Rubrik Reviews

We have been working with Rubrik product, the cloud backup solution, implemented with the storage space direct. That was a good solution at the time when I was looking at that. There were some challenges happening, but the team was quickly helping to identify the problem and then come up with a solution. Reliability was good and helped IT operation, providing very valuable inputs all the time.

I worked with both end users and also consulted on the integration of the system.

We have two main solutions from Rubrik. One of them is VM, virtualized machine, VM snapshots, the backup. The second one is SQL database, Oracle and also Microsoft SQL databases backup every 15 minutes.

The portal management was really good. The flexibility of the on-prem gateway, on-prem gateway solution was really handy for any different scenario where we needed it. In some places, we needed a cloud solution which was good enough. In some places, we needed to make it more secure and we ended up with massive data. So we were able to implement their on-prem solution to create a gateway to their cloud, but we still could use the cloud portal to restore anything we wanted, giving us lots of different options to export the data, which was really handy. Sometimes, picking the one file inside of the backup or the entire snapshot to deploy somewhere else was very handy and fast.

The self-healing was really amazing. Even if corrupted data occurred during the maintenance time, in the next cycle, they were automatically repairing the corrupted chain of the backup. That was a really handy thing. We basically did not need to do anything. In the next cycle, their automation was able to repair that. That was amazing. We did not need to create any cases or look after anything else. That was good. Also, in the last six or eight months, they came up with the cybersecurity defense features. They were adding additional features for free, such as previews. For the ransomware attack encryption things, if it happens, they were able to detect it. That was nice as well. We have not had the opportunity to see how that works because there was no attack, but from what we saw, it was good.

Portal identity management should improve. We end up losing people's identity, which was not sufficient enough to read the events. That was the only place I could see for improvement. They keep changing the layouts and descriptions, giving the user confusion if they have not used it for maybe three months. When they come back, the interface is changed. They lost the legacy support, and it is not consistent. Some of the options for the restore give a very hard time for the engineer if they come back after three months to use it because the phrases have changed completely. That is why they were not able to select whether they should select this option or should select another option. Where it comes from, the documentation we gave them does not match anymore. That was a challenge.

My consultation part was about how to integrate the technology with each other for the platform or storage or database. I did not deal with any price metrics or scaling the storage. I have no idea about the pricing part. I never joined any meetings or any documents to disclose the pricing. It was quite good in general. Recently, in March 2025, they did a new update which enabled them to update their agents remotely and built in, in-place mode. That is bringing the cybersecurity perspective. That was a big challenge. I said it is a challenge, but I do not know because I left the company, so I am not sure if cybersecurity addressed the solution. Rubrik support is usually very accommodating and very flexible. I am not sure, but the last challenge I saw was that.

I worked with Rubrik definitely from August 2023 until July 2025.

Their infrastructure was stable. We did not get an outage, but the only outage we got was because our network was impacted. Nothing on their side was an issue. One thing I can say about how stable it was is that the backing up is actually important when you turn to restore needed. When you need to restore some backup, every product is doing the same job. But when you do the restore, it is also stable and quickly delivering what we have been looking for. That makes Rubrik different. Sometimes if we cause an issue, Rubrik always notifies us that there is some issue and we cannot take the backup. Do you want to pay attention to it? That was very handy for the engineers to look after it. Where should we look? That was really good. Overall, it makes operational life way easier.

They are quite responsive, and their solution part is quick delivering. Case handling is very short. That was a good outcome. They are always approachable. We usually get quick assistance every time we approached them regarding any problem to ask for their help, and every solution and every problem was solved in less than a week.

Positive

We did use Veeam, which was horrible. Comparing Rubrik and Veeam was really relieving the headaches. Veeam was giving too much headache for data corruption. When we realized the data corruption happened and we tried to restore some things, the data was not there. That was horrible.

Comparing Rubrik to Veeam, Rubrik is much better in the market.

That is a pretty stable product. I am quite happy, and I recommend it to everyone to relieve the headaches. I am not sure about the price. They may be too expensive or not, but I do not see them in the market much. They are not very popular. Definitely comparing to Veeam, they are much better in the market. If I were to rate them from one to ten, I would give them eight or nine easily.

I would say eight to nine. I give it a nine. I am hesitant to give a ten because I am sure there is better somewhere. My overall rating for Rubrik is nine out of ten.

I tested out 12 use cases for infrastructure and DB prospects. One important use case involves retrieving data when a complete VM becomes corrupted using snapshots, or retrieving only the C drive binaries. The second use case involves retrieving a corrupted database from among 200 databases.

Regarding BCDR, we currently use on-premises cohesive backup, and we configured Rubrik for both BCDR and BAO operational purposes. We identified challenges with around 24 terabytes of database volumes, which takes longer than expected compared to on-premises. We achieve the same tasks within 15 to 20 minutes on-premises.

We tested a backup of six terabytes in cohesivity which takes only 25 minutes for restoring. The same test case in Rubrik takes more than six to seven times longer. This means the on-premises SLA is significantly faster. Currently, we are considering using only snapshot level backup and redirecting SQL backups into cohesive. For BCDR solutions, we are implementing snapshot level backup into Rubrik from West US 2. Currently, we have tested it for DR solutions, not for BAO operations. We are implementing automation, though pipeline setups, data retrieval, and data transformation take considerable time in the Rubrik solution. We continue to explore alternative approaches for achievement.

The solution is available in the Azure Marketplace, but approaching directly is more cost-effective. The Marketplace approach incurs additional platform and reporting costs.

We initially built Rubrik at host level and DB level. We encountered latency issues when reverting back, with numerous snapshots available. This resulted in increased costs and occupied spaces. I performed manual deletion of snapshots and verified with the Rubrik team for confirmation.

The GUI reporting functionality lacks flexibility. For instance, obtaining specific server reports considering drive space and backup quantities is not possible, as it only provides overall reporting.

It is a mixed situation that varies case by case. I can confirm they are accurate 50 to 60% of the time. The remainder still needs improvement, particularly in providing technical support.

I have been dealing with Rubrik solution and implementation for the last two years.

The implementation takes approximately one and a half days. The prerequisite dependencies with the cost team site, infrastructure, port opening, and adding the complete Rubrik console module take time, depending on the volume of servers and storage occupancy.

The main concern is latency and the current implementation process. Azure Backup solution offers faster restoration for data over six terabytes compared to on-premises. Complete host level restoration across different cloud subscriptions and domains requires GUI method alignment for a more user-friendly working environment. The automation feature has limitations, particularly with snapshot restoration to other subscriptions, which works in Azure but not in Rubrik.

The implementation process is straightforward with simple clicks, cluster implementation, discovery, and adding components.

Negative

I worked with CommVault Backup and IBM. I worked with CommVault from 2015 to 2018 for a major Sony client, but only with on-premises solutions, not cloud platforms. Recently, I started working with Veeam Backup solution in our environment and have gained some hands-on experience.

For use case testing, I performed manual implementation. We have PowerShell scripts available for direct VM attachment and database movement.

I handle infrastructure implementation and configuration of Rubrik. We have configured and implemented Rubrik solution for approximately 300 servers across production and non-production environments, managing database level and snapshot level backups, ensuring SLAs and security compliance.

For Azure Backup, I implemented database level and infrastructure snapshot level backups considering SLA retention periods. Azure provides inbuilt backups with default 34-day retention periods and minimum seven-day periods based on standard premium settings. For infrastructure as a service with SQL applications, we configure using Azure Recovery Service solution. This Microsoft backup solution integrates with Azure Arc for centralized discovery, backup reporting, and configuration.

The Rubrik agent installation provides specific server access levels. After installation, we can discover the complete server and configure security and backup retentions. The initial backup configuration is followed by incremental backups.

The solution is straightforward to implement with simple clicks, cluster implementation, and discovery processes. Snapshot restoration to other subscriptions remains a limitation. The implementation can be completed through manual processes or automated scripts. Based on the overall experience, I rate Rubrik 7 out of 10.

Hybrid Cloud

Microsoft Azure

Our customers primarily use Rubrik for secure backup, with a guarantee of ten million dollars in case of any attack on the backup. It is also used for seamless integration and as an appliance, which eliminates the need for additional storage.

The most valuable feature of Rubrik is its concept of a 'backup airbag', which provides a robust defense against attacks. Rubrik is known for its secure backup solutions that are integrated and certified with Oracle. This makes integration easy and automatic, requiring no manual effort.

Price-wise, Rubrik needs improvement as it is considered expensive compared to similar competitors.

I've been selling Rubrik for about three to four years, since its entrance into Saudi Arabia.

Although I am not a technical person, customer feedback suggests Rubrik's stability is rated an eight out of ten.

Rubrik is highly scalable, with a rating of nine out of ten based on its seamless integration.

Customer service and support for Rubrik are rated an eight out of ten, indicating a good level of responsiveness and assistance.

Positive

Our company previously used a different backup solution which was impacted by an attack on the production environment. As a result, we switched to Rubrik for its secure backup credentials and native integration with Oracle.

The initial setup for Rubrik is straightforward and easy. Basic installation can take about one to two weeks depending on the sizing.

We usually have two or three certified engineers involved in the implementation of Rubrik.

Using our own resources to implement Rubrik solutions is beneficial to our revenue as we take a cluster from Rubrik. 

Additionally, there is a rebate program from Rubrik.

Rubrik is considered expensive, with a price rating of three out of ten. Improvements in pricing and licensing would be beneficial.

For backup solutions for Office 365 on the cloud, we also consider Veeam or Veritas. For solutions on-premises, Cohesity is another option we offer.

I recommend Rubrik based on the customer's needs, especially if they seek easy integration with Oracle. 

I rate the overall solution nine out of ten.

I utilize Rubrik in my data backup and recovery processes for backup recovery, disaster recovery, and all types of workloads, including cloud, on-prem, and everything.

The solution is easy to manage, provides good ransomware protection, and their features on blast radius and other aspects of ransomware protection are very good.

Rubrik's automation has really impacted my operations positively by providing smooth automation for most backup and recovery tasks.

I would improve the cost part of Rubrik; they should improve in that area.

I have been using Rubrik for six to seven years.

I have faced no challenges or complaints regarding deployment; it is very smooth deployment.

It is very much a scalable solution. The scalability of Rubrik rates nine out of ten.

The scalability of Rubrik helps to manage data as the company grows. It can scale out horizontally as well as vertically, and the availability of expansion is very quick.

I find the technical support of Rubrik very responsive and helpful, rating them nine out of ten.

Positive

A complete deployment typically takes between two to 48 hours maximum.

The Rubrik support team helps us with deployment.

Rubrik provides long-term return on investment for my customers, as well as immediate benefits because of deduplication and compression, drastically reducing the cost on the storage side from traditional to Rubrik. This is a good aspect of this backup solution.

There are no extra expansions or expenses after purchasing the product. They use storage-based licensing, which is good without anything extra.

I work with multiple vendors, including all enterprise backup tools such as Cohesity, NetBackup, Veritas, and Veeam.

I plan to expand the number of users for Rubrik in the future. Currently, I have approximately 10 to 12 customers on Rubrik, as we are partners to Rubrik and a service provider, SIS.

I am working with large to medium organizations, not small ones.

Regarding Artificial Intelligence, Rubrik is in the initial phase, and I am expecting more from them. I can give them seven out of ten for their improvements in that area.

I would recommend Rubrik to other organizations because it is easy to install, easy to manage, and very compact in terms of a solution, with good support from Rubrik. These features allow it to match from small scale to large scale customers very easily.

The number of people who usually take part in maintenance from my side depends on the customer size. For large customers, we involve four to five people, but for small customers, one person is enough.

I rate Rubrik eight out of ten.

On-premises

Other

We use Rubrik for multiple purposes. One is for backups for our VMware environment, our file servers, and our Office 365 environment. Rubrik is a backup solution that also has threat hunting capabilities and live mount capabilities, where we can mount servers in real-time. It provides disaster recovery capabilities and, importantly, helps in recovery when faced with ransomware.

Rubrik allows us to delegate tasks to our DBAs so they can restore their own databases, and other departments can restore their VMs independently. It is easy to use compared to our previous solution and allows us to live mount systems for rapid restoration. Since switching to Rubrik, our backup times have decreased significantly, going from two and a half days to one and a half hours for certain systems. Immediately upon deployment, we saw the benefits as backup times were reduced substantially.

We're currently working with Rubrik on their Active Directory search. We need more efficient search capabilities that allow searching by last name or login ID. We have an open ticket and are collaborating with Rubrik to improve this feature.

We have been using Rubrik for over three years.

Rubrik has been stable, and we have not experienced any downtime. Occasionally, there are issues with the hard drives, which can happen with any system.

Rubrik's support has been good, better than many other vendors like Microsoft, VMware, and Dell. When issues arise, we open a ticket and they work through a tunnel to log into their appliances and assist us effectively.

Positive

We previously used Actifio. We switched because Actifio did not meet our needs. There was an issue with backups, particularly with large systems, which would take two to three days to complete a single backup. Rubrik significantly reduced backup time.

Rubrik provided a 'white glove' service, where engineers came in and completed the installation. It was quick, and we were able to deploy the system in a few days.

Rubrik's team handled the initial setup for us. We did not involve third parties.

The pricing was acceptable and provided flexibility with different types of nodes. We could mix and match to optimize costs for our needs. While some features like Office 365 backups and AD recovery required additional costs, these were necessary for our expanded use.

According to our experience, Rubrik deserves a nine out of ten for its overall performance.

On-premises

Rubrik is an enterprise backup solution that I found useful for large companies needing to back up very large amounts of data. It is especially beneficial for corporations that have thousands of users, as Rubrik is robust enough to handle vast quantities of data backups.

One of the most beneficial features of Rubrik is its immutable file system, which makes it immune to ransomware. Even if my network is compromised by ransomware, the file system does not allow overwriting of the backups, ensuring that my backups remain safe. Additionally, Rubrik offers ease of administration with less oversight required compared to other solutions like Avamar.

I wish there was more training readily available, not just the expensive classes that require purchasing Rubrik credits. Including packaged training with the product at the time of purchase would be beneficial.

I worked with Rubrik at two different hospitals for a total of about five years.

I have not been involved in the initial deployment of Rubrik. When I purchased Rubrik, implementation was included in the price, with a Rubrik engineer handling the setup. Migration of backups from Avamar to Rubrik went smoothly.

I have not experienced any performance issues with Rubrik.

Rubrik uses a scale-up architecture, meaning the more nodes I have, the more powerful it becomes. It is highly scalable, evidenced by its ability to handle significant throughput.

Rubrik's customer service is excellent. They offer 24/7 support and even have a dedicated ransomware hotline with a team ready to engage immediately.

Positive

I previously worked with Avamar. I did not make the decision to switch to Rubrik, as that was up to upper management. However, Rubrik offers a superior support model and overall features compared to Avamar.

I have not done an initial setup of Rubrik. The implementation is included with the purchase, and a Rubrik engineer takes care of the configuration.

A Rubrik engineer is responsible for implementation, and there is minimal setup required from my end.

Rubrik is expensive due to its robust hardware, but the costs are justified given the exceptional RPO and RTO improvements it provides.

The main competition includes Veeam, Cohesity, and NetBackup, but I believe Rubrik to be the best among them due to its comprehensive features.

Users should utilize the tech support as they are very helpful. Setting up all SLAs correctly is important. Also, it is worthwhile to consider Gartner's evaluations when deciding on implementing Rubrik. I would rate Rubrik a nine out of ten.

On-premises

For Rubrik, my use case is day-to-day management, as we have configured backup for our infrastructure. I manage day-to-day activities, and if anything goes wrong or if any restoration happens, it comes up to me or related management tasks.

Rubrik has their cluster application and hardware that allow the leverage to configure the backup on that cluster, which is on-prem, and they also provide the facility to configure that type of cluster on the cloud infrastructure, which is a good feature.

Rubrik's Instant Recovery and file level recovery features are good and work fine for me.

Rubrik has automation capabilities that help streamline my workflows.

Rubrik is integrable with different applications, various storages, and cloud solutions through APIs. It is easy to integrate their product.

Rubrik supports Azure and all types of clouds for multi-cloud environments.

Based on my experience with Rubrik, I think they could improve by providing more customer-friendly technical support, even though they currently offer the best support.

I have been working with Rubrik for almost three years.

For Rubrik's stability, I would rate it a nine.

For scalability, I would rate it a nine.

When comparing with NetBackup, which I used long ago, the support from NetBackup is good compared to Rubrik. I don't know if that kind of feature is available now.

The initial setup of Rubrik is simple, with cluster creation and new node addition being very straightforward.

Regarding pricing, Rubrik is a costly solution, and I would rate it an eight.

For comparing Rubrik, NetBackup is a good option, and Veeam is also available.

Rubrik is integrable with different applications, various storages, and cloud solutions through APIs.

I am currently working with an end user company in a storage-related role. There are different products we are using, including Rubrik software for backup.

I rate Rubrik a nine out of ten.

Hybrid Cloud

Microsoft Azure

I use Rubrik to take snapshots, restore live mounts, and recover VMs that have crashed.

I highly value Rubrik for its ability to take snapshots and restore live mounts. When some of our VMs crashed, Rubrik was instrumental in restoring them, which proves its efficiency and reliability.

The reporting feature should be improved. I need a better output from the existing reports as they currently do not provide comprehensive metrics.

I have experience with Rubrik for six years.

Rubrik provides excellent customer service and technical support. I would rate their customer service a nine out of ten.

Positive

I used Commvault a long time ago. At that time, there was no image level backup, such as a snapshot.

The initial setup with Rubrik was straightforward. I received good support from Rubrik during the process.

For deploying, it was not just me. There were a couple of other people involved, and I received support from Rubrik, who assisted with the installation.

As of now, I do not see any return on investment, but overall everything looks good.

Rubrik's pricing is a little costly. On a scale of one to ten, I would place it as an eight regarding cost.

I would definitely recommend Rubrik, especially to those using virtualization. I would rate Rubrik a nine out of ten.

On-premises

In terms of automation, Rubrik has improved data management processes. It allows for automated backups without configuring the VMware server directly, using scripts to rotate backups to the VPN source automatically.

I think the best feature is its masterless architecture. Unlike other backup tools that require a controller server and media server setup, Rubrik eliminates the need to purchase additional hardware, making deployment more straightforward with a single console. Rubrik's SaaS support allows for easy deployment of on-premises and cloud backups. Compared to other backup solutions, Rubrik has a more console-based approach, which means Rubrik's backend team supports significant issues. I also find that Rubrik offers cost savings compared to other vendors due to its bundled license, allowing you to do everything with one license.

One improvement I would suggest for Rubrik is to have an inbuilt media layer facility for direct backups to tape. Currently, this requires involving a third-party partner like QSR for backup integration. Additionally, Rubrik could improve security measures for Oracle database backups by enhancing Oracle database-level capabilities. It also offers limited capabilities for backup administrators to explore and analyze backup failures. I haven't had direct experience with it yet, but I believe Rubrik is working on incorporating AI into its data management capabilities. It's gaining traction in the market, especially in India, over the last few years. I can only provide more feedback once we assess its effectiveness in data security and overall performance compared to other tools like NetBackup and Commvault.

I have two years of experience using Rubrik.

I would rate stability around eight out of ten. Stability is uncertain because Rubrik is a relatively new product, having only been around for four years. So, I can't definitively say how stable it is. However, based on my experience, I haven't encountered any significant stability issues. Compared to other backup solutions like IBM Tivoli, which was known for its stability in the market, Rubrik is still establishing itself in terms of stability.

Rubrik is a scalable solution, rated around nine out of ten for scalability.

We submit a support request and promptly receive an email from the annual support team. Overall, I find the support satisfactory.

Positive

Previously, I've worked with multiple backup technologies, including NetBackup, EMC Avamar, Networker, and Commvault.

Rubrik's setup is relatively straightforward, rating around eight out of ten. The deployment method can be chosen based on your needs, supporting both on-premises and cloud deployments.Typically, the initial setup takes about two to four hours. In contrast, the entire backup setup duration varies depending on the organization's size and requirements, ranging from one week to a month.

Rubrik is fairly priced. 

I can recommend Rubrik, but it depends on each user's specific needs and environment. Assessing your company's requirements and infrastructure is crucial before deciding on any product. Overall, I would rate Rubrik a nine out of ten. 

We've got three main use cases. The most common one now is ransomware protection, specifically one-touch recovery. If a customer is affected by ransomware, they can easily recover just the affected files with Rubrik, without having to do a full data backup recovery. 

Rubrik has built-in intelligence to know what's been affected, allowing for quick recovery and minimal downtime.

The second use case is for cloud migrations. You can back up your data on-prem and then restore it to another location, streamlining your migrations. It is a clever way of using backups. 

There's no need for human intervention to kick off the automation if you create workflows in Rubrik that can be followed in the event of a backup or compromise. For example, you can define backup policies and retention policies.

You can automate tiering. If something is older than, like, 90 days on the backup, it can automatically move to cheaper disk. That's another key feature of the automation process. Rubrik does a lot of incremental backups, eliminating the need for those manual large backups all the time.

The main reason our customers are buying Rubrik is the automated intelligent data management. It analyzes storage usage and automatically optimizes compression, data location, and deduplication. This part of the automation process is very valuable because it eliminates the need for a human to manually optimize storage.

The automation of policies is powerful. It automates the backup and recovery process, reducing manual human errors. 

Also, it's a single platform for managing backup, replication, and recovery, eliminating the need for different products. The one-touch recovery reduces downtime and accelerates business continuity. 

Additionally, people really like the global search, which allows for granular recoveries. Regarding security, Rubrik is immutable by default. Many other backup technologies rely on the storage they live on to be immutable, which can be a problem if someone gains access and turns it off. Rubrik's immutability is by default. 

There is room for improvement in the cost. Make it cheaper. Everyone knows what you're getting with Rubrik. It's expensive for a reason, but it is one of the better ones. 

Sometimes, when we talk to customers, we explain the amazing features, cost savings, and efficiencies. But when we give them the price, the people in procurement who don't understand the technology just look at the price and want it lower. 

I try to explain that it's saving them money and paying for itself. If something happens and the company can't work for a week, they'll lose millions. Then, they're complaining about a few hundred thousand pounds. This avoids brand reputation damage too. If you get caught in the news saying you've had ransomware, it could affect your company.

In future releases, Rubril could open up more SaaS protection for products like Salesforce or ServiceNow. I know Rubrik is doing something with SAP, but there's competition in that space.

I started in 2014, so it's been almost ten years.  

I would rate the stability a ten out of ten. It is very stable.

It's very scalable, which was the reason it was invented because traditional backup wasn't scalable.

I would rate the scalability a ten out of ten.

We work with companies of all sizes, from 750 end users to 10,000 users. 

We've been working with Rubrik for many years. For now, we have between 20 and 50 customers.

The times I've worked with them, the customer service and support were just a little bit slow, but they're still very clever.

So, the customer service and support could be a bit faster. 

Positive

Commvault, Veritas, and Zerto are the main ones. As a reseller, we work with a lot of competitive products, including Veeam and Rubrik. Lately, there have been opportunities for both. 

However, customers are often already using one or the other, so it is difficult to switch them to Veritas.

The competitive edge lies in terms of the automation. Traditional backup solutions, like Veritas, involve a lot of manual processes. Rubrik's automation overcomes many of the manual issues and testing challenges.

Security and compliance is another area. Rubrik's reporting and analytics help overcome challenges related to backup reporting, especially for compliance with regulations like GDPR.

Rapid recovery is a big challenge. Rubrik's One-Touch Recovery helps address this. Using backup as a migration tool can also help overcome challenges when moving to a hybrid cloud.

Finally, storage management. Customers buy a lot of storage, and it's hard to manage efficiently. Rubrik's intelligent data management platform can help overcome this challenge.

The deployment is actually very straightforward, probably one of the easiest data protection platforms to roll out. They've really reinvented the way backup is done. The founders came out of Google, the guys who made Rubrik.

Deployment model:

It's primarily on-prem, but recently, people have been interested in the cloud protection module.

Deployment time:

Rubrik is easy to deploy, you should be up and running within a few weeks after testing. So, it can start from a few days to a couple of weeks.

For a small company, the deployment could be just a few days. For a bigger customer, it could be a couple of weeks, depending on their requirements. But you can be up and running quickly, then it's just a matter of configuring it to their specific needs.

We work in the resell division, so get measured on selling licenses, but the rest of Accenture is measured on professional services. They would handle the implementation, support, troubleshooting, and upgrading.

Accenture has 750,000 people divided into client teams. Each client has a group of sales or technical teams, and the technical teams are divided into security, infrastructure, compliance, and risk. It's difficult to say how many are in the technical teams, but each client has one, and we have 250 key clients around the world. So, tens of thousands of people.

The main benefit is cost savings. Rubrik is expensive, but due to its data management capabilities, customers can save a lot by reducing hardware and storage. The automation features also reduce manual labor from the operations team. 

One-touch recovery reduces lost revenue by recovering quicker. Automation improves staff productivity and reduces costly human error. So, overall, there's reduced risk, no business disruption, and a faster time to value because it's easy to implement, and much of it is automated.

It is a more expensive solution, but people need to know what they're paying for. On a scale of one to ten, where one is extremely expensive, and ten is very cheap, I would rate it a four.

Overall, I would rate the product I a ten out of ten. I love the product!