Check Point Remote Access VPN provides strong security features, including encryption, authentication, endpoint security, access control, and centralized management. These ensure data protection and access control for remote users, making it a reliable solution for maintaining security in remote access scenarios.
Security Architect/Staff Engineer at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
Provides strong security features and offers a straightforward setup
Pros and Cons
- "Check Point Remote Access VPN provides strong security features, including encryption, authentication, endpoint security, access control, and centralized management."
- "Improvements for Check Point Remote Access VPN could include enhancing mobile connectivity for a smoother user experience."
What is most valuable?
What needs improvement?
Improvements for Check Point Remote Access VPN could include enhancing mobile connectivity for a smoother user experience, bringing it closer to the level of Cisco AnyConnect, which is considered more user-friendly.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been working with Check Point Remote Access VPN for almost four years.
How are customer service and support?
My experience with tech support for Check Point Remote Access VPN was okay, but I find Cisco's support to be better. Overall, I would rate Check Point's support around six out of ten.
Buyer's Guide
Check Point Remote Access VPN
August 2025

Learn what your peers think about Check Point Remote Access VPN. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: August 2025.
865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Neutral
How was the initial setup?
Installation of Check Point Remote Access VPN is straightforward and it involves agent deployment to user laptops, enabling easy connectivity. Maintenance is low-cost and manageable, even for small teams, as configurations are straightforward. Network security engineers need to specify network segments for traffic segregation, but overall, deployment is automated, minimizing manual intervention and complexity.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The pricing for Check Point Remote Access VPN is average. Firewalls, whether physical or cloud-based, tend to be expensive, and Check Point's offering is no exception. While cloud options may offer more flexibility, physical devices have significant licensing costs, often totaling thousands of dollars.
What other advice do I have?
Remote Access VPN, like Check Point's solution, is user-friendly, requiring only client installation for connectivity. It is useful for employees accessing corporate networks remotely and for granting controlled access to contractors or vendors. Competitors like Cisco's AnyConnect exist but Check Point Remote Access VPN is highly regarded for its functionality and reliability.
Check Point's Remote Access VPN is user-friendly and efficient for connecting via laptops, offering a straightforward setup without complex configurations. It simplifies access to specific divisions within a corporate network, making it suitable for end-users without extensive security knowledge. Although challenges may arise with mobile connectivity, the overall experience is smooth and accessible.
MFA adds an extra layer of security to Remote Access VPN. For example, users might need to enter a code from an authenticator app on their phone in addition to their regular login credentials. This ensures enhanced verification of user identity and helps protect against unauthorized access.
Overall, I would rate Check Point Remote Access VPN as an eight out of ten.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.

Lead Technical Consultant at ITC Infotech
Provides ease of maintenance, but its installation process needs improvement
Pros and Cons
- "We encounter challenges for the product’s installation and troubleshooting processes compared to other VPN products."
What is our primary use case?
We use Check Point Remote Access VPN for security features.
What needs improvement?
We encounter challenges for the product’s installation and troubleshooting processes compared to other VPN products. It is difficult to restore settings in cases of connection failure. This particular area needs improvement.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have been using Check Point Remote Access VPN for five years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The product is stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We have 3000 Check Point Remote Access VPNs in our organization. It is a scalable product. We can increase and downgrade the access as much as possible. The usage depends on the licensing model.
How are customer service and support?
The technical support team only responds to the problems where the device stops working. Apart from that, they don’t reply to normal issues.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Neutral
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We used ForcePoint before. In comparison, Check Point Remote Access VPN is stable and easy to connect.
How was the initial setup?
The product is easy to maintain. It takes a few days to install and troubleshoot.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The product has average pricing. We purchase its yearly pricing.
What other advice do I have?
I advise others to use the product instead of multiple SD solutions and hardware products. I rate Check Point Remote Access VPN a seven out of ten.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Partner
Buyer's Guide
Check Point Remote Access VPN
August 2025

Learn what your peers think about Check Point Remote Access VPN. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: August 2025.
865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Secure remote access integration and hotspot access with a multi-level authentication support system
Pros and Cons
- "The secure hotspot access for enabling good network connectivity is great."
- "Price category and smooth renewal of agreement should be considered for flawless and quick onboarding of clients and partners."
What is our primary use case?
Check Point Remote Access VPN is a highly secure and seamless software that provides end-to-end security solutions to business users while they are working remotely and traveling for business purposes. Our organization involves over 70% of business travel to generate revenue, and it becomes really troublesome to secure the IT devices and cloud system at such traveling times.
Check Point Remote Access VPN is the best available solution in the market for providing endpoint management solutions by ensuring adherence to strict compliance and multiple scanning of the data to ensure no data theft or leakage and security and compliance are maintained at the highest level possible.
How has it helped my organization?
Check Point Remote Access VPN provides multiple factor authentication layers, and due to that, all the data transmission is completely scanned for any malware or malicious cyber threats. It is integrated with our various IT and cloud systems and performs its security scanning 24/7 without any glitches or trouble.
Also, they provided a multi-level authentication support system for continuous scanning and compliance management throughout the IT system.
They enable a secure hotspot registration process for enabling all-around support of IT systems while operating remotely without any hassle.
What is most valuable?
The secure hotspot access for enabling good network connectivity is great.
Multi-layer scanning of IT systems across various critical stages for detection of threats and malicious threats has been useful.
Provisioning VPN Client and Auto Connect management system for free flow of information without any data mismanagement.
The secure remote access integration is available for both android and IOS devices and systems is helpful.
The multi-factor authentication support system is a phenomenal feature for providing all-around authentication support to for secure IT enablement.
What needs improvement?
We are still in the learning phase as of now, and there seem to be more and more feature upgrades in the standard version of the application. They're providing updated features in the application with complete compliance assurance - which is really awesome - and we need specific customizations to make it a perfect fit for our business environment. This is a new and emerging area and requires a lot of customization and flexible features to suit the business requirements.
Price category and smooth renewal of agreement should be considered for flawless and quick onboarding of clients and partners.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've used the solution for over six months now.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution is quite stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It is an absolutely scalable solution.
How are customer service and support?
Technical support has been so far so good.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We did not use a different solution earlier.
How was the initial setup?
The setup is effortless and smooth.
What about the implementation team?
We installed the solution through the vendor ONLY.
What was our ROI?
We've seen an ROI of over 75%.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I recommend all businesses to go for Check Point Remote Access VPN. It's one of the best of its kind in the market today.
It has enormous features for ensuring security management solutions for remote workforce coupled with compliance assurance in the businesses.
It's one of the highly cost-effective solutions which leads to boosting business performance, and also renewal is smooth without any hassle. The licensing is not pricy and is affordable by organizations.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
The business and IT team did a lot of brainstorming sessions on this, and it went of really well in evaluating various available products in the market with their offerings.
We evaluated McAfee, Nord, and others
What other advice do I have?
I'd advise others to try the solution today itself and experience the utilities on their own. I am sure, they will love the product offerings and utilities to the greatest extent possible
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Private Cloud
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Independent Information Technology and Services Professional at a non-profit with 1-10 employees
Advanced threat protection and valuable features enhance security with great support
Pros and Cons
- "The advanced malware protection and the sandboxing features are very valuable as they perform well, with detection being very high."
- "There are some issues with the Check Point VPN, such as its complexity compared to other VPN clients."
What is our primary use case?
For remote work, Check Point Remote Access VPN connects, creates the site, and gathers information about the site in terms of the VPN domain, the public IP at that time, and so on.
How has it helped my organization?
The Check Point products provide solid detection and advanced malware protection, which helps safeguard the organization’s security infrastructure. The platform offers essential features like sandboxing that perform well in threat detection.
What is most valuable?
The advanced malware protection and the sandboxing features are very valuable as they perform well, with detection being very high. Additionally, the panel features are also solid.
What needs improvement?
There are some issues with the Check Point VPN, such as its complexity compared to other VPN clients. Another downside is related to performance, which lags behind similarly priced products like those from Palo Alto. The platform becomes layered with add-ons, moving away from its original simplicity, which poses a problem.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Check Point since version 4.1, which amounts to about 15 years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I rate the stability of Check Point Remote Access VPN as a seven out of ten. I experienced an issue when there was a recent upgrade to address a vulnerability that required the use of both a VPN user and a password along with a certificate or another form of identity confirmation. This was not mentioned in the upgrade notes, which initially caused some problems.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The scalability of Check Point Remote Access VPN is decent. On a scale of one to ten, I rate it a seven.
How are customer service and support?
Check Point's support has always been great. They are very responsive, and we always get technically capable people. I would rate their support a nine or nine point five out of ten.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I have worked with multiple vendors, including Palo Alto and Fortinet.
How was the initial setup?
For someone new to Check Point products or coming from managing other products, the setup can be difficult. However, for someone familiar with Check Point, the setup hasn't changed much over the years.
What was our ROI?
I am on the technical side and do not typically consider the business returns or ROI of the product.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I am not familiar with the exact pricing details. However, the pricing for the basic remote access VPN is a lot less than that of other vendors, and it comes with many features within the basic package.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I have compared Check Point with Palo Alto. Palo Alto is more GUI-based, which makes it easier to use, but it requires more configuration knowledge.
What other advice do I have?
For regular users, Check Point firewalls are easier to configure compared to Palo Alto's. In terms of detection rates and performance, both Check Point and Palo Alto are very good.
I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Partner
Network Security Engineer at Digitaltrack
Good support, easy connection, and helpful multi-factor authentication
Pros and Cons
- "The most valuable point is that it provides multi-factor authentication (MFA), which increases security by requiring an add-on verification method and ensures that only authorized users have access to the network."
- "The knowledge base can be improved for advanced troubleshooting."
What is our primary use case?
Our primary use case is to provide a remote access VPN to organization users so that they can access the organization servers or resources easily from anywhere.
How has it helped my organization?
With the help of Remote Access VPN, our organization's users can connect to our network easily and access servers. This has increased employee productivity.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable point is that it provides multi-factor authentication (MFA), which increases security by requiring an add-on verification method and ensures that only authorized users have access to the network.
What needs improvement?
The knowledge base can be improved for advanced troubleshooting. For new users, configurations might be complex. This can be also improved.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have been using this solution for the last year.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The stability is excellent.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The scalability is very good.
How are customer service and support?
Our experience with customer service and support is excellent.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We are using the same solution.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was very easy and straightforward.
What about the implementation team?
We implemented it through an in-house team.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
As per the market, everything looks good.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
No, we haven't evaluated other option
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Senior Network Administrator at a transportation company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Enable employees to securely connect but has configuration limitations
Pros and Cons
- "Check Point Remote Access VPN has some useful features, and configuring it is relatively straightforward."
- "Check Point Remote Access VPN's current configuration has some limitations and issues. One major drawback is the inability to configure multiple gateways from the same management server for VPN access."
What is our primary use case?
The main purpose of Check Point Remote Access VPN is to enable employees to securely connect to the corporate network when they work remotely, such as from home.
What is most valuable?
Check Point Remote Access VPN has some useful features, and configuring it is relatively straightforward. However, there are numerous issues, particularly with the SSL connection, including bugs and other problems.
What needs improvement?
Check Point Remote Access VPN's current configuration has some limitations and issues. One major drawback is the inability to configure multiple gateways from the same management server for VPN access. While there is a feature called "Map multiple entry point," it is reported to be buggy and inadequate. This forces users to purchase additional licenses for separate central point management to achieve VPN access for different locations. Ideally, Check Point should enhance its system to allow for multiple VPN entries managed from a single server without additional licenses or workaround solutions.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Check Point Remote Access VPN for three to four years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The product is stable.
I rate the solution’s stability a seven out of ten because we had some problems before, but we resolved them.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The solution is scalable. It is suitable for small and medium businesses.
I rate the solution’s scalability an eight out of ten.
How are customer service and support?
The documentation and support available for Check Point Remote Access VPN are pretty good. A smaller or medium-sized company don't communicate directly with Check Point. They can't open tickets with them directly, which is frustrating. Currently, we have to go through partners who sell us the product to open tickets, and there should be an option to communicate directly with Check Point. Opening tickets directly with the vendor would streamline the process and potentially reduce response times.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Optimization can be a bit more involved with Check Point. Initially, you'll need to perform optimization steps during the configuration process to achieve your desired outcome. Cisco's solution tends to be more straightforward from the outset, providing a robust VPN solution without requiring as much post-configuration tweaking. While Check Point is relatively easy to configure initially, you may deduce more time to optimization tasks afterward. However, once correctly configured and optimized, it functions effectively.
How was the initial setup?
It's easy to configure Check Point Remote Access VPN but It might not be suitable for certain configurations.
I rate the initial setup an eight out of ten, where one is difficult, and ten is easy.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
All the firewall solutions are expensive. Compared with the other vendors, Check Point's pricing is moderate.
What other advice do I have?
Like many IT solutions, equipment such as firewalls can be expensive, but Check Point's pricing is competitive compared to other vendors. Currently, Check Point may even be slightly cheaper than Palo Alto.
I recommend Check Point as a firewall solution due to its effectiveness and reliability. For VPN, I might lean towards Cisco because it tends to have fewer optimization issues and other potential complications with VPN deployment.
Overall, I rate the solution a six out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Senior Ts Systems Integration Specialist at NTT Security
Highly secure with good support and multiple factor authentication layers
Pros and Cons
- "It is easy to install the Endpoint Remote Access VPN client on different platforms."
- "Bug Fixes and enhancement requests should be remediated earlier."
What is our primary use case?
Check Point Remote Access VPN is a highly secure and seamless software that provides end-to-end security solutions.
We can connect anywhere in the world over possible ways to secure the infrastructure.
Check Point Remote Access VPN is the best available solution in the market for providing endpoint management solutions by ensuring adherence to strict compliance and multiple scanning of the data to ensure no data theft or leakage and security and compliance are maintained at the highest level possible.
Also, we have multi-authentication so there is no chance of leakage.
How has it helped my organization?
Check Point Remote Access VPN provides multi-factor authentication layers.
We can make Data transfer more strict with Data Integrity, Encapsulation, DES,3DES, and Hashing Algorithm so that the level of security will be higher.
Also, they provided a multi-level authentication support system for continuous scanning and compliance management throughout the IT system.
Multiple VPN connections can be established and share the data in a secure possible way.
What is most valuable?
It is easy to install the Endpoint Remote Access VPN client on different platforms. Within the company, we use it for Windows and macOS.
Built-in, centrally managed Compliance blade. We check the client OS for the presence of the latest security updates and that the corporate antivirus software is up and running, and do not allow the client to connect to the office site in the case where these rules are not satisfied. That prevents the infected computers from connecting to the company's location and spreading the threats.
The stable VPN connection and uptime are also very good.
We have a centrally managed Firewall blade, which allows filtering traffic on the rule base to protect the requirement.
What needs improvement?
Bug Fixes and enhancement requests should be remediated earlier, as we have multiple dependencies and Auditors are forced to have the latest patches in place.
Checkpoint Major version should have an extended time than the default time mentioned in the end-of-life policy document with additional prices.
Tools must be introduced and supportive in analyzing the data, flow, and threats.
We have to introduce the scripting part to work seamlessly.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've used the solution for more than four years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution is stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The solution is scalable.
How are customer service and support?
The company offers the best support overall and we can trust their advice.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
This is the first time we are using this type of solution.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is straightforward, simple, and centralized.
What about the implementation team?
We handled the setup in-house.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The product is better than any other product in the marketplace. Technically sounded techies all over the place. It is cost-effective and most importantly stable and secure.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We trust the Check Point Software technology.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Profesional Gestión Informática 2 - Especialista en Sistemas de Información at CompuGuana
Good integration, great for remote access, and centralizes users effectively
Pros and Cons
- "We can integrate remote access to our branches through Check Point services."
- "We'd like to integrate Check Point into the Remote Access VPN solution and have the ability to integrate multiple devices as access points through the solution."
What is our primary use case?
We needed to grow a little more at a cloud level, which means that we have had more places in which we host information, and needed to protect it. We needed to allow users to have access from the different branches in the cloud to our main branch and to access remotely. As a result of these needs, we have been looking for solutions that allow us to have quick and efficient access no matter which branch we are going to access, and to have access allowed quickly and easily as if users were inside the perimeter area of our organization.
How has it helped my organization?
Currently, Check Point is an ally that we have used within our organization to protect the perimeter area, the equipment, and other technologies. We have complete protection in one technology that we are using so that our users with greater frequency can access the data of our organization regardless of where they are. With this, they can have quick, simple access as if they were within the perimeter area. This has given us greater protection when it comes to having protected and verified access under user identity.
What is most valuable?
We can integrate remote access to our branches through Check Point services; however, those services come with a centralized identity, a domain identity, which does not work for the different logins. It only works for the login through the remote connection application. The user profile is centralized, verified, and filtered by the tool, thus being one of the characteristics that are very important to me since it shows any activity that the user is going to carry out.
What needs improvement?
We'd like to integrate Check Point into the Remote Access VPN solution and have the ability to integrate multiple devices as access points through the solution. This would allow us to have a tool that it is not only remote access for mobile devices but a remote access solution for virtual teams, including mobile devices such as cell phones, tablets, and other types of devices in IoT areas such as doors, houses, and medical equipment.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using the solution for one year.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.

Buyer's Guide
Download our free Check Point Remote Access VPN Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: August 2025
Popular Comparisons
Microsoft Intune
Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks
Fortinet FortiClient
Workspace ONE UEM
Microsoft Remote Desktop Services
Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service)
OpenVPN Access Server Enterprise
TeamViewer Business
Claroty Platform
Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect)
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)
Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway
Ivanti Connect Secure
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Check Point Remote Access VPN Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- What is the pricing for Check Point software?
- How does Check Point VPN compare to Windows VPN?
- When looking for a work from home solution, which Remote Access solution do you prefer? Why?
- What are the tools you recommend to support teleworking?
- When evaluating Virtual User Session, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- What is an efficient alternative to Microsoft Remote Desktop?
- What are the best practices to prevent a Brute Force attack via remote access?
- Why use remote access tools?
- Looking for recommendations for a well-priced remote/access management system for video editing
- Looking for SDK on Remote monitoring on Android devices