No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
NICE Robotic Automation Logo

NICE Robotic Automation Reviews

Vendor: NICE
3.8 out of 5

What is NICE Robotic Automation?

Featured NICE Robotic Automation reviews

NICE Robotic Automation mindshare

As of March 2026, the mindshare of NICE Robotic Automation in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) category stands at 1.1%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
NICE Robotic Automation1.1%
UiPath Platform12.5%
Microsoft Power Automate10.3%
Other76.1%
Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

PeerResearch reports based on NICE Robotic Automation reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryRobotic Process Automation (RPA)Mar 31, 2026Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersMar 31, 2026Download
ComparisonNICE Robotic Automation vs UiPath PlatformMar 31, 2026Download
ComparisonNICE Robotic Automation vs Automation AnywhereMar 31, 2026Download
ComparisonNICE Robotic Automation vs Microsoft Power AutomateMar 31, 2026Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
UiPath Platform4.412.5%98%914 interviewsAdd to research
Microsoft Power Automate3.910.3%88%133 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Construction Company
8%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
8%
Media Company
8%
Performing Arts
7%
Retailer
5%
University
4%
Transportation Company
4%
Consumer Goods Company
4%
Computer Software Company
4%
Comms Service Provider
4%
Real Estate/Law Firm
4%
Educational Organization
4%
Logistics Company
3%
Marketing Services Firm
1%
Engineering Company
1%
Legal Firm
1%
Agriculture
1%
Non Profit
1%
Outsourcing Company
1%
 
NICE Robotic Automation Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Senior RPA Developer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees3.0I used NICE Robotic Automation with ServiceNow to efficiently process ticket information, benefitting from its speed. However, the platform needs user-friendly enhancements and better documentation to improve ease of use, despite promising ROI if implemented correctly.
Head of HyperAutomation - UHA at BGP4.5I use automation extensively across business processes, employing NICE Robotic Automation for its graphical interaction, efficient flow management, and secure data exchange. Though installation requires specific skills, the ROI was swift compared to previous .NET scripts.
Chief Information Officer at Supergas4.0I value NICE's strong automation features, which save time and money by replacing manual work. However, I find the solution isn't intuitive, and both initial setup and ongoing development require significant time and integrator support.
RPA Solution Architect at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees3.0I found NICE required strong programming skills, lacked stable connectivity, had a complex interface, and offered poor online support. We switched to UiPath due to these issues and its greater user-friendliness.
Group RPA & AI Platform Manager at Thomas Cook5.0I find NICE exceptional, achieving significant ROI, improving customer experience, and offering great scalability. Its feature library is invaluable. My only suggestion is improving the "clunky" Designer UI, which I understand they're addressing.
Business Readiness & Continuous Improvement Support Manager at Swinton4.5We use NICE for agent guidance and automation, which significantly improved customer satisfaction (NPS +4%), employee engagement, and accuracy. Call handling time dropped by 60 seconds, saving £1M monthly. The system is stable, visually appealing, and scalable, earning a 9/10 rating.
Director at a tech services company with 51-200 employees2.5I found this tool suitable for desktop automation, but it lacks enterprise features and true RPA capabilities. Its user-based licensing limits scalability, making it expensive. I wouldn't recommend it, as it lags behind competitors.