering Workflow Management for agile development of stories and test cases, valuing its traceability and reporting features which enhance scrum efficiency and leadership insight. However, improved metrics graphics and SharePoint connectivity would be beneficial. |
Manager, Digital Engineering at Harman International | 3.5 | I find IBM Engineering Workflow Management's most valuable features to be traceability and reporting, although its UI needs improvement compared to competitors like Jira. It's complex, requiring substantial training, but once understood, it's highly effective for managing intricate processes. |
DevOps Tech Lead at a computer software company with 11-50 employees | 2.0 | I use IBM Engineering Workflow Management for source control, defect tracking, and project management. It was invaluable when starting software development in 2010 but has become less relevant as we shift to modern, cloud-based systems like GitHub. |
ALM tools engineer at a computer software company with 201-500 employees | 3.5 | I use IBM Engineering Workflow Management primarily as a task tracker, appreciating its customizable reports and management visibility. While it boosts productivity by 30%, slow performance and report loading on multi-project servers need improvement. We switched from Jira for better customization. |
Vice President Delivery - Enterprise Solutions and Infrastructure Services at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees | 2.0 | No summary available |
Manager, Digital Engineering at Harman International | 3.5 | No summary available |
Quality Assurance at Varroc Lighting System | 3.0 | No summary available |
Applications Developer Specialist at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees | 4.0 | No summary available |