Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
OpenText Software Delivery Management Logo

OpenText Software Delivery Management Reviews

Vendor: OpenText
4.1 out of 5
Leave a review

What is OpenText Software Delivery Management?

OpenText Software Delivery Management provides application lifecycle management with Agile and Waterfall support. It features intuitive interfaces, CI/CD integration, automated testing, and robust reporting, improving project management efficiency and usability.

Get the OpenText Software Delivery Management Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Software Delivery Management, GitLab, Microsoft Azure DevOps and more!
OpenText Software Delivery Management is the #7 ranked solution in top Application Lifecycle Management Suites and top Enterprise Agile Planning Tools. PeerSpot users give OpenText Software Delivery Management an average rating of 8.2 out of 10. OpenText Software Delivery Management is most commonly compared to GitLab: OpenText Software Delivery Management vs GitLab. OpenText Software Delivery Management is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 72% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a financial services firm, accounting for 24% of all views.
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Software Delivery Management
August 2025
Get the report
Helped 866,088 peers since 2012

Featured OpenText Software Delivery Management reviews

Read more reviews

OpenText Software Delivery Management mindshare

Product category:
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM...
As of August 2025, the mindshare of OpenText Software Delivery Management in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category stands at 5.8%, up from 5.5% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
OpenText Software Delivery Management5.8%
Jira20.0%
Microsoft Azure DevOps14.9%
Other59.3%
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

PeerResearch reports based on OpenText Software Delivery Management reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryApplication Lifecycle Management (ALM) SuitesAug 28, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersAug 28, 2025Download
ComparisonOpenText Software Delivery Management vs JiraAug 28, 2025Download
ComparisonOpenText Software Delivery Management vs Microsoft Azure DevOpsAug 28, 2025Download
ComparisonOpenText Software Delivery Management vs Polarion ALMAug 28, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
GitLab4.2N/A97%85 interviewsAdd to research
Microsoft Azure DevOps4.114.9%95%135 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

OpenText Software Delivery Management is valued for its Agile methodologies, seamless browser compatibility, integration with DevOps tools, and comprehensive features like backlog, pipeline, and traceability. Users appreciate the ease of customization, intuitive user interface, and robust reporting capabilities. It supports Waterfall and Agile development and offers strong CI/CD integration, enhancing project visibility and management. Its flexibility in handling complex projects, integrating existing tools, and facilitating collaboration further enhances its appeal.
  • "The ability to generate audit evidence with a single click saves ten days of work for ten people, enabling them to focus on other tasks."
  • "It is a very scalable solution."
  • "The integration capability of ALM Octane was very straightforward. We had a supporting team, and they provided us with detailed documentation."

Room for Improvement

OpenText Software Delivery Management faces challenges in project setup complexity, integration with tools like JIRA, and an unintuitive requirements management module. Licensing issues and limited dashboard functionalities hinder user experience. Reporting capabilities need enhancement for better usability. Users request improvements in automated testing visibility, workspace management, and synchronization tools. Additional features like mobile testing options, FedRAMP certification, and enhanced security management are desired, along with more customization in filtering and widgets.
  • "There is room for improvement in OpenText ALM Octane's flexibility. While it aims to be as flexible as possible for a large enterprise application, sometimes there are limitations that may not meet specific organizational needs."
  • "The tool's price is high, making it an area where improvement is high."
  • "Promoting it more could help a lot of projects."

ROI

Octane significantly enhances cost efficiency by automating processes like project creation and user management, reducing server usage, and streamlining tool integration. Users experience faster testing cycles and lower testing costs. Predictive analytics and automation promise substantial long-term returns, despite some challenges during the transition from earlier tools. Quantifiable benefits include savings from license costs and improved team productivity. While specific returns vary, the overall consensus is that Octane offers a significant financial advantage.

Pricing

OpenText Software Delivery Management is often perceived as expensive, especially compared to open-source alternatives. However, it offers a compelling set of features and flexibility with its licensing model, which can help mitigate high initial costs. While some organizations find the pricing comparable to other enterprise tools, others note that high costs are justified by its comprehensive functionality, flexibility, and ability to integrate broadly. Choosing this tool depends greatly on specific enterprise needs and the potential for license sharing or volume discounts.
  • "The tool's price is extremely high."
  • "The product is highly priced compared to other tools."
  • "I would say that it is an affordable product. There is an annual service fee, which is one of the additional payments to be made apart from the standard licensing costs attached to the solution."

Popular Use Cases

OpenText Software Delivery Management is utilized for Agile project management, test management, and application lifecycle management. It integrates requirements, backlog, defect, and test lifecycle into a cohesive system. It supports Behavior-Driven Development, test automation, and integrates with tools like Jenkins and TestCafe. Organizations use it for Agile and Waterfall projects, ensuring traceability and quality management. It's employed across various domains, including SAP and Teamcenter, facilitating efficient test planning and execution, especially in large-scale software migrations and integrations.

Service and Support

OpenText Software Delivery Management offers responsive support, engaging with customers at multiple levels, including R&D. Users appreciate direct communication and quick resolutions. Despite occasional delays with certain features and follow-up, many value interactions with knowledgeable teams. While some report slow escalation, others enjoy premium assistance and adaptability to custom needs. Enhanced online help and engagement have surprised some users pleasantly. Suggestions include improving flexibility and coordination among support teams for seamless service delivery.

Deployment

Many found OpenText Software Delivery Management setup straightforward, especially those transitioning from Micro Focus ALM. However, complexity arose when integrating additional components like ElasticSearch. SaaS users generally had an easier experience, requiring minimal input. On-prem deployments varied, with some needing extensive configuration and integration efforts, particularly in complex environments. Installation time ranged from hours to months depending on the organization's familiarity with the tools, infrastructure, and requirements. Technical knowledge was consistently highlighted as necessary.

Scalability

OpenText Software Delivery Management is highly scalable, with users expressing confidence based on prior experiences. While some note potential licensing hurdles, scalability itself is praised. Many report smooth transitioning from previous systems and note that additional hardware can address performance needs. The system effectively handles a range of users and projects, with several users preparing for further expansion.

Stability

OpenText Software Delivery Management demonstrates strong stability, frequently releasing updates with minimal issues. Users appreciate its reliability, even during regular updates, and commend its solid performance. Occasional minor challenges like user interface adjustments and integration hiccups occur but are resolved quickly. Performance remains consistent for small teams, though some anticipate testing with larger groups. Micro Focus's proactive support enhances user confidence. Many rate stability high, with frequent updates bolstering its robust reputation.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our OpenText Software Delivery Management Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise23
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business130
Midsize Enterprise75
Large Enterprise526
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
24%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Computer Software Company
10%
Government
8%
Educational Organization
5%
Retailer
4%
Insurance Company
4%
Healthcare Company
4%
University
3%
Media Company
3%
Performing Arts
2%
Construction Company
2%
Comms Service Provider
2%
Energy/Utilities Company
2%
Pharma/Biotech Company
2%
Real Estate/Law Firm
2%
Non Profit
2%
Legal Firm
1%
Hospitality Company
1%
Transportation Company
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Outsourcing Company
1%
Recruiting/Hr Firm
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Engineering Company
1%

Compare OpenText Software Delivery Management with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about OpenText Software Delivery Management

Designed to enhance teams' productivity and streamline processes, OpenText Software Delivery Management integrates seamlessly with Agile methodologies. Its comprehensive backlog and requirements management, user stories, and test management make it a complete tool for managing the development lifecycle. The platform aligns with DevOps, providing traceability and extensive customization options. Traceability from requirements to deployments is enhanced, making it easier for teams to track progress. It offers integration with popular tools like Jenkins and JIRA, ensuring a unified approach to continuous delivery and testing management.

What key features does OpenText Software Delivery Management include?
  • Versatile across browsers with consistent performance.
  • Seamless CI/CD integration for smooth development processes.
  • Intuitive interface aiding in efficiency and ease of use.
  • Comprehensive backlog management ensures organized prioritization.
  • Automated testing aligns with Agile and DevOps principles.
What benefits can users expect when evaluating OpenText Software Delivery Management?
  • Enhanced traceability from inception to delivery.
  • Improved project management efficiency through streamlined processes.
  • Robust reporting capabilities offering detailed insights.
  • Increased flexibility in customization enabling tailored experiences.
  • Predictive analytics for better decision-making.

OpenText Software Delivery Management is implemented across technology-focused industries, supporting Agile processes like requirements management and defect tracking. Organizations use it to standardize development workflows and optimize continuous delivery integration, choosing it for its ability to support both Agile and Waterfall methodologies within application lifecycle management.

OpenText Software Delivery Management was previously known as Micro Focus ALM Octane, Micro Focus Octane.

OpenText Software Delivery Management customers

Orange, Airbus, Haufe Group, Kellogg's, Claro, Bon Secours, World Wide Technology

Related questions

  • 378
What is the biggest difference between JIRA and Micro Focus ALM?
  • 61
Is Jira better or would you go with Micro Focus ALM Octane?
  • 39
What is the biggest difference between Micro Focus ALM Octane and Microsoft Azure DevOps?
  • 14
Which tool is integrated better with Jira - Micro Focus ALM Quality Center or TestRail by Gurock?
  • 93
Which product do you prefer: Micro Focus ALM Octane or Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?
  • 19
When evaluating Application Lifecycle Management suites, what aspects do you think are the most important to look for?
  • 14
Looking for suggestions - we need a test management and defect tracking tool which can be integrated with an automation tool.
  • 40
Looking for a Comparison of JIRA, TFS & HP ALM as a Test Management Tool
  • 3
Do you have any feedback on the HPE ALM Octane release that came out in June 2016?
  • 11
How does Digite's Swift ALM tool compare with HPE ALM or JIRA?

Product Categories

Product Categories
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
Enterprise Agile Planning Tools

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
GitLab vs OpenText Software Delivery Management Logo
GitLab vs OpenText Software Delivery Management
Microsoft Azure DevOps vs OpenText Software Delivery Management Logo
Microsoft Azure DevOps vs OpenText Software Delivery Management
Jira vs OpenText Software Delivery Management Logo
Jira vs OpenText Software Delivery Management
OpenText Application Quality Management vs OpenText Software Delivery Management Logo
OpenText Application Quality Management vs OpenText Software Delivery Management
ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management vs OpenText Software Delivery Management Logo
ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management vs OpenText Software Delivery Management
Codebeamer vs OpenText Software Delivery Management Logo
Codebeamer vs OpenText Software Delivery Management
Polarion ALM vs OpenText Software Delivery Management Logo
Polarion ALM vs OpenText Software Delivery Management
TFS vs OpenText Software Delivery Management Logo
TFS vs OpenText Software Delivery Management
Jama Connect vs OpenText Software Delivery Management Logo
Jama Connect vs OpenText Software Delivery Management
Rally Software vs OpenText Software Delivery Management Logo
Rally Software vs OpenText Software Delivery Management
Jira Align vs OpenText Software Delivery Management Logo
Jira Align vs OpenText Software Delivery Management
IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) vs OpenText Software Delivery Management Logo
IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) vs OpenText Software Delivery Management
Digital.ai Agility vs OpenText Software Delivery Management Logo
Digital.ai Agility vs OpenText Software Delivery Management
Planview AgilePlace vs OpenText Software Delivery Management Logo
Planview AgilePlace vs OpenText Software Delivery Management
Atlassian ALM vs OpenText Software Delivery Management Logo
Atlassian ALM vs OpenText Software Delivery Management
See all alternatives
 
OpenText Software Delivery Management Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Senior Test Automation Specialist at APG4.0We use OpenText ALM Octane as a Quality Hub in our development cycle, benefiting from its efficient audit features. While it saves us significant time and money, flexibility and support could improve further for specific organizational needs.
Operational Manager at LMI5.0I have used OpenText ALM Octane in developing a training information system at my company. The tool's high price is a drawback. Previously, we used Micro Focus but switched due to dissatisfaction with test scripts and output format.
Managing Partner at Georg Nauerz Consulting4.0My company uses OpenText ALM Octane for various purposes, including sprint planning and test management. Its one-tool solution is valuable, though release management needs improvement. We switched from Microsoft for its unified capabilities, despite some issues with metrics and dashboards.
Executive Vice President at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees4.0My team uses OpenText ALM Octane primarily for test management, valuing its capabilities in handling test scenarios and automation. However, integration with other SDLC tools could be easier, as it's currently time-consuming and challenging.
Principal at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees3.0I primarily use Micro Focus ALM Octane for test management, tracing defects back to requirements. It excels in managing the software testing lifecycle but needs improvements in DevOps integration. Competing tools include QA Testing Tools from Tricentis and Rally by Broadcom.
QA Engineer at Amadeus3.0I use OpenText ALM Octane for integrating Jenkins automation jobs and documenting test cases. Its test reporting and traceability are valuable. Unlike Rally, Octane offers user-friendly UI, efficient project management, and better integration capabilities, benefiting our organization.
Technical Vice President at Dugson Consulting5.0The most valuable feature of OpenText ALM Octane is its pipeline integration, which provides insightful visualizations through dashboards and quick reporting. However, the requirements management and release management features need improvement. It competes well with solutions like HPE Micro Focus ALM Quality Center.
Assistant QA Manager at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees3.5No summary available