Check Point Remote Access VPN Reviews

The primary use case is to remotely connect to various sites and various apps and use some technological apps that are cloud-based. Check Point Remote Access was the essential platform for us to connect remotely through a secure network with an encryption key. It's also an encryption service for all information shared and obtained from this remote connection. Today, we still use it to remotely connect to computers, apps, websites, and cloud-based apps while traveling or out of the office.

Check Point Remote Access has been the perfect solution for us for a couple of years now. It helped us to remotely connect to various cloud-based apps and software when we were out of the office during the pandemic. 

After the end of the pandemic, we continue to use this platform so that all our employees in our real estate sector can connect to specific apps and not neglect their workdays when they are traveling in other states of the country. 

Check Point has been perfect for protecting us from any type of attack or data theft during remote management; it prevents and blocks all types of data leaks and has an authentication for each connection.

The most valuable aspects of the solution include: 

- VPN auto-connect feature. It is essential. It activates the VPN every time I make a remote connection and since I don't have to activate it manually to make the remote connection, it saves me time.

- Compliance scanning. It allows me to detect any existing irregularities in the network that is being used for the remote connection.

- The VPN Client. It allows me to fully configure all remote access, configure the firewall used, and gives me full access to network settings.

The main feature that would be improved within Check Point Remote Access is its operation within Linux OS, as it currently does not have many features for that OS. You cannot access the detection of threats that can steal your data. 

In addition, it does not have an incident analysis that can detect failures in time in the network or VPN connectivity. 

Also, the IPsec settings on Linux are quite limited, which makes it a bit difficult to configure the settings you can make for remote connection to Linux.

I have used this solution for a period of more than three years. The main reason why I decided to start using it is due to the fact that we needed a solution that would allow us to work remotely when the COVID-19 pandemic happened; this was a perfect solution for working remotely securely.

I was impressed by the scalability of this platform throughout our company, mainly since this solution emerged as the main use within the C-Level area of our company. It does not neglect some cloud-based apps when out of the office. The scalability of this platform made it possible for us to implement it in most areas of the company in order to strengthen remote work.

The Check Point support team was always attentive to any requirement when we first purchased this system. We had about three questions when we purchased Check Point Remote Access and the Check Point team answered all of our questions within minutes.

Positive

The main implementation was quite simple. Implementing it correctly in our corporate area took us a few days. However, it took us one month to fully implement it in all areas of our company. 

I found the initial setup to be fairly quick and provided a pretty useful system for protecting data leaks during remote connections.

We handled the initial setup in-house.

We got a return on investment from this platform in about four months. We managed to enhance remote work greatly. This allowed our sales and our customers' solutions to benefit by 40%. In addition, we managed to enable our employees to provide direct customer service, which strengthened our sales by more than 40%.

The Check Point Remote Access pricing is one of the most affordable solutions in terms of cost. This solution will power remote work for any company, and this solution comes at a very low cost. It provides a complete control panel, an SSL Portal, and client access for operating systems. I consider it very helpful for any company - at a very affordable price.

The most valuable feature of Check Point Remote Access VPN is its ability to deploy. It follows the same process as their stateful inspection firewall or IPS. If you know how to enable one feature, you can enable and configure others. The learning curve isn't steep.

The product needs to improve its support. 

Check Point Remote Access VPN is quite stable. Once we trained our staff on using and troubleshooting the solution, we could quickly hand it over.

The tool is scalable. If you size your appliance correctly, you shouldn't have software issues. It is deployed with head-end gateways in three regions. From the endpoint perspective, it supports about 1000 end users globally. These users have SMB devices shipped to them that build VPN connections to our head-end devices in the data centers.

This VPN solution integrates with SMB devices. We ship these devices to our end users, who just need to plug them into their network. Once the device receives an IP address, it connects with our head-end and provides connectivity.

A special team helps design solutions, but I can't remember what they're called. It's not the regular break-fix support, which can be frustrating.

The solution's deployment is straightforward. We needed less staff than with other products. Two people were involved in certification, one in verification, and three in deployment (one for build services, one for service delivery, and one for rotation for additional help).

Regarding pricing, as a global customer, we get a big discount. For us, it's a good return on investment. We need to pay for additional features we want to enable. It seems cheaper than other vendors, but I can't say what it would cost an average customer.

During COVID-19, we needed a VPN solution for a specific team that had to use special equipment in the office. We couldn't install this equipment on laptops for home use. The tool helped us deploy a VPN solution in less than 30 days, including project costs and gathering facts. Their support was amazing, especially the R&D team. We worked with someone with experience with similar solutions for other clients, which made it easier. The VPN is still being used, and it's robust.

We mainly implemented the Check Point Remote Access VPN to support our team during the COVID-19 peak. Some employees needed specific equipment that couldn't be installed on laptops at home. The solution allowed us to set up a similar setup to the office for these users so that they could support our clients during COVID-19.

My advice for those considering Check Point Remote Access VPN is that if you're familiar with one solution, the deployment and configuration process is identical for others. There's no learning curve. Just understand your use cases, enable the needed features, and you're ready.

I rate the overall solution a ten out of ten. 

We use it to connect our sites. We have a couple of sites that need to interconnect. They are in our cloud and our premise data center. 

The scalability needs improvement.

I have been using Check Point Remote Access VPN for five years. 

The solution is not very scalable. 

The initial setup is not very straightforward. I would rate the setup a four out of ten. The solution is easy to maintain. 

The solution is pretty expensive. I rate it an eight out of ten. 

Overall, I will rate the solution a seven out of ten. 

Check Point Remote Access VPN provides strong security features, including encryption, authentication, endpoint security, access control, and centralized management. These ensure data protection and access control for remote users, making it a reliable solution for maintaining security in remote access scenarios.

Improvements for Check Point Remote Access VPN could include enhancing mobile connectivity for a smoother user experience, bringing it closer to the level of Cisco AnyConnect, which is considered more user-friendly.

I have been working with Check Point Remote Access VPN for almost four years.

My experience with tech support for Check Point Remote Access VPN was okay, but I find Cisco's support to be better. Overall, I would rate Check Point's support around six out of ten.

Neutral

Installation of Check Point Remote Access VPN is straightforward and it involves agent deployment to user laptops, enabling easy connectivity. Maintenance is low-cost and manageable, even for small teams, as configurations are straightforward. Network security engineers need to specify network segments for traffic segregation, but overall, deployment is automated, minimizing manual intervention and complexity.

The pricing for Check Point Remote Access VPN is average. Firewalls, whether physical or cloud-based, tend to be expensive, and Check Point's offering is no exception. While cloud options may offer more flexibility, physical devices have significant licensing costs, often totaling thousands of dollars.

Remote Access VPN, like Check Point's solution, is user-friendly, requiring only client installation for connectivity. It is useful for employees accessing corporate networks remotely and for granting controlled access to contractors or vendors. Competitors like Cisco's AnyConnect exist but Check Point Remote Access VPN is highly regarded for its functionality and reliability.

Check Point's Remote Access VPN is user-friendly and efficient for connecting via laptops, offering a straightforward setup without complex configurations. It simplifies access to specific divisions within a corporate network, making it suitable for end-users without extensive security knowledge. Although challenges may arise with mobile connectivity, the overall experience is smooth and accessible.

MFA adds an extra layer of security to Remote Access VPN. For example, users might need to enter a code from an authenticator app on their phone in addition to their regular login credentials. This ensures enhanced verification of user identity and helps protect against unauthorized access.

Overall, I would rate Check Point Remote Access VPN as an eight out of ten.

We use Check Point Remote Access VPN for security features.

We encounter challenges for the product’s installation and troubleshooting processes compared to other VPN products. It is difficult to restore settings in cases of connection failure. This particular area needs improvement.

We have been using Check Point Remote Access VPN for five years.

The product is stable.

We have 3000 Check Point Remote Access VPNs in our organization. It is a scalable product. We can increase and downgrade the access as much as possible. The usage depends on the licensing model.

The technical support team only responds to the problems where the device stops working. Apart from that, they don’t reply to normal issues.

Neutral

We used ForcePoint before. In comparison, Check Point Remote Access VPN is stable and easy to connect.

The product is easy to maintain. It takes a few days to install and troubleshoot.

The product has average pricing. We purchase its yearly pricing.

I advise others to use the product instead of multiple SD solutions and hardware products. I rate Check Point Remote Access VPN a seven out of ten.

For remote work, Check Point Remote Access VPN connects, creates the site, and gathers information about the site in terms of the VPN domain, the public IP at that time, and so on.

The Check Point products provide solid detection and advanced malware protection, which helps safeguard the organization’s security infrastructure. The platform offers essential features like sandboxing that perform well in threat detection.

The advanced malware protection and the sandboxing features are very valuable as they perform well, with detection being very high. Additionally, the panel features are also solid.

There are some issues with the Check Point VPN, such as its complexity compared to other VPN clients. Another downside is related to performance, which lags behind similarly priced products like those from Palo Alto. The platform becomes layered with add-ons, moving away from its original simplicity, which poses a problem.

I have been using Check Point since version 4.1, which amounts to about 15 years.

I rate the stability of Check Point Remote Access VPN as a seven out of ten. I experienced an issue when there was a recent upgrade to address a vulnerability that required the use of both a VPN user and a password along with a certificate or another form of identity confirmation. This was not mentioned in the upgrade notes, which initially caused some problems.

The scalability of Check Point Remote Access VPN is decent. On a scale of one to ten, I rate it a seven.

Check Point's support has always been great. They are very responsive, and we always get technically capable people. I would rate their support a nine or nine point five out of ten.

Positive

I have worked with multiple vendors, including Palo Alto and Fortinet.

For someone new to Check Point products or coming from managing other products, the setup can be difficult. However, for someone familiar with Check Point, the setup hasn't changed much over the years.

I am on the technical side and do not typically consider the business returns or ROI of the product.

I am not familiar with the exact pricing details. However, the pricing for the basic remote access VPN is a lot less than that of other vendors, and it comes with many features within the basic package.

I have compared Check Point with Palo Alto. Palo Alto is more GUI-based, which makes it easier to use, but it requires more configuration knowledge.

For regular users, Check Point firewalls are easier to configure compared to Palo Alto's. In terms of detection rates and performance, both Check Point and Palo Alto are very good.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

Our primary use case is to provide a remote access VPN to organization users so that they can access the organization servers or resources easily from anywhere.

With the help of Remote Access VPN, our organization's users can connect to our network easily and access servers. This has increased employee productivity.

The most valuable point is that it provides multi-factor authentication (MFA), which increases security by requiring an add-on verification method and ensures that only authorized users have access to the network.

The knowledge base can be improved for advanced troubleshooting. For new users, configurations might be complex. This can be also improved. 

We have been using this solution for the last year.

The stability is excellent.

The scalability is very good.

Our experience with customer service and support is excellent.

Positive

We are using the same solution.

The initial setup was very easy and straightforward.

We implemented it through an in-house team.

As per the market, everything looks good.

No, we haven't evaluated other option

The main purpose of Check Point Remote Access VPN is to enable employees to securely connect to the corporate network when they work remotely, such as from home.

Check Point Remote Access VPN has some useful features, and configuring it is relatively straightforward. However, there are numerous issues, particularly with the SSL connection, including bugs and other problems. 

Check Point Remote Access VPN's current configuration has some limitations and issues. One major drawback is the inability to configure multiple gateways from the same management server for VPN access. While there is a feature called "Map multiple entry point," it is reported to be buggy and inadequate. This forces users to purchase additional licenses for separate central point management to achieve VPN access for different locations. Ideally, Check Point should enhance its system to allow for multiple VPN entries managed from a single server without additional licenses or workaround solutions.

I have been using Check Point Remote Access VPN for three to four years.

The product is stable.

I rate the solution’s stability a seven out of ten because we had some problems before, but we resolved them.

The solution is scalable. It is suitable for small and medium businesses.

I rate the solution’s scalability an eight out of ten.

The documentation and support available for Check Point Remote Access VPN are pretty good. A smaller or medium-sized company don't communicate directly with Check Point. They can't open tickets with them directly, which is frustrating. Currently, we have to go through partners who sell us the product to open tickets, and there should be an option to communicate directly with Check Point. Opening tickets directly with the vendor would streamline the process and potentially reduce response times.

Positive

Optimization can be a bit more involved with Check Point. Initially, you'll need to perform optimization steps during the configuration process to achieve your desired outcome. Cisco's solution tends to be more straightforward from the outset, providing a robust VPN solution without requiring as much post-configuration tweaking. While Check Point is relatively easy to configure initially, you may deduce more time to optimization tasks afterward. However, once correctly configured and optimized, it functions effectively.

It's easy to configure Check Point Remote Access VPN but It might not be suitable for certain configurations.

I rate the initial setup an eight out of ten, where one is difficult, and ten is easy.

All the firewall solutions are expensive. Compared with the other vendors, Check Point's pricing is moderate.

Like many IT solutions, equipment such as firewalls can be expensive, but Check Point's pricing is competitive compared to other vendors. Currently, Check Point may even be slightly cheaper than Palo Alto.

I recommend Check Point as a firewall solution due to its effectiveness and reliability. For VPN, I might lean towards Cisco because it tends to have fewer optimization issues and other potential complications with VPN deployment. 

Overall, I rate the solution a six out of ten.